The fact it’s satire doesn’t make it untrue, and we have plenty of statistics to back it up, but it seems the only thing Americans like more than complaining about their broken system is insisting that any change at all would make it worse.
Action fans will know Around the Worls in 80 Days because of Jackie Chan, many kids will have seen it in the animation with Mickey Mouse.
Was this spry 88-year-old killed by followers of Opus Dei‽
j/k I don’t know enough about them to say anything. I thought it was an interesting idea, but seems unlikely.
This will have no negative impacts on America’s trade prospects or their economy…
/s
There is Fossify Messages. A caveat. Fossify is a fork of some apps that were abandoned or had the license changed. After that happened, they were unmaintained for a while. That appears to have changed somewhat, but it has been 2 months since the last update on F-Droid.
I can see him writing that for a million dollars.
First entertainment purposes only is corporate language for gives the wrong answers and don’t want to lose the lawsuit if we tell people to trust it. Just like Fox News.
This is intentional behavior on the part of Sxan, and he’s fairly consistent about it. I don’t agree with his reasons, but he has the right to believe what he does and write how he does. I don’t begrudge him making people spend additional mental effort reading it, and most days it doesn’t bother me. I don’t have the energy today, so stopped reading after the first thorn.
The line I use is, “If I was going to bet on this situation, I’d bet against it, but it’s not enough information to make a good judgement in this case.” Much like age differences or wealth differences in relationships, or indigenous status and domestic abuse. If that’s all the info you have.
They do spot checks now, sometimes. And they do regular checks on large containers. Do you think those containers are shipped to them? Who do you think is paying for those inspections now? How do you think this is any different for inspections for lettuce or other produce?
Absolutely, large containers are easier to check. And yes, it would be logistically impossible to check every batch that was canned and sold like these were. But regular, unannounced spot checks of the canned product would mean that every time you adulterated the product would be a risk to be caught, and you can guarantee that if every can they bought in this investigation was adulterated that it wasn’t a one-off thing.
But ACER doesn’t inspect syrup in cans that are sold directly by producers to grocery stores, which is how Bourdeau sells his syrup.
“Our mandate is to analyze large containers,” Clermont said.
“We don’t classify maple syrup from a producer who sells directly to a supermarket.”
Lagacé said such syrup can be subject to random spot checks, but not systematically tested like syrup in bulk.
Nice loophole. Maybe they should start.
I realize there are benefits to attacking Iran, but it’s still wrong.
Ive always thought of it as more of a shot against the man than the woman. In your example, the man slept with someone he normally wouldn’t, for whatever reason, and only recognized that fact once his desire for sex was satisfied. The woman didn’t change in the entire situation.
Likewise, I’d say my choices in this area were poor, but had nothing to do with looks.
State-run prisons where labor can be required would also qualify as slavery by any definition.
I feel this should be answered with a number of pancakes. So, what do you say?
For me, I have far too many to count at this point, but one that comes to mind was a few seconds after the roller coaster ride when I decided I shouldn’t have had that sub minutes before the ride. I got to see that sub again almost immediately after that.
Note that I didn’t say it wasn’t cannibalism, just that it is as much so as organ donation. Exploitation is kind of the name of the game. Is prostitution any worse than doing physically grueling labor? Is organ donation technically different from cannibalism? Certainly, arguments can be made. They are certainly things to think about.
These are not the pixels I was looking for!
Pixels coming at a premium in this picture.
The notwithstanding clause can’t negate any part of the constitution, but that is a distinction without a difference. That said, it does make it easy to call any politician who uses it a slimy piece of shit and have something to refer to for why you believe that. Not that I would ever call a politician a slimy piece of shit - our slander laws in Canada do not have a clause to use the truth as a defense.
Having not scanned your history, are you German? That sounds like something a German would say.