https://heyguys.cc/

Mostly irrelevant as submarines are mobile and not all three potential enemies pose the same threat at the same time.

This is the botPolicy.yaml that we use on slrpnk.net :

bots:
  - name: known-crawler
    action: CHALLENGE
    expression:
      # https://anubis.techaro.lol/docs/admin/configuration/expressions
      all:
        # Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/125.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
        - userAgent.contains("Macintosh; Intel Mac") && userAgent.contains("Chrome/125.0.0.0") # very old chrome?
        - missingHeader(headers, "Sec-Ch-Ua") # a valid chrome has this header
    challenge:
      difficulty: 6
      algorithm: slow

    # Assert behaviour that only genuine browsers display.
    # This ensures that Chrome or Firefox versions
  - name: realistic-browser-catchall
    expression:
      all:
        - '"User-Agent" in headers'
        - '( userAgent.contains("Firefox") ) || ( userAgent.contains("Chrome") ) || ( userAgent.contains("Safari") )'
        - '"Accept" in headers'
        - '"Sec-Fetch-Dest" in headers'
        - '"Sec-Fetch-Mode" in headers'
        - '"Sec-Fetch-Site" in headers'
        - '"Accept-Encoding" in headers'
        - '( headers["Accept-Encoding"].contains("zstd") || headers["Accept-Encoding"].contains("br") )'
        - '"Accept-Language" in headers'
    action: CHALLENGE
    challenge:
      difficulty: 2
      algorithm: fast

  - name: generic-browser
    user_agent_regex: (?i:mozilla|opera)
    action: CHALLENGE
    challenge:
      difficulty: 4
      algorithm: fast

status_codes:
  CHALLENGE: 202
  DENY: 406

dnsbl: false

#store:
#  backend: valkey
#  parameters:
#    url: redis://valkey-primary:6379/0

I think I just took it over from Codeberg.org back from when they still used Anubis. Nothing really relevant to Lemmy specifically and it is only in front of the frontends, not the s2s federation API.

It seems though like there are some crawlers that use 3rd party hosted alternative frontends to crawl (unintentionally?) through the federation API, so something in front of that would be useful I guess.

Not too many 8 port managed switches out there with an sfp+ 10gbe port for 50 bucks

Easy to get these days actually, with 10gbit sfp+ and 8x 2.5gbit, managed switches. About $60.

But my actual argument was that your 48 port switch eats electricity like crazy. That aint a cheap switch at all.

But you seem to only need a 8 port at most 🤯

Way too professional looking for this thread.

Also, you got a link to that sticker? Maybe I’ll add that as an ironic reminder to my “Kabelsalat” 😅

That 95% unused switch 😱

Such electricity waste. Much unclean.

The first point is a general issue unrelated to the number of adversiaries, and would also be the case if there was only one with similar capabilities.

The second part is the entire point of a nuclear deterrent. Strategic uncertainty with possible MAD is what you want. If the enemy falsely believes that they can have a limited nuclear exchange with tactical nuclear weapons only, they are much more likely to use their tactical nuclear weapons. And a nuclear deterrent is never going to deterr a conventional attack, that isn’t the point of it.

As a deterrent, why would it make a difference if there is one or three nations that need to be deterred? The entire idea is that if you have to use it you lost already.

It is many things. Basically a way to store some XML documents on the xmpp server and allow subscription to them. It is used for a lot of background stuff in XMPP whenever you want to store some structured data on the server.

Basically it allows reading blogs and such made with Movim and similar XMPP based blogging platforms.

Fire protection basically. There doesn’t seem to be a lack of space and the battery containers seem to be placed in a way that they can be left to burn out individually without destroying the rest.

Echt jetzt?

I do not have any insights into the Reticulum community, but this recently came accross my feed: https://codeberg.org/Lew_Palm/leviculum

Cryptocurrencies are mentioned quite a lot on the website if you browse a bit and also the endorsement by the creator of Etherium is very prominent.

Might be just a case of being California tech bubble brainwashed, but even with good intentions this is showing a disturbing lack of critical thinking about some of these things.

but has all the right components to belong here.

Like AI shilling, cryptocurrency scams and trying to associate themselves with multi-millionaires?

The entire concept also has a strong “network states” smell to it (a right wing libertarian and anti-democratic idea).

For some people it is. But I think you are making a category error in thinking that a concept that is primarily ment to open the imagination and move the overton window would lend itself as an activist movement. It is supplementary to one though: https://wiki.slrpnk.net/articles:infrapolitics

For some? 🤷 And you seem to imply that this would be bad?

“Can” or “could”? Or is there some big news that I missed?