[go: up one dir, main page]

  • 8 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 11th, 2025

help-circle


  • Day-to-day, it’s very nice. Charging at CCS chargers is very fast (though charging at Tesla is slower than some, 98kw). If you’re not in a warm climate, be sure you get one with battery preconditioning (in '22, that meant getting an AWD model).

    The GT (and I think GT-Line?) has a low ceiling due to the sunroof… we got the Wind+options due to tall family members.

    The interior and exterior 120v outlets are really nice: I powered a freezer, fridge, window A/C unit and internet from it during an all-day power outage.


  • AFAIK, all EV6’s, IQ5s etc have the ICCU issue, which appears to be under-spec MOSFETs . One tally on a forum I’m on estimates 2%-10% of owners have experienced failure. However, the 10yr/100k-mile electric warranty covers it.

    There is a new part number last month for the ICCU (from old 36400 1XFA0 to new 36400 1XFA0A), so there’s some hope that it may be sorted. Maybe your dealer can verify that a new EV6 has the new ICCU part number (I’ve also heard that it can be read via CarScanner).

    We are at 80k miles, so hoping either ours pops within 20k, or else there is a recall or class-action.


  • The only Fast Charging most EV owners do is on road trips. The rest is more like plugging your cell phone in while you sleep. So the relevant comparison is: how long do you usually stop for a bio-break & snack+checkout. I wish I could get the family in and out a convenience store as fast as the EV6 charges (though it’s much slower than Blade2’s high-speed charge).

    Of course, most petrol users fuel-up weekly in the USA, so the petrol car is starting each road trip at a disadvantage. If you fuel-up with petrol for 4 minutes, 4x/month, and road-trip 1x/month, then the petrol car starts each road trip 16 minutes behind.








  • The way I read it is:

    • if you never plug-in overnight, and the vehicle is big, and you drive aggressively, you get 34mpg (believable)
    • but if you plug-in a small car every night, and you get 75% of your miles electric, and you drive like a grandma, then you get 223mpg (believable)

    Sadly, it sounds like Porsche drivers may fall into the first category and Toyota drivers in the second. And there are enough Porches to skew the MPG of the whole PHEV class.

    (it’s also possible that Porsche/VW/Audi just make PHEVs that score well on gov’t tests but poorly in the real world, though I’d lean towards the drivers. But the article title really implies that all PHEVs get shockingly bad mileage)


  • The article is horribly unclear: it seems to say that PHEVs are no good, but “the main reason for the higher-than-stated fuel usage was …that the PHEVs use two different modes, the electric engine and the combustion engine”. Well, so do non-plugin hybrids. I doubt they’re saying that plug-in hybrids are worse than non-plugin, but you might guess that from the title.

    The article states that Porsche PHEVs used 7 liters per 100 miles (33.6mpg), but Kia/Toyota/Ford/Renault used “85% less” (1.05L/100k or 223mpg… maybe about right if driven 75% from plug-in energy).

    Porsche mentioned “different usage patterns”. I can buy that a typical Prius owner is plugging-in every night, filling low-rolling-resistance tires to 54psi and driving like grandma, and a typical Porsche owner… isn’t. If you want apples-to-apples, then compare a gas Corolla vs a Prius vs a Plug-in Prius, where the cars are from the same city/suburb, and similar owners (e.g.: no ubers, no regional sales reps).

    This “study” is evaluating real-world use of one class of vehicles, and not other vehicle types; then using the dismal ways some people drive to imply that this particular class of vehicles is the problem.




  • There’s also the risk that credit card companies are claiming that fraud done using your phone app (for example, someone stole your unlocked phone(*)) is not covered, and you are on the hook for losses.

    But stolen physical credit cards are always covered.

    (*)EDIT: I thought I’d read a report that someone who had been mugged and forced to give their phone+PIN had an issue with their CC company; but it looks like this is mostly a problem with money transferred out of a bank account, not credit card purchases… and even then, hiring a lawyer will usually get the bank to pay-up.





  • kimchi@lemmy.worldtoPrivacy@lemmy.mlSwitching to GrapheneOS
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I have separate profiles:

    • main user has no Google Play services or Gapps: just F-Droid apps and a couple of play store apps I use daily (anonymously via Aurora Store app)
    • Aurora profile has other playstore apps that will run without Google Play Services
    • PlayStore profile is for anything that requires full Google Play Services (banking, purchased apps)
    • Work profile is full-on Google everyting (Google school)
    • Location is on, but only shared with Organic Maps, FindMyDevice (FMD) and Transit.app
    • USB port is power-only (no data).

    Some compromises I’ve made:

    • I have fingerprint unlock enabled (but not on my password vault or PlayStore/Banking profile)
    • I tap-to-pay with a Garmin watch ( you only need the Garmin app to set-up the credit card, then it can be deleted )

    But… I think starting-out, don’t worry about it. If you load all the same apps as on your old phone, into a single main profile, it’ll still be a huge improvement.