it was pretty clear sarcasm

apologies for pedantry, but if they’re star-crossed it won’t work out by definition

thank you for adding the absolute figure to the headline

it’s a typical free market supply n demand argument, if those pesky pc bureaucrats with their red tape fetish would all fuck off and die then the housing market would be rosy. of course it’s bollocks. and certainly it’s insensitive to say everyone dies in the context of people who’ve died. but everyone does die. i’m not interested in defending him but to get sacked for the offensiveness of that when they have lucy connolly speaking at their conference is just bizarre

This is easily one of the least offensive quotes ever issued by a reform member

Anything burns down the first thing people say is insurance job

if you’ve done something reprehensible you might be asked how you sleep at night. maybe sleeping like a baby is due to the association with innocence rather than literally how a baby sleeps (this is probably nonsense)

it’s probably you

Removed by mod

see ‘diddying’

right, sorry, i took know about to also be upset about as a given

edit: no, hold on i think i get it. how do you do strikeout? what i mean is you must already think something is bad in general, in abstract, before you think it’s bad that your kid is exposed to it. you are probab;y allowed to find the immediate issue (your kid enjoying epstein jokes) worse than the wider issue (epstein etc etc) when raising your own kids

how could they be upset about it without knowing the monsters it depicts? if a hypothetical kid was playing gaza clicker you couldn’t take offence without knowing the real life counterpart

life friend hard, mouse friend easy. thank you… friend?

oh shit, some kid playing club penguin: execute bin laden edition is really controlling a neuralink marine

i also just played five nights at epstein’s. for a couple of minutes anyway, i couldn’t be arsed to figure it out but the instructions are funny at least. excerpt:

Night 3 – Stephen Hawking

He remains stationary at Camera 6 and is immune to all audio lures

Task: You must electrocute him

anyway there might have been a crumb of something in this beyond think-of-the-children, as we expect parents to monitor their kids internet use at home, so it’s reasonable to expect access from school computers to be monitored similarly. but the school did that, they’ve blocked it now, what else do you want from them? it will get hosted elsewhere, they’ll add that to the blocklist too, life will go on and there’ll be some other thing to be pointlessly outraged about

can anyone help me understand the point of comics like this? this is a common sarcastic comment found all around the internet. what is the appeal of writing it above a cartoon mouse and releasing it as its own thing? why should i be sure to check out ig_doods on instagram dot com?

yes of course in this or any other specific case it’s not particularly relevant. but it’s something to consider against the general question of what is a paedophile

re laws, that would be thoughtcrime so i don’t expect there are

i tried to look up the case but only get loads of results for fritzl

what age was his daughter? was he popping viagras and crying ‘this is going to hurt me more than it hurts you?’ i would previously have thought that being able to maintain a boner long enough to rape your own daughter (assuming prepubescent) makes you a paedophile. but having just read the ‘primary or exclusive’ bit of the definition i don’t know what to make of it