- 0 Posts
- 405 Comments
Well, there is a wavelength that by itself activates both of these cones such that we interpret it as yellow. But a combination of wavelengths also does that
What I meant is that if you have a photo of a yellow flower, I’d would say that the file contains “yellow color”, even though it only uses RGB values. The display is “transmitting yellow into your brain” by emitting a combination of wavelengths. Wavelength that normally represents color yellow is not emitted, but the “color yellow” is sent, in a way
IMO saying that yellow doesn’t exist during the entire process is going a bit far. It exists as a combination of the other values. Or no colors exist during the process, as it’s all just ones and zeroes and then wavelengths, which only get turn into colors in your brain. Depending on how you want to look at it
Why are you at my home???
He didn’t care about the contact photo/name, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t care about you. We all show it in a different way.
Theseus of Theseus
Grab a rock off a sidewalk and go from there, like those “traded a pen up to a car” stories lol
Everything emacs can do, my OS can as well. Emacs is my OS
I don’t really post my photos, sorry. But the important part is to have a clear vision what’s important in the photo and what isn’t. Even by cropping the photo you posted, we can get a more interesting frame (in my opinion, obviously ;) )
Here, I found the way lines zig-zag interesting, so by cropping other elements out, the attention is brought to them
As others have said, framing. This picture is just as snapshot of a view you had. And if the view isn’t interesting, then the snapshot isn’t going to be as well. Try to get in a different position, crop in on different elements, play with composition. Create a view that a typical person wouldn’t normally consider. I love shooting urban architecture and I’m sure that I would find a dozen different frames in that location that I would like. But that’s another thing: maybe that’s just not a subject you’re interested in. Then there isn’t much you can do to take a photo there that you would like. Try to find inspiration in other people’s photographs and figure out what makes you like those
I’m not an expert, but LLMs should still be deterministic. If you run the model with 0 creativity (or whatever the randomness setting is called) and provide exactly the same input, it should provide the same output. That’s not how it’s usually configured, but it should be possible. Now, if you change the input at all (change order of movies, misspell a title, etc) then the output can change in an unpredictable way
It bothers me a little too
This sounds really interesting!
And the point about decision fatigue in solo gamedev is so true. Most of the time when I’m stuck making a game, it’s because I’m not sure what to do and each decision brings 20 more questions
I really like those fellas. Probably the prettiest birds I can encounter in my neighborhood
I think that the commenter, like me, understood it as that the deer was reading a non-fiction book while eating a sparrow. Which is an interesting image
This is a confusing graph, not just your fault
Yeah. Now I dont have homework AND I get to spend money on stuff I want
That’s very generous of you!