Given that none of the three articles directly address the request, this implies a retraction.
- 0 Posts
- 147 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 30th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/james-webb-spikes/ includes you can easily identify the points of light that are stars contained within our own Milky Way by their diffraction spikes, whereas the fainter, more distant, extended objects definitively do not possess them. in reference to a Hubble photo.
Clearly Australians have danger-handling handled.
For me, methodology would be quantitative methods used to calculate the dataset’s (csv file’s) values (Download the Dataset), which I might be able to provide for specific outputs. Your invocation of the term (“how it is measured”) could differ; in that case please further explain what you’re seeking?
For which particular columns of the csv file are you seeking a further explanation?
fucking foreigners who helped gather the intelligence on the good Americans in the first place and helped our militaries learn how to destroy the good Americans
Could you please be more specific? (keywords please?)
Surely you mean foist not hoist.
Unilateral action without a seconded motion, discussion, vote? Gives me flashbacks of some meetings I’ve attended…
nazi puppet corrupt regime
humanspiral, could you please provide the Definition of “nazi” you’re using in this phrase? Pasted quote from linked source preferred.
AFAIK, the president directing the attorney general lacks precedent. Evidence to the contrary invited.
Merrick Garland not Biden.
The dropping of the charges.
Perhaps a headline of “Scrutiny of Drop of FIFA Bribery Charge After Trump Given Peace Prize” would be better?
Allowing more things through, if I understand your analogy correctly in this case, is broadening the exceptions – things not matched by the definition.
But, I’ll bite, let’s dive in. In a Venn diagram, substances with a minimum of 2 fully fluorinated carbon atoms is a subset of substances with a minimum of 1fully fluorinated carbon atoms, yes? Similarly, M&Ms with only red and green colors is a subset of M&Ms of any color, yes? If a person was to change their personal definition of acceptable M&Ms from any color to only red and/or green, would you call that broadening that definition?
Paqui One Chip Challenge available again!?
From the first article:
Worse, there is no firm definition of exactly what a PFAS is—at least in the United States. The Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which works with 38 member nations including the U.S. to foster international cooperation and economic growth, defines PFAS as industrial chemicals that have at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom—which is a carbon atom with two or three fluorine atoms attached to it. There are about 15,000 species of chemicals that meet that standard. But the EPA has pushed back, broadening the definition to two fully fluorinated carbon atoms. “The final definition does not include substances that only have a single fluorinated carbon,” the agency wrote in its formal report in 2023—during Joe Biden’s presidency. That change is worrying.
A minimum of 2 fully fluorinated carbon atoms instead of 1 is NOT broadening the definition. That’s narrowing it.
Yes, they’re using reasonable suspicion for stops; Kavanaugh Stops due to what he wrote in his concurrence.
They’ve recently been judged to be using reasonable suspicion for arrests. But I think you might’ve implied as much.
It’s all Greek to me.