Colbert et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Toward structural modelling strategies for characterization of future airframe–propulsion system interactionsColbert et al., 2020
- Document ID
- 11160566457135172835
- Author
- Colbert S
- Quinn D
- Nolan D
- Fox R
- Haynes P
- O'Doherty-Jennings J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum
External Links
Snippet
Unconventional aircraft configurations which have been proposed to facilitate achievement of sustainable aviation goals are anticipated to display more significant interactions between the airframe and major sub-systems than conventional Tube-And-Wing aircraft. The design …
- 230000003993 interaction 0 title abstract description 11
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
- G06F17/5018—Computer-aided design using simulation using finite difference methods or finite element methods
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
- Y02T50/60—Efficient propulsion technologies
- Y02T50/67—Relevant aircraft propulsion technologies
- Y02T50/671—Measures to reduce the propulsor weight
- Y02T50/672—Measures to reduce the propulsor weight using composites
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5086—Mechanical design, e.g. parametric or variational design
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLYING SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENTS OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
- B64D27/00—Arrangement or mounting of power plant in aircraft; Aircraft characterised thereby
- B64D27/02—Aircraft characterised by the type or position of power plant
- B64D27/16—Aircraft characterised by the type or position of power plant of jet type
- B64D27/18—Aircraft characterised by the type or position of power plant of jet type within or attached to wing
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
- Y02T50/40—Weight reduction
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64D—EQUIPMENT FOR FITTING IN OR TO AIRCRAFT; FLYING SUITS; PARACHUTES; ARRANGEMENTS OR MOUNTING OF POWER PLANTS OR PROPULSION TRANSMISSIONS IN AIRCRAFT
- B64D27/00—Arrangement or mounting of power plant in aircraft; Aircraft characterised thereby
- B64D27/26—Aircraft characterised by construction of power-plant mounting
- B64D2027/262—Engine support arrangements or elements
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C1/00—Fuselages; Constructional features common to fuselages, wings, stabilising surfaces and the like
- B64C1/06—Frames; Stringers; Longerons; Fuselage sections
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Mauery et al. | A guide for aircraft certification by analysis | |
Keane et al. | Computational approaches for aerospace design: the pursuit of excellence | |
Moerland et al. | On the design of a strut-braced wing configuration in a collaborative design environment | |
Cavagna et al. | Structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis, and optimization in aircraft conceptual design | |
Garrigues | A review of industrial aeroelasticity practices at dassault aviation for military aircraft and business jets | |
Piperni et al. | Preliminary aerostructural optimization of a large business jet | |
Schültke et al. | MICADO: overview of recent developments within the conceptual aircraft design and optimization environment | |
Kraft | After 40 years why hasn't the computer replaced the wind tunnel? | |
Colbert et al. | Toward structural modelling strategies for characterization of future airframe–propulsion system interactions | |
Britt et al. | Aeroservoelastic characteristics of the B-2 bomber and implications for future large aircraft | |
Sarojini et al. | A certification-driven platform for multidisciplinary design space exploration in airframe early preliminary design | |
Martin et al. | Understanding influence of powerplant component connection strategies on aircraft engine structural deformations | |
Bhatia | Airplane aeroelasticity: Practice and potential | |
Quinn et al. | Propulsion system integration on truss-braced aircraft: structural performance sensitivity to architectural design parameters | |
Piperni et al. | The application of multi-disciplinary optimization technologies to the design of a business jet | |
Colbert et al. | Impact of Airframe–Propulsion System Modeling Strategies on Key Structural Performance Metrics | |
Shah et al. | Fully Coupled Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Adaptive Shape Memory Alloy Structural Technologies for Airframe Noise Reduction | |
Papageorgiou et al. | Development of Analysis Capabilities for the Preliminary Sizing and Evaluation of Unmanned Airborne Early Warning Aircraft | |
Orr et al. | Framework for multidisciplinary analysis, design, and optimization with high-fidelity analysis tools | |
Sarojini et al. | Parametric wingbox structural weight estimation of the crm, pegasus and truss-braced wing concepts | |
Dovi et al. | Multidisciplinary design integration system for a supersonic transport aircraft | |
Nasoulis et al. | Structural optimization of the wing box for a hybrid-electric commuter aircraft | |
Cavagna et al. | A fast MDO tool for aeroelastic optimization in aircraft conceptual design | |
Turner | Aeroelastic Stability Assessment Methodology and Application to Slat Noise Treatments on the High-Lift Common Research Model | |
ROBINSON et al. | Application of an advanced computerized structural design system to an arrow-wing supersonic cruise aircraft |