Jansen et al., 2021 - Google Patents
Does agreement mean accuracy? Evaluating glance annotation in naturalistic driving dataJansen et al., 2021
View HTML- Document ID
- 6146509519972919135
- Author
- Jansen R
- van der Kint S
- Hermens F
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Behavior research methods
External Links
Snippet
Naturalistic driving studies often make use of cameras to monitor driver behavior. To analyze the resulting video images, human annotation is often adopted. These annotations then serve as the 'gold standard'to train and evaluate automated computer vision algorithms …
- 230000004438 eyesight 0 abstract description 10
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06K—RECOGNITION OF DATA; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K9/00—Methods or arrangements for reading or recognising printed or written characters or for recognising patterns, e.g. fingerprints
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Wolfe et al. | Toward a theory of visual information acquisition in driving | |
Greenlee et al. | Driver vigilance in automated vehicles: Hazard detection failures are a matter of time | |
Xu et al. | The alleviation of perceptual blindness during driving in urban areas guided by saccades recommendation | |
Kotseruba et al. | Attention for vision-based assistive and automated driving: A review of algorithms and datasets | |
Reimer et al. | A field study on the impact of variations in short-term memory demands on drivers’ visual attention and driving performance across three age groups | |
Lappi et al. | Systematic observation of an expert driver's gaze strategy—an on-road case study | |
Doshi et al. | Head and eye gaze dynamics during visual attention shifts in complex environments | |
Jansen et al. | Does agreement mean accuracy? Evaluating glance annotation in naturalistic driving data | |
Stapel et al. | Measuring driver perception: Combining eye-tracking and automated road scene perception | |
Kotseruba et al. | Behavioral research and practical models of drivers' attention | |
Kunishige et al. | Spatial navigation ability and gaze switching in older drivers: A driving simulator study | |
Yang et al. | Evaluating driver features for cognitive distraction detection and validation in manual and level 2 automated driving | |
Drysdale et al. | Gaze patterns of individuals with ASD during active task engagement: a systematic literature review | |
Lehtonen et al. | Gaze doesn’t always lead steering | |
Navarro et al. | Dynamic scan paths investigations under manual and highly automated driving | |
Iskander et al. | Eye behaviour as a hazard perception measure | |
Gonzalez et al. | Detection of driver health condition by monitoring driving behavior through machine learning from observation | |
Wykowska et al. | Motivation modulates visual attention: evidence from pupillometry | |
Kondyli et al. | How do drivers mitigate the effects of naturalistic visual complexity? On attentional strategies and their implications under a change blindness protocol | |
Song et al. | The effect of apparent distance on peripheral target detection | |
Matthews et al. | Sustained conscious access to incidental memories in RSVP | |
Hatfield et al. | Analysis of visual scanning patterns comparing drivers of simulated L2 and L0 systems | |
Wu et al. | Analyzing eye-movements of drivers with different experiences when making a turn | |
Liu | Towards practical driver cognitive load detection based on visual attention information | |
Biebl et al. | Knowing me, knowing you—A study on top-down requirements for compensatory scanning in drivers with homonymous visual field loss |