[go: up one dir, main page]

Data Insights

Bite-sized insights on how the world is changing, published every few days.

Counting lives saved is difficult, but it can show us the great difference some people have made

The image presents a horizontal bar chart that illustrates the contributions of various scientists whose innovations have saved millions of lives. Each bar represents the estimated number of lives saved by a specific medical innovation, with the bars increasing in length from left to right to indicate more lives saved.
Many significant innovations are listed, including the development of different vaccines, medical procedures, and treatments that have saved millions. 
The footer provides sources for the estimates shown, acknowledging that except for information Sarah Gilbert's contributions, all estimates are from Science Heroes.

Scientists can make an enormous difference in the world.

Take the researcher Sarah Gilbert, who has dedicated her career to developing vaccines. Over the last two decades, she has contributed to vaccines against the flu, MERS, Nipah virus, and Rift Valley fever. When she heard about the outbreak in China in January 2020, she began working on a vaccine, just in case. By the end of that year, the vaccine against COVID-19 was approved, saving an estimated 6.3 million lives in the following year alone. Without this effort, we would have faced a much darker reality, marked by lockdowns, overwhelmed health systems, and widespread suffering.

This chart lists many such scientists whose work saved many people’s lives. The estimates are taken from the web publication Science Heroes, where you can find profiles of these scientists.

It’s difficult to estimate the exact difference particular innovations have made, and I take all such estimates with a grain of salt. None of these scientists did their work in isolation; their innovations were achieved thanks to collaborative efforts and the earlier work of other researchers.

Our team spends much of its time counting deaths, but it’s equally important to know the number of lives saved — even though it is harder to estimate and involves much larger uncertainty. It’s inspiring to be reminded that creative, enterprising, and tenacious people can enormously contribute to our lives.

Fritz Haber and Carl Bosch, who invented synthetic fertilizers, are at the top of this list. My colleague Hannah Ritchie wrote an article about the difference their work has made: How many people does synthetic fertilizer feed?

Gold export data suggests that Peru, one of the world’s largest producers, mines nearly as much informally as it does formally

This image displays a bar graph depicting the top gold-producing countries in 2023, with gold production measured in tonnes of recorded raw mined output. The countries are listed alongside the amount of gold they produced. China is the highest producer with 370 tonnes, followed by Russia and Australia, both at 310 tonnes. Canada produced 200 tonnes, while the United States produced 170 tonnes. Other notable producers include Kazakhstan with 130 tonnes, Mexico with 120 tonnes, and Indonesia with 110 tonnes. Uzbekistan and South Africa each produced 100 tonnes. Peru and Ghana both produced 90 tonnes, while Tanzania, Mali, and Brazil produced 60 tonnes each. 

The data sources are USGS, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024, and Our World in Data, which can be visited for more information. The graph is licensed under Creative Commons BY.

According to official mining output records, Peru mined about 90 tonnes of gold in 2023, far ahead of any other South American country. That puts it within the world’s top 15 producers, just below the 10th place, as shown in the chart.

However, this official figure captures only part of Peru’s gold economy. Customs export data shows a striking discrepancy: about 80 tonnes of unaccounted gold in 2023, according to the Peruvian Institute of Economics. That’s gold whose value appears in export statistics but not mine-output records — and it is almost as large as the official figure based on mine records.

Some of this gap may be due to re-exports, inventories, or recycled gold. But given how big the discrepancy is, Peru’s authorities, researchers, and media see it as a practical indicator of the scale of informal and illegal mining. An article in The Economist, for example, compares Peru with other countries using this approach, and argues that gold has become more profitable than drugs for many gangs in South America.

Illegal gold mining is widely recognized as a major issue in Peru and the region, frequently linked to environmental damage and organized crime. This context matters today: the steep recent increase in gold prices raises incentives around unregulated extraction and trade.

→ Our Minerals Data Explorer has more data on metals, minerals, and mining. This United Nations report provides more information about illegal mining and its environmental effects.

Hostility toward homosexuality remains common in many of the world’s largest countries

This is a line graph depicting levels of homophobia in several large countries from 2004 to 2022. The vertical axis lists countries: Pakistan, Indonesia, China, Russia, and India. The horizontal axis represents the years, moving from 2004 on the left to 2022 on the right.

Each country has a line connecting data points from 2004 to 2022. The percentage of respondents who expressed homophobic views is shown at each endpoint:

- Pakistan starts at 100% in 2004, decreasing to 91% in 2022.
- Indonesia begins at 98% and slightly declines to 93%.
- China decreases from 87% to 83%.
- Russia shows a decline from 71% to 75%.
- India starts at 52% in 2004 and climbs to 65% in 2022.

The graph includes a note explaining the data: it represents the share of people responding on a scale of 1-10 to the question regarding the justification of homosexuality, with values between 1 to 4 indicating a negative stance. The data source is the Integrated Values Surveys from 2024, and the graph is attributed to "Our World in Data" with a CC BY license.

This chart shows the share of people who say homosexuality cannot be justified across five of the world’s most populous countries.

Together, these countries are home to nearly half of the global population. And in all of them, most people still hold strong views against homosexuality. In Pakistan and Indonesia, it’s over 90%; in China, more than 80%. In India and Russia, these views are widespread, and they’ve increased in recent years.

That’s troubling. It’s hard to feel free, or even safe, when your sexuality is seen as something to condemn. In Western Europe and the US, negative views of homosexuality have dropped over the last 40 years.

Homosexuality is now legal in both China and India, but legal status doesn’t erase stigma. When large parts of society see same-sex attraction as morally wrong, laws alone are not a guarantee to protect people from harassment, exclusion, or violence.

Explore responses to this question in more than a hundred countries

Oil spills from tankers have fallen to less than one-thirtieth of the levels seen in the 1970s

A bar graph illustrating the decline in oil spills from tankers over several decades. The vertical axis represents the amount of oil spilled, measured in tonnes, ranging from 0 to 700,000 tonnes. The horizontal axis indicates the years from 1970 to 2024. A significant drop in spills is visible, with peaks in the 1970s and 1980s, where more than 300,000 tonnes were spilled each year. Notably, a bar is labeled indicating that 10,000 tonnes were spilled in 2024. An annotation points out the Sanchi incident off the coast of China in 2018. The data source for the graph is indicated as ITOPF, with a date of 2025. The overall message emphasizes a dramatic decrease in oil spills from tankers over recent decades.

We’ve all seen the dramatic images of vast parts of the ocean caked in oil; birds and other wildlife stuck in the thick, dark liquid. These spills are both environmentally damaging and expensive to clean up.

As the chart shows, in the 1970s, over 300,000 tonnes of oil were spilled from oil tankers in most years. By the 1980s and 1990s, this had dropped, but the annual average was still over 100,000 tonnes.

These losses have fallen dramatically since the millennium. Last year, 10,000 tonnes were spilled, less than one-thirtieth of the amount lost in a typical year in the 1970s.

This decline has occurred despite global oil production and trade increasing dramatically.

We’ve just updated our charts on oil spills; explore the latest data

Foreign aid can be a large share of a country’s income during times of conflict or humanitarian crisis

The image displays a world map highlighting various countries based on the percentage of foreign aid as a part of their gross national income for the year 2023. The map features several colors indicating different categories: countries receiving foreign aid that constitutes more than 20% of their national income are shaded in dark brown, while those receiving less than 20% are light blue. 

Seven countries are specifically marked in dark brown: Ukraine, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, South Sudan, Burundi, and the Central African Republic. Countries that did not receive aid are shown in white. The map provides a visual overview of how foreign aid impacts national income in these regions, with a legend clarifying the meaning of the color codes.

Data source for this information is the OECD, dated 2025. The image is attributed to "Our World in Data" under the Creative Commons BY license.

Many countries receive some foreign aid, but it typically accounts for just a few percent of their income. But during periods of conflict, crisis, or natural disaster, foreign aid forms a large part of some countries’ economy.

The map shows the countries where aid was more than one-fifth of national income in 2023 (the latest year of data available). This included Yemen, Syria, and the Central African Republic, which experienced continued conflict, and Ukraine, which received humanitarian aid following the Russian invasion.

Since aid is often given during periods of acute fragility and humanitarian crises, the countries on this list change a lot from year to year. If you look at the trend for Haiti, for example, you can see a spike in aid after the devastating earthquake that hit Port-au-Prince in 2010.

During these events, aid often plays a crucial role in providing basic resources and support for countries trying to rebuild.

Explore data on who gives foreign aid, who receives it, and how this has changed over time

In low-income countries, most people work in farming; in richer countries, they work in services

This graphic illustrates the distribution of the labor force across different sectors—agriculture, industry, and services—based on income levels of countries in 2023.

On the left, there is a stacked bar representing low-income countries, where 59% of the workforce is in agriculture, 10% in industry, and 31% in services. Next, the lower-middle-income group shows a breakdown of 40% in agriculture, 23% in industry, and 37% in services. The upper-middle-income countries have 21% in agriculture, 28% in industry, and 51% in services. Finally, in high-income countries, only 3% of the labor force is in agriculture, with 23% in industry and 74% in services.

The title highlights the trend that higher-income countries have fewer agricultural workers and a greater proportion involved in industry and services. The footer indicates the data source is the International Labor Organization (2025)

As countries get richer, the type of work that people do changes a lot.

The chart breaks down the workforce by sector by country income groups. In most low-income countries, a majority of people work in agriculture. People grow their own food, get a surplus to sell to others, or produce commodities that they can export overseas.

In comparison, fewer people work in farming in middle- and high-income countries. People start to move to industrial and service jobs instead.

In rich countries, three-quarters of workers are employed in services, compared to just 3% in agriculture.

There are several drivers of this. Agricultural productivity tends to increase as countries get richer (and they gain access to better seeds, fertilizers, irrigation, and land). This means fewer family members must work on the farm to produce the same — or more — income.

At the same time, many industrial and service jobs pay more, so people are incentivized to move out of farming to higher-paying roles when they become available. This transition has been a key driver of economic growth and poverty reduction for many countries.

Read my article on why improvements in agricultural productivity are important to reduce poverty

Which countries have nuclear weapons, and how many?

A horizontal bar chart comparing the estimated nuclear weapon stockpiles of various countries in 2025. Each bar represents a different country, with the length corresponding to the number of nuclear warheads. 

- Russia has the highest stockpile, with 4,299 warheads.
- The United States follows with 3,700 warheads.
- China has an estimated 600 warheads.
- France is shown with 290 warheads.
- The United Kingdom has 225 warheads.
- India is estimated to have 180 warheads.
- Pakistan has around 170 warheads.
- Israel's stockpile is estimated at 90 warheads.
- North Korea has the smallest estimated stockpile at 50 warheads.

The chart is titled "Which countries have nuclear weapons?" and includes a note that these estimates exclude retired warheads queued for dismantlement. The data source is the Federation of American Scientists, indicating that the estimates are based on publicly available information, historical records, and occasional leaks. The image is credited to "Our World in Data" and employs a CC BY license.

As conflicts break out across the world, the threat of nuclear war is never far from many people’s minds.

One of the first questions we need to answer to better understand the risks of nuclear weapons is: which countries have them, and in what quantity? The chart shows estimates of national stockpiles in 2025.

The exact number of warheads is secret, so these are some of the best estimates based on publicly available information, historical records, and occasional leaks.

Nine countries are thought to have nuclear weapons today, but over 80% of warheads are held by just two: Russia and the United States.

While the number of countries that possess nuclear weapons has never been higher, the total number of warheads and tests being carried out is lower than they were a few decades ago.

Read our colleague Max Roser’s article on why nuclear war is a key concern of our generation

Homophobic attitudes have fallen in Western Europe and the United States

A graph illustrating the decline in negative views of homosexuality across several wealthy countries from 1984 to 2022. The title states that “Negative views of homosexuality have dropped in Western Europe and the US” 

The countries are the United States, Spain, Great Britain, Sweden, and the Netherlands. Each line shows the percentage of respondents in each country who believe that homosexuality is rarely or never justifiable, represented by scores of 1 to 4 on a scale from 1 to 10. 

In 1984, the United States had the highest percentage at 75%, followed by Spain at 70%, Great Britain at 61%, Sweden at 48%, and the Netherlands at 34%. By 2022, the percentages had decreased significantly: the United States to 28%, Spain to 19%, Great Britain to 15%, Sweden to 9%, and the Netherlands to 6%. 

The data source is listed as Integrated Values Surveys (2024). The chart is CC BY Our World in Data.

Forty years ago, public views about homosexuality were extremely negative in many rich countries. As the chart shows, back in 1984, one in three Dutch people believed homosexuality was “never or rarely justified”. In Spain and Great Britain, that view was held by the majority. Perhaps most strikingly, three-quarters of Americans thought the same.

Since then, levels of discrimination have plummeted. Today, the share of people in these countries who think that homosexuality is “never or rarely justified” makes up a shrinking minority. That’s good news — everyone should be free to decide for themselves who they are attracted to.

It might sound odd today to ask whether someone else’s sexuality is justified. But that’s how the long-running World Values Survey phrased it when they began decades ago. Keeping the phrasing consistent helps show how attitudes have changed, but the fact that it may sound outdated now is, in itself, a reflection of how much has changed.

Explore responses to this question in more than a hundred countries

What share of new cars in your country are electric?

The image presents a bar chart illustrating the percentage of new cars sold globally that were electric, including both fully battery-electric and plug-in hybrids, with data projected for 2024. The chart shows a selection of countries and regions from highest to lowest percentage. 

- Norway leads with 92%.
- Sweden follows with 58%.
- China shows 48%.
- The United Kingdom and Switzerland each have 28%.
- The European Union has 21%.
- Canada has 17%.
- Australia is at 13%.
- The United States has 10%.
- South Korea registers 9%.
- Brazil is represented at 6%.
- Japan stands at 3%.
- India is at 2%. 

The data source cited at the bottom is the International Energy Agency's Global EV Outlook 2025.

As someone who studies the transition to low-carbon energy, I am always on the lookout for electric cars in everyday life. I like to see how common they are, and it has been exciting to see their prominence grow on the roads in the UK.

Last year, more than one in five new cars sold globally were electric. But how does this vary worldwide? This share is shown across a selection of countries in the chart (more are available here).

Norway leads the world by a long way, with almost all new cars there being electric. China is another standout, with nearly half of new sales.

At the bottom, you can see that electric cars are still relatively rare in countries like Japan, Brazil, and India.

In most countries, greenhouse gas emissions from transport have either grown or, at best, stagnated in the last decade. Accelerating the transition to electric vehicles will be crucial to pushing emissions downwards.

Note that “electric” here includes fully-electric and plug-in hybrid cars; you can see the contribution of each here.

Explore data on electric car sales and stocks across countries in our latest update →

Renewables have taken the lead in Dutch electricity production

The image presents a line graph illustrating the share of electricity generated from fossil fuels and renewables in the Netherlands from 1985 to 2024. 

The horizontal axis marks the years, starting at 1985 on the left and progressing to 2024 on the right. The vertical axis indicates the percentage of electricity generation, ranging from 0% to 100%. 

A brown line represents fossil fuels, which shows a gradual decline over the years, starting near 90% in 1985 and dropping sharply after 2015, approaching close to 40% by 2024. In contrast, a blue line illustrates renewables, showing a slow increase from nearly 0% in 1985 to a significant rise, crossing the fossil fuel line in 2024 to surpass it. 

The title notes the historic shift in Dutch electricity generation, indicating that for the first time, most electricity now comes from renewable sources. 

Data sources for the graph are attributed to Ember for the year 2025 and the EI Statistical Review of World Energy for 2024. The graph is licensed under CC BY.

For the first time, in 2024, more than half of the electricity produced in the Netherlands came from renewable sources, and almost all of it (45%) from solar and wind.

As the chart shows, this has been a sharp and recent shift. Even as recently as 2018, over 80% of Dutch electricity was generated by fossil fuels.

The Dutch government signed a national climate accord in 2019 that introduced more than 600 measures to accelerate the shift to low-carbon power. These included further stimulation of solar and wind energy, a rising carbon tax, and the closure of a major coal plant. A rapid surge in renewable electricity followed, with solar and wind growing from 14% to 45% of the electricity mix.

See how each source contributes to the Dutch electricity mix

A century ago, around half of today’s independent countries were European colonies

The visual displays a stacked area chart titled "Number of European overseas colonies by colonizer," indicating the historical decline in the number of colonies held by European nations. The vertical axis represents the number of colonies, ranging from 0 to 100, while the horizontal axis spans from 1925 to 2022. 

The chart shows that in 1925, there were 97 colonies, predominantly held by France and the United Kingdom. A sudden drop in the number of colonies occurs around the 1960s, correlating with a period of rapid decolonization following World War II. There are annotations highlighting key information: "97 of the countries that are independent today were European colonies in 1925" and an explanation of the rapid decolonization. 

Data source: Bastian Becker (2023). Chart CC BY Our World in Data

Just a century ago, many of today’s independent countries weren’t self-governing at all. They were colonies controlled by European countries from far away.

Modern European colonialism began in the 15th century, when Spain and Portugal established overseas empires. By the early 20th century, it had peaked: the United Kingdom and France dominated, and nearly 100 modern-day countries were under European control, mostly in Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean.

As the chart shows, this changed rapidly after World War II. A wave of decolonization spread across the world, especially in the 1950s and 1960s. Colonies became independent countries, formed their own governments, joined international institutions, and started having their own voice in global decisions.

The decline of colonialism marked one of the biggest political shifts in modern history, from external rule to national sovereignty.

Read more about colonization and state capacity on our dedicated page

Two ways of measuring 160 years of economic growth in the United States

The image presents a grid of line graphs displaying the increase in household access to various amenities in the United States from 1860 to 2020. The title at the top states, "What did economic growth mean for US households?" 

In the top left panel, the data on average income, here measured by GDP per capita, tells us that the average American was 13 times poorer in 1860. 

The purple lines represent a very straightforward approach to measuring growth: each line tracks the share of households that have access to one specific good or service. Starting from the top, you see the rising provision of basic infrastructure like running water, flush toilets, and electric power. You can also see the increasing availability of communication technology from the radio to the TV to the Internet to mobile phones. And further down, you see the increasing availability of technologies that reduced the drudgery of work at home — vacuum cleaners, washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers.

Footnotes at the bottom provide data sources, including research by Horace Dediu, Comin, Hobijn, and GDP data from the Maddison Project Database.

Economic growth is easy to understand: it means that people have access to goods and services of increasing quantity and quality.

What is hard, however, is to measure economic growth. This chart shows two ways of doing this for US growth over the past 160 years.

The purple lines represent a straightforward approach: each line tracks the share of households with access to one specific good or service. Starting from the top, you see the rising provision of basic infrastructure like running water, flush toilets, and electric power. You can also see the increasing availability of communication technology: radios, TVs, the Internet, and mobile phones. And further down, you see the rise of technologies that reduced work at home: vacuum cleaners, washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers.

This approach is very concrete; it shows practical ways in which the production and consumption of specific goods increased over time. The downside is that it only captures a limited number of particular goods. Millions of goods and services are produced and consumed, and most are not recorded with such precision.

A way to measure how people’s access to the full range of goods and services changes is to measure people’s incomes. This way of measuring growth is shown in the top left panel. The data on average income, here measured by GDP per capita, tells us that the average American was 13 times poorer in 1860 than in 2022 (adjusted for inflation).

These two ways of measuring economic growth have pros and cons: one is concrete but not comprehensive, the other is comprehensive but quite abstract. If we want to understand what growth means for our societies, I find it helpful to combine them both.

If you want to know more about this — and see how the inequality of incomes can be factored in — you can read my article: “What is economic growth? And why is it so important?”

Per capita CO₂ emissions in China now match those in the United Kingdom

This image is a line graph comparing per capita CO2 emissions in China and the United Kingdom from 1990 to 2022. The vertical axis represents emissions in tonnes per person, ranging from 0 to 14 tonnes, while the horizontal axis represents the years from 1990 to 2022.

There are two lines on the graph: one in blue for the United Kingdom and another in red for China. The blue line shows that UK emissions began around 12 tonnes per person in 1990, then displayed slight fluctuations but generally declined over the years, indicating a move away from coal. 

In contrast, the red line for China starts below 2 tonnes per person in 1990 and increases steadily over the years, matching the UK's emissions by 2022. 

Text annotations highlight that in the early 1990s, per capita emissions in the UK were six times those in China and that China's emission growth primarily stemmed from increased energy demand, largely powered by coal.

The data sources for this information are the Global Carbon Budget (2024) and UN World Population Prospects. The note specifies that the data refers to fossil emissions only, excluding land use and international transport. The image is credited under CC BY.

When I was born in the 1990s, the average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United Kingdom were about six times higher than in China, but these trends have converged in my lifetime.

You can see this in the chart: in 2022, China’s per capita emissions matched those in the UK.

Once a country that ran on coal, the UK has closed its last coal plant. This has been the main driver of its emissions decline.

Meanwhile, rapid economic growth, powered mainly by coal, has ramped up emissions in China.

These emission numbers are adjusted for trade. Based on domestic production, China’s per capita emissions are much higher than the UK's. But since China is a net exporter of goods (and emissions) and the UK is a net importer, the gap closes when we adjust for consumption.

These emissions are based on domestic consumption and do not include international aviation or shipping, where Brits are likely to emit more.

There are many ways to compare national contributions to climate change; explore them here

Strong anti-tobacco measures are growing, but reach only a minority worldwide

This image presents a horizontal range chart titled "Anti-tobacco measures are expanding, but coverage remains patchy."

It shows the percentage of the world population covered by the World Health Organization's best practices for selected tobacco control policies, with data for 2007 and 2024.

Each policy has a corresponding horizontal bar indicating its coverage.

The chart includes a footnote indicating the reference year for taxation is 2008 and cites the data source as WHO, 2024. The chart is CC BY Our World in Data

Smokers are about 21 times more likely to die from lung cancer than people who never smoked, and they face increased risks from over a dozen other diseases. I know people who died from smoking: you probably do too.

In 2008, the World Health Organization created a set of tobacco control policies with different tiers, the highest of which are considered “best practices” — they are listed on the chart.

The chart also shows the share of the global population living in countries that had enacted these policies as of 2007 and 2024.

What surprised me is how recent most of these policies still are. In 2007, only a tiny share of the global population benefited from these policies. Since then, coverage has increased across all these measures, but most of them still reach less than half of the world's population.

What is the share of taxes on the retail price of a pack of cigarettes? See the data for each country

Global inequality is the result of two centuries of uneven economic growth

A line graph depicting GDP per capita from 1820 to 2022, with the vertical axis representing GDP in international dollars and the horizontal axis showing the years. Multiple colored lines represent different regions: 

- A purple line for "Western offshoots" (United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), showing the highest GDP per capita, peaking just above $60,000 in 2022.
- A dark blue line for "Western Europe," also showing significant growth and stabilizing around $50,000.
- A light blue line for "East Asia," indicating gradual growth.
- An orange line for "Eastern Europe," displaying a more moderate increase.
- A green line for the "Middle East and North Africa," showing slow growth throughout the years.
- A brown line for the "World" that climbs steadily.
- An olive line for "Latin America," with modest growth.
- A purple line for "South and Southeast Asia," showing the lowest GDP per capita.
- A teal line representing "Sub Saharan Africa," showing minimal gains.

Additional information indicates the data is sourced from Bolt and van Zanden's Maddison Project Database, with a note that it is expressed in international dollars based on 2011 prices. The graph is attributed to "Our World in Data" and is labeled with a Creative Commons license (CC BY).

For most of history, almost everyone everywhere was very poor. Hunger was common, half of the children died, and, as the chart shows, average incomes were low across all regions.

The chart also shows how people’s incomes have changed over the last two centuries. The chart highlights a stark divergence: while average incomes in every region have increased, the pace of this growth has varied enormously. Western Europe and the “Western Offshoots” (like the US and Australia) experienced early and sustained economic growth. Meanwhile, Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia grew much more slowly.

Two hundred years ago, people in all regions were similarly poor. Today, the average incomes of people in Australia, the US, or Denmark are more than 15 times higher than those in Sub-Saharan Africa.

I wrote an article on how economic growth is possible and why it is important: “What is economic growth?” →

One-third of cars on the road in Norway are now electric

The image presents a line graph illustrating the growth of electric cars in Norway from 2010 to a projected 2024. The title indicates that one-third of cars on the road in Norway are expected to be electric by 2024, with a specific note that electric cars encompass both fully battery-electric and plug-in hybrids, though recent sales predominantly feature fully electric models.

The vertical axis represents the percentage of electric cars, ranging from 0% to 35%. The horizontal axis denotes the years from 2010 to 2024. A bold brown line sharply rises, indicating growth, reaching 32% in 2024. Accompanying annotations highlight that in 2019, the percentage was 12%, and in 2014, it was just 1%. 

Additionally, the graph includes lines representing electric car adoption rates in other countries, specifically Sweden, China, the UK, the USA, Japan, and the global average, shown in lighter shades of gray. 

The data source at the bottom reads: "International Energy Agency. Global EV Outlook 2025." The graph is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).

Norway is leading the way in the transition from petrol to electric cars. Almost every new car sold in Norway is electric. Hardly anyone buys a combustion engine car anymore.

However, data on new car sales doesn’t tell us about the distribution of cars on the road. There is a lag between sales and stocks, because people can hold on to their existing petrol and diesel cars for as much as a decade or more.

But after years of electric cars dominating the market, one-third of cars in use in Norway are now electric. The chart shows this growth.

The share was only 12% five years earlier, which shows that this transition can happen relatively quickly.

As the global leader, Norway’s experiences can help to inform other countries on factors like charging networks, grid management, and the impacts of electric car uptake on emissions and air quality.

See how common electric cars are in other countries across the world

Rising yields, falling hunger

A line graph titled "Cereal yields in England and globally" illustrates the yields of wheat and barley over time, measured in tonnes per hectare. The horizontal axis represents the years from 1275 to 2023, while the vertical axis indicates yields ranging from 0 to 8 tonnes per hectare. 

Shown are wheat yields and barley yields in England and the global average.

Today's yields in England are approximately ten times higher than in the 16th century. Globally, yields have increased three-fold in the last six decades. 

The data sources cited at the bottom are "Broadberry et al. (2015), FAO, and others".

The Agricultural Revolution — the transition from hunting and gathering to farming — didn’t end hunger. That’s because more food didn’t mean more per person: it meant more people.

The English cleric Thomas Malthus predicted this would continue forever: food production would always be outpaced by population growth, making lasting progress against hunger impossible.

But at least since the mid-20th century, England has left mass hunger behind. How was this possible? How did English farmers prove Malthus wrong?

The chart shows one central part of the answer. For centuries, cereal yields in England — for staples like wheat and barley — were stuck at about 0.6 tonnes per hectare. That means farmers needed a plot of 100 meters by 100 meters to grow 600 kilograms of cereals per year. Hunger was widespread.

But this changed from the 17th century onward, accelerating a hundred years ago. In a dramatic transformation known as the Second Agricultural Revolution, farmers found ways to grow much more food on the same land.

Today, after four centuries of rising productivity, English farmers are growing about ten times more food on the same land than in the past. This has made it possible to increase food production faster than population growth, breaking England out of the “Malthusian Trap”.

The chart also shows that the world as a whole is changing in the same direction. Global average yields have tripled in the last six decades. Today, yields are already about five times higher than in England in the past. If yields continue to follow this trajectory, it would bring us much closer to the end of global hunger, while also sparing land for nature.

My colleague Hannah Ritchie wrote about how climate change might affect crop yields in the future

Every year, 230,000 children are spared from HIV thanks to treatments that reduce mother-to-child transmission

A line graph illustrates the trend of new HIV infections in children from 1990 to 2023. The vertical axis represents the number of new HIV cases, ranging from 0 to 600,000. The horizontal axis represents the years, spanning from 1990 to 2023.

In 2000, the peak shows 530,000 new HIV cases in children. A highlighted area, labeled "New infections averted due to PMTCT," indicates the number of cases prevented each year, demonstrating a gradual decrease in infections since then. The lowest section of the graph, colored in dark purple, represents the actual new HIV infections in children, while the upper section reflects infections prevented through prevention methods. An annotation notes that 230,000 cases are prevented each year due to these treatments.

The data source is the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, referencing 2024, with a copyright attribution of CC BY.

It’s hard to imagine many things that are more terrifying than your baby contracting HIV. This is the reality for around 130,000 families every year.

Just a few decades ago, this figure was over half a million. Most of these infections were passed on from mothers who had HIV themselves.

But the introduction of anti-retroviral (ART) drugs and other interventions has meant that most infections can be prevented. If the mother takes ART during pregnancy, it dramatically reduces the risk of passing on HIV. In some cases, giving ART to the baby in the first few weeks of life can help too.

In the chart, you can see this decline in new HIV infections in children. On top, you can see the huge number of cases estimated to have been averted thanks to these interventions; they amount to almost a quarter of a million cases every year.

Explore more of our work on HIV/AIDS in adults and children

Trade’s share of China’s economy is far below its 2006 peak — but still much higher than in the 1970–80s

The graph illustrates the trend of trade as a percentage of GDP for China, the United States, and Germany from 1970 to 2023. 

China's trade as a share of GDP, represented by a thick brown line, starts at around 5% in 1970, increases steadily to approximately 64% around 2010, and then declines to 37% by 2023. 

In contrast, the United States, shown with a thin gray line, exhibits a more stable trend, beginning below 20% in 1970 and rising slightly to around 30% in 2023. 

Germany's trade as a share of GDP follows a varying path, starting near 45% in 1970, climbing to nearly 80% by 2023, and showing notable fluctuations throughout. 

Key data sources for this information include the World Bank and OECD, with a projected update scheduled for 2025. The visualization is licensed under CC BY.

Global trade has never been a bigger slice of the world economy. However, China, the country that most people think of as the export giant, has seen a decline in its trade-to-GDP ratio in the last 15 years.

The chart shows China’s trade in goods and services as a share of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP). In 1970, it was just 5%. Following Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms, which opened China to market forces and international trade, this figure soared to 64% in 2006. But since then, it has fallen considerably, reaching 37% in 2023 — still far higher than before the 1990s. China's exports have grown in dollar terms, but its economy has expanded even faster, making trade a shrinking share of the whole.

While the 2008 financial crisis disrupted global trade, China’s trajectory also reflects the increase in domestic demand for its products. The decline in the trade-to-GDP ratio since 2006 reflects a shift from export-led growth toward domestic consumption, not a return to pre-reform levels. For years, Chinese officials have advocated rebalancing the economy away from export dependence and toward one driven by domestic consumption. A rising middle class now buys more of what China produces, reducing its reliance on international markets.

Explore more data on our Trade and Globalization page

Extreme poverty has not declined in these four Southern African countries

Chart showing that in Zambia, Malawi, Mozambique, and Madagascar, the majority of people live in extreme poverty and poverty has not declined in the last decades.

Globally, the share of the population living in extreme poverty has declined fast, from 38% in 1990 to 9% in 2024.

Some countries, however, have not made any progress against poverty. Four of them are in Southeast Africa, as shown in the chart. In Zambia, Malawi, Mozambique, and Madagascar, most people still live in extreme poverty, and this hasn’t changed in decades.

Poverty has remained high because these economies have not achieved economic growth in recent decades.

In the 1990s, most extremely poor people lived in countries that went on to have strong economic growth. Today, however, a substantial share of the poorest people live in economies that have not grown in decades. Based on current trends, this means that the world cannot expect an end to extreme poverty.

Whether or not the economies that are home to the poorest people in the world start to grow will determine whether the world ends extreme poverty.

I’ve written more about this in “The history of the end of poverty has just begun”, where I explain why economic growth is key to ending poverty →

12345

Get Data Insights delivered to your inbox

Receive an email from us when we publish a Data Insight (every few days).

By subscribing you are agreeing to the terms of our privacy policy.