Valentin et al., 2012 - Google Patents
Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food scienceValentin et al., 2012
View PDF- Document ID
- 5252440637459746733
- Author
- Valentin D
- Chollet S
- Lelièvre M
- Abdi H
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- International Journal of Food Science and Technology
External Links
Snippet
For food scientists and industrials, descriptive profiling is an essential tool that involves the evaluation of both the qualitative and quantitative sensory characteristics of a product by a panel. Recently, in response to industrial demands to develop faster and more cost-effective …
- 235000013305 food 0 title abstract description 109
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
- G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or demand forecasting
- G06Q30/0203—Market surveys or market polls
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Valentin et al. | Quick and dirty but still pretty good: A review of new descriptive methods in food science | |
Varela et al. | Sensory profiling, the blurred line between sensory and consumer science. A review of novel methods for product characterization | |
Kemp et al. | Introduction to descriptive analysis | |
Ballester et al. | Conceptual vs. perceptual wine spaces: Does expertise matter? | |
Asioli et al. | A discussion of recent methodologies for combining sensory and extrinsic product properties in consumer studies | |
Reinbach et al. | Comparison of three sensory profiling methods based on consumer perception: CATA, CATA with intensity and Napping® | |
Valentin et al. | Projective mapping & sorting tasks | |
Velardo | The nuances of health literacy, nutrition literacy, and food literacy | |
Esmerino et al. | Consumer-based product characterization using Pivot Profile, Projective Mapping and Check-all-that-apply (CATA): A comparative case with Greek yogurt samples | |
Hopfer et al. | A summary of projective mapping observations–The effect of replicates and shape, and individual performance measurements | |
Torri et al. | Projective Mapping for interpreting wine aroma differences as perceived by naïve and experienced assessors | |
Ares et al. | Further investigations into the reproducibility of check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions for sensory product characterization elicited by consumers | |
Jervis et al. | The use of qualitative research methods in quantitative science: A review | |
Chollet et al. | Sort and beer: Everything you wanted to know about the sorting task but did not dare to ask | |
Garber Jr et al. | Measuring consumer response to food products | |
Ng et al. | The influence of sensory and packaging cues on both liking and emotional, abstract and functional conceptualisations | |
van Zyl et al. | The roles of culture and language in designing emotion lists: Comparing the same language in different English and Spanish speaking countries | |
Nestrud et al. | Perceptual mapping of citrus juices using projective mapping and profiling data from culinary professionals and consumers | |
Varela et al. | Influence of brand information on consumers’ expectations and liking of powdered drinks in central location tests | |
Carrillo et al. | Packaging information as a modulator of consumers’ perception of enriched and reduced-calorie biscuits in tasting and non-tasting tests | |
Pensé‐Lhéritier | Recent developments in the sensorial assessment of cosmetic products: a review | |
Lawrence et al. | Using the free comments method for sensory characterisation of Cabernet Franc wines: Comparison with classical profiling in a professional context | |
Ares et al. | 14 Comparison of Novel Methodologies for Sensory Characterization | |
Ristic et al. | Towards development of a Wine Neophobia Scale (WNS): Measuring consumer wine neophobia using an adaptation of The Food Neophobia Scale (FNS) | |
Schouteten et al. | Comparison of response formats and concurrent hedonic measures for optimal use of the EmoSensory® Wheel |