CEOs of giant corporations are sometimes actually sociopaths, so they don’t care if they kill people. And they get financially rewarded only for short term profit, the company’s long term future doesn’t effect them at all, so they don’t care if reducing maintenance causes problems for the company 10 years later

Good eye. If you freeze frame at around 0:01 we can see that the wing nearest to the camera has an engine under it like normal, but the farther back wing is just a flat surface underneath

Don’t need DMs, I’ll happily post it here for everyone

ProtonVPN

https://protonvpn.com/pricing

Perfect picture choice!

Because there are good free ones.

You can use a vpn. There are good free ones, don’t pay for one

Make sure you contact a trap-neuter-release group so you don’t just wind up creating an even larger population of stray animals who then face even worse starvation situations

I actually haven’t heard much of his stuff. Does he do a bit on this?

Just 3 years? If they think its really not a problem anymore then it should be lifetime of the monitor

You’ve had lots of experiences too I’m sure

Makes sense. Millennial generation starts with people born in 1981, and ICP became big in the late 90s. So millennials were the teenagers when ICP hit big. I doubt many people in their 20’s and 30’s were jumping on the ICP train.

I think the ICP fans include at least as many millennials, maybe even more

deleted by creator

I just had a related experience. I’ve been out of a medication for a bunch of days, and today i finally was able to get myself to call the doctors office to ask for a refill. The receptionist in a tone told me “ok but you shouldn’t wait till you’re out of meds to ask for a refill, you should call in the refill when you’re down to 5 pills left.” Arg. As if needing to call in a refill hadn’t been nagging on my mind daily for a month.

TBF she didn’t know i have adhd, but still. It took a lot of restraint to just tell her “ok” instead of giving her a long explanation of the struggles i deal with.

No, its pretentious and not understandable to a huge percent of people. Exactly how the movie is according to all reviews. It doesn’t matter if the technical meaning of the phrase is applicable or not. It’s an obviously bad title for a mass market movie. For an art film showing at indie theaters it would be ok, but for a mass market film it’s a horrible title that screams “this movie is cringe!”

That’s bad advice anyway.

1. Set reasonably attainable goals, then once you’ve accomplished it set a new reasonably attainable goal.

2. Frequently reassess whether the goal you originally set is still actually the goal you most want to be pursuing. Sometimes you set a goal and at some point later realize it isn’t worth it or will never actually succeed, in which case you’re much better off abandoning that goal so you can instead pursue a goal that will actually succeed.

I don’t remember, it was a long time ago. But I’m sure a biology major or professional biologist could answer your question

Exactly. That’s the whole point of link sharing sites, you can curate it to just show the things you’re interested in. Simply blocking like 5 politics-related communities will almost entirely wipe political content from your view.

https://microbeonline.com/types-of-staining-techniques-used-in-microbiology-and-their-applications/

A single dna molecule is too small to see with the naked eye, but a few million dna molecules released from a few million microbes is easy to see IRL. In my bio lab days we did an experiment to isolate the dna molecules from a scoop of microbes, and at the end you wind up with a clump of dna molecules that together are about the size of an eraser head.

And yeah as the other person said, the term “staining” is the official term used for what you’re calling “tagging”