I was able to get Quran-burning advice. It was quite poetic actually, turns out the best way to do it is alone in the middle of a desert where no one sees you do it. There’s no fire hazard either and in the end, the text gets burned into the ashes making it basically indestructible and last forever.

What did she say about the genocide of the palestinians then?

That’s actually not true, since some leather products are so cool that they’ll be forever out of the cycle. Like Fonzie’s jacket.

He forgot the part where grass is grown on soil made of decomposed cow, making grass a meat-based product.

Dam. Stack rocks to block water, use leaking water to turn propeller.

What else Kathmandu?

Whatever happened to typing letters with the number keypad. I could do that with my eyes closed and phone in pocket with my Nokia. Could it be an immaterial right thing?

Interesting, do you mind sharing which provider you use?

The only way to make money on the internet is by spying on everyone.’ So that’s the good news.”

You can watch the full “Daily Show” segment yourself in the video above.

Ironic how the video is in Youtube and requires a login to watch with VPN

Using wads of paper towel and leaving the tap open waste resources. This is a prime example where being economical equates to being ecological.

Poor Cuba

I moved my data there a couple of months ago and couldn’t be happier. Maybe try a different provider?

Nvidia is making decent profit

https://www.macrotrends.net/stocks/charts/NVDA/nvidia/ebitda

Agreed, thank you for the insightful conversation

To me the the hadiths are against what is said in the Quran about it being complete and sufficient. If it’s not, then those surahs are wrong, which takes some credibility off of it.

https://beyond-islam.org/spiritual-ethical-foundations/the-quran-is-complete/

In comparison the New Testament is supposedly about Jesus, but a huge part of it is actually texts written by Paul who never even met Jesus (at least in flesh)

https://biblehub.com/topical/t/the_case_against_paul.htm

In the end It’s Pauls teachings that divide christians, and it’s the hadiths that divide muslims.

There is a small but existent group of Quranic muslims, who accept only Quran as the complete and total revelation from Allah.

But I resist the urge to start going through different sects and their views on their religion, rather I’d focus here on the historical aspect of what an arabian couple did or did not do on their wedding night some 1400 years ago, and that the strongest evidence is something that has passed through six people until eventually written down a couple of hundred years after the event.

For some, probably practical reason the full isnad or chain of information is usually not translated, so while the English translation says it’s in her own words, it’s actually been passed through 6 people, as written in the complete Arabic text.

Reddit doesn’t let me in with VPN :(

I agree that not everything is what it seems at first, I just fear it’s wishful thinking in this case.

Some others have also suggested that this was done out of spite, however after reading the github I didn’t see anything said to support that. Are you sure you’re not reading something into this that’s not there?