About
The New About Page!
299 Comments
leave one →
| Rppbell on The UK is losing the industry… | |
| Gamecock on CfD Subsidies Hit Record High… | |
| It doesn't add up... on CfD Subsidies Hit Record High… | |
| It doesn't add up... on CfD Subsidies Hit Record High… | |
| auto on CfD Subsidies Hit Record High… | |
| Phoenix44 on CfD Subsidies Hit Record High… | |
| 2hmp on Conservative Environment Netwo… | |
| Iain Reid on Conservative Environment Netwo… | |
| auto on CfD Subsidies Hit Record High… | |
| Nigel Sherratt on Electricity Generating Costs |
Not seeing anything?
you wont … it’s not that sort of “about”. The old page was one where comments could be made that weren’t about articles on the main page. And this is what is was filled with .. many years worth. And unfortunately in chronological order with latest at the bottom. My old laptop couldnt cope. I used to occasionally comments and links to interesting media items although usually ignored.
unless of course my interpretation is wrong
Testing the new page:
https://takeaction.cpre.org.uk/page/email?mid=0e9626468bc649699dd17183250e3d8b
“MPs will soon have the chance to vote on the Sunshine Bill, requiring all new homes to be fitted with solar panels.”
I think developers will have something to say about that!
It works but the link does not!!!!
? If you mean the CPRE link, it did. Whilst I have your attention, pleased consider swapping the order of comments so that we see newest first, as was the case earlier.
Thanks,
Ian
Wednesday funny:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/net-zero/labour-council-doubles-parking-permits-for-ev-drivers/
“But Councillor Mike Eddy, a Green Party member for Deal and Walmer Town Councils, said the decision to increase the cost to EV owners “makes no sense whatsoever”….“I unfortunately don’t have an electric vehicle, …””
I do not have an electric vehicle, fortunately!
Two articles on the consequences of bad weather and energy policy:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/01/08/weather-warnings-snow-disruption/
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/jan/08/two-power-station-owners-to-get-more-than-12m-for-three-hours-of-electricity
Neither of them bothers to really say why the prices are so high or to note that ALL suppliers get the same price or that it’s direct consequence of energy policy and Ed’s fault (not that the nasty Tories made any changes).
A plea, please Paul – Please set this page to show “latest first” for ease of use.
I’ve just read the inevitable bilge by the BBC on the fires in Los Angeles where they are blaming it on climate change. They drone on about how climate change has caused the drought that has contributed to the fires and then, unbelievably, say
“California has experienced a decades-long drought that ended just two years ago. The resulting wet conditions since then have seen the rapid growth of shrubs and trees, the perfect fuel for fires.”
To top it off the very last sentence of the article admits:
“That said, it is too early to say to what degree climate change has made these specific fires more extreme. This will need to be evaluated in a more detailed attribution analysis.”
i.e. when they have tweaked the computer models to come up with the right answers.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0ewe4p9128o
Michael “Hockey Stick” Mann Ordered To Pay National Review Over $500,000
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/01/12/michael-hockey-stick-mann-ordered-to-pay-national-review-over-500000/
From the Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/14/keir-starmer-ai-labour-green-energy-promise
“[M]inisters need to be honest about the tradeoff involved in focusing on AI to solve growth concerns. “Prioritising AI growth zones does imply a deprioritisation of something else, such as electrifying heavy industry or housebuilding,””
“Starmer’s announcement included plans for a new AI energy council …. The council plans to accelerate investment in low-carbon energy sources for datacentres, including renewables and small nuclear reactors.“
Rolls Royce may have a future after all.
Another one from the Guardian, this one hilarious:
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/jan/14/private-school-run-in-south-london-linked-to-27-per-cent-rise-in-air-pollution
“We’d like to see more safe, convenient and sustainable travel choices for families, these include parent-free travel options like primary-age school buses as well as much safer cycling routes”.
Guess which demographic is the least likely to indulge the government and use “active travel”?
Banning all private schools could be a double hit for Labour – saving the planet and winning the class war. Mind you, I live close to one of the better primary schools in our area and the school run vehicles have to be seen to be believed – all the big SUVs, including a Bentley Bentayga.
Car carrier catches fire outside Oxford Mini Plant:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cn0yxwgndngo
A spokesperson for Mini told us (This is Oxfordshire) “We can confirm that there was a small fire in the cab of a logistics car carrier at the Oxford plant earlier today.
Hmm – looks more like ‘on’ the cab to me. I wonder if it was an electric mini?
This is well worth watching.
The backdrop is what we generally already know, and discusses what happened on 10th January. It is very well presented.
UnHerd’s Freddie Sayers meets Kathryn Porter.
From the results of the AA August 2024 Driver’s poll.
We asked respondents to think about their next car purchase and which fuel type they think, they will be most likely to purchase next. Almost a third (31%) think they will likely buy a petrol vehicle (31%). Over a quarter said they are likely to buy a hybrid vehicle and 13% are likely to buy a diesel vehicle. The proportion of respondents indicating their next car would be an electric vehicle was (7%).
Found just the CPD course for you!
https://tcij.org/scheduled-training/climate-investigations-course/?utm_medium=email
Moss Landing power plant was converted from a natural gas power plant to battery storage. It caught fire yesterday and is still burning.
https://www.ksbw.com/article/fire-moss-landing-battery-plant-hazmat-california/63448902
Hmm. I’m getting “Sorry, this content is not available in your region.” when following the link.
try this
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14295791/fire-moss-landing-California-evacuations.html
Is it my suspicious mind Paul, or are the comments on this Met Office scaremongering produced by bots, human or AI based?
it’s something I’ve observed over the last year, whenever there’s a ‘sensational’ weather event, caused of course by ‘climate change’.
See what you think https://youtu.be/0uik9bShm8E?si=UEFUVklSvw4OVKpD
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/01/21/ed-miliband-warns-trump-that-net-zero-is-unstoppable/
“Meanwhile, Mr Miliband used his committee hearing to once again reiterate the importance of Britain’s shift to net zero.
“He said: “In the last few years, every family, every business in this country, has seen their energy bills rocket after Russia invaded Ukraine.
““This has taught us something really important about the dangers of our dependence on fossil fuel markets controlled by Petro states and dictators.
““The reality is that Britain is at the mercy of the rollercoaster [nature] of these markets, not just in power, but when it comes to how we heat our homes, fuel our transport and power our industry.
““That is why we are moving to clean energy because it’s the right choice for energy security.””
Tell a lie often enough …
Solar and Wind effectively contributing 0 to the grid right now (Wednesday 11:30)
https://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/
https://patch.com/florida/across-fl/s/j46sk/record-10-inches-of-snow-falls-in-fl-power-outages-soar?utm_source=alert-breakingnews
Thought you might enjoy a local news report of some Climate Change in northern Florida. Not only do they have no snow removal equipment you couldn’t find a snow shovel in this entire state.
I live about 100 miles further south of the panhandle and all we got is cold weather. It’s been cold (50-60 deg F) nearly every day for a couple of weeks now. Very unusual for us. I’ve had a call in to Al Gore for a week now but no answer….. Global Warming where are you.
Wind power collapses to less than 1pc of UK electricity
Calm weather leaves Britain highly reliant on ageing fleet of gas-fired power stations
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/01/22/wind-power-collapses-less-1pc-uk-energy
Who would’ve guessed it would happen in January?
After Heathrow III, another dilemma for Ed:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/jan/22/burning-wood-for-power-not-necessary-for-uks-energy-goals-analysis-finds
We don’t need it anyway, according to the greens:
“Losing that would leave a big gap in the government’s plans to decarbonise the power sector by 2030.
“However, research seen by the Guardian shows that the shortfall can be made up and that bill-payers would benefit. The thinktank E3G and the analyst company Baringa Partners found that expanding offshore wind, encouraging consumers to use electricity at quiet times through smart metering and regulating gas-fired power plants to stop them profiteering would produce savings to consumers and enable the target to be met.”
Ticks all the boxes, dunnit?
Trump has got one thing right, but for the wrong reasons. (He is not playing the notes in the right order!). He has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement (explanation at end of this post).
The Establishment Groupthink view is that Global Warming is caused by the ‘greenhouse effect’ which is the trapping of heat by carbon dioxide molecules in the atmosphere which is alleged to have been increased by the use of fossil fuels during the last 100 years or so since the start of the industrial era. Many countries signed up to the Paris Agreement to reduce greenhouse gases in the hope of eliminating global warming.
This man-made Global Warming hypothesis was named the “Anthropogenic Global Warming “ hypothesis (AGW) and was arrived at in 1988 when Earth’s average temperature went on rising when the output of the Sun was stable or even falling, and no other explanation presented itself. Such has been the Groupthink since then that no discussion of any alternative explanation has been allowed, despite much recent research findings.
But, carbon dioxide concentrations continue to rise, while average Earth temperatures are stable or even starting to fall as we move into a Grand Solar Minimum as predicted by some scientists, It will be interesting to see how the proponents of AGW explain this.
A Grand Solar Minimum is due to a cyclical fluctuation in solar output that happens roughly every 400-450 years. Current predictions suggest we are entering a Grand Solar Minimum that will last between about 2030 and 2050. In the Maunder Minimum of 1645-1715 the Thames froze in most winters. If you want to know more, read my paper “Climate Lessons from the Covid Inquiry”
( https://mvteal.co.uk/…/10/COVID-Lessons-neutral-V04.pdf ).
+++
The Paris Agreement is a legally binding treaty that aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit global temperature rise. It was adopted in 2015 at the United Nations climate change conference in Paris.
Goals
• Limit global temperature rise to 2°C above pre-industrial levels,with an aspiration to keep temperatures below 1.5°C
• Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to reach carbon neutrality by mid-century
• Help developing countries adapt to climate change
Implementation
• It provides a framework for monitoring and reporting countries’ climate goals
• It calls on countries to strengthen their commitments over time
• The agreement has encouraged countries to set carbon neutrality goals
• It has helped countries shift towards a net-zero emissions world
Originally the goals were set to achieve about 90% reduction by 2090, but after the production of the IPCC report AR6, the Secretary General of the UN, Antonio Guterres, announced a “code red for humanity” and demanded that the target should be advanced to 100% by 2050.
There is no scientific justification of the 2°C or 1.5°C targets, and certainly none for the advance to 2050. They are all political targets.
Link in my post did not copy correctly it should be
https://mvteal.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/COVID-Lessons-neutral-V04.pdf
Link in my post did not copy correctly it should be
https://mvteal.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/COVID-Lessons-neutral-V04.pdf
AE-P is at it again:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/01/24/when-it-comes-to-energy-donald-trump-is-chinas-useful-idiot/
Commenters (as usual) aren’t convinced.
It looks as if the “Ban the Bomb” mob will finally get their win:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/01/24/miliband-throw-away-gold-mine-burying-nuclear-waste/
There were many comments in sections of the (non-mainstream) media earlier this week when the weather was calm about how little of our electricity was being generated by wind. As little as 0.1% of demand at some points. I thought I’d check the figures for yesterday lunchtime when Storm Eowyn was doing its worst. Wind was only delivering 32% of demand, gas 23% and bizarrely 17% of demand was being met by imported electricity through the inter-connectors. So even when the wind is blowing hard we are having to import electricity. Absolutely crazy.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/01/25/electric-special-forces-jeep-will-sneak-behind-enemy-lines/
“… hoping it will be able to sneak behind enemy lines without detection because of its reduced noise and thermal masking.”
Until it catches fire!
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/full-list-of-uk-seaside-towns-predicted-to-be-underwater-in-25-years/ar-AA1xR9ST?ocid=winp2fptaskbar&cvid=74e3f4990cb34bf8959eb7f5b16f2b38&ei=25#
No link to a calculation or other information on what the predicted rise is, of course.
“Small island nations like Tuvalu – one of the lowest countries in the world – and Maldives have long been raising the alarm …” I wonder if their new airports are like the one on Madeira – on stilts.
https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.MWg_FY13bNT6yZaY2jawgwHaFj%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=07a027f5e33e7a007fa0af8e3b43c7f67361bed65515886dfe77e243d1ce1e58&ipo=images
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/jan/25/the-oil-crisis-fuelled-by-russias-war-is-evaporating-and-so-are-the-profits
“But as markets have reduced to a simmer, oil executives have warned that profits are also going off the boil. A glut of new oil and gas projects, stoked by a pro-fossil-fuel agenda from the White House, could mean weaker markets in the future too.”
That would make renewables look even more expensive, surely?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/28/climate-triple-whammy-boosted-risk-of-la-fires-study-shows
That’s you told, Paul!
AE_P at it again:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/01/31/right-wing-wokeism-green-tech-global-energy-war/
“More than $2 trillion (£1.6 trillion) a year now goes into renewable capex, and just $1 trillion into the last hurrah of the hydrocarbon industry. That has little to do with climate policy. The money is chasing profit.”
For “profit” read “subsidy”?
Safety of Lithium-ion Batteries Campaign
That e bikes and e scooters and the Lithium-ion batteries used to propel them are subject to independent testing before being marketed. Currently this is not the case.
That regulation are made to ensure the safe disposal of the batteries. Currently this is not the case resulting in fires in bin lorries and waste disposal sites.
That charging kits and conversion kits used on the bikes are also safe. Currently regulations do not cover this.
That online marketplaces through which many goods are sold nowadays are subject to the same safety regulations as high street shops. Currently this is not the case.
https://www.electricalsafetyfirst.org.uk/battery-breakdown/battery-safety-campaign
The same concern, magnified, applies to grid-scale batteries and EV charging stations. My council is about to spend £1.1m on improving drainage at four recycling sites because: “[The]sites do not currently comply with their environmental permits due to a lack of adequate drainage and the means to contain fire water at each site.” There don’t appear to be any equivalent rules about battery installations. FOIA question on the way.
The “Nudge Unit” at work via car manufacturers? I’ve recently ordered a new car from a well known German company. This was despite a delivery estimate of 6-7 months. Latest information? It’ll be here in less than 2 months. Was I being “nudged” into switching to an EV (which the dealer said weren’t selling)?
Correction – Silly me – 4 months, not 2, but the principle is the same?
More hysteria:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/feb/04/climate-change-target-of-2c-is-dead-says-renowned-climate-scientist
James Hansen, no less.
“A new analysis by Hansen and colleagues concludes that both the impact of recent cuts in sun-blocking shipping pollution, which has raised temperatures [surely good news?], and the sensitivity of the climate to increasing fossil fuels emissions are greater than thought.” [I thought CO2 was reaching saturation? Where’s the proof of that?]
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/06/expanding-heathrow-put-london-greater-risk-plane-crashes/
Lord Bamford should stick to building diggers. I don’t think he’s accounted for the stacking and increased time over urban areas due to runway congestion. Wouldn’t a third runway address that?
Just checked – top comment (my bold):
“Adding SPARE runway capacity reduces the risk as it will take pressure off the ATC system to shift huge volumes of traffic off just 2 runways. My last role in NATS was investigating ATC incidents on the Heathrow approaches. All of the 25 incidents I investigated were ultimately caused by traffic pressure on the controllers to get the aircraft as tightly spaced as possible.
“Spare runway capacity is not waste – it is an essential part of the ATC safety infrastructure and operating without it is utter folly. This is why all the other major airports around the world have many more runways.”
This article is chock full of contradictions:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/08/battery-powered-britain-race-prevent-net-zero-blackouts/
The people at the DT don’t seem oy talk to each other:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/08/miliband-full-scale-retreat-good-for-britain/
The bottles that SHOULD be taxed, and heavily, are those containing WATER! You can’t have missed the heaving supermarket shelves full of this luxury, entirely unnecessary product.
It’d be interesting to check out the political views of those purchasing them. It’s a safe bet that there’s a strong correlation with fears about climate change and pollution.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/10/miliband-hand-2bn-subsidies-wood-burning-power-station-drax/
“The company is being guaranteed an electricity price of £113 per megawatt hour under the contract for difference (CfD) regime, in 2012 prices. This is about £156 per megawatt hour when adjusted for inflation.”
“Analysis from Baringa indicated that the agreement would result in a reduction in electricity system costs of between £1.6bn and £3.1bn, compared with if new gas-fired power plants had been built.”
Apples and oranges?
Lateral thinking – there’s a piece in the DS:
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/02/11/the-devastating-ecological-carnage-wrought-by-wind-turbines/
There’s also a requirement in the National Planning Policy that says:
“The NPPF includes a requirement for new developments to deliver at least a 10% net gain in biodiversity. This means that when land is developed, the biodiversity of the area must be improved rather than diminished.”
Surely, then, all (onshore at least) planning applications for turbines should be rejected? I wonder what RSPB and CPRE think.
Lateral thinking – there’s a piece in the DS:
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/02/11/the-devastating-ecological-carnage-wrought-by-wind-turbines/
There’s also a requirement in the National Planning Policy that says:
“The NPPF includes a requirement for new developments to deliver at least a 10% net gain in biodiversity. This means that when land is developed, the biodiversity of the area must be improved rather than diminished.”
Surely, then, all (onshore at least) planning applications for turbines should be rejected? I wonder what RSPB and CPRE think.
How do I log back into your site. Homepage, WordPress?
Giant gas field discovery could power Britain for a decade
Exploiting the find could add up to £112bn to GDP and create tens of thousands of jobs
A giant gas field has been discovered under Lincolnshire that could fuel the UK’s entire needs for a decade, reducing dependence on imports and generating tens of thousands of jobs, an energy company has claimed …
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/13/giant-gas-field-discovery-could-power-britain-for-decade/
Miliband vows to ban fracking permanently after huge UK gas field discovered
Energy Secretary’s shunning of shale gas means a decade’s worth of fuel risks staying underground
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/14/miliband-vows-ban-fracking-permanently-huge-gas-discovery
Defence v Net Zero
Defence v Net Zero – we cannot do both
“We had to make difficult choices” is the current government mantra. It matters not whether the plea is for financial relief or more capital for building and maintaining schools and hospitals; reduction of inheritance tax for farmers; pensioners TV licence; energy bills relief; business rates relief; reduction in the NI increase – or numerous other items.
Now we have an almost overwhelming requirement to upgrade our defence budget to meet the developing situation in Ukraine.It is always argued that we do not want to increase taxes, or cut public services or increase the National debt, so Nothing Can Be Done.
The only major expenditure never mentioned in these discussions is Net Zero.
A rather exciting week in politics has concentrated political and media minds on the Ukraine defence issue.
It seems that as a minimum the increase in the defence budget to 2.5% of GDP will have to be accelerated. And if we listen to President Trump it ought to be lifted to 5% of GDP – the level it reached by the end of the Cold War. Depending on the outcome of “negotiations” these levels could be regarded as “existential”.
Net Zero is also classed by Government as “existential” and with almost religious fervour. It must be done urgently to save the planet from “imminent” tipping points. But is this really the case? Debate is suppressed by the zealotry of Ed Milliband and a supine media, especially the BBC.
It is almost self evident that we will have difficulty in affording either of these programmes, so which should have priority?
Well, we can leave the evaluation of the defence budget requirement to Government. After all, Defence of the Realm is probably the most important obligation on Government! On the other hand, Government has already vetoed any serious analysis of Net Zero in two ways:-
▪ In a recent House of Lords debate, Government rejected a request by Lord Frost for a “Blue Team/Red Team” verification of the science behind the costs of Net Zero
▪ Recently, Ed Milliband cancelled a report showing the total Net Zero budget and timeline that had been initiated by his predecessor, Claire Coutinho.
So we have to do the best we can. Fortunately, after the Covid pandemic Government commissioned an Inquiry into the preparedness for a national emergency likely to affect human wellbeing chaired by Baroness Hallett. The first module looking specifically at Preparedness was published a couple of months ago. The conclusions and recommendations map neatly onto the climate issue which could be a national “emergency” likely to affect human wellbeing. I carried out an exercise to see how that might be done and published the results in a report titled “Climate Lessons from the Covid Inquiry”. It recommends applying Baroness Hallett’s recommendations to the climate problem. In particular, it recommends the formation of a “Blue Team/Red Team” approach to verifying the science.
To test the possible outcome of the recommendations, I used the work of an American scientist who carried out a forensic examination of the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) hypothesis (which is the driving force behind Net Zero), and the work of a scientist at a British University who has constructed a mathematically sound alternative to AGW. If both of these studies were to be verified by a properly constituted Red Team, then the conclusions are stark:
▪ The AGW hypothesis has never been properly verified by scientifically sound investigation. Such studies as exist all start with a bias that global warming is a fact caused by human activity
▪ Carbon Dioxide (and other greenhouse gases) are not a significant contributor to global warming
▪ Climate models developed by IPCC are flawed and incapable of “hindcasting” onto known climate events.
▪ The alternative proposal based on astronomical data and solar system geometry is credible and the mathematical processes used are well known. Despite the short run of data available for mathematical analysis, the formulae developed successfully “hindcast” onto known climate effects such as the Maunder minimum, the little ice age, the medieval warm period, and even events as far back as Homeric times.
If these findings were confirmed by a proper Red Team formally appointed by the procedures defined by Baroness Hallett, then the consequences would be:
▪ Immediate review of all uncompleted decarbonisation contracts not yet in force with a view to terminating any do not contribute in the short term to energy security at competitive cost free of subsidy
▪ Immediate review of all renewables subsidies with a view to terminating them
▪ Immediate invitation to bid to provide additional energy (electricity or gas)
▪ Abandonment of all Net Zero targets including stopping internal combustion engine vehicles, except where ulez type zones are required for pollution reasons.
▪ Review of all other existing ulez type zones
▪ Abandonment of subsidised creation of a hydrogen industry
▪ Total abandonment of the CCUS programme
▪ Withdrawal from the Paris agreement
▪ Review of overseas aid where it is specifically directed at climate change
▪ Consideration of recent budget measures with a view to relieving some of the acknowledged pressure points
Taken together these measure would release large sums of government money measured in tens or possibly hundreds of billions of poundsas well as large amounts of industrial investment associated with Net Zero programmes.
Sadly, it is not all good news. The alternative programme suggests that we are already entering a Grand Solar Minimum that will result in low temperatures and possible food shortages in the period between 2030 and 2042, with the warming trend returning after 2053. [See my report for details]. We will need all the energy resources we can find, including fossil fuels, to meet the expected demand. But we will avoid the urgent need to transform home heating and the transport fleet at pace. All these developments may find their place, but at a pace dictated by the market. Not by an imagined climate crisis.
In short, the climate IS changing, but the change is driven by astronomical factors beyond human control, not by AGW. There is an underlying slow warming trend caused by changes in the Sun Earth distance, but over the next 30 years or so, cyclical variations in solar output will drive Earth into a cool period that could cause significant difficulties.
All the technical support and links to relevant scientific and other papers are included in my paper “Climate Lessons from the Covid Inquiry” that can be accessed at
https://mvteal.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/COVID-Lessons-neutral-V04.pdf
Interesting discussion on the fate of the car market at Harrys Garage on U-Tube.
“Turmoil as car industry puts new EV plans on hold & moves to PHEV. How did we get in this mess?”
Hi Paul, I’m glad to see ASA have agreed with me in their ruling on an EDF advert (my complaint was actually of the tv version but they lumped them together).
EDF Energy Ltd – ASA | CAP
This is a useful guide to rebuttal of the Green Transition narrative. It is in note form with links to supporting papers
https://judithcurry.com/2025/02/19/unraveling-the-narrative-supporting-a-green-energy-transition/
The Good News:
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/swedish-supreme-court-says-activists-075223591.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAALZgBSOzchyEjNDJ8ye_VpS_1Yhzgzu5wxgxezWOsdGux3rPHIelOBPpVPCKN-XtPcUew-Dh27GFBMeDYFOyB1_Ds10Hr9HBYPylzgL6vmqfHzZcICRkrMB2n74Bm98v_B6jrTTwpYWTFYKc7C6iYnqfJ85Qyv2ghmnMEyCKvjhO
The Not So Good News:
“But the court did not rule out that a climate lawsuit formulated differently could be heard in Sweden, as the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has said groups meeting certain requirements may have the right to sue over climate change.”
congratulations on your work
according to ‘ThundersaidEnergy’ grid battery storage is 6000 times more expensive than storing oil or gas.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/feb/24/britain-net-zero-economy-booming-cbi-green-sector-jobs-energy-security
“The analysis, by the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), found that 22,000 net zero businesses, from renewable energy to green finance, employ almost a million people in full-time jobs. The average annual wage in the businesses – £43,000 – was also £5,600 higher than the national average.”
And how much of that is directly related to taxpayer subsidies?
Haven’t they seen the BP news?
How do you know when a politician’s lying? When his lips move:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/24/mark-carney-fund-snap-up-national-grid-net-zero-assets/
“As well as its move to offload National Grid Renewables in the US, the transmission giant is also selling its UK liquid natural gas asset, Grain LNG.”
What could possibly go wrong (for us)?
“[Carney] has said there is money to be made in the shift to net zero …”
“Chris Wright, the US energy secretary, argued the UK’s rollout of wind farms and solar panels had “not delivered any benefits” but had pushed up electricity prices and made manufacturing unviable.”
Spot the difference!
I’m sure I’ve seen it written elsewhere, but just in case:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/feb/25/tesla-sales-europe-elon-musk-donald-trump-afd
Doesn’t this show that large umbers of people buying this very expensive form of virtue signalling are hypocrites?
Just as Starmer is having to cut foreign aid to finance defence (sob):
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/02/25/nhs-trust-launches-2bn-net-zero-plan-despite-hiring-freeze/
Multiply this across the NHS and it’s sorted anyway.
The DS has caught up with the CBI report scandal;
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/02/26/another-green-blob-gaslighting-report/
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/feb/27/drax-power-plant-owner-reports-highest-earnings-since-pandemic
“Move comes after government said it would halve subsidies that allowed firm to make ‘unacceptably large profits’”
That’s gratitude for you.
This isn’t going to go down well in Ambridge!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/28/labour-backs-release-of-beavers-new-front-against-farmers/
Another attack on the farmers.
Continuing the BBC Radio 4 theme …
This morning’s final episode of The Many Lives of James Lovelock by Jonathan Watts
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m00289vt
Wherein he is described as having recanted on the UEA Climate Gate scandal, which was supposedly created out of nothing and all lies anyway …
Another Nobel prize winner speaks out
Hi Paul,
I thought you might be interested in this and perhaps critique it:
This is climate modeller Peter Stott of the UK Met Office ,as described in an interview today with The Actuary https://www.theactuary.com/2025/03/07/interview-peter-stott-climate-scientist
“A huge advance in the public acceptance of the science has come through the many heatwaves, floods, droughts, hurricanes we’ve experienced,” he says. “At the beginning of my career, in the mid-1990s, this wasn’t the case. We had the charts of global temperature but this didn’t mean a lot to anyone except climate scientists. We didn’t have such frequent extreme weather events.”
Why, with all this science and increased acceptance, is there still a degree of resistance to the idea of human-induced climate change? “In some parts of the world, I accept that there is a polarisation of views, split along political lines – where evidence isn’t relevant,” he notes. As part of his career-long struggle against the climate change deniers, he wrote the 2021 book Hot Air: The Inside Story of the Battle Against Climate Change Denial.
And so on and so forth……
Best wishes,
John Dawson
Should I be worried?
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/06/global-sea-ice-hit-all-time-minimum-in-february-scientists-say
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/05/carbon-can-be-captured-but-it-isnt-worth-the-cost
Good to hear, if for the wrong reasons.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/03/10/people-living-near-new-pylons-250-off-electricity-bills/
No mention of where the money’s coming from, unlike here:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/05/heat-pumps-cost-british-households-more-than-europeans/
Lord Callanan, a minister of energy efficiency in the last Conservative government, said that “one of the biggest barriers to uptake of heat pumps is these artificially high prices electricity because of all the add-ons” from net zero projects. … “They need to start the process of slowly transferring the levies from electricity onto gas.”
“Artificially high prices for electricity”?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/mar/10/uk-coastguard-scrambled-after-reports-of-collision-between-tanker-and-cargo-vessel
Greenpeace concerned about possible pollution, but apparently cool with the consequences of wind farms.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/10/microplastics-hinder-plant-photosynthesis-study-finds-threatening-millions-with-starvation
It seems at odds with the stats on crop yields and increased greening.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/12/loch-ness-hydro-storage-schemes-scotland
They’re still pretending that this type of project gives long duration energy and is only needed because of the unreliability of wind.
More foaming at the mouth from the Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/12/epa-trump-climate-rules
“Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued an extraordinary cavalcade of pollution rule rollbacks on Wednesday, led by the announcement it would potentially scrap a landmark 2009 finding by the US government that planet-heating gases, such carbon dioxide, pose a threat to human health.
“The so-called endangerment finding, which followed a supreme court ruling that the EPA could regulate greenhouse gases, provides the underpinning for all rules aimed at cutting the pollution that scientists have unequivocally found is worsening the climate crisis.”
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/mar/12/labour-climate-plans-anti-green-noise
“Labour knows that anti-net zero feeling hasn’t contributed to its fall in the polls; but disappointment about unambitious environmental policies has.”
And Port Talbot, Scunthorpe, Redcar and Grangemouth are imaginary.
Climate Change? Global Warming? Global Boiling? NO! Climate Whiplash!
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/12/global-weirding-climate-whiplash-hitting-worlds-biggest-cities-study-reveals
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/13/decades-after-peregrines-came-back-from-the-brink-a-new-threat-emerges-aoe
“Curiously, the peregrine’s plight in North America seems most pronounced along the coasts….
“Peregrine nests in inland Washington state, near the Cascade mountains, seem stable, Anderson says, while those on the nearby San Juan Islands are struggling.
“It is interesting that coastal populations are showing impact while those in the middle of the continent, so far, do not,”
Not a single mention of the impact of wind farms. May be a coincidence, but …
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/15/electric-cars-so-heavy-can-smash-through-motorway-barriers/
This reads like the transport equivalent of the climate scam – “send more money”. Not a single mention of the fact that barriers are designed to cope with 44tonne HGVs. However:
“The UK’s transition to electric vehicles is accelerating, with a legally binding target to phase out new petrol and diesel vehicles sales by 2030.
“While this shift is a vital step towards reducing emissions and combating climate change, it introduces a critical and largely overlooked issue: whether our existing vehicle restraint systems are capable of safely containing and redirecting heavier, battery-laden vehicles.
“So, if there was a proven accident where the system failed, then the Government and National Highways could be at risk of being sued.”
It’s climate related, so where’s the money?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/03/18/evs-charged-fast-filling-petrol-car-breakthrough/
1MW chargers, what could possibly go wrong? Is there enough copper in the world?
Here’s the Guardian’s take. Surprisingly sensible:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/18/ev-maker-byd-batteries-charge-shares-elon-musk-tesla
Talking of the Guardian, this is where this writer should be. Delusional, and with comments like this:
‘“You can’t blame this on renewables,” said Frank Aaskov from UK Steel.’
There’s no wonder we don’t have a steel industry any more.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/03/20/kemi-badenochs-net-zero-rant-comes-close-political-tragedy/#comment
https://www.thestar.co.uk/business/electric-air-taxi-airports-video-5042077
“The air taxi company says they expect to offer prices “comparable with existing premium ground ridesharing options”.
Really? On what planet, EdMilibandWorld? I wonder how much the machine would cost c/f a conventional taxi. Another rich boy’s (or public sector employee) toy?
Two stories showing the consequences of the rush to ne zero:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/24/households-to-be-saddled-with-shoddy-heat-pumps/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/25/net-zero-electric-vehicle-charge-subsidy-scheme-wave-fraud/
AI is starting to become useful (2nd piece).
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/03/27/bosses-starting-admit-it-net-zero-making-us-poorer/
“In reality, bosses are starting to admit what has been obvious for some time. Net zero is making us poorer – and that means we have to rethink the way we go about reducing carbon emissions.”
“We can all argue about how serious a threat climate change represents and whether the UK really needs to be a world leader in fighting it (or whether it doesn’t really make much difference given that we only account for 1pc of global emissions). But one point is surely abundantly clear. We need to rethink our approach to achieving net zero because the costs are becoming more than the economy can realistically bear.”
But that’s just the point. Still asking “HOW?” instead of “WHY?”.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/29/uk-net-zero-tsar-i-understand-why-people-are-angry/
Welcome to the church of St Carbon:
First, the vicar: “Pinchbeck thrived at Stroud High School and went on to read Classics and English at Corpus Christi College, Oxford, the first in her family to go to university. Her first job was in finance in London.”
“The key global swing factor,” she says “is how fast China can build factories to make solar PV panels so it can turn off its coal-powered stations.”
Amen.
Meanwhile, on the coast, a funeral service for the fishing industry:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/03/28/british-maritime-sector-impacted-miliband-net-zero-targets/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/03/30/labour-set-to-align-britain-with-eu-net-zero-laws/
Elsewhere in this paper experts are bemoaning the impact of RfA’s damage to the economy. This is TTK’s contribution?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/03/30/sir-dave-lewis-xlinks-green-energy-project-morocco/
About as practical as electric airliners. Why aren’t Spain or France, literally next door, interested?
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/03/30/fury-as-labour-mp-in-british-city-piled-high-with-rubbish-requests-new-airport-in-pakistan/]
“He said on X: “There has been a long-standing promise for an international airport in Mirpur, which has yet to be met.
“This causes significant issues to a number of my constituents, who are having to drive over three hours to get to the nearest airport in Pakistan.”
Doesn’t he realise that air travel is going out of fashion anyway? Wy hasn’t Ed jumped on him?
https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/04/03/largest-ever-uk-pumped-hydro-scheme-granted-consent/
Anybody got any money down the back of the sofa?
Since Gilkes is a UK company, it would be nice to think the machines were UK-made, along with the steel for the pipework. 22hrs full pelt is somewhat impressive but not much good in a wind drought?
But the article indicates it’s 50 years since any pumped hydro was constructed in the UK … so the supply chain will have to be established.
But with UK energy prices at silly levels, who will build a factory [or convert one] here – without slatherings of tax-payer [and bill-payer] money absolutely cast-iron guaranteed?
It will, therefore be interesting to see if Gilkes buys much in the UK – even the hardhats will probably be cheaper from China. Sadly.
Auto
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/04/04/how-net-zero-is-fuelling-the-comeback-of-propeller-planes/
Fuel cell powered, hydrogen storage at -250degC, what could possible go wrong? So many qualifications, I can’t see it ever taking off.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/04/07/giant-floating-wind-farms-to-be-moored-off-south-west-coast/
“… mounted on individual floating platforms as big as a football pitch.”
That won’t be cheap!
And, analogous to ships, may need a dry-docking every five years – for condition assessment and necessary repair. Possibly a ten year interval to start with [if well-built].
But where will these platforms go to dry-dock? Does the UK have the capacity to dock these – several simultaneously …
And repairs may need imported steel [unless Sir Starmer goes into the steel business today, buying out the Chinese [or confiscating the British Steel @ Scunthorpe …].
Auto
And all for what? An entirely unnecessary use of resources.
Here’s new one from an old favourite – “CLIMATE REPAIR!”
This time t=with the link (an edit option would be much appreciated):
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/apr/07/climate-solutions-extreme-options
It’s worse then we thought – again!
“Scotland experiencing hottest day of the year so far”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2wwwl73reo
Not just the UK “experiencing hottest day of the year so far” – now it is a part. Coming soon – before summer, I guess – “Kent [or Lancashire, or Argyllshire] experiencing hottest day of the year so far”.
Then Derby – or Preston or Chipping Sodbury – experiencing the hottest …
Then Station Approach [but not Main Road], Little Glossop experiencing …
Be afraid – be very afraid – we have never had anything like this – er, since last year [but whisper that last bit]!
It’s completely unprecedented [since the depths of the winter just gone].
All very sad.
Auto
Batteries. Supposedly the saviour of ‘Wind n Sun’ unreliables.
Yet very expensive, and not without problems – even if taxpayers are obliged to afford them …
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/scottish-news/14624984/batteries-rot-exploding-horror-kilwinning-blaze/
The recycling outfit went bust.
And nobody removed [to a place of safety?] the ‘unrecycled’ batteries it appears. Whose duty was that?
Happily, nobody seems to have been hurt. This time.
Auto
So, the UK’s national finances are in a mess – as a nation, we MUST pay north of £100,000 million, each year, in interest payments [not paying a penny off the outstanding debt, note].
One reason [there probably are many] is the green nonsense – here is one example: –
Council to spend £10m to decarbonise buildings [Oxfordshire]
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjdxz003rmzo
Also being spent – a grant from Westminster of £360,000.
And this will save 333 tonnes of plant food [CO2]. This week? This year? this century? The council doesn’t know, or the BBC [them!] doesn’t care or won’t say.
Now, ‘some’ of the works ‘would need doing, even without decarbonisation’ … “In addition, a reactive only maintenance approach has left much of the council’s estate in very poor-quality condition, with many components past their expected working life and in need of replacement irrespective of the carbon neutrality target.”
Appalling management, then. But we’ve suckered London – and our ratepayers – for millions.
And China is still burning 13,000,000 tonnes of coal every day.
Auto
Paul, have you seen this https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/local-news/nine-factory-new-cars-worth-10106004
Government spaffing our money (and a BBC team credulously boosting it) on a ‘new’ carbon capture adventure.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cr788kljlklo
I understand the University taking grant money. It is what they have to do. But the Government (and Civil Service) – surely – need to think about the places they spaff taxpayers’ money.
This particular adventure threatens the entire marine ecosystem, they say, by changing the amount of dissolved CO2 in the water; may need much of the oceans to be covered in solar panels (storms at sea may affect their lifespan), and need to pump 1% of the water in the oceans (a year?, didn’t say … ): that’s about five million cubic kilometres a year.
Oh wow!
Do note the use of ‘consensus’ and ‘believe’ early in the piece.
and making the seawater more acidic… (and then more alkaline); it is unclear where the chemicals (and permits!) to do this will come from …and the charred cocoanut husks – there’ll be no room in the tropics for solar panels if this is scaled up!!
Quote – “Removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere is essential in helping us achieve net zero,” says energy minister Kerry McCarthy. End quote.
But Nut Zero is itself wholly unnecessary!
Auto.
Here are two papers on how Space Weather affects the Earth’s Climate.
h/t Space Weather News
How the Magnetic North Pole and Energetic Particle Precipitation Control Earth’s Climate
https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/8942/
Atmospheric Turbulence Triggered by Events 20,000 km Up
https://physics.aps.org/articles/v18/81
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/04/20/british-flying-taxi-pioneer-cash-crunch-bailout/
who’da thought it?
Isn’t Miliband dim enough already?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/04/22/experiments-to-dim-the-sun-get-green-light/
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/apr/23/coral-reef-bleaching-worst-global-event-on-record
I wonder what Peter Ridd thinks.
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/04/23/net-zero-plan-to-blot-out-sun-using-50-million-of-taxpayer-money-set-to-be-approved/
This is a more detailed account. Time to start stocking up on Vitamin D?
Jo Nova having problems …
“This page isn’t working”
Unclear what the problem is … problems a few days ago, too.
Auto
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/04/23/global-warming-is-mostly-caused-by-the-sun-not-humans-says-astrophysics-professor/
Just imagine if governments decided they ought to check this out before committing £trillions to stuff that won’t work.
It looks like there’s been a massive grid outage in Spain & Portugal with 60% solar generation possibly to blame. Hopefully a wakeup call for the nutters in charge here.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/apr/29/nationalise-gas-power-plants-to-boost-energy-security-thinktank-urges-uk-ministers
“Nationalise gas power plants to boost energy security, thinktank urges UK ministers”
‘Common Wealth’ – which seems to be a Redistributive Arm of the CCP – thinks nationalising gas power station [and everything else, perhaps] magically abolishes the laws of physics – but no wind means some other power source is needed unless we do an ‘Iberia’.
And to have that source present, manned, fuelled and maintained – 24/7/365, as we don’t know when unreliables will let us down – costs money, usually rather a lot of money to keep it handy for the ‘rainy day’ when a dunkelflaute comes to town.
Auto
The below image (if fit works!) is a snapshot of the grid at 8:30 this morning.
https://www.mediafire.com/file/icjfaqjqwczlmn0/Energy+Mix.jpg/file
When Paul follows up on “Why Are UK Electricity Prices So High? (Part 1)”, could it include information on how the price of £103.63/MWh is established and what it looks like in the accounts of typical users, taking into account CfD, etc?
Here’s a fun one!
Guido says that EV chargers in the parliamentary estate are being shut down for healthy and safety reasons after a chat with the Fire Safety team!!!
https://order-order.com/2025/04/30/parliament-scraps-electric-car-charging-points/
CK
You cannot make it up! 🙂
“Carbon bombs” – latest buzzword from the Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/may/01/uk-banks-put-75bn-into-firms-building-climate-wrecking-carbon-bombs-study-finds
Another great idea from the Ed Miliband Ideas Factory:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2051520/ed-miliband-solar-panels-energy
I think, if they HAVE to be used, I’d rather see them on canopies in supermarket car parks than in fields, but the cost would surely be a lot higher as the space above the parking area would have to be roofed.
Another great idea from the Ed Miliband Ideas Factory:
https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/2051520/ed-miliband-solar-panels-energy
I think, if they HAVE to be used, I’d rather see them on canopies in supermarket car parks than in fields, but the cost would surely be a lot higher as the space above the parking area would have to be roofed.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg414w9xx91o
“The choppy waters between North Sea oil and green energy revolution”
Douglas Fraser Business and economy editor, Scotland – who has a BA in politics and economics.
Usual BBC drift –
“An alternative outcome from REMA would be an evolved system with several reforms:
“And reform of those Contracts for Difference to align them with the changes the power system needs, and not merely with lower prices for consumers.”
“Technical and economic fixes to balance the power grid when the wind doesn’t blow, and reduce the dependence on back-up gas plants
“Opening up access to smaller generators, in solar, for instance: improving price transparency
So – Higher prices; unobtanium to the rescue; and looking down the back of the sofa to see if there is a few watts of power there – or anywhere – to try to keep the grid live until election day …
All very depressing – unless you’re a Russian Mass-murderer, of a Chinese demigod intent on exporting a system tht doesn’t work to these shores.
Auto
No option for ‘feedback’ to the BBC on this – important – subject.
Odd, that!
Auto
This is a ‘you can’t make it up’ report:
https://www.offshorewind.biz/2025/05/09/crown-estate-confirms-capacity-boost-at-seven-existing-offshore-wind-farms/
All in the UK.
niw, Crown Estates consider (at least publicly) that this is on the National Interest. After all “up to”lots of dwell8ng may get power from this extension, if it is just windy enough.
It sems “up to” does a lot of heavy lifting in Unreliables World.
And Crown Estates, presumably, will get extra money for the permitted extra capacity (their sea bed, is it not?) and pethaps also for the extra powrr generated when the wind is right (although the wind is free – no?).
But it’s okay. Poisoner Putin doesn’t know where these subsidy farms are, so he won’t cut them off …
Auto
I note:
She was on again this morning, similar theme. Talk unusually incurious. I’ve emailed them suggesting they have a look at her past life before she comes on again, but she may be worth more to them knocking TTK than that.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79ezrvd9neo
“Climate experts criticise handling of Tata changes”
Note, the BBC didn’t use ‘experts’ – so they obviously think Emma Pinchbeck – MA [Oxford] (2011) and 2 years at the WWF as ‘Head of Climate and Energy’ – is an expert.
The usual litany in the article linked of ‘could be’, ‘may be’ and ‘should have’ –
“The UK government should have taken steps to make industrial electricity prices more competitive, and convened “early and collaborative” negotiations between plant owners, workers and the community, the report said.” The report from the CCC is on the disaster of closing Tata’s blast furnace in Port Talbot, exactly as the CCC has wanted, with only a scrap steel recovery electric arc furnace planned for replacement.
All very depressing.
And it might suggest to some that the CCC, at least collectively, cares more about a trace gas than about UK security and economic prosperity.
Misguided – or actively malevolent?
Each will, I guess, have their own take on this.
Auto
It looks like the Chinese Intelligence Services are coming to the help of distraught UK consumers.
Chinese ‘kill switches’ found in US solar farms
Ed Miliband under pressure to pause green energy blitz after hidden components discovered
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/15/chinese-kill-switches-found-in-us-solar-farms/
Yet this hasn’t made the BBC.
Ummm … oddly?
It is our national broadcaster. Acting in OUR interests, is it not?
Auto.
And I know where all the ‘green’ jobs are cpoming from.
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/uk/road-safety-charity-calls-for-10-mph/
The Road Safety Federation wants a 10mph speed limit. The Government – this one, anyway – will agree; in two years time, it’ll be 5 mph – and you’ll need a man with a red flag to walk 50 yards in front.
Voila – millions of ‘green jobs’ – and a healthier nation [all that walking]; and no need for the dole.
Three problems solved at once!
Auto
Jo Nova’s post on the kill switch issue has this image:
Another sob story:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/may/17/swiss-firm-that-captures-carbon-from-air-to-cut-workforce-by-more-than-10
“The only way in which direct air capture can really make sense … is if the rules are so tight that it’s the only option you have left,”
Tagesschau website: Federal Government Plans: How climate-friendly are gas-fired power plants? The German government is planning new gas-fired power plants on a large scale – Economics Minister Reiche is talking about at least 20 gigawatts. How does this fit with Germany’s goal of being climate-neutral by 2045? By J. Kösters and K. Wilhelm.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/21/raise-taxes-or-gas-bills-to-remove-green-levies-miliband/
The insanity continues. Not least in assuming making electricity cheaper by adding surcharges to gas is the same as making ENERGY cheaper.
A useful contribution from JP. Why did a picture of Mad Ed keep intruding as I was reading it?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/22/net-zero-is-a-mental-illness/
Trump Calls on UK to Abandon Wind Power and Revive North Sea Drilling
The U.S. president’s comments come amid rising gas prices and growing tensions over the UK’s net-zero transition.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/trump-calls-on-uk-to-abandon-wind-power-and-revive-north-sea-drilling-5862538
Law of Unintended Consequences?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/24/wind-wars-the-fight-over-the-north-sea-breeze/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz63g95nxxno
“Dry heat to torrential rain – enter the age of ‘weather whiplash'”
Climate ‘scientists’ – desperate to get their picture on the BBC – have dreamt up this new phrase ‘weather whiplash’, in the last few years, to describe ‘weather’, which has been variable since before records began.
The article itself should really be marked as coming from Tendentiousness Central.
Auto
The Aussies have it right:
Another brilliant take by Jo Nova:
https://joannenova.com.au/2025/05/bang-price-bomb-sinks-transmission-lines-plan-b-says-lets-pretend-cars-home-solar-and-batteries-will-save-transition/
Any chance SOMEBODY in this country is watching this?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/27/data-centre-blitz-threatens-labours-net-zero-hopes/
“Council documents show officials asked QTS to consider adding more renewable power or battery storage facilities to its plans, however the developer had “discounted” these as impractical.”
But, good news:
“In making their decision [Planning Committee] members noted that the applicant will be utilising a high number of sustainable practices which will help to mitigate its carbon footprint.”
A bit like the mandatory 10% increase in biodiversity?
Here we go again:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/28/most-woke-roundabout-three-minute-explainer-video/
“The Hertfordshire roundabout has been funded by Active Travel England, the Government’s executive agency for promoting walking, wheeling and cycling.”
According to AI:
“Active Travel England (ATE) had an operational budget of approximately £7.5 million for the 2023–24 financial year, which increased to around £9 million for 2024–25 .
“In addition to its operational budget, ATE oversaw the distribution of significant funding to support cycling and walking initiatives across England. For the 2023–24 and 2024–25 periods, a £101 million investment package was allocated, …”
The people driving this are the usual suspects:
https://chatgpt.com/share/68380e86-29a8-800b-8a40-933e6dd89b86
There has been much question raised about Reform’s claim of how much taxpayers money could be saved by their scrapping the Net Zero project. I believe Nigel Farage suggested £45 billion or upwards and it was claimed this morning it would only be £6 billion. Has anyone got a clear understanding and simply demonstrated case for what are the facts in this matter?
Most of the cost currently falls on electricity bills, so won’t affect taxation.
Going forward the cost will certainly be hundreds of billions, but again most will likely fall on individuals, eg EVs, heat pumps, power prices
The Marvellous Mr. Miliband is to arrange the construction of two Very Expensive Underwater Wires – from ‘Scotland’ to the ‘NE of England’.
These two wires alone [and I have no idea how many the SoS for Energy Security etc. will finally want] have been costed – at 2024 prices – at £6,500,000,000.
Estimates for the final cost of these wires vary, right up to [as PJ O’Rourke had it] ‘as much money as you can shake a stick at, and the stick’.
Now this may not come out of taxation – but will come from the public, in one way ort another, sooner or later.
Auto
These wires have been quite widely reported.
To assume that persons with malevolent intent – possibly from, say, Russia – are utterly ignorant of the wires’ existence and location would be, politely, naive in the extreme.
Auto
There has been much question raised about Reform’s claim of how much taxpayers money could be saved by their scrapping the Net Zero project. I believe Nigel Farage suggested £45 billion or upwards and it was claimed this morning it would only be £6 billion. Has anyone got a clear understanding and simply demonstrated case for what are the facts in this matter?
I have been seeking the answer to these questions for some 3 years. In March 2023 the previous government published a series of papers under the title “Powering up Britian”, Lots of figures, but nowhere is there a cost summary, a timeline of total expenditure. I made a selection of statements lifted from the reports that llustrate the scale of government commitment to AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming and Net Zero).I have no idea how many of these numbers overlap, or are duplicated. It is a classic case of the Sir Humphrey technique that is one degree more than Divide and Rule. It is Confuse and Conquer. So much information is provided that the reader is overwhelmed and does not try to ask what is not included in the report. To take one example, none of the three main reports contain the word “intermittent”, so the civil servants can correctly state that “intermittency of supply from wind and solar does not appear to be a significant issue” because the question was never mentioned in the report. Yet this is the most important question regularly raised by AGW doubters.
Since then there have been many announcements about hydrogen manufacture, carbon capture and storage, grid enhancement to accept intermittency and manage grid stability. Note also that the drive to force the introduction of e-cars and heat pumps will mean we need to double out electricity generation capacity in only a few years.
It is almost impossible to disentangle whether an announcement is a repeat, in whole or as a part of a precious announcement or is something totally new. When she was sec of state at DESNZ, Claire Coutinho commissioned a report to try and solve this problem, but that report has recently been cancelled by Ed Milliband.
Then – along came Kathryn Porter. Indpendent, plainly objective and scientific, always quoting her data sources and their quality, she has recently published her attempt to solve the question. It is titled “the-true-affordability-of-net-zero” and can be found here:
https://watt-logic.com/2025/05/19/new-report-the-true-affordability-of-net-zero/
It is a good place to start. There is also an excellent interview in which she asserts that the expenditure on net zero in recent years has been £290 billion with nil returen and explains many of the current costs. It can be found at
Somewhere on her website there is a paper covering the same ground, with references to the data sources.
My own view is that while Kathryn Porter has become the best source of data on net zero, we need to go further and challenge the net zero hypothesis and the anthropgenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis behind it. I also think that to examone this we should take advantage of the work of the Civid Inquiry headed by Baroness Hallett that unearthed a lot of organisation failures that map exactly on to the climate question. I tried this exercise in a paper titled “Climate Lessons from the Cobid 19 Report” It can be found at:
https://mvteal.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/COVID-Lessons-neutral-V04.pdf
I hope this helps!
Graham Rabbitts
I’ve got a post coming out on Tuesday which covers the £6 billion claim
Also
Kathryn Prrter published a paper describibg a near collapse of the grid a few days ago. When I sent it to a friend his comment was that it read like a script for an exciting documentary, Or as Sir Dieter Helm might say “You couldn’t make it up!”
https://watt-logic.com/2025/05/30/high-wind-and-forecasting-errors-cause-havoc-on-the-gb-grid/
BBC again – https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c23meelzelgo
“Rowing research finds UK seas are warming”
“Data, collected by rowers who circumnavigated Great Britain and analysed by university researchers, has found that sea temperatures have risen. A report by the University of Portsmouth and GB Row Challenge found UK seas were, on average, 0.39C (32.7F) warmer in 2023 compared to 2022. The data was collected by a crew who took part in the 2023 GB Row Challenge which saw participants travel more than 2000 miles (3219 km) around Britain. Professor of environmental pollution at the University of Portsmouth, Fay Couceiro, said: “We expect fluctuations but we don’t want to see this increasing number of marine heatwaves.” Some regions, including the Celtic and Irish Seas and the northern North Sea, experienced temperature increases exceeding 2C (35.6F), during a marine heatwave.”
One year.
I wonder if Professor Fay Couceiro has heard of weather. Or natural variability.
And the BBC – surely not the good professor – has carefully converted DIFFERENCES in temperatures, as if they are temperatures outside … And, of course, accurately [ISH]. [More than 2000 miles – 3219 kilometres!] But, hey, the author of the bit on the Beeb is Curtis Lancaster, who has a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.), Media and Entertainment Technology h/t Linked-In.
Finally, hats off to the rowers – no mean feat to row round Great Britain – 2000 miles plus! – and possibly in some – ah – entertaining weather!
Auto
Re the answers to my query about Reform’s net zero costing, thank you and please continue if the ‘disputation’ becomes less muddied.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/05/31/miliband-plots-120-gbp-net-zero-gas-bill-rise/?recomm_id=6ce01a39a86949d682a8e880e1e1c695
“I think the principled case for these levies not falling on electricity is clear. “
What principle would that be? Oh:
“Jonathan Brearley, chief executive of the energy watchdog Ofgem, said there was a “rationality” for shifting levies away from electricity.
“He said that it was “the right thing to do from the perspective of getting to net zero” but that inevitably it would result in “a lot of people losing out”.”
Can somebody help me with a translation of what I see on the iamkate website?
Yesterday at 12:50pm, demand was 27.3GW, 93.7% of which was met by the UK suppliers. The price was £2.07/MWh, gas was running at 6.7%.
How does this translate into bills?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/05/23/labours-tax-raid-to-trap-15bn-barrels-of-oil-and-gas/
“The report said: “The UK North Sea industry is being destroyed by taxes that are too high, taxes which threaten energy security, jobs, investment and economic growth.”
But Labour says:
“A government spokesman dismissed criticisms, saying: “The Government has reformed the Energy Profits Levy to support investment and give industry certainty and stability.
““We are delivering a fair and orderly transition in the North Sea, with the biggest ever investment in offshore wind and two first-of-a-kind carbon capture and storage clusters.””
Talking different language and hoping nobody notices.
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/06/02/activist-scientists-rage-about-trumps-executive-order-comparing-him-to-hitler-for-insisting-that-federally-funded-science-projects-are-more-scientifically-rigorous/
“Needless to say, not everyone is happy with this return to the “gold standard” with a group of scientists including Michael ‘Hockey Stick’ Mann writing in the Guardian – seemingly without irony – that it will “destroy American science as we know it”. A group called Stand Up for Science, whose executive director also helped write the Guardian article, is collecting signatures noting that “state sponsored” scientific programmes in Nazi Germany led to the deaths of millions of Jews, people with disabilities and people identifying as LGBTQ+.
Seems everybody to the right of Karl Marx is a Nazi.
Another ship carrying electric vehicles abandoned after fire broke out on the deck carrying the EVs…
https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1153746/Crew-evacuated-from-Zodiac-Maritime-vehicle-carrier-in-Pacific-Ocean-after-fire
CK
The $2.2 billion Ivanpah solar project approved by the Obama administration is shutting down – leaving behind 173,500 thermal collectors on 3,500 Acres in the Mojave desert Obama’s Department of Energy also provided $1.6 billion in loan guarantees to Ivanpah, a $535 million grant, and tax credits – even though the site was within the critical habitat of the desert tortoise, an endangered species native to the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts – forcing the tortoise to be relocated. The plant also killed between 3,500 – 6,000 birds each year, according to a 2015 report, from collisions with heliostats or from being incinerated when flying through the concentrated heat beams that reached 800 degrees Fahrenheit – Meaning over the course of 11 years from 38,500 to 66,000 total birds were killed.
Rumoured that Mrs Balls is on the point of resignation over failure to get more money out of RfAccts. I wonder how Miliband will fare:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/06/09/miliband-warned-green-tech-project-collapse-4bn-injection/
As if that’s not bad enough:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/06/10/ed-miliband-turns-to-nuclear-power-as-blackout-fears-rise/
“Energy analyst Kathryn Porter warned the UK was committing itself to an outdated and expensive reactor design at Sizewell C.”
“The money will come initially from the Treasury but it and other investors will recover the construction costs via a new levy, known as the Regulated Asset Base, to be added to consumer and business energy bills.”
The Tories still don’t get it:
Andrew Bowie, Conservative shadow energy spokesman, said nuclear power offered a reliable and continuous source of electricity essential to balance the intermittency of renewables like wind and solar.
““We need to move to a lower-carbon electricity system that includes wind and solar.
““But we do not have the electricity storage capacity needed for times when the wind doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine. Nuclear will give us reliable baseload electricity to stabilise the system.””
Perhaps the author of this book sent Ed a copy:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/books/non-fiction/review-going-nuclear-tim-gregory/?recomm_id=826fdfbd-a81c-43c0-97fd-4997f31f6d1f
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgdyl817p1o
“Homeowners warned over green energy scammers”
BBC – but an increasing problem, so only right that the BBC at least recognise this. But will it slow the Monstrous Mr. Miliband’s pursuit of some imaginary green-ish nirvana? [Rhetorical, of course!].
Auto
‘Subsidy free’ wind turbines – claim promulgated by the BBC [in one case, at least].
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crmk94zgekyo
“Developers hope to put up 22 turbines measuring 115m (377ft) in place of 23 existing 41.5m (136ft) ones at Cold Northcott Farm in St Clether near Launceston.”
These will be MUCH taller than the ones they replace [I wonder how old the ‘old’ ones are, needing replacement].
“In a statement, the applicants, said: “The proposed development is conservatively modelled to produce sufficient renewable electricity to power approximately 10% of homes in Cornwall. The development will be subsidy-free and provide a reliable income stream for the benefit of the wide range of local farmers involved in the project and enhancing Cornwall’s energy supply security.””
No subsidy at all? No constraint payments down in deepest Cornwall? No help to meet demand when the wind doesn’t blow?
Auto, not really bemused at the BBC’s insouciance with the verifiable truth.
Approved by the planners.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crmk94zgekyo
Same statement about ‘subsidy free’; no mention of preferential access, nor of what will be needed when the wind fails to blow [and so 10% of Cornwall’s houses won’t get power from the new turbines, to be 115m [377feet] – nearly as high as Salisbury Cathedral spire [404 feet].
Auto
From the sublime to the ridiculous (or the other way round:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2025/06/14/king-trooping-the-colour-royal-family/
“Red Arrows perform world’s first eco-friendly fly past at Trooping the Colour”
And they’re still using nine aircraft. Next year six?
His Majesty will be thrilled, though, till he reads this:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/06/14/mark-carney-conversion-eco-warrior-to-oil-and-gas-champion/
““When I talk about being an energy superpower, I mean in both clean and conventional energies,” he said. “And yes, that does mean oil and gas.
““It means using our oil and gas here in Canada to displace imports wherever possible, particularly from the United States.””
He clearly didn’t get the same memo as Ed.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/06/16/britain-to-keep-lights-on-gas-free-power-grid-first-time/
“Adam Bell, a former energy department official who is now at consultancy Stonehaven [gravy train, revolving door example?], said: “Running the system without any fossil-based spinning reserve and instead relying on the stability services that batteries, storage and renewable energy sources can provide is our first glimpse of the future of our power system.””
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/06/18/britain-to-rely-on-france-to-avoid-blackouts-this-winter/
Best check your property insurance includes good cover for loss of freezer contents when the power inevitably goes off.
Poor Governmental Statistics: –
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg3zxyj5l2o
It’s the Beeb – so the situation must be dire – becoming serious.
“The recent spending review gave the UK’s statistical system extra money to prepare for a census in 2031, but the rest of its funding will not keep up with rising prices.”
It doesn’t know how many people are in the country – and the 2031 Census might, perhaps, not tell the Government. But they’re not counting properly [and less well, as their budget is cut].
Nothing at all to do with saving money, nor with ‘not paying for bad news’.
But depressing, as some of the £1,100,000 million the Government spends, this year, could, possibly, be better spent on knowing who is in the country, where they are, and how much energy they use.
Or have I misunderstood the role of the Office for National Statistics …
Auto
Story tip
Chinese owned Lotus poised to end sports car production at Norfolk factory
https://www.edp24.co.uk/news/25273976.lotus-poised-end-sports-car-production-hethel-factory/?ref=ebbn&nid=2288&u=7b2a8d7531b023e4cc37b1b60401d833&date=270625
Paul,
Ed’s world is falling apart.
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-14851229/Miliband-ditches-25bn-Morocco-Britain-undersea-power-line-project-focus-domestic-renewables.html
A good article in the DT:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/06/29/why-britain-pays-such-a-crippling-price-for-electricity/
Labour advised by Ember, who, according to AI:
“Ember’s financial backing comes from a range of philanthropic and environmental foundations, ensuring its research remains data-driven and aligned with its mission to drive clean energy policy.”
Data driven?
“The price of electricity in the UK has remained high because the UK is over-reliant on gas for energy and grid stability, with gas almost always setting the price of electricity.
“Clean power generation and grid stabilising technologies such as batteries will free the UK from this pricing dynamic.”
More lunacy:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/06/30/ed-miliband-britains-lakes-floating-solar-panels-roadmap/
And to prove how stupid: “The document also claimed that building solar panels over a field can improve biodiversity by encouraging pollination.”
Most pf the open water near where I live is heavily populated by geese, divers and ducks. What does RSPB think? What’ll be the budget for bird dropping removal and clearing of carcasses of birds killed by mistaking the panels for open water?
Seriously?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14864605/Scientists-use-PARACHUTES-Gulf-Stream.html
What’s almost as scary is that of 19000 answering the question, 49%-of-people-are-worried-about failing-gulf-stream!
Reading that, and other mass media accounts, I got the strong impression that the originators of this have not actually sailed on an ocean, any ocean, and hence have not a scooby of how big oceans actually are.
But they got their ‘branewave’ into the press, and probably citations [even if of the ‘Ten Daftest Ideas’ sort …].
Auto
She’s on the warpath again:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/07/03/heathrow-fire-report-is-not-just-damning-for-national-grid/
BBC2 7/7. “Heatwaves – the new normal”. “How hot is too hot”
climate collapse, record temperatures, more frequent, deadly, wild fires, running in 40C is not good for you, houses and offices cant cope, railways cannot cope….. etc .
Girl from Quadrature Climate Foundation (who they?) quoted several time. More climate grifters.
Basically a typical BBC climate bollocks transmission. Its what i dont pay my licence for.
And note .. written and produced by a couple of BBC staff generic journalists. so not scientists and no specialist knowledge.
Reepham school told to limit use of ‘noisy’ heat pumps – BBC News
“School told to limit use of ‘noisy’ heat pumps”
Auto
Radio 4’s “More or Less” this morning had a long item on the price of electricity in Britain. It is a more detailed explanation than just high gas prices. Paul Homewood might like to comment further.
It starts about 12 minutes along:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m002fj8f
Much more thoughtful than the usual BBC garbage!
The only thing he does not mention is that renewables under new CfDs are still going to be paid more than gas power.
One comment made me laugh though, when the claimed that though the renewable transition had cost a lot, there were also some benefits!!
The Mayor of London’s policies are succeeding beyond expectations:
Khan’s Ulez hollows out London as empty shops hit decade high
Retail vacancy rate in the capital is soaring as a result of the Mayor of London’s flagship expansion
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/07/10/khans-ulez-hollows-out-london-empty-shops-hit-decade-high
Wind in Wales.
“Sites chosen for new state-backed Welsh windfarms”
Doubtless the best places already have devices for culling bats, but “Wales’ new publicly owned renewable energy developer has announced where it plans to build its first wind farm projects, promising hundreds of jobs.” and – ” … with the potential to generate enough clean electricity to power about 25% of Welsh homes.”
That’s when the wind is blowing ‘nicely’. No real discussion of what happens when it doesn’t [mention is made of substations …].
“Having the country’s own renewable energy developer means profits generated by Wales’ wind can be retained and reinvested locally in communities and public services, the government argues.”
So – the Welsh Government considers subsidies from bill-payers and taxpayers are ‘profits’. Economics of the madhouse.
Locations chosen for three Welsh government-backed wind farms – BBC News
More – 67 turbines in all [up to 200 metres high [taller than the NatWest Tower [Tower 42] in London!] – “Should all three make it through the planning process as well as securing connection to the grid, they will generate enough electricity to power the average needs of 350,000 homes. The building work is anticipated to cost £500m, creating about 650 construction jobs. Forty direct and 55 indirect jobs are also promised over the wind farms’ 35-year operational lifetime.”
hen the wind is blowing ‘nicely’, as noted. Interesting to see if state-owned outfits spend just £500 million on a sometimes-working source of power … or might the bill be larger?
Oh yes, “Tree clearance will be kept to a minimum, environmentally sensitive features will be protected, and any areas cleared of trees will be replaced through our Compensatory Planting Programme,” explained Elsie Grace of NRW” NRW is Natural Resources Wales, [didya guess] another quango …
Auto
Per G. B. National Grid status, at 1155 BST, 11 July 2025 – Wind, in the UK, gives 0.61GW. Some of that, presumably, in Wales – but not enough to run a 21st century civilisation …
Auto
“UK pledges to make electric cars cheaper to buy”
Electric car purchases will be cheaper, pledges Heidi Alexander – BBC News
The Transport Secretary said “I can guarantee to your viewers that we will be making it cheaper for those who do want to make the switch to an electric vehicle.”
The Transport secretary did not say “I can guarantee that we will have dispatchable power to enable you to charge your electric car, subsidised by the taxpayer.”
Nor was there any sense that the Government was giving us our own money back, if we want an electric car – but after charging us costs for the Civil Servants … and much of thje purchase price will go to China.
Delusional – or committed to the downfall of the UK.
You judge.
Auto
Update;
“Drivers offered up to £3,750 discount to buy electric cars”
Electric cars: Drivers offered up to £3,750 discount – BBC News
“The cost of some new electric cars will soon be reduced by up to £3,750 under grants being introduced by the government to encourage drivers to move away from petrol and diesel vehicles. The discounts will apply to eligible vehicles costing up to £37,000, with the most environmentally friendly vehicles seeing the biggest reductions, the Department for Transport (DfT) said.”
‘Most environmentally friendly’ – does that allow for the mining of battery materials, and [if Chinese-made] transport halfway round the world?
“Under the scheme, discounts will range between £1,500 and £3,750 and buyers will be able to claim a discount at the dealership. The grants to lower the cost of EVs will be funded through a £650m scheme, and will be available for three years.”
So – the taxpayer is on the hook for £650,000,000 – to go to people who can afford a new car (NOT everybody!).
“Announcing the new support, Alexander [Secretary of State for Transport, Heidi Alexander] said: “This EV grant will not only allow people to keep more of their hard-earned money, it’ll help our automotive sector seize one of the biggest opportunities of the 21st century.”” (my emphasis)
That money comes from the taxpayer, now – or in the Budget in October, or in debt repayments if this incontinent Government simply borrows money it doesn’t have.
Auto, despairing.
Blabbering Miliband in the HoC:
Lewis Brackpool on Twitter claims he has evidence that Ofcom ignored complaints about climate alarmism for the past 3 years.
Have a look at this thread while it is up:
Lewis Brackpool on X: “NOW — I’ve managed to obtain Internal documents that reveal Ofcom has quietly dismissed dozens of public complaints about climate dissent in UK broadcasting without investigating a single one. For three years, viewers raised concerns about alarmist claims, one-sided messaging,” / X
HM Government is borrowing about £150,000 million this year, in part to pay £108,000 million in interest on money it owes [without that paying off a penny of the debt].
Yet HMG is still spaffing money – Sheffield gets funding boost for green jet fuel research – BBC News –
“The University of Sheffield will receive a share of government funding to boost its research into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). The Translational Energy Centre is to receive £1.5m of the £63m funding package, which is being shared with 16 other UK groups working in SAF research and production. SAF is an alternative to fossil jet fuel which reduces carbon emissions on average by 70%, according to the Department for Transport.”
My italicization.
IF this research is necessary [and opinions may vary on that] – surely Big Oil, or Big Planemakers, or Big Engine-makers would cover the costs? And do we need sixteen different [presumably competing] groups to be given taxpayers’ money? 16!?
Auto
The article goes on –
“Aviation Minister Mike Kane said: “From the labs of Sheffield to the runways of the future, this is how we kickstart economic growth, secure energy independence and make Britain a clean energy superpower.””
If Mike Kane thinks [as he seems to] that taking taxpayers’ money and splitting it between sixteen groups, all of which need to contribute heavily to the admin costs of their institute, is how to ‘kickstart economic growth’, perhaps he needs to be told that wealth is not created by governments. Wealth can certainly be wasted by governments.
Mohamed Pourkashanian, Professor of Energy Engineering and Head of the Energy Innovation Centre at Sheffield , said he was “delighted” by the announcement.
I imagine he would be – more Other People’s Money, more pension contributions, more money for overheads.
Auto, appreciating more and more Jo Nova’s tagline at JoNova
“A perfectly good civilization is going to waste…“
“Borrowing in the first three months of the current financial year has now reached £57.8bn. “
Government borrowing increase adds to pressure on Reeves – BBC News
Today.
Annual rate =- 4 x£57.8billion = £231,200 million borrowed.
Taxes up?
The Government in incontinent – so taxes up now VERY likely.
Auto
Another shipping company declines to carry EV’s.
https://maritime-executive.com/article/matson-suspends-shipping-evs-citing-hazards-of-lithium-ion-batteries
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/07/26/miliband-eyes-battery-bonanza-to-cut-wind-farm-costs/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Another way to waste our money.
This is the most exciting development in Climate Science for yearsAt least one person in the Trump administration has had the courage to question AGW science. The team selected to produce the report includeJohn ChristyJudith CurrySteve KooninRoss McKitrickRoy Spencer
Please, please read this link carefully:https://judithcurry.com/2025/07/29/new-climate-assessment-report-from-us-doe/
It looks like the download of the full report is overloaded as I type this. I am not surprised!
This is the most exciting development in Climate Science for years
At least one person in the Trump administration has had the courage to question AGW science. The team selected to produce the report include
John Christy
Judith Curry
Steve Koonin
Ross McKitrick
Roy Spencer
Please, please read this link carefully:
https://judithcurry.com/2025/07/29/new-climate-assessment-report-from-us-doe/
It looks like the download of the full report is overloaded as I type this. I am not surprised!
Here’s an amazing educational speech in the House of Commons:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/08/01/one-of-britains-last-refineries-runs-out-of-oil/
e- boat explodes at Gayton Marina.
https://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/news/crime/canal-cordoned-off-and-marina-evacuated-after-boat-explodes-and-burst-into-flames-in-northants-5260199
Lithium batteries + water = explosion. What a surprise!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14979315/glaciers-COLLAPSING-Perito-Moreno-Glacier.html
18 miles long but loss of 1/2 mile suggests imminent collapse?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/08/09/britain-must-copy-china-in-net-zero-race-says-chris-stark/
“Mr Stark is one of the UK’s most influential experts on energy and climate, …”
Actually: “Early in his career, Stark held a number of roles at HM Treasury and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills …”
Electric boat fire update …
Apparently hired from Gayton Marina, one of their e boat range.
A day boat which the YouTuber says was available for hire from ABC Day Boat Hire https://www.abcdayboathire.com/our-boats/electric/
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/uk-households-told-sleep-downstairs-32224127?int_source=nba
As somebody remarked – what if you live in a bungalow?
Silly Gilly’s at it again:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/09/cool-britannia-the-heat-pumps-keeping-pace-with-the-uks-wild-weather
“Air heat pumps use the same basic principles as hydronic system heat pumps, but instead of heating water that is pumped through the home, they heat the air. In the summer a refrigerant is used to provide cooling.
““Demand for air-to-air heat pumps could be significant,” Sissons said. “They provide cooling – which is more in demand as our summers get hotter – and the cost of units is far lower too. They are also relatively simple to install because they are usually wall mounted so they don’t require as much outdoor space.”
“The catch? They don’t usually provide hot water, meaning a separate low-carbon solution would be needed to replace a traditional gas boiler system entirely.”
“In West Sussex, Tester has kept his gas boiler to heat the water used in his underfloor heating system on the first floor – but uses it sparingly for a few hours in the morning and evening during the winter months …”
So, cost of heat pump whilst retaining a gas system, cost of solar panels (and battery?), cost of air movement system whilst retaining conventional heating circuit, cost and space for hot water system. What’s the payback? Can air-to-air be retrofitted in many properties anyway.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consumer-affairs/britain-air-conditioning-rules/?recomm_id=d3d86e8c-c643-478a-bee1-51d6494bf173
[Air-to-air] it is currently excluded from the £7,500 boiler upgrade scheme (BUS) grant.
But installing an air-to-air heat pump could backfire on homeowners by tanking their energy performance certificate (EPC) score.
Do your research Gilly.
More nonsense from the Guardian:
Global heating has led the southern small white butterfly to venture further north.
So not just wiped out, extinct, then?
This time with the link. I was so excited at finding out how to use formatting I forgot:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/08/uk-butterfly-species-southern-small-white
Bird choppers – on steroids …
https://www.offshorewind.biz/2025/08/05/153-metre-wind-turbine-blades-head-to-testing-after-leaving-chinas-yantai-port/
“153-Metre Wind Turbine Blades Head to Testing After Leaving China’s Yantai Port”
“The ultra-long blades for what will be the world’s most powerful offshore wind turbine have been shipped from Yantai Port in China’s northeastern Shandong province and are en route to a test base.”
“Three blades, each measuring 153 metres long and weighing 83.5 tonnes, were loaded at the Port of Yantai on 1 August. The ultra-long blades are planned to be installed on a 26 MW offshore wind turbine, which is being developed by Dongfang Electric Corporation.”
So 26 MW from one bird chopper. If the wind blows nicely.
“The wind turbine’s hub centre is 185 metres high” – add 153 metres, and tips of the blades will be not less then 338 metres high [depending on the dimensions of the hub and generator nacelle at the top of the – er – pole]!
Nearly a hundred feet taller than the Shard …
3 blades – just over 250 tonnes, plus the nacelle.
Could the UK manufacture anything like this, in these days of ‘gween energy’?
Let alone do so at a modest profit?
Auto
Help! How do I activate the “Like” button on comments? Looking at settings, it appears to be activated but no sign of it, just the “Reply” button. Thanks.
New satellite will help ‘transform’ forecasting capability – Met Office
Nice words, including –
“Met Office Managing Director of Products and Services Simon Brown is part of the team that represents UK and Met Office interests within EUMETSAT. Speaking ahead of the launch, he said: “Trusted weather and climate intelligence begins with having the most detailed and accurate observations you can, “
My bold.
Obviously Simon Brown doesn’t know – or, conceivably, doesn’t want to know – about the Met. Office’s own Class 4 and Class 5 sites. The latter are ‘accurate’ [is that the word?] to +/- 5 Centigrade [9F!].
No doubt the new satellite – to be launched on 13 August 2025, will help with observations … but if they get homogenised, or adjusted, or ‘tampered with’, or “Fiddled”, they lose some of their value – as Simon Brown indicates.
Auto
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/aug/12/david-lammy-faces-possible-legal-action-over-foreign-office-secondments
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/aug/12/david-lammy-faces-possible-legal-action-over-foreign-office-secondments
But if it’s Carbon Brief or one of the other green blob campaigners, OK?
Cancelled Climate Dissenter Professor Norman Fenton Speaks Out:
With the rise of ‘Virtual Power Stations’, VPSs – ‘rationing’ in English – I rather thought that our electricity grid was feared to struggle with demand, certainly in hours of darkness [when solar is more useless that usual], or if thre Wind Gods are having a craft break.
But NO! We – or our Government, anyway, on our behalf, and with our money, is cranking demand up! This – on the BBC, so problems skated over – today –
Data centres to be expanded across UK as concerns mount – BBC News
The money quote: –
“According to the National Energy System Operator, NESO, the projected growth of data centres in Great Britain could “add up to 71 TWh of electricity demand” in the next 25 years, which it says redoubles the need for clean power – such as offshore wind.”
I suggest it ‘redoubles the need for reliable power – not offshore wind.’
But 71 TWh is an actual number, unusual in green blob communications [oddly]. Current UK demand – at an average of, say [guessing, by eye] 40GW, across 8760 hours [365 days] gives about 350 TWh. So this suggests that data centres, alone, will increase the UK’s power demand by something like 20%. Arm waving number, certainly. But not a negligible amount.
Add in all the energy, currently in petrol and diesel, needed to run tens of millions of electric cars [IF the ‘Great Transition actually happens!!], and then all the extra juice needed for electric heat pumps.
My guess is that passing breezes, and a bit of sunshine [the UK is more than 50 degrees North, and sometimes has cloud!], just won’t cut it.
Result – er … more VPSs
Auto
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxyezqx4r5o“Erin rapidly intensifies to category five hurricane”
More misdirection it seems
Although the BBC report includes – “Hurricane Erin has rapidly intensified into a category five hurricane, packing maximum sustained winds of 160mph (260km/h). National Hurricane Center Director Mike Brennan told a briefing that the “extremely powerful” storm had “explosively deepened and intensified” overnight after growing from tropical storm strength on Friday.”
Category 5?
Ventusky suggests that this storm, still out in the Atlantic, where nobody much is able to see – let alone measure – it, is possibly not possessed of hurricane [>64kt] winds at ‘ground level’ – perhaps 60-66 Kt winds, at 10 m above sea level.
Certainly at greater altitudes, the wind is stronger – I’ve spotted winds north of 85 kts at about 2000 metres.
Auto
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/08/14/low-wind-pushing-household-energy-bills-power-giant/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has also forecasted a global trend of slowing winds in the coming decades.
AND increased extreme weather? Make your minds up!
Two articles from the same paper:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consumer-affairs/ed-miliband-wind-turbine-garden/
Domestic heat pump uptake surged in the past year
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/08/06/heat-pump-installations-90pc-below-ed-miliband-target/
Heat pump installations are falling short of Ed Miliband’s targets, with just 30,000 fitted to British homes in the past six months – far below an annual goal of 600,000.
Used to be a great newspaper.
Sir Humphrey (of “Yes Minister” fame) would have approved
A senior politician has advised that there is no point in sending a paper or report to Government, even if it concerns matters of national importance, if it relies on links to websites on the Internet, “as they simply go unopened”.
No doubt this practice (or was it an official edict?) delighted the civil service Mandarins, the successors to Sir Humphrey. He would have said “The threat of malicious programs interfering with our computer systems is unacceptable so we should ban access by state employees to unapproved websites”
The Minister, Jim Hacker, would have looked alarmed and said “But, but, but the report could contain essential information providing evidence of a policy error; or perhaps we would miss a wonderful new opportunity”
To which, Sir Humphrey would reply “But, Minister, what about the risk of new and novel ideas being introduced to Government? They could be inconsistent with Government policy or suggest something completely new! Either way it would involve cost and could cause questions in the House! Something must be done. This is Something. So it must be done!”
Hacker: “Who would approve which websites could be accessed?”
Sir Humphrey: “Well Minister, we could form a committee to approve websites. Or even better we could have a website of our own and maybe call it ‘.gov.uk’”. That way we could control official information in the public domain”.
Sadly, our imaginary story stops there. Perhaps it should have continued like this:
Hacker: “Humphrey. What you are proposing amounts to censorship of the most insidious kind. In this country we pride ourselves as being a country where free speech and a
vigorous media and press prevail”
Sir Humphrey: “Minister, it is only a trivial extension to what happens now. The BBC knows that if it is to continue receiving special licence fee status (or the equivalent special status in the new media world) it has to follow government policy, and the other
media slavishly follow suit. And the print media are only interested in stories that sell newspapers and magazines, especially the gory ones of revolutions and wars overseas that justify expensive overseas adventures for journalists”.
Hacker: “That is no good, Humphrey. We need something to look for bias in public information to counter the censorship accusation”
Sir Humphrey: Well, we could form an inter-departmental committee to periodically review the quality of government science and policies derived from it”
Hacker: “That is still not good enough, Humphrey. We need a group independent of government and the civil service to review all policy papers, and to vet proposals put forward to government to ensure that they are not malicious and comply with certain essential quality criteria. We will call that ‘The Red Team’ who shall be tasked with reviewing government information which will be regarded as ‘The Blue Team’ “.
Sir Humphrey : “But Minister. In some areas we already have such an arrangement. For example in the field of climate change we have the Climate Change Committee”.
Hacker: “Ha ha! That was designed to promote the Government Net Zero Policy, not to stress test it. Many of the committee members have a private sector interest that will profit if Net Zero is pursued more ruthlessly. Nearly all their previous cost estimates and
forecasts have been shown to be wildly optimistic. No, Humphrey, you will do what I say and implement a truly independent Red Team/ Blue Team system to protect free speech and scientific integrity”.
Sir Humphrey: “Yes Minister”
>>>>>>
The Yes Minister scripts were written in 1980 and the subsequent years, but they remain hilariously absurd, but so, so close to reality, even today.
OK, that is all very droll, but the reality is that it is nothing new. Even in recent times, the Inquiry into the Covid Pandemic, chaired by a senior judge, Baroness Hallett, stated that:
“Ministers, who are often without specialised training in civil contingencies, did not receive a broad enough range of scientific advice and often failed to challenge the advice they did get
Advisers lacked freedom and autonomy to express differing opinions, which led to a lack of diverse perspectives. Their advice was often undermined by “groupthink” – a phenomenon by which people in a group tend to think about the same things in the same way
.”
This Groupthink is a pernicious problem that pervades much of government and academia. It is probably at the root of most valid complaints concerning government failure or ineptitude. I was so concerned about it that I took the conclusions and recommendations from the Module one Covid Inquiry report and mapped them onto the climate debate that is behind the Net Zero policy. It resulted in an essay titled “Climate Lessons from the Covid Inquiry”. Of course, I cannot give you the link because I would
like it to be read by government, so it is attached to this essay as an addendum. Even that is imperfect as the paper includes links to other web papers and interviews that I cannot attach easily.
Refusal to even look at serious contributions inevitably amounts to self-censorship by Government and increases the chances of error and hypocrisy. There is, of course, the risk of disinformation or malicious assertions. That does need to be addressed, but
outright rejection of all input is absurd,.
One further example from a public Inquiry into the proposal to build a major port extension in Southampton. [I declare an interest in that I am a retired Associated British Ports manager, though I took no part in the Inquiry]. The Inspector recommended
acceptance of the proposal to the Secretary of State for Transport, whose remit included ports. He declined a request to make the decision on the grounds that he had been lobbied by ABP to support the Inspector’s recommendation. So the decision was passed to Sir John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, who also declined on the same grounds. So, the decision was finally made by the Secretary of State for Aviation. At Last! The Civil Service had found someone with no expertise in the subject matter of the decision!
He rejected the proposal.
It is easy to laugh at that anecdote, but the avoidance of cronyism is a legitimate concern in a free enterprise democracy, and it clearly failed in the appointment of members to the Climate Change Committee referred to above.
Which all goes to show that Government is difficult. It gets even more difficult as progress depends increasingly on complex technical decisions where some expertise is required to make the appropriate judgements. I have chosen not to include details of an interview with Professor Norman Fenton who was hounded out of his post at Queen Mary University in London because he challenged some of the scientific analysis relating to Covid. It destroyed his spectacular career as a mathematician and statistician. Towards the end of the interview he drifts into
conspiracy theories that I sincerely hope are ill founded.
Let us hope we are not drifting aimlessly into a dystopian 1984. I reject the idea of a conspiracy theory that an elite is seeking to control how we live in detail. But I fear drift caused by the conventions of bureaucracy into a state where creativity and original thought is actively suppressed for the purpose of supporting the ‘consensus’ view to the extent that it is enforced, almost unwittingly, by the Establishment and its agent, the
Civil Service. It looks like we still have a long way to go to get this situation right. For now we should make a start by acknowledging that in the UK, the state controls much important information to the point where censorship is being applied and freedom of speech
restricted.
Graham Rabbitts
Southampton
August 2025
If you do not mind clicking on a website link, you can go to
https://mvteal.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/COVID-Lessons-neutral-V04.pdf
“… as they simply go unopened”. Precisely what my MP once said when I was writing to her.
By chance I saw thr following quote on facebook today
“Freedom of opinion can only exist when government thinks itself secure” – Bertrand Russell
By chance I saw thr following quote on facebook today
“Freedom of opinion can only exist when government thinks itself secure” – Bertrand Russell
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/aug/19/a-climate-of-unparalleled-malevolence-are-we-on-our-way-to-the-sixth-major-mass-extinction
Last week they were drooling over the ability of butterflies to change their location to deal with a change in climate!
It turns out that there are only a few known ways, demonstrated in the entire geologic history of the Earth, to liberate gigatons of carbon from the planet’s crust into the atmosphere. There are your once-every-50m-years-or-so spasms of large igneous province volcanism, on the one hand, and industrial capitalism, which, as far as we know, has only happened once, on the other.
Damn powerful those capitalists!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/08/19/energy-bills-rise-october-subsidise-poorest-households/
The cost of energy has risen sharply over the last five years.
In 2020, the price cap was set at £1,042 but this rose sharply because of the energy crisis triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
By October 2023, the price cap had reached £2,380 but it has since declined – but with no sign it will drop back to 2020 levels.“
More gaslighting.
Nice piece by Kathryn Porter:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/08/24/miliband-is-gambling-on-wind-power-even-questions-mount/
My local BBC News ran this story tonight, full of the usual claims of more frequent and heavier downpours. I was considering writing to complain and wondered if you had some useful references I could point to.
Bigger storms are putting pressure on guttering on UK homes – BBC News
If my own experience is anything to go by, there’s more of a risk of overloading the gutters with moss and the like and not regularly cleaning them out. That moss can grow so well (north and east facing roofs) is down to the clean air we now breath.
Questions for the BBC:
1. “What is the perfect, acceptable weather?”
2. “Why shouldn’t it change?”
….plus of course, “Do you have any actual evidence man’s CO2 dominantly controls the weather to make it dangerous?”
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/aug/28/drax-inquiry-fca-questions-billions-subsidies?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Industry sources have suggested that although there are growing concerns about the sustainability of burning biomass, there are likely to be deeper concerns about the viability of the government’s green energy targets if biomass is ruled unsustainable and struck from the energy system.
Tells you a lot.
Conspiracy or just plain incompetence?
Have a look on TV Channel 5 archive for these two programmes:[A]“The big Drought of 1975”[B]“Heatwave Summer of ‘76”
With my interest in weather and climate (yes, I know the difference!) I tend to collect these extreme weather programmes on my TV recorder. The very first programme I recorded on my new TV about 2 years ago was item [B] above. I remember that summer well. Only a few weeks ago, I saw programme [A] above was advertised. It puzzled me because I did not remember a serious drought in 1975.
When I played item [A] it turned out to be all about 1976! It used some of the same material as item [B], all the same interviewees, and featured many of the same events.
It looks like somebody much more recently has re-edited the original material. The tone of the two videos vary significantly. [B] is a fairly straight account of the year, not understating the seriousness of the weather situation faced by the country in 1976, but with a sense of wonder. [A] on the other hand is much more alarmist as if it had been edited by Justin Rowlatt, chief AGW ambassador in the BBC. As for the totally incorrect titling of [A] (i.e. reporting it as 1975 instead of 1976), one has to wonder if this was deliberate.
Can anyone throw any light on this situation? Act quickly please before the cover-up is launched by whoever got it that badly wrong!
Conspiracy or just plain incompetence?
Have a look on TV Channel 5 archive for these two programmes:[A]“The big Drought of 1975”[B]“Heatwave Summer of ‘76”
With my interest in weather and climate (yes, I know the difference!) I tend to collect these extreme weather programmes on my TV recorder. The very first programme I recorded on my new TV about 2 years ago was item [B] above. I remember that summer well. Only a few weeks ago, I saw programme [A] above was advertised. It puzzled me because I did not remember a serious drought in 1975.
When I played item [A] it turned out to be all about 1976! It used some of the same material as item [B], all the same interviewees, and featured many of the same events.
It looks like somebody much more recently has re-edited the original material. The tone of the two videos vary significantly. [B] is a fairly straight account of the year, not understating the seriousness of the weather situation faced by the country in 1976, but with a sense of wonder. [A] on the other hand is much more alarmist as if it had been edited by Justin Rowlatt, chief AGW ambassador in the BBC. As for the totally incorrect titling of [A] (i.e. reporting it as 1975 instead of 1976), one has to wonder if this was deliberate.
Can anyone throw any light on this situation? Act quickly please before the cover-up is launched by whoever got it that badly wrong!
On reflection, [A] ends more optimistically, refuting the gloom and doom expressed earlier. I wonder when the AGW acolyted=s will learn that climate moves in cycles, not in straight lines
Stunning video of the Gayton Electric Canal Boat explosion. Superb citizen journalism from a guy who has been on the receiving end of a lot of criticism from vested interests.
“Somerset gets £4m to install EV charging points”
Somerset gets £4m to install electric vehicle charging points – BBC News
Today’s hymn from the BBC …
“In total, Somerset Council is being given £3.78m from the government’s Local Electric Vehicle Infrastructure fund. The council is now in the process of appointing a company to fulfil a 17-year contract. Under the contract, a minimum of 1,606 low-powered chargepoints will be installed, each delivering up to 7kW, which is suitable for overnight charging.”
‘Up to’ – again – doing a lot of heavy lifting.
No suggestion that there will be any new power station – except the nuclear one at Hinkley Point C.
“The existing electrical network for street lamps will be used where possible to reduce installation costs and disruption, it added.”
Keeping costs down is good, unless the demand means the street lights go out – but they will have thought of that, won’t they.
And Rachel from accounts has – reportedly – a multi tens-of-thousands-of-millions of ponds hole in her budget, so cutting this – and [I presume] similar schemes across the other 40 or fifty counties – will save a bit – a couple of hundred million quid, perhaps.
Auto
Didn’t councils replace all the street lamps with LED models to reduce the strain on the power grid, and their finances from rocketing electricity costs?
“UK cement production drops to lowest levels since 1950s”
UK cement production drops to lowest levels since 1950s – BBC News
Even the BBC reports – “The Mineral Products Association (MPA) said production levels were “increasingly under threat” due to high energy, regulatory and labour costs.”
Golly Gosh! Who’s a thunk that?!
“MPA executive director Dr Diana Casey said the decline threatened to derail the government’s ambitions for housing, infrastructure and clean energy projects. “[You] can’t build houses, bridges or railways without us,” she told the BBC.”
Another small step in the Brezhnevites’ destruction of the United Kingdom, and the West.
[I assume that China is not pricing its own cement out of the Chinese market by imposing unilateral cost increases in energy, wages and other employments costs, and red tape. Nor India, Indian cement out of the Indian market, similarly …]
Auto
“Fifteen illegal workers arrested at solar farm”
Fifteen illegal workers arrested at solar farm in Bristol – BBC News
“Supported by Avon and Somerset Police, the Home Office’s Immigration Enforcement team arrested 15 illegal workers at the Goldbeck Solar Farm in Bristol.”
Plainly, employment law is complex.
This is certainly not Chinese slave labour – “Those arrested were of Kazakhstani, Turkish, Georgian, Uzbekistani, Kyrgyz and Tajikistani nationalities, and 13 had entered the UK on temporary work visas. All 13 submitted asylum claims prior to their visas expiring. Of these, 10 claims remain outstanding and three claims have been refused.”
Auto
Kathryn Porter, on form again:
ECO4 and the Great British Insulation Scheme
“30,000 homes fitted with botched insulation under government schemes, ministers admit”
[So roughly one home in a thousand across the entire United Kingdom!]
30,000 homes fitted with botched insulation under government schemes, ministers admit – BBC News
Whilst sensible insulation is often a good thing, if it cuts people’s bills – net! over, perhaps 10 years – the demented green fixation with a trace gas has been seen to allow clown outfits to rip people off.
Auto
I have lost count of the number of chancer emails, flyers, letters, social media posts and even door knocks we’ve had from folk who ‘happen to be in the area’ trying to flog a system subsidised by the dear old soul in the cottage opposite via her utility bills, minus the vig to China, Ed, Growler’s crowd fund, Dale Vince…
So, awaiting ‘Been misfitted insulation? Call BodgeSkim!’ from the same lot.
A success story fpr Mad Ed to publicise?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/09/05/pakistan-opium-production-heroin-afghanistan/
Afghan farmers have brought with them the technical expertise needed to grow poppies in the desert landscape, utilising solar power to pump water out of deep wells.
And another thing – how can a UK-based business win a defence contract for £10Billion when we have the highest power costs? How much is the taxpayer subsidising these jobs?
In some markets, the – er – Magnificent Mr. Miliband is only 10-1 against.
Now Big Ange has resigned [so no pay-off?], 2T Kier needs a Deputy :Leader … and Deputy Prime Minister. Ponder that for a moment – Ed [of the Edstone, lest we forget] is at least being considered as #2!!
What are the requirements for emigration to, say, Vanuatu, or North Korea/ For a freer life!
Auto
So David Lammy gets the Deputy P.M. job.
Waiting to hear if theBacon-Butty Botherer stays as Secretary of State for Energy Security etc. ….Auto
And the Son of a Toolmaker is having a reshuffle. Maybe he knows about tools, but – having spent a year nicely sharpening a chisel, is it sensible to use it as a screwdriver? And the screwdriver is being readied as a spanner; the spanner didn’t pay tax, so gets promoted to mallet [ohhh, the previous mallet didn’t pay its tax either – ‘Bad Mallet!’]. The hammer is being asked to do the job of the tin snips, and the tin snips wins the jackpot and looks after Scotland, with whisky distillery visits!
Not often I think Ed ‘Davey’ Clown is on the money, but the BBC reports –
“Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey has urged Starmer to “grab the bull by the horns and confront the real issues” as opposed to moving people “around the cabinet table”…. “If Keir Starmer thinks a reshuffle will solve anything he is learning the wrong lessons from the calamity Conservatives,” he says on X.”
This is Government, not picking a five-a-side footy team. Having folk with little to no interest in – let alone actual knowledge of – their brief is not usually an improvement.
No news on the Meretricious Mr. Miliband so far!
Auto
No pay off?
Errr … I was wrong – WRONG!
Angela Rayner to get taxpayer-funded golden handshake after resigning over tax scandal
Seems odd. If sacked, perhaps …
If one resigns – unless there is an agreement in place – ummm – and this is funded by taxpayers …
Er – ‘Not my rules’ …
Auto
Sir Starmer’s reshuffle – he wanted to move the Marvellous Mr. Miliband – per the Express – and Miliband refused.
Keir Starmer humiliated after trying and failing to sack Ed Miliband | Politics | News | Express.co.uk
Updated: 15:02, Mon, Sep 8, 2025
Auto – seriously worried for the UK – we cannot take another 45 months of Nut Zero.
“Behind a village’s eco heat scheme that cost £14m”
Behind Swaffham Prior’s £14m eco heat scheme – BBC News
It’s the BBC, so not too critical, and, noted, this is a bit of a trail blazer … but –
“The council-owned heat network uses bore-holes in a field to supply ground source heat pumps; it is free for residents to sign up and about half of the homes in the village – 166 properties – were reported to have done so in 2021. But as it stands only 100 have been connected to the network, at a cost of £14m.”
‘Council-owned’ – other people’s money.
‘Free to sign up’ – Yeah, I’ll have some of that … before looking at wider problems …
“only 100 have been connected to the network, at a cost of £14m” – Oh. £140,000 per property, if I have done my maths right. In some parts of the UK, an entire house can be bought for less than that [I’m thinking the North East …].
Whilst I like the principle of this sort of arrangement, it always seems to be good on paper. Near me is a scheme in Sutton, which seems forever getting brickbats on line as expensive, or broken, or both.
But – hey – Council [i.e. other people’s] Money.
Why was no careful planning done beforehand? Have heads rolled?
Auto
The fundamental problem with community schemes is that when it breaks down, you cannot initiate any action to get it fixed. So do you also pay to have your own backup? If so, why bother with the community scheme in he first place? Also what happens when the service contract ends, or the service company go bust, etc. etc. Even with careful planning, this can happen, leaving those 100 homes without heating. Saying the council will pay for it would be a ridiculous statement, as they council doesn’t have its own money, only what it’s taken from you/us, it’s [y]our money. Also, I would imagine big schemes like this don’t have ‘cheap’ repairs.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15091263/Vital-ocean-upwelling-FAILS-warning.html
Looks serious. Nothing in WUWT yet.
More hypocrisy. The Times has just launched a travel company, with the web pages helpfully showing an alphabetical list of exotic countries to visit.
All the nationals have a travel section and all but the virtuous Guardian have a home page tab for it. In the G, you have to go via “Lifestyle”, but it’s just the same as the others.
Climate crisis? What’s that?
AE-P confused again:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/09/19/trumps-big-beautiful-tech-pact-watershed-moment-brexit/
The US-UK tech alliance is a vindication of Brexit. It is also a vindication of Britain’s clean energy strategy.
Really?
The very definition of pomposity:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2025/sep/17/the-guardian-climate-pledge-2025
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/20/yorkshire-village-is-battling-a-net-zero-facility/
But within 10 miles of Heath village are the vast and now cleared brownfield sites of two former coal-fired power stations, at Ferrybridge and Eggborough. The now vanished power stations are, of course, also excellent locations for connecting to the grid. They are also away from rivers so that any risk of flooding or pollution is avoided. The planned site at Heath is close to the River Calder and an old canal.
Cui bono?
Another important contribution to the energy debate. What’s the gas equivalent of a transformer fire?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/09/20/britains-other-grid-is-underfunded-and-creaking/?recomm_id=c666c257-da78-4cd1-a373-2343cf36b311
April already?
https://joannenova.com.au/2025/09/finally-a-burning-battery-ejector-to-save-evs-and-kill-pedestrians/
Ya don’t say!
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/09/25/net-zero-risks-fuelling-inflation-warns-bank-official/
The Telegraph, once home to rational, informed, thinkers (but now home to AEP), seems a little slow at catching the economy, and society, destroying implications of the Brezhnevites’ Nut Zero.
But still furlongs ahead of the BBC, or the Grauniad.
Auto
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/09/26/polar-bears-abandoned-weather-station-kolyuchin-russia/
A good one for the Met Office – beats “the dog ate my homework”!
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/sep/29/labour-must-fight-right-wing-billionaires-undermining-net-zero-ed-miliband
A lie in every paragraph (but then it is the Guardian). The speech tomorrow should be a cracker.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/09/30/dr-michael-mann-finally-gets-his-comeuppance/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
https://freebeacon.com/campus/upenn-provost-resigns-after-boosting-social-media-post-likening-charlie-kirk-to-hitler-youth/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Delicious! Who does he think he is? Gretha 2#?
More EV pyrotechnics:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3vz291qx4ko
Just spotted this on an i paper front page:
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/uk-brexit-energy-deal-eu-bills-rising-households-3951126?ico=most_popular
Fiddling round the edges.
This is on topic, if you listen to this for five and a half minutes:
https://youtu.be/JA9yJ5g5C5A
It describes the dysfunctionality of the Political Bubble, including the Energy Sector, and the UK Economy in general.
Prof Valentina Zharkova, based at Northumbria University, has argued since about 2021 that we are entering a Grand Solar Minimum not dissimilar to the Maunder Minimum when the Thames froze. While the effect started in 2021, it has been overshadowed by the peak in the 11yr solar cycle, the peak in the el nino cycle, and the effect of the Hunga Tonga volcaninc eruption in 2022. It will really kick in after 2025. It will last till about 2053, when the Solar Inertial Motion will take over again slowly reducing the Sun Earth distance which will result in temperature increase of about 3 deg C above present levels by about the year 2500. Both these phenomena have happened before.and are not existential. However, if the Gran Solar Minimum follows the pattern of the Maunder Minimum it is likely to have its greates effect in northern Americas and Borthern Europe. We may face shorter growing periods and serious drop in crop yields.
Prof Zharkova justifies these predictions through strict mathematical analysis of the solar magnetic fields as measured by NASA using equations that have been well established in engineering, so the result is a calculation, not a speculation. There have been isolated examples of unusual temperature drops during the last two years, and during the last two severe winters in Northern USA and Canada. There is one further indication shown in the link below.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/snow-bosnia-walkans-weather-europe-b2838842.html
Prof Zharkova explains the science behind these assertions in this interview with Tom Nelson:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYOMKLDbeYE
Oh no!
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15165637/Key-North-Atlantic-current-brink-COLLAPSING.html
Renewables overtake coal as world’s biggest source of electricity – BBC News
A puff piece by Justin Rowlatt.
Example – ‘That’s thanks to spectacular reductions in cost. Solar has seen prices fall a staggering 99.9% since 1975 and is now so cheap that large markets for solar can emerge in a country in the space of a single year, especially where grid electricity is expensive and unreliable, says Ember.’ In 1975, photovoltaics were a lab toy, and no sensible person thought of them as more than an isolated, off-grid, power source.
And the ‘Ember; piece Rowlatt quotes lumps in hydropower [hated by some greens, but also weather-dependent] as renewable …
Auto
County Counci;l spends £230,000 a year on ‘Ge=ween Electricity’.
Council tax=payers get warm feeling.
Wiltshire Council spends £230k on green electricity levy a year – BBC News
It is pretty despereate as the BBC is reporting this, including comments from Councillors not wildly happy.
Wiltshire is – or was last time I was there – a fairly rural county; it has farms, which grow crops or livestock which graze.
And CO2 is plant food.
Auto
Oh No! 2#
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/oct/13/coral-reefs-ice-sheets-amazon-rainforest-tipping-point-global-heating-scientists-report
We’re Doooomed!
No point in bird-choppers or EVs now. We’ve tipped. Per the Grauniad, anyway.
That rag is not fit to wrap fish and chips. And I thought we left the EUSSR!
Auto
WUWT’s take:
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/10/13/claim-weve-hit-a-climate-change-tipping-point/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Jo Nova’s hilarious take on it:
https://joannenova.com.au/2025/10/climate-prophets-say-humanity-is-entering-new-reality-crossed-the-first-tipping-point/#more-105481
Oh No! 3#:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15188469/weak-spot-Earths-magnetic-field-explodes-size.html
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/10/14/miliband-approves-uks-biggest-solar-farm-on-3000-acres-of-prime-farmland/
Vindictive, insane, evil or all three?
Ref my post of October 6, 2025 8:34 pm:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15165637/Key-North-Atlantic-current-brink-COLLAPSING.html
In the real world:
https://notrickszone.com/2025/10/16/new-study-contradicts-the-alarmist-narrative-that-says-the-amoc-is-catastrophically-collapsing/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Heavily researched does not guarantee correct. Even one erroneous assumption in common renders pages of references, papers and citations useless. CAGW’s GHE contains three such assumptions.
GHE claims without it Earth becomes 33 C cooler, a 255 K, -18 C, ball of ice.
Wrong.
Naked Earth would be much like the Moon, barren, 400 K lit side, 100 K dark.
TFK_bams09 heat balance graphic uses the same 63 twice violating GAAP and calculating out of thin air a 396 BB/333 “back”/63 net GHE radiative forcing loop violating LoT 1 & 2.
Wrong.
Likewise, the ubiquitous plethora of clones.
GHE requires Earth to radiate “extra” energy as a BB.
Wrong.
A BB requires all energy leaving the system to do so by radiation. Per TFK_bams09 60% leaves by kinetic modes, i.e. conduction, convection, advection and latent rendering BB impossible.
GHE is bogus and CAGW a scam so alarmists must resort to fear mongering, lies, lawsuits, censorship and violence.
2T Kier off on another jaunt –
Keir Starmer will attend Cop30 in Brazil, No 10 confirms | Keir Starmer | The Guardian
Auto
Met Office warns – wind may blow leaves about!
Shock!! Horror!!*
UK weather: Met Office issues rain and wind warnings as named storm possible – BBC Weather
Ahhh … it’s the Beloved Bolshevik Conspiracy exaggerating an already over-egged Met. Office warning of autumn gales … in – wait! – autumn.
“Met Office yellow weather warnings have been issued for wind and rain impacts on Thursday in the United Kingdom. This severe weather come as a deepening area of low pressure heads across southern England that has the potential to be a named storm.”
The money quote, however; –
“Impacts for the UK do not look severe enough for the Met Office to name this weather system.”
It’ll rain, locally heavily, no doubt, somewhere [tho the BBC certainly can’t say where!]. And windy, with gusts i the usual places – up mountains, off coastel headlands, etc.
But another chance to ‘raise consciousness’ of the weather [in the UK, FFS!] – and its intimate link to meat-eating, driving a car, being free, making your own mind up and all the rest that the Blob frowns on.
Remember masks?!
Auto
There must be another COP round the corner:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/climate-and-people/climate-inaction-costing-millions-of-lives-each-year/
Full of ifs and maybes but no comments allowed.
https://joannenova.com.au/2025/10/bill-gates-is-suddenly-skeptical-warning-against-the-doomsday-climate-outlook/
Truth #1: Climate Change is a serious problem but it won’t be the end of civilization.
Truth #2: Temperature is not the best way to measure our progress on climate.
Truth #3: Health and prosperity are the best defense against climate change.
He should have a word with Ed before it’s too late for us.
Bill Gates has a fairly good idea of what is good … for Bill Gates.
Auto
https://dailysceptic.org/2025/10/27/shock-new-report-lays-out-the-full-scale-of-environmental-damage-caused-by-onshore-wind-turbines/
It’s all relative though:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/oct/28/offshore-windfarm-projects-may-be-exempted-from-new-uk-nature-rules
Sacrifices have to be made to save the planet:
The Berwick Bank windfarm in Scotland, for example, is predicted to kill 2,808 guillemots, 814 kittiwakes, 260 gannets, 154 razorbills and 65 puffins in its first year of operation, according to an analysis by the Scottish government. The number of birds killed by turbines, however, is tiny compared with those killed by domestic cats and from flying into power lines.
I wonder how many guillemots, kittiwakes, gannets, razorbills and puffins are killed by cats. And what about the alleged crisis in puffin numbers? Hypocrites.
More cash for the Met. Office –
Labour’s Liz Kendall unveils record £55bn R&D boost for UK innovation
“The funding includes £38bn for UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), the UK’s national funding agency for science, £1.4bn for the Met Office, and £900m for the UK’s national academies.”
Auto
So, £1,400,000,000 for an organisation that appears unable to forecast reasonably accurately two days ahead yet spouts about the weather two generations from now. And borrowed money, at that.
Auto
And is there any truth in the rumour that, last night, a case of good champagne was delivered to ‘an address in Windsor’, with a short note saying “Thanx! Rachel”?
Auto – asking for a friend…
Recent honourable mentions in WUWT and Daily Sceptic. Well done Paul!
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/nov/17/ai-climate-crisis-cop30
Panicking about the energy requirements of AI.
… a new global initiative aimed at fostering AI “as a tool of empowerment” in developing countries to help them tackle environmental problems.
Proponents say the program, in time, will help educate countries on how to use AI in an array of ways to bring down emissions, such as better optimizing public transit, organizing agricultural systems and recalibrating the energy grid so that renewables are deployed at the right times. calibrating the energy grid so that renewables are deployed at the right times.
They don’t get it, do they?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11/18/farmers-ban-gene-edited-crops-starmers-eu-reset/
Isn’t one of the concerns about climate change food insecurity? In which case why hamstring our famers?
To reduce the Deplorable Count – would be my first guess.
Hatred of independent people [like all farmers are, or certainly used to be] – my second guess.
And pandering to innumerate back-benchers needs to be in there, I fear. Sadly.
Auto
Studies show how the giant statues on Rapa Nui were made and moved—and what caused the island’s deforestation
Interesting brief article on Easter Island – Rapa Nui – and the Moai.
The ending is worth quoting – and its applicability may not be restricted to archaeology!
“To tackle Rapa Nui’s mysteries, we used systematic documentation. We specified testable predictions, gathered data that could prove us wrong and accepted what the evidence showed. Rapa Nui shows that even entrenched mysteries yield to methodical investigation.”
Auto
WSJ has a good article about the hole the EU and UK have dug for itself with energy policy
https://emailshare.cmail20.com/t/n/d-l-e3bc87d2cf6c11f08e3808da62d5b08d-l-d-r-l/
Another failure
https://www.startupresearcher.com/news/dutch-solar-startup-soly-collapses-after-eur30-million-funding
“New homes delayed by ‘energy-hungry’ data centres”
Remember 1,500,000 to be built this parliament [even if they’re not hooked up …]
West London housing was delayed by new data centres, report finds – BBC News
But it is sunny in the UK … a [little] bit of the time.
The utter disconnect between the drive for AI and data centres, and th regression to Eighteenth Century energy is unfathomable – unless those decreeing this are NOT acting in the best interests of the UK.
But, aware of the Duck Rule, some of us were well aware of this.
What’s Sir Starmer’s Excuse?
Or Boris’s, or May’s??
Auto
The BBC, of course, doesn’t explore why the UK destroyed power stations – many in or close to London.
There could have been upgraded, perhaps with gas instead of coal [although modern HELE stations are reportedly pretty clean].
Auto
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/consumer-affairs/85000-heat-pump-tumble-dryers-at-risk-of-catching-fire/
Grid scale batteries, EVs, solar panels, domestic battery packs, electric buses and trucks, e-bikes, etc. What next?
ABSTRACT:Earth is cooler with atmosphere/water vapor/30% albedo not warmer.Ubiquitous RGHE heat balance graphics don’t plus violate GAAP and LoT.Kinetic heat transfer processes of contiguous atmospheric molecules render a surface BB impossible.RGHE is bogus & CAGW is a scam!
FACTS & EVIDENCE:
FACT 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GHGs and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At Earth’s distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K).
That’s NOT what the RGHE theory says.
EVIDENCE:
RGHE theory says “288 K (15 C) w – 255 K (-18 C) w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth.” 255 K assumes w/o case keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud. Nobody agrees 288 K is GMST plus it was 15 C in 1896. 288 K is a physical surface measurement. 255 K is a S-B equilibrium calculation at ToA. Apples and potatoes.
Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies”
Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth”
UCLA Diviner lunar mission data
JWST solar shield (391.7 K)
Sky Lab golden awning
ISS HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site)
Astronaut backpack life support w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center)
FACT 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a BB.
EVIDENCE:
According to TFK_bams09 atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396 BB/333 “back”/63 2nd net W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a BB. These graphics & data tables contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors.
FACT 3: Because of the significant (60% per TFK_bams09) non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a near Black Body.
EVIDENCE:
As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science.
For the experimental write up see:
https://principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/
Search: Bruges group “boiling water pot”
CONCLUSION:No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.
Nick Schroeder, BSME CU ‘78
Colorado Springs
719 651 7383
Nschroeder48@aol.com
ACRONYMS & DEFINITIONS
RGHE: Radiative GreenHouse EffectGAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting PrinciplesLoT: Laws of ThermodynamicsBB: Black Body: A thermodynamic system that absorbs ALL incoming energy and emits ALL that energy by radiation alone. Only possible in a vacuum.CAGW: Catastrophic Anthropomorphic Global WarmingGHGs: GreenHouse Gases, all of them including water vaporK: Celsius degree units on the Kelvin scale used for serious science (No such thang as a Kelvin unit)hot^3: hot cubed, i.e. hothothotcold^3: cold cubed, i.e. coldcoldcoldalbedo: Ice, snow, clouds, etc. that reflect incoming solar radiation thereby cooling the EarthC: Celsius degree units on the Celsius scaleUCLA: Univ of CA LAJWST: James Webb Space TelescopeHVAC: Heating, Ventilation, Air ConditioningF: degrees Fahrenheit on the F scale. Not useful for formal science.ISS: International Space StationSpace Discovery Center: Colorado SpringsTFK Trenberth-Fasullo-Kiehl, UCAR climate scientists responsible for GHE budget conceptUCAR: Univ of CO Atmos ResearchSURFRAD: NOAA network of stations that measure the surface radiation budget and aerosols over the Earth’s land surface.LWIR: Long Wave Infra-Red radiation.CO2: Carbon DioxideBSME: Bachelor of Science Mechanical EngineeringCU: University of Colorado, Boulder
The top brass has noticed – at last, some would say – that the UK doesn’t have enough Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen.
Britain’s defense chief calls on Gen Z grads leaving university to skip corporate jobs and join the military as war with Russia becomes a growing risk | Fortune
Not on the BBC yet.
But would you join, or advise your [grand]child to join, an outfit that – in 30 or 50 years – will come after them, claiming they misgendered a shot, incapacitated, foe? Yet this seems to be what Sir Starmer – and the wonderful Lord Hermer – are trying now.
Whilst excusing [‘It’s a long time ago’] the terrorists trying to kill our soldiers and policemen. Not without success, sadly, so frequently
It absolutely looks like 2 Tier justice.
And if Lammy gets rid of juries, they’ll be forced to put up with a judge – who might be impartially lefty ….
Auto
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/12/19/the-marvellous-prospect-of-cheap-energy-again/
Seriously? Last I heard, even if gas was free, we’d still be seeing energy price rises.
Could you make it up?
‘Not enough hydrogen’ for Liverpool City Region’s hydrogen buses – BBC News
“A fleet of 20 hydrogen-fuelled buses – half of which have never been used – will be converted to battery power after the Liverpool City Region Combined Authority (LCRCA) said there was not enough hydrogen to run them. Ten of the buses operated by Arriva have been used sporadically since 2023, but only 450 passenger-carrying journeys have been made. Rival operator Stagecoach’s 10 buses have never carried passengers though.”
“The 20-strong fleet was purchased through the Liverpool City Region’s Transforming Cities Fund in 2021. The buses were intended to serve the region’s busiest route – the 10A between St Helens and Liverpool city centre.
“The fleet was launched to huge fanfare and described as a “trailblazing” way to help the region meet its net zero targets.”
“LCRCA transport committee member and Liberal Democrat councillor Liz Makinson said ending the hydrogen project was “the right decision” but added: “It’s a pity that we spent £10m on the wrong decision.””
“Makinson suggested the buses were acquired “on a whim”. …
“”And the reality of it is that there are failed experiments in these buses in Aberdeen, further afield in the Netherlands and Germany.
“”So really, some of this intelligence should have been listened to and thought through at the time, rather than just go ahead with this big, splashy fanfare.”
Makinson said she believed there should be more scrutiny of “big ticket decisions” in the city region.”
More ‘scrutiny’?
But … it’s other people’s money!
In fairness – “The costs for this conversion will be met by the vehicle supplier as part of their ongoing commitment to support the introduction of an electrical bus fleet in the City Region.”
No transport – no emissions.
Auto
Fairly considerable re-engineering it might seem – changing from a compressed gas combustion system to a battery-powered electric motor.
I wonder if the original contract for supply of 20 buses included a big-enough profit margin for such work to still leave the [unidentified] supplier ahead on points?
And, for that to be the case, will they seek to re-possess any free pens and canvas tote bags given away as part of the marketing or ‘celebrations’?
“The 20-strong fleet was purchased through the Liverpool City Region’s Transforming Cities Fund in 2021.”
Auto
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/12/30/the-tech-bro-plan-to-cut-the-price-of-britains-electricity/
Sounds good, but exactly what portion of the domestic energy bill can be affected by their approach?
Hundreds of British Buses Have Chinese ‘Kill Switch’: Concerns Over Security and Sovereignty | The Swamp
Also in the Telegraph, behind a paywall.
And, anyway, it’s saving the universe, or something …
Auto
Britain at risk of electricity rationing before general election
Ageing gas-fired power stations prompt fears of ‘widespread system failures’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/01/11/britain-risk-electricity-rationing-before-general-election/
Germany to tender 12 gigawatts of new power plant capacity in 2026
Okay it’ll take years to get the kit and build, but it’s a start.
Is Mr. Miliband aware?
Auto
Germany to build 10GW of baseload gas plants (disguised as “future” hydrogen plants) « JoNova
Jo Nova also has this story.