Gifford et al., 2007 - Google Patents
Auditory function and speech understanding in listeners who qualify for EAS surgeryGifford et al., 2007
View PDF- Document ID
- 10239838114171515864
- Author
- Gifford R
- Dorman M
- Spahr A
- Bacon S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Ear and Hearing
External Links
Snippet
Objective: For patients with relatively good low-frequency hearing and relatively poor high- frequency hearing, who met the pre-implant criteria for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS), our aims were to i) assess deficits in low-frequency auditory function, ii) to …
- 238000001356 surgical procedure 0 title abstract description 9
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
- A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
- A61B5/6814—Head
- A61B5/6815—Ear
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0476—Electroencephalography
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Takahashi et al. | Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly | |
| Zhang et al. | Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit | |
| Kumar et al. | Temporal and speech processing skills in normal hearing individuals exposed to occupational noise | |
| Summers et al. | F0 processing and the seperation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss | |
| Martin et al. | The effects of decreased audibility produced by high-pass noise masking on N1 and the mismatch negativity to speech sounds/ba/and/da | |
| Korczak et al. | Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing aids on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing | |
| Sinkkonen et al. | Towards optimal recording and analysis of the mismatch negativity | |
| Bennett et al. | Neural encoding and perception of speech signals in informational masking | |
| Eddins et al. | Cortical correlates of binaural temporal processing deficits in older adults | |
| Jenkins et al. | Effects of amplification on neural phase locking, amplitude, and latency to a speech syllable | |
| Choi et al. | Envelope following responses elicited by English sentences | |
| Hillock-Dunn et al. | Assessing speech perception in children with hearing loss: What conventional clinical tools may miss | |
| Kamerer et al. | The role of cognition in common measures of peripheral synaptopathy and hidden hearing loss | |
| Smith et al. | Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: The effects of age and hearing loss | |
| Grose et al. | Masking period patterns and forward masking for speech-shaped noise: Age-related effects | |
| Vanheusden et al. | Improved detection of vowel envelope frequency following responses using Hotelling’s T2 analysis | |
| Drennan et al. | Nonlinguistic outcome measures in adult cochlear implant users over the first year of implantation | |
| Draganova et al. | Auditory cortical response patterns to multiple rhythms of AM sound | |
| Hall et al. | Developmental effects in the masking-level difference | |
| Parkinson et al. | Hybrid music perception outcomes: implications for melody and timbre recognition in cochlear implant recipients | |
| Alaerts et al. | Cortical auditory steady-state responses to low modulation rates | |
| Kapul et al. | Pure-tone audiometer | |
| Easwar et al. | The accuracy of envelope following responses in predicting speech audibility | |
| Gifford et al. | Auditory function and speech understanding in listeners who qualify for EAS surgery | |
| Köbler et al. | Successful and unsuccessful users of bilateral amplification: Differences and similarities in binaural performance |