[go: up one dir, main page]

Schmidt et al., 2002 - Google Patents

Genotypic drug resistance interpretation systems—the cutting edge of antiretroviral therapy

Schmidt et al., 2002

View PDF
Document ID
6588757325288476815
Author
Schmidt B
Walter H
Zeitler N
Korn K
Publication year
Publication venue
AIDS Rev

External Links

Snippet

The technical quality of genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance testing has considerably improved, and therefore the major challenge now lies in the interpretation of drug resistance. This is due to several facts:(i) in times of combination therapy, the effect of drug resistance …
Continue reading at www.academia.edu (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/10Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology
    • G06F19/18Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology for functional genomics or proteomics, e.g. genotype-phenotype associations, linkage disequilibrium, population genetics, binding site identification, mutagenesis, genotyping or genome annotation, protein-protein interactions or protein-nucleic acid interactions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/10Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology
    • G06F19/22Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology for sequence comparison involving nucleotides or amino acids, e.g. homology search, motif or SNP [Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism] discovery or sequence alignment
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/10Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology
    • G06F19/16Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology for molecular structure, e.g. structure alignment, structural or functional relations, protein folding, domain topologies, drug targeting using structure data, involving two-dimensional or three-dimensional structures
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/10Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology
    • G06F19/28Bioinformatics, i.e. methods or systems for genetic or protein-related data processing in computational molecular biology for programming tools or database systems, e.g. ontologies, heterogeneous data integration, data warehousing or computing architectures
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES OR MICRO-ORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/70Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving virus or bacteriphage
    • C12Q1/701Specific hybridization probes
    • C12Q1/702Specific hybridization probes for retroviruses
    • C12Q1/703Viruses associated with AIDS

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Rhee et al. HIV-1 protease mutations and protease inhibitor cross-resistance
Parkin et al. Improving lopinavir genotype algorithm through phenotype correlations: novel mutation patterns and amprenavir cross-resistance
Kijak et al. Discrepant results in the interpretation of HIV‐1 drug‐resistance genotypic data among widely used algorithms
Kempf et al. Identification of genotypic changes in human immunodeficiency virus protease that correlate with reduced susceptibility to the protease inhibitor lopinavir among viral isolates from protease inhibitor-experienced patients
EP1352356B1 (en) Method for predicting therapeutic agent resistance using neural networks
Josefsson et al. Majority of CD4+ T cells from peripheral blood of HIV-1–infected individuals contain only one HIV DNA molecule
Rousseau et al. HLA class I-driven evolution of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype c proteome: immune escape and viral load
Abecasis et al. Protease mutation M89I/V is linked to therapy failure in patients infected with the HIV-1 non-B subtypes C, F or G
Recordon-Pinson et al. Evaluation of the genotypic prediction of HIV-1 coreceptor use versus a phenotypic assay and correlation with the virological response to maraviroc: the ANRS GenoTropism study
Beerenwinkel et al. Geno2pheno: interpreting genotypic HIV drug resistance tests
Wang et al. Simple linear model provides highly accurate genotypic predictions of HIV-1 drug resistance
Vercauteren et al. Algorithms for the interpretation of HIV-1 genotypic drug resistance information
Schmidt et al. Genotypic drug resistance interpretation systems—the cutting edge of antiretroviral therapy
Frentz et al. Comparison of HIV-1 genotypic resistance test interpretation systems in predicting virological outcomes over time
Qari et al. Comparative analysis of two commercial phenotypic assays for drug susceptibility testing of human immunodeficiency virus type 1
Shulman et al. Genetic correlates of efavirenz hypersusceptibility
Puchhammer‐Stöckl et al. Comparison of virtual phenotype and HIV‐SEQ program (Stanford) interpretation for predicting drug resistance of HIV strains
Nwobegahay et al. Low prevalence of transmitted genetic drug resistance in a cohort of HIV infected naive patients entering antiretroviral treatment programs at two sites in northern South Africa
Dunn et al. Genotypic resistance testing in routine clinical care
Reynolds et al. Antiretroviral drug susceptibility among HIV-infected adults failing antiretroviral therapy in Rakai, Uganda
Servais et al. Variant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proteases and response to combination therapy including a protease inhibitor
De Luca et al. Impact of different HIV resistance interpretation by distinct systems on clinical utility of resistance testing
Ormaasen et al. An algorithm‐based genotypic resistance score is associated with clinical outcome in HIV‐1‐infected adults on antiretroviral therapy
Chen et al. Distinguishing HIV-1 drug resistance, accessory, and viral fitness mutations using conditional selection pressure analysis of treated versus untreated patient samples
Wang et al. Antivirogram or PhenoSense: a comparison of their reproducibility and an analysis of their correlation