Whose entire personality was hating Justin Bieber?

Far preferable to plain bread without cheese.

I think part of the theory is that people get polarized by spending time in communities that reinforce their beliefs without challenging them or exposing them to other ideas, and that leads to polarization, division and disputes when different sides interact.

Like, being self aware? Yes, that happens to me sometimes.

I think Manitoba is okay

Sure, this deranged cretin says lots of stuff

Apparently OP is “all white people are bad! the people who are on our side and those who are not! silence!!”

So, back in real life. At a protest? Yes, it’s valuable for white people to speak up, since they’re more difficult for police to persecute. Sorry you’re too uninformed and naice to realize this, so wise OP.

Pretty easy decision to block based on annoyingness level, thanks

Those are a manufactured medical product, like the lollipops (wouldn’t be surprised if there are counterfeits for each like of pills, though). My guess is putting it on paper would be somewhat dangerous for anyone who handled it.

So it’s a synthetic cannabinoid… basically a retread of the ‘spice’ thing, but easier to conceal. Why could they not do this same thing with fentanyl though?

As far as “more lethal than the crack epidemic”, it’s just shitty synthetic weed. I have serious doubts about the expertise of correction officers about drugs. That’s not their area of specialty or education.

It’s useful for some things, but nothing serious. The danger is people who are clueless and think it’s infallible and reliable. As far as a making a suggested shopping list, it could actually save time. It’s good for … suggestions.

This would be fine if consumers could get the point that AI is not reliable enough to operate without review, and Target makes it clear to them what the situation is. I doubt that will happen though.

There’s a huge amount of dolts who think AI magically knows the answers to everything and is always right.

He says they can’t afford to pay for it, and states should cover it, and states might have to raise their taxes, but then the federal government could lower taxes to offset that. Which obviously makes no fucking sense at all. What a moron.

It being about rap and racism are what the entire article and headline here address. Do I need to quote it for you? “Prosecutors used hip-hop lyrics to help sentence a man to death: ‘This only happens to rap music’”. So I am addressing what appears to be the entire topic? I agree, the way the court system works should be the focus, not that the dude is black. But it’s not.

It seems like a better point than a lot of people made

Not at all. What I said is that not enough information is provided for me to decide if I agree with the claim that it’s racism related to rap or not. At the same time as apparently the prosecution once people believe that this is a bad dangerous guy, it seems like the author of the article wants me to believe that it’s all because he’s black and his poetry is considered rap for some reason. Like say I was a white guy with long hair and a bunch of piercings and tattoos and I wrote a bunch of death metal lyrics about massacring people. Am I to believe that the jury would not have considered me dangerous? Maybe they’re racist, and they wouldn’t have. I don’t know. Or what if I was a white guy who wrote a bunch of rap about how much I love to kill people or whatever. I can’t really say. Do I trust the Texas justice system or people who live there? No, of course not.

I made a comment and people replied to it. How is that “steering the conversation“? And all I was doing is referring to exactly what the post and article say. Not sure what your point is.

I believe he already thinks that, something like “we don’t need them“. What I have asked him is who he thinks would benefit from the US leaving NATO. The US? No. Europe? No. Russia, China? Yes. Iran? Yes. So why would we be doing that?