[go: up one dir, main page]

  • 2 Posts
  • 1.46K Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2025

help-circle


  • wheezy@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@programming.devThe mist of the www
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I’m not sure. I was actually asking. And I’m not even sure enough to tell if this is a joke reply you’re making or not. Lol.

    I just assume the process is to start a general session. Rather than accessing the request to the resource directly.

    So, I guess it would be abstracted a bit though. The user COULD be successful at starting the session. Get a success response to redirect to the resource they are trying to reach AFTER the session starts. Then once they are logged in their privileges are checked on that resource. Either returning an unauthorized response or the actual content.

    So, I’d guess this is (at minimum) a two step process. Though from a user perspective they just login and get the resource.

    If the login fails it’s just a single response. I’d guess for security just a 200 response but with no session token or response.

    Honestly, I’m just typing this for my brain to try to remember the small amount of work I did with Redfish and RESTful stuff awhile back.

    But, you are right. There isn’t a reason to give the user html error codes that can tell them anything more than they should know. Without a user session or without user privileges it’s just telling users more than they should. Redirecting to a 404 page with the same generic response is probably best practice. As long as it’s consistent.






  • Any party that is allowed to exist within the dictatorship of the bourgeoise will “be at best Social Democratic” when looking at the party as a whole. That doesn’t really say much about the individuals within that party nor of how they will treat American fascism.

    DSA in America is “Social Democratic” at best. It doesn’t mean that the party isn’t filled with socialist and communist. It is. I am one.

    My understanding of Spain and PSOE is definitely limited. But in terms of the actual material steps they are taking to stand up to the American empire they are far ahead of the rest of Europe.


  • wheezy@lemmy.mltoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldWho Would Win?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Definitely. But I do worry about many parts of Europe that seem to think they can watch the American empire turn to fascism and think they can simply observe it from afar. European fate is very much interwoven with the American Imperialism it relies upon for its economic power.


  • Glad someone noticed. I used it over 404 just for you comrade.

    To those that don’t know. 410 is the “gone” response. It is different than “404 not found” as it is meant to tell the request that the resource was once there but has been deleted permanently.

    So it’s basically “not found, because it was removed purposely”. Rather than just the “not found” which is seen more often because it’ll just be the default general response when a request is not able to return any content.





  • wheezy@lemmy.mltoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldWho Would Win?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s why you hear mostly about Iran and the strait and nothing of Lebanon until it influenced the ceasefire.

    Israel has displaced around 1M people from Lebanon and are repeating the tactics of terror it enacted in Gaza. But I’d bet that the majority of people paying attention to the Iran war every day had no idea Israel was even invading Lebanon.

    Unfortunately, most people of the world are trained to not care about anything until they can see a direct material impact on their lives personally. But, that means we have a real powerful method of getting people to care.

    I don’t care if the masses are directed to the right conclusions because of a moral framework or if they are directed to that same conclusion because of a material impact on their lives. They just need a means of understanding where to correctly place blame when they are inevitably impacted.

    That’s the difficult part. Because historically that blame is misplaced through xenophobia, racism, gender persecution, etc.

    Even now, the reactionary forces in America have anchored their outrage to the correct criticisms of Israel. However, they all seem to be using Israel as a means to ignore the same crimes of the American empire. It is interesting. It seems to be a desperate move to let American politicians and the rich capitalist off the hook and place all blame solely on Israel as if American Oligarchy is not also to blame.

    It’s similar to the liberal Zionist that would blame Netanyahu as the problem and attempt to wash away the sins of Israel with him being the sole problem. But, that ship has sailed. There is no way to repair the image of Israel.

    My worry through this is that the right wing narratives around Israel will be much easier to spread than the more complicated but accurate left wing reality. I worry as the right wing movements (like Tucker Carlson) become more popular the left will struggle.

    The left either agrees with the right that “it’s Israel controlling America” and lose the narrative by being seen as “weak” against Israel. This will come from many in the Democratic party remaining as loyal Zionist while the Republican party will quickly label their own Zionist as “RINO” but keep them around.

    I think it’s very important the left (1) Purges and shames any liberal Zionist. They should be seen as Nazis. And (2) does not give the right wing the power of the narrative they want. It is not “Israel controlling America”. It is more than that. It is the crimes of the entire ruling (Epstein) class and those in Israel and those in America need to brought to answer for their crimes.


  • wheezy@lemmy.mltoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldWho Would Win?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Because capitalism is not designed around planning for events like this. Global trade is meant primarily for profits of the capitalist class. This means they remove redundancies that would provide stability to maximize profits.

    This is a very simple explanation. But it’s why there is nothing in place prepared for this.

    “Adapting” just be further capital consolidation as the working class suffers all of the losses and the capitalist class is protected in their bubble. They don’t plan for events like this, because they are able to whither the storm.

    Their wealth is not measured in dollars. Their wealth is a reflection of how much more power they have over the working class of the world. Events like this only serve to solidify that power unless the working class of the world fights back.




  • You just restated your position and then just rambled about things you think help support your already unfalsifiable statement.

    I am criticizing your phrase “there are always tyrannical leaders on the horizon” as being vague, unfalsifiable, and useless in describing historical struggles. You said this to hand wave away something the other commenter said. And I’m calling you out for it.

    You are using an unfalsifiable statement to describe history. Because if I say “well X leader was good” your statement is vague enough to say “well, after X leader there was Z leader and they were a tyrant by my definition”.

    Do you understand what I am criticizing now? You aren’t actually saying anything meaningful or useful when you said “there is always a tyrannical leader on the horizon”