[go: up one dir, main page]

Hanscom, 1981 - Google Patents

Admissibility of Illegally Seized Evidence in Civil Cases: Could This Be the Path out of the Labyrinth of the Exclusionary Rule

Hanscom, 1981

View PDF
Document ID
4629573464040402476
Author
Hanscom R
Publication year
Publication venue
Pepp. L. Rev.

External Links

Snippet

The use of the exclusionary rule in criminal cases has been the subject of extensive debate since its inception. Although most efforts to modify the rule have been deemed unworkable, the author proposes a modification that is both workable and sensible. Modification would …
Continue reading at digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu (PDF) (other versions)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Schwartz Section 1983 litigation
Kircher The four faces of tort law: Liability for emotional harm
Johnson At the intersection of injustice: Experiences of African American women in crime and sentencing
Litman Legal innocence and federal habeas
Pope Balancing public health against individual liberty: the ethics of smoking regulations
Gormley et al. Privacy and the States
Phillips From overdose to crime scene: The incompatibility of drug-induced homicide statutes with due process
Geiger‐Oneto et al. Cannabis regulatory confusion and its impact on consumer adoption
Alexander et al. Mental Illness as an Excuse for Civil Wrongs
Dressler The jurisprudence of death by another: Accessories and capital punishment
Esser Extraordinary Punishment: Conditions of Confinement and Compassionate Release
Brooks Reevaluating Substantive Due Process as a Source of Protection for Psychiatric Patients to Refuse Drugs
Hanscom Admissibility of Illegally Seized Evidence in Civil Cases: Could This Be the Path out of the Labyrinth of the Exclusionary Rule
Karagiozis et al. Forensic investigation handbook: an introduction to the collection, preservation, analysis, and presentation of evidence
Garcia Drug addiction and mother/child welfare: rights, laws, and discretionary decisionmaking
Wai-Kin Criminal Law in Hong Kong
Neethling et al. The law of delict
Inbau et al. Protective security law
Krongard A population at risk: Civil commitment of substance abusers after Kansas v. Hendricks
Taylor Unlocking the gates of desolation row
Berry III Eighth Amendment Stare Decisis
Snyder et al. Domestic Violence Ten Years Later
O'Connor The cruel and unusual criminalization of homelessness: Factoring individual accountability into the proportionality principle
Schonfeld Malicious Prosecution as a Constitutional Tort: Continued Confusion and Uncertainty
DeClue Sugarcoating the Eighth Amendment: The grossly disproportionate test is simply the Fourteenth Amendment rational basis test in disguise