[go: up one dir, main page]

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes it absolutely is still a burglary. Classic victim blaming.




Who’s the victim? The CEO? I think the patients are the victims here.

I'm not well versed in Finnish law - but in the USA simply the act of accessing a computer without authorization, even if it not secured, can be a crime under the CFAA. So the company is still a victim, and obviously the patients as well, even if they are incompetent. For the same reason that a person that gets burgled because they left their door unlocked when they left the house is still a victim.

But if you attest that your computer system is not accessible by any passersby in order to pass compliance, is that not also a crime? If it is indeed accessible to just anyone? HIPAA law violations and all that

I’m not arguing the person who stole didn’t commit a crime - just a lesser one than actually breaking in, cracking a safe, and making off with the jewels. I think the CEO and executive staff are culpable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: