Antunes et al., 2014 - Google Patents
Assessing and comparing vulnerability detection tools for web services: Benchmarking approach and examplesAntunes et al., 2014
- Document ID
- 7595679185732601643
- Author
- Antunes N
- Vieira M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- IEEE Transactions on Services Computing
External Links
Snippet
Selecting a vulnerability detection tool is a key problem that is frequently faced by developers of security-critical web services. Research and practice shows that state-of-the- art tools present low effectiveness both in terms of vulnerability coverage and false positive …
- 238000001514 detection method 0 title abstract description 89
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3676—Test management for coverage analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3604—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
- G06F11/3612—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs by runtime analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3409—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment for performance assessment
- G06F11/3414—Workload generation, e.g. scripts, playback
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/30—Monitoring
- G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
- G06F11/3466—Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/57—Certifying or maintaining trusted computer platforms, e.g. secure boots or power-downs, version controls, system software checks, secure updates or assessing vulnerabilities
- G06F21/577—Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/07—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring responding to the occurence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
- G06F11/0703—Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation
- G06F11/0766—Error or fault reporting or storing
- G06F11/0775—Content or structure details of the error report, e.g. specific table structure, specific error fields
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/362—Software debugging
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/07—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring responding to the occurence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
- G06F11/0703—Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation
- G06F11/0706—Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation the processing taking place on a specific hardware platform or in a specific software environment
- G06F11/0709—Error or fault processing not based on redundancy, i.e. by taking additional measures to deal with the error or fault not making use of redundancy in operation, in hardware, or in data representation the processing taking place on a specific hardware platform or in a specific software environment in a distributed system consisting of a plurality of standalone computer nodes, e.g. clusters, client-server systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/55—Detecting local intrusion or implementing counter-measures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2201/00—Indexing scheme relating to error detection, to error correction, and to monitoring
- G06F2201/875—Monitoring of systems including the internet
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2201/00—Indexing scheme relating to error detection, to error correction, and to monitoring
- G06F2201/86—Event-based monitoring
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Antunes et al. | Assessing and comparing vulnerability detection tools for web services: Benchmarking approach and examples | |
Antunes et al. | Benchmarking vulnerability detection tools for web services | |
Nunes et al. | Benchmarking static analysis tools for web security | |
Gyimesi et al. | Bugsjs: a benchmark of javascript bugs | |
Chen et al. | Analytics-driven load testing: An industrial experience report on load testing of large-scale systems | |
Marchetto et al. | A multi-objective technique to prioritize test cases | |
Hemmati et al. | Prioritizing manual test cases in traditional and rapid release environments | |
Rahman et al. | Recalling the" imprecision" of cross-project defect prediction | |
Foo et al. | Mining performance regression testing repositories for automated performance analysis | |
Mirshokraie et al. | Efficient JavaScript mutation testing | |
Marculescu et al. | On the faults found in REST APIs by automated test generation | |
Rahimi et al. | Vulnerability scrying method for software vulnerability discovery prediction without a vulnerability database | |
Ali et al. | Enhanced regression testing technique for agile software development and continuous integration strategies | |
Theisen et al. | Approximating attack surfaces with stack traces | |
Alsaleh et al. | Performance‐Based Comparative Assessment of Open Source Web Vulnerability Scanners | |
Shatnawi | Deriving metrics thresholds using log transformation | |
Srikanth et al. | Improving test efficiency through system test prioritization | |
Lenhard et al. | Exploring the suitability of source code metrics for indicating architectural inconsistencies | |
Autili et al. | Software engineering techniques for statically analyzing mobile apps: research trends, characteristics, and potential for industrial adoption | |
Theisen et al. | Risk-based attack surface approximation: how much data is enough? | |
Amankwah et al. | Bug detection in Java code: An extensive evaluation of static analysis tools using Juliet Test Suites | |
Brodie et al. | Automated problem determination using call-stack matching | |
Mahapatra et al. | Usage of machine learning in software testing | |
Davari et al. | Analysing vulnerability reproducibility for Firefox browser | |
Fu et al. | Runtime recovery actions selection for sporadic operations on public cloud |