[go: up one dir, main page]

Huffman et al., 2005 - Google Patents

Assessment of children with brachial plexus birth palsy using the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument

Huffman et al., 2005

View PDF
Document ID
5327922973697353014
Author
Huffman G
Bagley A
James M
Lerman J
Rab G
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics

External Links

Snippet

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) measures differences in function between children with brachial plexus birth palsy (BPBP) who are candidates for shoulder tendon surgery and age-matched …
Continue reading at iprmd.org (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3418—Telemedicine, e.g. remote diagnosis, remote control of instruments or remote monitoring of patient carried devices
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • G06F19/322—Management of patient personal data, e.g. patient records, conversion of records or privacy aspects
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/345—Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/36—Computer-assisted acquisition of medical data, e.g. computerised clinical trials or questionnaires
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
    • G06F19/3431—Calculating a health index for the patient, e.g. for risk assessment
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10—Services
    • G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
    • G06Q50/24—Patient record management
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/48—Other medical applications
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/0002—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Huffman et al. Assessment of children with brachial plexus birth palsy using the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument
Li et al. Functional gain and pain relief after total joint replacement according to obesity status
Ondeck et al. Discriminative ability for adverse outcomes after surgical management of hip fractures: a comparison of the Charlson comorbidity index, Elixhauser comorbidity measure, and modified frailty index
Beaton et al. Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires
Osborn et al. Management of acute compartment syndrome
Callaghan et al. Patellar taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome in adults
Fritz et al. An examination of the reliability of a classification algorithm for subgrouping patients with low back pain
Ayers et al. Patient-reported outcomes after total knee replacement vary on the basis of preoperative coexisting disease in the lumbar spine and other nonoperatively treated joints: the need for a musculoskeletal comorbidity index
Nepple et al. Meniscal repair outcomes at greater than five years: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Liu et al. Likelihood of reaching minimal clinically important difference in adult spinal deformity: a comparison of operative and nonoperative treatment
Ast et al. Weight changes after total hip or knee arthroplasty: prevalence, predictors, and effects on outcomes
Morshed et al. Delayed internal fixation of femoral shaft fracture reduces mortality among patients with multisystem trauma
Heneweer et al. Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub) acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands
Flynn et al. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation
Gutke et al. Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in pregnancy: a cohort study of the consequences in terms of health and functioning
LeBrun et al. Functional outcomes after operatively treated patella fractures
Di Monaco et al. Handgrip strength is an independent predictor of functional outcome in hip-fracture women: a prospective study with 6-month follow-up
Suhr et al. Considerations and intervention in congenital muscular torticollis
Leblebici et al. Clinical and epidemiologic evaluation of pressure ulcers in patients at a university hospital in Turkey
Mehta et al. Concurrent validation of the DASH and the QuickDASH in comparison to neck-specific scales in patients with neck pain
Bernstein et al. Do patient sociodemographic factors impact the PROMIS scores meeting the patient-acceptable symptom state at the initial point of care in orthopaedic foot and ankle patients?
Das et al. Early versus delayed operative intervention in displaced clavicle fractures
Christensen et al. Natural history of anterior chest wall numbness after plating of clavicle fractures: educating patients
Zhou et al. Predictors of patient satisfaction with hand function after fasciectomy for Dupuytren’s contracture
Williamson et al. The prevalence of back and leg pain and the cross-sectional association with adverse health outcomes in community dwelling older adults in England