The biggest issue I see is there’s never a plan on how to actually implement anarchy without violating the core tenants of it.
do you know how i know that you don’t hang out with any anarchists?
The biggest issue I see is there’s never a plan on how to actually implement anarchy without violating the core tenants of it.
do you know how i know that you don’t hang out with any anarchists?
they’re all quotes from the banned user
that’s not a source. it’s hand waiving.
get out of here
have you read the sidebar here or for this instance?
you’re sealioning now. you know you made all that up because you don’t have a credible source for any of it. go play games somewhere else.
I’m blocking your disingenuous ass now.
oh thank God
I never said vigilante justice would be more effective. you’re arguing with a strawman.
any claim about the future is dubious, and theirs to a great degree
to be clear, you don’t know the future
they don’t know what a future looks like without the state or capital.
the past isn’t the future
So you are unable to specify exactly what was fabricated.
i did. every line.
an unsupported appeal to authority.
if you were an expert you wouldn’t have made the erroneous claim.
that’s how speech works. people make up what they say.
when making claims about the natural world, doing that is worse than just keeping your mouth shut.
I am right, they are wrong. they made baseless claims and proceeded to posture as though I was wrong for calling them out.
your characterization doesn’t change any of the facts.
i am not demanding anything. i’m pointing out that you literally made up your claim, and rather than even try to support it, you play rhetorical games.
i think that the systems that govern us are unjust in a myriad of ways. i’m willing to tolerate some level of injustice in dealing with antisocial behavior, since i get that already, if it means we can throw off all the rest of the oppression we face from being governed.
this is a strawman