[go: up one dir, main page]

Showing posts with label Walt Disney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Walt Disney. Show all posts

Friday, June 19, 2026

The Tramp & The Mouse


Two of cinema's earliest universal icons, Charlie Chaplin's Tramp and Walt Disney's Mickey Mouse, followed a similar trajectory: they started off as these very primal creatures, driven by impulses and instincts such as lust, jealousy, rage and stubbornness, with little care for the consequences. Presumably, part of why they caught on with audiences the way they did was that they sort of served as our Id, behaving mischievously and sometimes outright badly in ways we might wish we could if we weren't so damned civilized. It was cathartic to see them lob a brick right at some big annoying guy's head, especially since we were safe in the knowledge that this was the world of comedy so said annoying guy would shake it off and be fine in the end. No harm, no foul. Wouldn't you like to do that?

Eventually, these rough edges were sanded down and the characters became gentler, more pathos-driven. The difference is that with the Tramp, this less-aggressive version of the character allowed him to soar to his highest heights-- it's hard to imagine the mean-spirited Tramp we see in the early Keystone short The Fatal Mallet carrying a feature like Modern Times or (especially) The Great Dictator. Whereas when Mickey got nicer, he consequently wound up taking a backseat to his more interesting co-stars who were allowed to do dangerous and stupid things, Donald Duck and Goofy.

Charlie Chaplin and Walt Disney in 1939.
I think the key difference here is that the Tramp's personality shift seemed to be an organic evolution, the product of Chaplin becoming more intimate with the character as the years passed and he figured out who he was, and who he wasn't. It didn't feel like a subtraction, it felt like he was being fleshed out. Conversely, Walt Disney admitted in a moment of candid frustration that Mickey's de-fanging was a product of parents complaining their children imitated him every time he misbehaved [1]. It was a concession to Disney's efforts to more-deliberately court family audiences and become a staple of wholesome Americana, something Chaplin consistently rejected, even when it wound up causing problems for him.

Would this make Donald Duck Monsieur Verdoux? Hell, I'd watch that.

1. In 1953, Walt Disney said, “Mickey’s our problem child. He’s so much of an institution that we’re limited in what we can do with him. If we have Mickey kicking someone in the pants we get a million letters from mothers telling us we’re giving their kids the wrong ideas. Mickey must always be sweet, always lovable. What can you do with such a leading man?”  (Sourced from Joshua Glenn) [top]

Sunday, January 4, 2026

2025 Reading - Part II

 Click here for the previous part!

Dylan Goes Electric! Newport, Seeger, Dylan and The Night That Split The Sixties

By Elijah Wald

2015

Last December, a biopic about Dylan's earlier years came out to much fanfare (notably, it had the stamp of approval from ol' Zimmy himself). For those wondering my thoughts on it: I liked it! Thought it was quite good. Ed Norton's performance as Pete Seeger, especially, was phenomenal. The film took a few liberal departures from reality, but this is to be expected with a biopic.

What I wasn't initially aware of was that it was an adaptation of a book. I made a beeline to the library (a few months after I saw the movie, if we're being honest... not a particularly beeline-ish beeline) to get a copy. 

Honestly, I think the book surpasses the movie, as much as I did enjoy it. Like the film it spawned, Elijah Wald's book walks us through the beginning of Dylan's career up until his famous polarization of his folkie fanbase upon whence he plugged in his electric guitar and started rocking and rolling and so forth. Now, I'm no newcomer to Dylan-- a lot of the information concerning him was information that I already knew. What I didn't know, however, was all that much about the life of Pete Seeger, who this book admirably devotes about equal time to. I knew a basic outline of who the man was, but I found myself coming away from reading this feeling like I had gained a much richer understanding of him and where he had come from. A very fascinating and remarkable figure who deserves more than being relegated to the cranky-old-fogey-telling-Bob-to-turn-that-infernal-racket-down role he is often shoved into whenever people talk about The Legend of Electric Dylan. Wald evidently sought to rectify that by spilling (almost) as much ink on what Pete was up to in the mid-60s as he does Dylan's adventures. 

As it turns out, he was more open-minded about the electrified material than he is typically given credit for (Dylan wasn't even the first electric act he had at the Newport Festival!), and no, he didn't attempt to cut Bob Dylan's seismic set at Newport '65 short with an axe to his amp cables like you might have heard. People are complex, and-- brace yourself-- Seeger had a bit more going on than the conventional wisdom of music lore generally allows him whenever it recounts this tale. It was refreshing to see a take on the events that made a point of thoroughly separating fact from fiction-- as iconic a story as the fiction may be.

Everybody Loves Somebody Sometimes (Especially Himself): The Story of Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis

By Arthur Marx

1974

(Serendipitous? I picked up some Martin and Lewis DVDs earlier today.)

One of the greatest comedy duos who weren't named Laurel and Hardy are examined in this volume written by Arthur Marx (son of Groucho). We begin with their chaotic beginnings as a nightclub act, follow them as they ascend the mountain to superstardom, and brace ourselves as things sour and the two race towards their acrimonious breakup, largely thanks to Jerry Lewis' swollen ego (the book does not paint him very kindly, although I don't think it was too out of line in this respect. Brilliant comedian, but by all accounts a very taxing man to be around). The aftermath and the solo careers that emerged in its wake are analyzed as well.

What's especially interesting about this book is what's not in it-- being written in 1974 informs a markedly different view of Jerry Lewis' career than what we have now nearly a decade after his death. When Martin and Lewis split, just about everybody thought it would lead to the latter flying higher than ever and the former descending into obscurity. Jerry was the funny one, and under-utilized Dean just sort of stood around and looked pretty most of the time; not hard to see why this was the go-to prediction. Of course, it wasn't to be-- it took some patience, but Dean Martin became one of the most beloved singers of his day and remains a definitive crooner, having at least three or four tunes from his repertoire that are familiar to everybody on the planet.

Jerry, on the other hand, started off strong with a string of popular, crowd-pleasing movies, but ran out of gas when it became evident that he would simply be unable to reign in his infamous ego. When you have talent and enough people notice it, you tend to get surrounded by ass-kissers who will tell you your farts smell fantastic while they're down there. If this persists long enough, you may start to believe it yourself. Such was the case for Mr. Lewis upon reaching household-name status; he was seemingly convinced he was the logical heir to Chaplin, but many have gunned for such a title and none achieved it. In his bubble o' fame, he fell out of touch with what the moviegoing public wanted. As audiences consequently grew less and less interested in what JL had to offer them, the promise that was shown in his first few solo films like The Bellboy and Cinderfella seemed to evaporate, leaving the 1950s' favorite clown perennially trapped in the shadow of his ex-partner, a picture of potential left unfulfilled. 

The book's narrative ends around the time of The Day The Clown Cried, Jerry Lewis' legendarily ill-advised project that was emblematic of the gulf between what Lewis thought he should be doing and what people actually wanted to see. It would have had Jerry portraying a clown who ends up in a nazi concentration camp and becoming a sort of angel of death(?) for imprisoned Jewish children. A masturbatory warped version of The Great Dictator that, in place of Chaplin's heartfelt plea for the world to reject fascism, is a hollow vehicle for some asshole character to dance around the backdrop of the Holocaust, which is transparently his set piece for no reason other than he really, really wants an Academy Award (hey, it ended up working for Benigni! To Lewis' credit, there's no way it could have been more soulless than Life is Beautiful).

Mercifully, it was never completed, being scrapped after Jerry presumably had a moment of extreme mental clarity the likes of which Buddhists have sought out for years and asked "What the fuck am I making?" To date, it has not been released in its unfinished entirety (but every once in a while it seems like it almost comes out), although some have seen what exists of it, including Harry Shearer:

"The closest I can come to describing the effect is if you flew down to Tijuana and suddenly saw a painting on black velvet of Auschwitz. You'd just think, My God, wait a minute! It's not funny, and it's not good, and somebody's trying too hard in the wrong way to convey this strongly held feeling."


This bleak note ends Marx's story, but as you probably know did not necessarily end Martin and Lewis'. Just two years after the book's publication, the two reunited on live television courtesy of one Frank Sinatra and reportedly rekindled their friendship thereafter. In 1982, Martin Scorsese cast Jerry Lewis in what was quite a departure for the Nutty Professor, a role in The King of Comedy. Lewis got a chance to reveal a different side of his acting chops, and although the film didn't exactly set the box office ablaze, it was met with acclaim with many singling out Jerry for praise. His film career never really regained the momentum it had in the early 1960s, but he had given his public one last great performance for the books.

The Pirates & The Mouse: Disney's War Against The Underground

By Bob Levin

2003

As everybody knows, the one thing The Walt Disney Corporation loves the most is when people parody their work, making liberal use of their copyrighted characters in doing so. Unfortunately, it seems that a group of underground cartoonists from the early 1970s who did so caught them at a bad moment, igniting a lawsuit that lasted eons and a debate about Fair Use vs. plagiarism that still gets quite heated mileage a half-century later.

Bobby London's model sheet for Goofy. 
Click on the image for a better look!
The Air Pirates, ostensibly led by Odd Bodkins creator Dan O'Neill and featuring several young cartoonists who would go on to become legends of the industry shortly after (Bobby London, Shary Flenniken, Ted Richards and Gary Hallgren), self-published some comic books that featured Disney characters like Mickey and Minnie Mouse smokin' dope and enjoying the free love of the times, much to the chagrin of said characters' corporate masters. (Supposedly, O'Neill actually wanted to get sued, and saw to it that copies of the book would be placed directly on a conference table at Disney's offices. Eccentric guy, as you will find out!) Disney took things to court, and the case dragged out for much longer than one would have expected, particularly due to O'Neill's repeated provocations (he kept putting out comics featuring Mickey during the whole ordeal). 

Bob Levin's book on the matter interviews just about everybody concerned with the story-- each member of the Pirates, several of the lawyers involved, and so forth. I've been weirdly fascinated by the entire caper ever since I was in middle school and I first started getting into the history of the underground movement, so a lot of the material in here was not all that new to me-- but I would have to say that it must be the definitive account of the story. It also features some cool art I hadn't seen beforehand.

Gary Hallgren's model sheets for
Horace Horsecollar and Pete. Click
on the image for a better look!
As I mentioned earlier, to this day people debate the Air Pirates case-- yes, they drew on-model versions of Disney characters in their comics, but at the same time the stories were so outlandishly raunchy that nobody in their right mind could have ever mistaken it for a genuine Mouse House product (not to mention the books were distributed in head shops and the usual hippie haunts, rather than newsstands or... basically anywhere a child/Disney's regular audience would be able to get their hands on it. In fact, I would argue the lawsuit exponentially increased the chances of the general public looking at the books, as it raised their profile quite substantially).

The Pirates' tomes are available to read on the Internet Archive as of this writing, so you can decide for yourself whether they crossed the line or not.


Crumb: A Cartoonist's Life

By Dan Nadel

2025

While we are on the topic of underground comics, let's close out this second instalment with the much-anticipated biography of Robert Crumb. Done with the participation of the man himself (as you may have intuited through the cover illustration present here), it's a highly in-depth, nothing-held-back look over his life and art. This is not particularly new territory for Crumb, as much of his work is quite famously autobiographical and willing to tell you every nasty detail in his trademark guilty-confession-esque style, but it certainly is interesting to see it written from the perspective of a third party for once (particularly one who isn't ashamed/aroused by much of the proceedings). 

I don't have much else to add, but don't get me wrong-- I highly recommend this one, it was a great read that I blazed through because it kept me hooked. I would put this up there in the upper-echelon of biographies that I've read, with the likes of Brian Jay Jones' book on Jim Henson, Peter Guralnick's two volumes on Elvis Presley and James Kaplan's also-two-volumes on Frank Sinatra. Thorough and engrossing.

Part the Third, which should close out this verbal vomit, will hopefully be up before the end of the month! Stay tuned!

Friday, December 19, 2025

2025 Reading - Part I

The Beatles, Lennon & Me

By Pete Shotton and Nicholas Schaffner

1983

By this point, I think I've read nearly every book on the Beatles that contains any worthwhile information (there are a zillion Beatles books out there, but only a small percentage really have anything of value to add to the conversation). This was one that I had neglected to get under my belt up until the start of the year.

For those who don't know, Pete Shotton was John Lennon's childhood best friend, and the two of them remained incredibly close up until the breakup of the Fab Four (or somewhere around there, I don't 100% remember. I read this in January). There is lots of fascinating insight Shotton's memoir offers, as he had a perspective very few did: he knew Lennon pre-fame, and got what mostly seemed to be an unguarded version of the famously-guarded musician. To wit, many of the stories here (especially concerning their teenage years) are pretty ribald and peppered with curse words and stories about bodily fluids that come from the nether-regions, which, again, is pretty rare for a tome concerning the Beatles. If you wish to know John Lennon's record for honking it in one day, you're in luck!

Two pretty infamous Beatle anecdotes originated from here, that you've probably heard by now if you care anything about the Mop Tops-- the groupwank sessions, of which Pete was a participant (I am weirdly proud to let you all know that despite not having read this book, I did know about that years before it made headlines recently-ish), and the allegation that John and the Beatles' manager Brian Epstein had some sort of sexual encounter on their oft-speculated-about trip to Barcelona together. The latter here spawned a well-regarded short film!

I would consider it essential Beatles reading, even if the information volunteered here doesn't have much to do with their creative process (although Shotton does claim he contributed a line to Eleanor Rigby) or artistry or history outside of what Shotton was privy to. If you want to see the most mythologized figures of 20th-century pop culture humanized, this is a good place to go.


Sick on You: The Disastrous Story of Britain's Great Lost Punk Band

By Andrew Matheson 

2015

There are two books that I read this year that had the greatest impact on me; one is this one (and the other we won't be getting to in this instalment).

I had been meaning to listen to the Hollywood Brats' album for quite awhile, and finally did so at the start of this year. I was blown away. For my money, it's one of the best pure rock 'n roll albums ever recorded. The sound of that record is the sound I've always wanted to hear from rock music, Stones-influenced sleaze glammed out to the extreme. The New York Dolls, one of my favorite bands of all time, are the only other group who hit this sweet spot for me just as perfectly (the Dolls are often a point of comparison for the Brats, although in this book Matheson claimed they weren't influenced by them at all-- which I don't buy). Why did they just make one proper album? How did they presage the explosion of punk rock by a couple of years? Where did these guys come from, and where did they go?

The band's founder and frontman, Andrew Matheson, answers all these questions here with a vivid and hilarious narrative style. He walks us through the band's origins, when he arrived in the UK as a teenager armed with nothing but a wad of cash, some records and a guitar (which he was promptly semi-swindled out of). We follow the Hollywood Brats' struggle to exist in the first place, and after that, their struggle to not implode in on themselves. Young an' rowdy rock an' rollers who keep seeming to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, despite their talent. I won't spoil the many tales that comprise their journey, but I would be remiss not to mention the fact that Cliff Richard of all people lets the band stay in one of his mansions while he's not using it, and what ensues reads like a debauched episode of The Monkees on crack.

The Brat's album is phenomenal, but was released after their demise. Malcolm MacLaren tried to revive the group shortly after but Matheson turned him down, causing the impresario-in-training to focus his attention to his other going musical concern, the burgeoning Sex Pistols, whom the Brats influenced. The Clash and several other seminal punks took more than a few cues from the Brats, yet they remain relatively obscure unlike their peers in this sense such as the Velvet Underground, the Stooges and so forth-- a secret for those who want to seek it out. It's a shame.

A further shame is that Matheson passed in May of this year with little fanfare. The Brats' drummer Louis Sparks (maybe the heart of this book) also departed a few years back, and the sole piece of info I could find about that was his obituary on a crematorium website. The group sorta-reformed (and released a single) in 2019, but it looks like the story has come to an anti-climactic end. Do yourself a favor and listen to their album if you haven't. Keep Brat-dom alive, it deserves it.


Dead Man's Curve: The Rock 'n' Roll Life of Jan Berry

By Mark A. Moore

2021

I mentioned this book in another post, so I will reiterate: it's the definitive tome on Jan Berry and Jan & Dean in general. Exhaustively comprehensive, sometimes to a fault, it covers everything one should know about the massively-underrated pop duo and then some.

Jan Berry is an unsung genius of 1960s music, so if you are unfamiliar with why I make such an assertion, I would point you in the direction of this book. You'll gain an appreciation for just how much the guy accomplished and pioneered in such a short window of time, starting with his professional-quality DIY recording studio he built in garage as a teenager.


Hank Williams: The Biography

By Colin Escott, with George Merritt and William MacEwen

1994

A captivating account of the life of one of country music's Mount Rushmore figures. Does a good job of separating fact from fiction, especially in regards to sanitized narratives that were pushed (predominantly) by Williams' ex-wife Audrey Sheppard after his death. Quite tragic overall, the man had some real demons and never seemed to be quite able to get it together long enough to reach stability (although this is well-known by now). I don't have too much to add here, really. If you're a fan of country this is an essential story, and if you're not I would wager you'll still find it a fascinating tale.


Ginger Geezer: The Life of Vivian Stanshall

By Lucian Randall and Chris Welch

2001

The Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah band have been a favorite of mine for many years, and Vivian Stanshall was an artist like few others both within and outside of it. One of the great British figures of the 20th-century, his boundlessly creative and unique artistry gets the retrospective it deserves here. Much like the Hank Williams book mentioned above, this is a musician whose story ends in tragedy and who seemed rather tormented during his life. The book doesn't shy away from any of this, it's a warts-and-all portrait of Stanshall. 

What I truly enjoyed about it is that it analyzed Stanshall the artist and human being on his own level and truly engaged with what he left the world, rather than treating him like some kind of wacky cartoon character or novelty act like many recollections of the man often do. Randall and Welch are clearly two people who had a sincere appreciation of Stanshall's body of work and his specialized place in the history of the performing arts.

Walt Disney: The Triumph of The American Imagination

By Neal Gabler

2001

When we hear the name "Walt Disney" nowadays, we don't really think of a person. We think of an entertainment company that is practically omniscient by this point. If we try to envision the man who bore that name, what we see is still not so much a human being but a symbol. Someone who was effectively turned into a mascot for themselves.

If you ask ten different people for their opinion on Walter Elias Disney, you will likely receive ten different points of view. He was "Uncle Walt", the jovial storyteller who wanted us to know that it was okay to believe in magic, because he was going to bring it to us. He was "Disney", the cold and calculating media conglomerate that easily vanquishes anyone who stands in its path to world domination. He was an innovator; a forward-thinker who was completely obsessed with the idea of progress and wanted the world to be its best self. He was a close-minded crank who eventually developed some stubborn and backward notions, seeming threatened by anything that he couldn't understand. He created a studio that was a haven for artists, a mecca with a "one-for-all and all-for-one attitude" where he worked hand-in-hand with creative talent to realize a shared vision. He was an unreachable boss who handled the idea of his staff unionizing disastrously and made enemies of many of them when they were forced by his own stubbornness to go on strike. He was a friend to everyone and wanted the whole world to be included in his whimsical fantasies, regardless of race or creed. He was a symbol of American imperialism whose works include racist and regressive moments dotted throughout.

What's the truth? How did this walking contradiction, who simultaneously represented the best of us and the worst of us, exist?

Author Neal Gabler pulled off quite a remarkable feat: he was granted completely unrestricted access to the Disney archives in order to write this biography, and Disney the company had absolutely no say over the final product. As a result, we get what has to be the most well-rounded, three-dimensional portrait of a guy who seems so impossible to pin down. Gabler's overarching theory, which I agree with, is that Walt Disney was a man who was hurt by the real world many times and consequently aimed to create a world of his own where everything would be just to his liking. 

This results in Walt's most admirable qualities: the constant drive to blaze forward, to pioneer new technologies and take the medium of animation further than anyone could have possibly conceived of it going before. The care and craftsmanship he personally poured into projects such as Snow White, Fantasia and Steamboat Willie as he took each and every frame under his microscope a dozen times, made the impossible a reality, opened new horizons for artists and brought joy to countless people. It also resulted in his worst qualities: whenever an issue presented itself that seemed incongruous with his fantasy world, he wanted no part of it. He sided with some nasty characters during the Disney studio strike of 1941, and viewed the animators trying to get what they were owed as a personal betrayal. He named names during the McCarthy hearings after becoming paranoid that the entity of communism was gunning to take his studio away from him and would possess certain employees in its effort to do so. The most apt demonstration of this is when he wanted to create a movie that would promote racial equality and he personally went above-and-beyond to get its star, James Baskett, an Academy Award in 1948, a time when racism was even more deeply-ingrained into American society than it is today. His desire for harmony amongst mankind was genuine, yet he still viewed the world through the simplistic lens of the pop culture he was familiar with, offering a foolish view of what those who weren't white were like-- the resulting movie was Song of The South, an Uncle Tom-ish picture that is frequently cited as a symbol of everything backwards and bigoted about the Disney studio's body of work, attempting to treat the black characters as dignified but coming across as condescending.

Gabler's biography is the definitive word on Disney as far as I'm concerned-- the research was clearly exhaustive and it comes across in the detailed final product. Yet it's not merely a mechanical reciting of the events that happened that happened throughout Disney's lifetime; it manages to be an engrossing, living and breathing portrayal of a man who poured his blood, sweat and tears into creating a kinder world for himself to live in, yet often failed to establish meaningful connections with the people around him in doing so, frequently shutting himself off in the bubble that world he had constructed allowed him to stay in.

This is it for part one! Part two will be up... I dunno. Soon I hope. I'm busy!