I don’t think that this is confirmed. If confirmed, EU can complain about freedom of speech. Also doesn’t have to post as official account, like all this propaganda.

So design an AI counter offensive. I don’t know why the EU struggles so much with this. Anyone can post.

Ich wundere mich allerdings inwieweit es mit nur Ignoranz zusammenhängt, es gibt wahrscheinlich einige, die sich dafür einsetzen würden, aber sie verstehen es nicht oder wissen noch nicht mal dass es möglich ist. Gefühlt hat kein einziger Mainstream Politiker eine Ahnung was ZKP ist.

Government could generate anonymous time-limited access tokens for specific scopes like age, citizenship, etc.

Why do right wingers vote for globalists?

Warum kann die Regierung nicht zeitbegrenzte Tokens mit den erforderlichen Berechtigungen erstellen (z.B. jeweils ich bin über 18, ich habe diese Staatsangehörigkeit usw.)? Die Unternehmen bekommen nur den Token, und gut ist?

These ape NFTs are also the ugliest and dumbest thing ever. Their faces look like hairy testicles. Whoever spent more than like $0.5 for this, fully deserves the outcome.

The other day there was a discussion here about just having government id generate a token that can anonymously verify the user’s age. It’s not as privacy friendly as full anonymity, but at least it’s only between you and the government, which you have to trust for a lot of things anyway. And supposedly some countries in Europe are implementing it that way. Why is this not brought up more?

But on public discussions, also remember that there can be undecided people watching / reading too.

The entire world needs to stop. It’s seemingly being considered to drop nukes on millions of people like you and me for no reason. Hello? This is not a matter of tapping on little hearts and arrows on social media, we’re all financing this, in one way or another, and allowing it to happen.

No problem, it was not very clear

What you’re describing is absolutely not my thinking, I very much agree and in fact bring up myself often that collective action should be the norm. I just see politicians as part of this collective, and within the context of representative democracy where we currently live in, expected to be more aware of political context and meaningful action, because that’s literally their profession. Collective action should exist regardless and if needed “help” with the shortcomings of incompetent representatives, but in any case it invites to look closely at how well representatives are qualified, and motivated to do their jobs.

These kind of things show how detached politicians are from their actual job. Shouldn’t they be the FIRST to change, given that they’re the ones whose direct job is to protect our sovereignty?

Well said, it lives in the realm of posturing, saying things because of how they sound and not actually thinking and wanting to solve problems.

Defeatists really need to STFU. Most annoying people ever. It’s like they‘re on a mission to demoralize everyone.

Es ist genau das, was sie sind oder sein wollen. Da kommt sogar die große Verschwörungstheorie mit rein, die sie immer bei den „anderen“ Globalisten zu entdecken meinten.

Globalistische Organization gegen die globalistische Agenda, ok

No problem 😊 thanks again for explaining.

I mean canonical the word, not company? name.

And ok, interesting to know that PostmarketOS might be what’s closest to that.

Very interesting and informative, thanks for explaining. My understanding was that UT just conveniently copied/reused some hardware interfacing components from Android, since Android uses a Linux kernel too and why reinvent the wheel, especially with the plethora of phone manufacturers available, which you really don’t want to do again. But I didn’t know about it using Android kernel, or needing an existing Android install, which sound indeed problematic.

I still think that it is important to standarize a canonical Linux core, or something like that, that can unify more development efforts, or if not needed, at least a marketing presence to raise funds. E.g politicians usually don’t understand a word of tech, and you’d need something like “The open source interoperable alternative to Android and iOS” to be appealing instead of coming with Alpine, Debian, etc. which will sound just geeky and fringe and it will be confusing which to fund and why, and subsequently none will get any substantial funding.