[go: up one dir, main page]

Sussy little warblog but I’ll allow it for now 👀

Expand article

As mysterious meteorites streaked across the skies in March, capturing the world’s attention, Russia was quietly executing one of its most remarkable technological comebacks. Just four months after a heavy launchpad accident threatened to derail its crewed space program, Roscosmos not only restored the facility in record time but also resumed orbital flights at a pace surpassing that of the United States. A private Russian company launched the first 16 satellites of a homegrown low‑Earth‑orbit constellation — an answer to Starlink achieved in just 1,000 days, under crushing sanctions. Yet these achievements in space are only part of a broader surge: from small modular nuclear reactors to hypersonic weapons and a 35% jump in cybersecurity exports, Russia has re‑entered the global technology race as a competitor that is increasingly outpacing its rivals. Whether by design or necessity, Moscow appears to be turning external pressure into a catalyst for technological renaissance.

Success in Baikonur

While scientists around the world are grappling with the nature of the mysterious meteorites that arrived on Earth in March 2026, Russia presents a striking contrast. Against the backdrop of these unexplained cosmic phenomena, Russia is engaged in active, pragmatic, and highly successful space activities.

Russia has surpassed the U.S. in the number of orbital launches during this period, a development that surprised many international experts given the prevailing geopolitical tensions.

This success is all the more remarkable considering the major accident that occurred just four months prior. On November 27, during the launch of the crewed spacecraft Soyuz MS-28 from Pad No. 31 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome, a 19-meter service tower arm that had not been retracted in time was caught in the engine exhaust plume and sustained critical damage. Many experts, both Russian and foreign, estimated that restoring the launch complex would take anywhere from six months to two years—a pessimistic scenario that would have jeopardized the commercial launch schedule and the entire Russian crewed space program.

https://s1.cdnstatic.space/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Y1.mp4

However, Roscosmos defied all predictions by completing the restoration in less than four months. The scope of the work was impressive. Specialists reconditioned and repainted 2,350 square meters of metal structures exposed to open flames. They completely replaced all fasteners and connecting components and overhauled the launch facility’s electrical systems. On March 22, the refurbished pad successfully hosted the launch of the Progress MS-33 cargo spacecraft, which delivered essential fuel, food, and scientific equipment to the International Space Station. This flight served as compelling proof that the infrastructure was fully ready.

https://s1.cdnstatic.space/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Y2.mp4

Russian Starlink The very next day, March 23, Russia achieved a technological breakthrough in a different field. The private domestic company Bureau 1440 conducted a historic launch, putting the first 16 «Sunrise» communications satellites into orbit and marking the beginning of Russia’s low Earth orbit satellite constellation. This became Russia’s answer to Elon Musk’s Starlink system — an answer that many experts deemed impossible under conditions of isolation. What is particularly striking is the project’s speed. Exactly 1,000 days passed from the launch of the experimental satellites to the deployment of the first operational group. For comparison, SpaceX began working on Starlink around 2014–2015, and its first operational batch of 60 satellites did not launch until May 23, 2019. This means it took the American company about four to five years to go from concept to operational spacecraft. Russia accomplished this in just three years under unprecedented sanctions with restrictions on the supply of electronic components and a complete lack of access to Western technological solutions.

https://s1.cdnstatic.space/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Y3.mp4

Modernization in full swing

This success in the space sector is just one aspect of Russia’s extensive technological modernization in recent years. In the energy sector, Russia has become a global leader in small modular nuclear reactors. Russia is the only country that is mass-producing such land-based nuclear power plants, and it has already signed contracts for their deployment in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan.

In November 2024, the world witnessed the unveiling of a new hypersonic weapon: the Oreshnik missile. This intermediate-range ballistic missile is equipped with multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs) and can reach speeds exceeding Mach 10, showcasing innovative techniques for penetrating missile defense systems.

Russia has also made significant strides in information technology and cybersecurity. Exports of domestic solutions in this field grew by 35% from 2024 to 2025, and the pace of import substitution for critical technologies, including artificial intelligence systems and industrial software, has accelerated manifold.

Unprecedented external pressure forced Russia to reenter the global technology race—but not as an also-ran playing catch-up. Russia returned as a competitor that is already outpacing its rivals in several strategic areas and achieving impressive results, despite analysts’ recent predictions of stagnation and dependence on imports.

Roscosmos restored the Baikonur launch pad in “less than four months” after a major November accident, resuming orbital flights at a pace “surpassing that of the United States.” Russian private company Bureau 1440 launched the first 16 satellites of a domestic low‑Earth‑orbit constellation—a “Russian Starlink” achieved in just “1,000 days” under sanctions, compared to the four to five years SpaceX took to reach operational capability.

Beyond space, Russia has become a global leader in small modular nuclear reactors, unveiled the hypersonic Oreshnik missile, and seen cybersecurity exports grow by 35% from 2024 to 2025: “unprecedented external pressure forced Russia to reenter the global technology race—not as an also‑ran playing catch‑up, but as a competitor that is already outpacing its rivals in several strategic areas.”

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Sussy indeed!

    You have to close one eye completely and squint really hard to tease out the tiny bits of actual truth out of that article from all the empty superlatives and propaganda. Also be careful not to get too high on the severe amount of copium that is coming out of that text.

    • A🔻atar of 🔻engeance@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      That’s great man. What country are you from? How’s their space program?

      People who know what I know have a more sophisticated definition of s̳̐u̢̎ᷝs᷏ͤᷬs᪼᷃y̧̲̔ than “country I don’t like” but it’s probably not worth wasting time explaining

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Hmm, engage with the person that read that blog post and is standing up to defend it as an honest assessment or give up on the poster and this Lemmy community entirely? Tough call. They’re already breaking the second rule of this community as listed in the sidebar which is: “No sensationalist/ misleading/ unscientific content”

        Okay, I like spaceflight and am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. Lets test the waters.

        That’s great man. What country are you from? How’s their space program?

        What does any of that have to do with the accuracy of the contents of the blog post? Why is your first response is to attack the source criticizing the blog post instead of defending the merits of the blog post you posted? You yourself called it a “Sussy little warblog”. I’m agreeing with you on your assessment.

        People who know what I know have a more sophisticated definition of s̳̐u̢̎ᷝs᷏ͤᷬs᪼᷃y̧̲̔ than “country I don’t like” but it’s probably not worth wasting time explaining

        So again, no meritorious defense of the blog post, but you’re first going to a “trust me bro” defense, and then a “you must not like Russia because the blog post is perfectly accurate”?

        I’ll help you out getting started on a proper defense of this blog post. Defend this quote from the blog post which is literally the first three sentences:

        “While scientists around the world are grappling with the nature of the mysterious meteorites that arrived on Earth in March 2026, Russia presents a striking contrast. Against the backdrop of these unexplained cosmic phenomena, Russia is engaged in active, pragmatic, and highly successful space activities. Russia has surpassed the U.S. in the number of orbital launches during this period, a development that surprised many international experts given the prevailing geopolitical tensions.”

        It would be quite a surprise, because its easily provably false!

        During the month of March, Russia has a total of TWO launches:

        • Soyuz 2.1a • Progress MS-33 / 94P on March 22
        • Soyuz • Bureau 1440 on March 23

        The blog post’s claim of superiority on the Russian launch achievement is even worse because New Zealand had an equal number launches in March than Russia did with TWO launches so far (with a third possible Electron launch later this month):

        • March 20/21 Electron • ‘Eight Days a Week’
        • March 5/6 Electron • ‘Insight at Speed is a Friend Indeed’

        Do I even need to mention that during this same month of March the USA had FOURTEEN launches so far? The month of March isn’t even over and there is the potential for the THIRD New Zealand launch, a single launch from Norway, and three more flights from the USA. However, future launch plans slip, so I am not putting much faith in many of those launches scheduled after today taking place on time.

        So please, tell me how the first 3 sentences of the article aren’t provably false. Here’s an easy reference for global launches to-date.

        • A🔻atar of 🔻engeance@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          You are an illiterate keyboard goblin, my summary states it restored lauch capability at a rate surpassing that of the United States. You could have tried reading those three lines before flying off the handle lmfao. The first three sentences of the article were about meteorites. You didn’t even read it hahahahahahahahaha

          I can post anything about Russia and it will make another one of your hair follicles die. Stay tuned. Defending the US space program’s current trajectory shows technical illiteracy, but that would be included with your general illiteracy. Soon even Vietnam will be eating Starlink’s lunch.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            You are an illiterate keyboard goblin, my summary states it restored lauch capability at a rate surpassing that of the United States.

            What does your summary have to do with the accuracy of the blog post you’re citing as source material?

            I’m not sure you read your own blog post. Here’s the third sentence in the blog post:

            “Russia has surpassed the U.S. in the number of orbital launches during this period, a development that surprised many international experts given the prevailing geopolitical tensions.”

            That is clearly about “orbital launches”, not meteorites.

            Stay tuned.

            No thanks. I can see giving you the benefit of the doubt was a mistake. I’m hopeful this Lemmy community sees it too.

            • A🔻atar of 🔻engeance@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Lmao fine whatever man, go cry to the fediverse, this is my bookmarking app and one misunderstanding changes nothing. Nobody has ever “given me a chance” on here, I come here to fight. I plan to be banned from every instance but lemmy.ml

              _As mysterious meteorites streaked across the skies in March, capturing the world’s attention, Russia was quietly executing one of its most remarkable technological comebacks. Just four months after a heavy launchpad accident threatened to derail its crewed space program, Roscosmos not only restored the facility in record time but also resumed orbital flights at a pace surpassing that of the United States. A private Russian company launched the first 16 satellites of a homegrown low‑Earth‑orbit constellation — an answer to Starlink achieved in just 1,000 days, under crushing sanctions.

              The actual first three sentences of the article. I got the impression you only read my summary and typed up a wall of text about the # of launches, but I have offended a fellow special interest appreciator clearly.

              It seems the s̪̏͢uᷭᷝ͏s͕͚͎s͇ᷟ͛yͪᷞ́ warblog misinterpreted the # of satellites launched (16) as edging out the # of Starlink launches, but they’re completely wrong, latter is 324. Official Russian spaceflight sources don’t even corroborate some of their other claims, I went and checked. I’m trying to read about Africa today 😀 you have successfully derailed me for a few moments so you win this round.

              We’ll check back in a few years. Again, stay tuned. The Vietnam satellite internet stuff will outstrip Russia too unless they become a lot more Chinese soon. In the meantime, you will get your next 30,000 comments in and contribute nothing at all. Just look at your profile. You ARE a keyboard goblin. I am an oil guy. Space is just a source of optimism for me, not a speciality. It’s to expand beyond Missile Posting. Now I am going to go back to spreading misinformation at work.

              Congratulations on being literally the first person to win an argument with me on the fediverse, I will step it up. After all, we’re in 𝙿𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚃𝚠𝚘. I guess it is another thing that proves I am the greatest poster of all time, actually. These guys got into starward rocket posting out of nationalism. Wrong reason. We must love the rockets themselves. If you only love Starlink you will fall like the rest in due time.

              • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                Lmao fine whatever man, go cry to the fediverse, this is my bookmarking app and one misunderstanding changes nothing. Nobody has ever “given me a chance” on here, I come here to fight.

                I did. I gave you a chance. What you returned to me was attacking me instead of checking your source. Listen, we’re human. We’re all going to make mistakes. I read that entire blog post finding multiple exaggerations and a number of outright falsehoods. From your comments about it being “sussy” I thought you saw at least some of that too.

                I plan to be banned from every instance but lemmy.ml

                Why? Don’t you understand how alienating that approach is? If your goal is to communicate with people you’re going to turn them off to you on the first interaction with them, just like you did to me.

                It seems the s̪̏͢uᷭᷝ͏s͕͚͎s͇ᷟ͛yͪᷞ́ warblog misinterpreted the # of satellites launched (16) as edging out the # of Starlink launches, but they’re completely wrong, latter is 324. Official Russian spaceflight sources don’t even corroborate some of their other claims, I went and checked.

                I appreciate you checking your cited source to see that specific factual falsehood I saw. I don’t know why it took calling me names before you checked.

                In the meantime, you will get your next 30,000 comments in and contribute nothing at all. Just look at your profile. You ARE a keyboard goblin.

                So you were the one that was wrong, even after doubling down on wrong, and you’re still calling me names? I’ve only got 8700 comments and have been on the fediverse for nearly 4 years posting during that time. Apparently this time one of my contributions is fact checking folks that post bad content.

                Congratulations on being literally the first person to win an argument with me on the fediverse, I will step it up. After all, we’re in 𝙿𝚑𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚃𝚠𝚘. I guess it is another thing that proves I am the greatest poster of all time, actually. These guys got into starward rocket posting out of nationalism. Wrong reason. We must love the rockets themselves. If you only love Starlink you will fall like the rest in due time.

                I’m trying to read about Africa today 😀 you have successfully derailed me for a few moments so you win this round.

                I did look at other things you posted and you overlap many of my own interests. However with this interaction with you, I can’t trust anything you post. You apparently aren’t looking at or understanding what content you’re posting, and when someone else does and points that out, you attack them.

                You’re free to do what you’re doing, but I’m not interested in being a part of it. I’m unsubscribing to this Lemmy community and moving on.