McNamara et al., 2007 - Google Patents
Optimizing LSA measures of cohesionMcNamara et al., 2007
View PDF- Document ID
- 6003182393845031095
- Author
- McNamara D
- Cai Z
- Louwerse M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Handbook of latent semantic analysis
External Links
Snippet
One important application of LSA has been to measure cohesion in text and to predict the effects of cohesion on comprehension (see Foltz, chap. 9 in this volume; Foltz, W. Kintsch, & Landauer, 1998; Louwerse, 2004; Shapiro & McNamara, 2000). We use the term cohesion …
- 230000000694 effects 0 abstract description 17
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
- G06F17/27—Automatic analysis, e.g. parsing
- G06F17/2765—Recognition
- G06F17/277—Lexical analysis, e.g. tokenisation, collocates
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
- G06F17/27—Automatic analysis, e.g. parsing
- G06F17/274—Grammatical analysis; Style critique
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
- G06F17/27—Automatic analysis, e.g. parsing
- G06F17/2785—Semantic analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
- G06F17/27—Automatic analysis, e.g. parsing
- G06F17/2705—Parsing
- G06F17/271—Syntactic parsing, e.g. based on context-free grammar [CFG], unification grammars
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
- G06F17/27—Automatic analysis, e.g. parsing
- G06F17/2705—Parsing
- G06F17/2715—Statistical methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F17/3061—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B19/00—Teaching not covered by other main groups of this subclass
- G09B19/06—Foreign languages
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G06N99/005—Learning machines, i.e. computer in which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the machine itself during a complete run
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
- G06N5/02—Knowledge representation
- G06N5/022—Knowledge engineering, knowledge acquisition
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B5/00—Electrically-operated educational appliances
- G09B5/02—Electrically-operated educational appliances with visual presentation of the material to be studied, e.g. using film strip
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Ke et al. | Automated Essay Scoring: A Survey of the State of the Art. | |
Janda et al. | Syntactic, semantic and sentiment analysis: The joint effect on automated essay evaluation | |
Dascalu et al. | ReaderBench, an environment for analyzing text complexity and reading strategies | |
Lin et al. | Discovering genres of online discussion threads via text mining | |
Ravi et al. | Profiling student interactions in threaded discussions with speech act classifiers | |
Pilán et al. | Predicting proficiency levels in learner writings by transferring a linguistic complexity model from expert-written coursebooks | |
Hao et al. | CPS‐Rater: Automated sequential annotation for conversations in collaborative problem‐solving activities | |
Das et al. | Automatic question generation and answer assessment for subjective examination | |
Crossley et al. | How Important Is Size? An Investigation of Corpus Size and Meaning in Both Latent Semantic Analysis and Latent Dirichlet Allocation. | |
Fougt et al. | Epistemic network analysis of students' longer written assignments as formative/summative evaluation | |
McNamara et al. | Optimizing LSA measures of cohesion | |
Li et al. | Computerized summary scoring: crowdsourcing-based latent semantic analysis | |
Sung et al. | Construction and validation of a computerized creativity assessment tool with automated scoring based on deep-learning techniques. | |
Yoo et al. | Predicting learner’s project performance with dialogue features in online Q&A discussions | |
Tack et al. | Evaluating lexical simplification and vocabulary knowledge for learners of french: Possibilities of using the flelex resource | |
Kafle et al. | A corpus for modeling word importance in spoken dialogue transcripts | |
Kumar et al. | Discovering the predictive power of five baseline writing competences | |
Johri et al. | A study of academic collaborations in computational linguistics using a latent mixture of authors model | |
Hughes et al. | Machine learning for holistic evaluation of scientific essays | |
Erickson et al. | Is it fair? Automated open response grading | |
Cai et al. | NLS: A non-latent similarity algorithm | |
Flor et al. | Associative lexical cohesion as a factor in text complexity | |
Patout et al. | Towards context-aware automated writing evaluation systems | |
Chen et al. | Analyzing and comparing reading stimulus materials across the TOEFL® family of assessments | |
Heilman et al. | Application of automatic thesaurus extraction for computer generation of vocabulary questions. |