Ecosia wants to become an “AI powered” search engine as well now. Recent reviews on Kununu imply that the CEO/COO are pushing this against employee resistance.
- 0 Posts
- 9 Comments
adsche@lemmy.worldto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK you can add a noAI version of DuckDuckGo to FirefoxEnglish1·3 个月前
adsche@lemmy.worldto No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world•Whats a good and proper alternative google message thats clean but better with privacy? - for textingEnglish2·4 个月前fwiw exactly my experience. Only 2 other people in my family still use Signal after that, down from ~8.
adsche@lemmy.worldto You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK that you can disable AI features on DuckDuckGo without cookiesEnglish4·9 个月前This seems to work for me:
https://noai.duckduckgo.com/ac/?q=%25s&type=list(edit: again, remove the ‘25’ between percent sign and
s)
adsche@lemmy.worldto Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Since when does a clock need a privacy policy?English8·1 年前A pull request for that issue is open since April with no comments from the developers. Not a good sign :/
https://github.com/FossifyOrg/Clock/pull/62
EDIT: Looking further into it, the only merges and commits seem to be translations and GitHub metadata stuff, there has been no development since the fork :( - https://github.com/FossifyOrg/Clock/commits/master/
adsche@lemmy.worldto DACH - Deutschsprachige Community für Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz@feddit.org•Sabotage in der Landwirtschaft: So groß ist das ProblemDeutsch21·2 年前Die bauen Silage an, kein Essen.
adsche@lemmy.worldto Deutschland@feddit.de•Merz sinniert über Schwarz-Grün – Söder schmettert ihn sofort ab: „Haben lange Auszeit verdient“Deutsch1·2 年前Würde sie nicht trotz <5% einziehen, solange sie mindestens 3 Direktmandate holt?
adsche@lemmy.worldBanned from communityto Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•chmod -R hit me, again... Anyone else who faced these sys-admin woopsies?English2·2 年前The above command just changed all files ownership to root (privileged user)
Hey uhm, are you sure? That seems wrong.
For me, the command removes read, write, and execute permissions of the user, and read and execute permissions for everyone else. Which would be expected.
chownwould be the command to change ownership…To run any app now, you need to open a new terminal and type sudo -E app-name &,
You could also try and fix the permissions by running
sudo chmod -R u+rwX g+rX /home/user. That will fix all access permissions first of all. Then, you might have to fix execute permissions (but do this only on files that are meant to be executed!) usingchmod +x path/to/file.Solutions Be extra extra careful while running sudo commands
Yes. But you (as the owner) would not even have needed
sudofor thechmodcommand to succeed. I think you might have just slightly misunderstoodchmod’s syntax. Your command as given means "recursively, remove the permissions 755 (you have a-in front of them!). It sounds like you probably wantedchmod -R 755 ...(without-, giving read/write/execute to the owner and read/execute to everyone else). But the descriptive notation above is probably easier to remember. Read the manpage maybe…
Huh, interesting. I’m the opposite, I never want any sites opened in in-app browsers where my browser extensions are not active.
Then you can still afford a few bytes of backups via tarsnap.com - they calculate in picodollars ;)