High demand from data centers decreases the supply for consumers, the consumer demand is unaffected.

To protect themselves from the other armed off-duty soldiers, of course

Any resulting violence will justify the need for more guns!

Haven’t played it, eh?

Only when it’s properly funded. But we can do that.

Damage or destroy, sure. But to me, hijacking means taking control of the aircraft, and I don’t see that happening without cockpit access. (Not that doors are impenetrable, but still.)

Mixing religion and people was a mistake.

But they do prevent hijackings…

After Flavius Columbus, of course

True, but I think the point is that Reuters, et al have better things to do.

Me with Oasis. Which one is the asshole with the bad haircut?

He’s dropping the People’s Cankle on 'em!

These all sound like reasons for Sony to get out of the console market. (And maybe start making PCs that go head to head with Steam Machines.)

Oh, they will.

Books like “A Canticle for Liebowitz”

If you do that, there will be nothing left!

Honestly, I feel like most people won’t know or care. The people driven away by the title probably aren’t their target demo. It doesn’t seem to be too focused on gunplay, other than point & shoot.

Perhaps so, but it wouldn’t be the first “fantasy round” in an RPG.

Meh.

The catch is that we’ve already been paying for it, since the consumers bear the cost of the tariffs.

A direct link to the relevant comment: https://lemmy.world/comment/20377671