skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Updated 3/18/2024
I heard from an unimpeachable source that you've all been good little children this year. So as a last-minute gift from me to you, all the Monkey's alternate Oscar polls are up and running — that's 728 741 polls covering 130 132 years of movie history honoring more than two thousand motion picture features, shorts and fragments.
What value! What insanity! As I told Katie-Bar-The-Door this morning, it's like bragging you finally chopped down that oak tree with a butter knife. But it's my oak tree and my butter knife and you chop that which fate has given you to chop whether the chopping of it makes sense or not.
Or as Albert Camus put it, "One must imagine Sisyphus happy."
The polls are grouped by decade, starting in 1888 and running through 2017 2019. On New Year's Day, I'll begin reposting them one year at a time until you've had a crack at them all.
In the meantime (in case you just can't wait), you can follow these links to the decade of your choice and vote now. Seasons greetings and happy new year!
1888 to 1909
1910s
1920s
1930s
1940s
1950s
1960s
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
Rumor has it that Edmond O'Brien won best supporting actor because a trio of On the Waterfront actors — Lee J. Cobb, Karl Malden and Rod Steiger — split the vote. Given that O'Brien didn't do anything in The Barefoot Contessa but sweat, all I can say is, "Maybe."
No, that's not fair. Edmond O'Brien was actually very good in The Barefoot Contessa, and a lot of other things, too — D.O.A., Seven Days in May and The Wild Bunch, for example.
But the Monkey is all about having your cake and eating it too — I've combined Cobb, Malden and Steiger into a single nominee for your voting convenience. No excuses if they lose this time.
Me? I'm voting for Toshiro Mifune.
Best Supporting Actor of 1954
My choices are noted with a ★. A tie is indicated with a ✪. Historical Oscar winners are noted with a ✔. Best foreign-language picture winners are noted with an ƒ. Best animated feature winners are noted with an @. A historical winner who won in a different category is noted with a ✱.
Best Actress of 1998
My choices are noted with a ★. A tie is indicated with a ✪. Historical Oscar winners are noted with a ✔. Best foreign-language picture winners are noted with an ƒ. Best animated feature winners are noted with an @. A historical winner who won in a different category is noted with a ✱.
Sight & Sound came out this past week with its once-a-decade list of the greatest movies ever made.
As usual, it treats the ticket-buying public with ridicule rather than respect. Screw Star Wars and Marvel. And there's not much love for classical Hollywood filmmaking either — no Spielberg, no Hawks, no Capra, no Lubitsch.
Dr. Strangelove? Double Indemnity? The Marx Brothers? Not on the list.
The Adventures of Robin Hood? Pulp Fiction? The Grapes of Wrath? Nope.
A Hard Day's Night? Unforgiven? Uh-uh.
Not even Weekend at Bernie's 2!
Make of it what you will.
As for their choice of the best of all time, Jeanne Dielman, 23, quai du commerce, 1080 Bruxelles — a dull movie about a dull woman living on the raggedy edge of Dullsville — well, other than to note that it's 200 minutes of Delphine Seyrig peeling potatoes, I don't have much of anything to say about it.
But I do want to mention how much film fandom has changed in my lifetime. Back in the day, everything was word of mouth — no VHS, no DVDs, no streaming. No IMDB. Hell, no cable television! There were only two ways to see a movie: in the theater or on broadcast television. Sometimes you'd have to wait five years to see a movie and if for some reason you missed it, you waited five more.
And if some boozed-up jackanapes laid claim to a watching-paint-dry-snoozefest as the best movie of all-time, you had to take his word for it.
Now pretty much everybody in the industrialized world can dial up a movie like Jeanne Dielman (on the Criterion channel) and watch it at their convenience.
The old film canon is dead because you don't need one — watch everything yourself and draw your own conclusions.
Anyway, is Jeanne Dielman the greatest movie ever made? Let me put it this way — I'd rather spend three hours on line at the DMV. But if you want to vote it the best movie of 1975, here's your chance.
Best Picture of 1975
Best Actor 1975
Best Actress of 1975
Best Director of 1975
Best Supporting Actor of 1975
Best Supporting Actress of 1975
Special Award
My choices are noted with a ★. A tie is indicated with a ✪. Historical Oscar winners are noted with a ✔. Best foreign-language picture winners are noted with an ƒ. Best animated feature winners are noted with an @. A historical winner who won in a different category is noted with a ✱.
Nothing particularly wrong with the 1953 actress vote the first time around. But since then, the Argentine classic El Vampiro Negro has been rescued and restored and has recently made its TCM debut on Eddie Muller's Noir Alley. And if you can't change your mind in light of new information, well then, you're like a lot of people these days ...
A loose remake of Fritz Lang's classic M, El Vampiro Negro (The Black Vampire to you English-speakers) stars Olga Zubarry as a nightclub singer who is the only person to have seen the face of a serial killer preying on local children. It's a very good movie and Zubarry is very good in it. Thus, her nomination here for best actress.
Four of the other nominees remain the same. For those of you scoring at home, three of them — Audrey Hepburn, Deborah Kerr and Marilyn Monroe — have won alternate Oscars for other movies.
Which is not why I'm voting for Jane Russell, but it doesn't hurt. She's terrific in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes — if you know the movie and the behind-the-scenes story, you know she's the reason this is such a great film — and I happen to think it's the best performance by a lead actress in 1953. That she had a career worth a little recognition is just icing on the cake.
Not that I'm trying to influence you, but if you can't twist a friend's arm, then what are arms for?
Have at it.
Best Actress of 1953
My choices are noted with a ★. Historical Oscar winners are noted with a ✔.
A year ago I asked you to decide who the nominees for the 2016 alternate Oscars should be. With one exception (it's my blog!), I abided by your picks. A lot of solid choices for best picture without any of them being the obvious winner. No Casablanca's here.
Some of the best picture nominees have become regular staples of basic cable — Deadpool, Rogue One, Hidden Figures. Others like Moonlight never will.
It's up to you to decide what you think a best picture is.
Best Picture of 2016
Best Actor of 2016
Best Actress of 2016
Best Director of 2016
Best Supporting Actor of 2016
Supporting Actress of 2016
Special Award
My choices are noted with a ★. A tie is indicated with a ✪. Historical Oscar winners are noted with a ✔. Best foreign-language picture winners are noted with an ƒ. A historical winner who won in a different category is noted with a ✱.
