Valentin et al., 2012 - Google Patents
Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food scienceValentin et al., 2012
View PDF- Document ID
- 5252440637459746733
- Author
- Valentin D
- Chollet S
- Lelièvre M
- Abdi H
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- International Journal of Food Science and Technology
External Links
Snippet
For food scientists and industrials, descriptive profiling is an essential tool that involves the evaluation of both the qualitative and quantitative sensory characteristics of a product by a panel. Recently, in response to industrial demands to develop faster and more cost-effective …
- 235000013305 food 0 title abstract description 109
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or demand forecasting
- G06Q30/0203—Market surveys or market polls
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Valentin et al. | Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science | |
| Pagès | Collection and analysis of perceived product inter-distances using multiple factor analysis: Application to the study of 10 white wines from the Loire Valley | |
| Varela et al. | Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization | |
| Næs et al. | Multivariate analysis of data in sensory science | |
| Reinbach et al. | Comparison of three sensory profiling methods based on consumer perception: CATA, CATA with intensity and Napping® | |
| Hopfer et al. | A summary of projective mapping observations–The effect of replicates and shape, and individual performance measurements | |
| Velardo | The nuances of health literacy, nutrition literacy, and food literacy | |
| Valentin et al. | Projective mapping & sorting tasks | |
| Esmerino et al. | Consumer-based product characterization using Pivot Profile, Projective Mapping and Check-all-that-apply (CATA): A comparative case with Greek yogurt samples | |
| Kilcast | Instrumental assessment of food sensory quality: A practical guide | |
| Ares et al. | Further investigations into the reproducibility of check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization elicited by consumers | |
| Jervis et al. | The use of qualitative research methods in quantitative science: A review | |
| Chollet et al. | Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask | |
| Ng et al. | The influence of sensory and packaging cues on both liking and emotional, abstract and functional conceptualisations | |
| Nestrud et al. | Perceptual mapping of citrus juices using projective mapping and profiling data from culinary professionals and consumers | |
| van Zyl et al. | The roles of culture and language in designing emotion lists: Comparing the same language in different English and Spanish speaking countries | |
| Carrillo et al. | Packaging information as a modulator of consumers’ perception of enriched and reduced-calorie biscuits in tasting and non-tasting tests | |
| Pensé‐Lhéritier | Recent developments in the sensorial assessment of cosmetic products: a review | |
| Ares et al. | 14 Comparison of Novel Methodologies for Sensory Characterization | |
| Ristic et al. | Towards development of a Wine Neophobia Scale (WNS): Measuring consumer wine neophobia using an adaptation of The Food Neophobia Scale (FNS) | |
| Schouteten et al. | Comparison of response formats and concurrent hedonic measures for optimal use of the EmoSensory® Wheel | |
| Lestringant et al. | 2010–2015: How have conventional descriptive analysis methods really been used? A systematic review of publications | |
| Ares et al. | Polarized projective mapping: Comparison with polarized sensory positioning approaches | |
| Faye et al. | Assessing and taking into account the subjects’ experience and knowledge in consumer studies. Application to the free sorting of wine glasses | |
| Marano-Marcolini et al. | A consumer-oriented model for analysing the suitability of food classification systems |