[go: up one dir, main page]

Skuodienė et al., 2013 - Google Patents

The effect of meadow phytocenoses productivity and herbage quality on the energy value of biomass.

Skuodienė et al., 2013

View PDF
Document ID
990630129500600664
Author
Skuodienė R
Repšienė R
Karčauskienė D
Katutis K
Sendžikienė E
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

A high proportion of Lithuania's meadows are either in poor condition or abandoned (not mowed and not grazed). These changes in meadow use have negative consequences such as increasing area of meadows not being used and landscape turning wild, which inevitably …
Continue reading at www.researchgate.net (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C05—FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
    • C05G—MIXTURES OF FERTILISERS COVERED INDIVIDUALLY BY DIFFERENT SUBCLASSES OF CLASS C05; MIXTURES OF ONE OR MORE FERTILISERS WITH MATERIALS NOT HAVING A SPECIFIC FERTILISING ACTIVITY, e.g. PESTICIDES, SOIL-CONDITIONERS, WETTING AGENTS; FERTILISERS CHARACTERISED BY THEIR FORM
    • C05G3/00—Mixtures of one or more fertilisers with materials not having a specially fertilising activity
    • C05G3/0005—Further uses of fertiliser, also the form in which it is presented, e.g. by englobed granules
    • C05G3/0011—Further uses of fertiliser, also the form in which it is presented, e.g. by englobed granules by covering; apparatus for covering
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/10—Biofuels

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Šiaudinis et al. The assessment of Virginia mallow (Sida hermaphrodita Rusby) and cup plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) productivity, physico–mechanical properties and energy expenses
Rengsirikul et al. Effects of inter‐cutting interval on biomass yield, growth components and chemical composition of napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) cultivars as bioenergy crops in Thailand
Burner et al. Dry matter partitioning and quality of Miscanthus, Panicum, and Saccharum genotypes in Arkansas, USA
Tilvikienė et al. Effects of 5 years of digestate application on biomass production and quality of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.)
Ottaiano et al. Yields and quality of biomasses and grain in Cynara cardunculus L. grown in southern Italy, as affected by genotype and environmental conditions
Adams et al. Evaluation of pyrolysis chars derived from marine macroalgae silage as soil amendments
Nazli Evaluation of different sweet sorghum cultivars for bioethanol yield potential and bagasse combustion characteristics in a semiarid Mediterranean environment
Kurucz et al. Opportunities for the production and economics of Virginia fanpetals (Sida hermaphrodita)
Sokchea et al. Effect of biochar from rice husks (combusted in a downdraft gasifier or a paddy rice dryer) on production of rice fertilized with biodigester effluent or urea
Piskier A method of estimation of the caloric value of the biomass. Part I-biomass energy potential
Liu et al. Switchgrass response to cutting frequency and biosolids amendment: biomass yield, feedstock quality, and theoretical ethanol yield
Southavong et al. Effect of biochar and biodigester effluent on growth of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatic) and soil fertility
Kosasih et al. Biochar application in Calliandra calothyrsus plantation management
Balodis et al. Biomass yield of different plants for biogass production
Osman et al. Pongamia seed cake as a valuable source of plant nutrients for sustainable agriculture
Skuodienė et al. The effect of meadow phytocenoses productivity and herbage quality on the energy value of biomass.
Gamayunova et al. Sorghum culture in the South of Ukraine, state of production, use and possibility of processing into bioethanol
Birla et al. Modern Strategies for Crop Residue Management
Jacobs et al. Switchgrass management practice effects on near-surface soil properties in west-central Arkansas
Hryhoriv et al. Prospectives of growing energy crops for the production of different types of biofuel
Singh et al. On and off farm crop residue management: a brief review on options, benefits, drawbacks, limitations and policy interventions
Stolarski et al. Willow productivity on a commercial plantation in triennial harvest cycle
Kerckhoffs et al. Trials for producing biogas feedstock crops on marginal land in New Zealand.
Rancane et al. Fertilisation effect on biomass formation of perennial grass used as energy crop
Paschalidou et al. Perennial vs annual energy crops-SWOT analysis (case study: Greece)