After the completion of the A-Z April Blogging Challenge this week, my friend Pauleen , who also participated in the A To Z Challenge, published a post about her A to Z Themes to Date. I thought his was a great idea and an opportunity to reflect on the many themes I’ve had for this challenge, throughout the years, over four blogs.
I first participated in this challenge in 2015. In 2016 and 2022, I did the challenge on two blogs – and my goodness, that was hard work and a definitely challenge. Below are my themes for each year so far.
A TO Z Challenge 2025
Tracking Down The Family: The Earl Grey Irish Orphan Challenge, that sent young destitute girls to Australia for a better life and to provide domestic servants to the new settlers. There was also a shortage of single girls in the colony at the time.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ato Z challenge 2024
Haverfordwest History – One Place Study
The theme was Newspapers Articles About People in Haverfordwest
AtoZChallenge 2023
Best Bookish Blog
The theme was Book Reviews
AtoZ Challenge 2022
Best Bookish Blog
The theme was Book Reviews
and
Tracking Down the Family
The theme was Family Stories
AtoZ Challenge 2021
Tracking Down the Family
The theme was Newspaper Articles About My Family Found in Trove
AtoZ Challenge 2020
Best Bookish Blog
My theme was Book Reviews
AtoZ Challenge 2019
Best Bookish Blog
My theme was Book Reviews
AtoZ Challenge2018
Next Phase in Fitness
The theme was The Story of Me1
AtoZ Challenge 2017
Tracking Down The Family
My theme was People In My Family History
AtoZ Challenge 2016
Tracking Down The Family
My theme was Places in Victoria
and
Next Phase in Fitness
My theme was Health and Exercise
AtoZ Challenge 2015
Tracking Down The Family
My theme was People or Places In My Family History
I love this blogging challenge and will be back for it again in 2026. I have chosen my theme already and have a few ideas.
Link to my four blogs
In case you think this challenge looks like fun and something that you would like to do, here is the link to information about the challenge – April Blogging from A to Z Challenge

©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com
The Blogging from A to Z April Challenge is an annual challenge put out to bloggers, to publish a post from A-Z, every day in April, except for Sundays. April 1 is A, April 2 is B……….and so on throughout the month. Participants can post on a chosen theme or publish random posts with no theme at all.
Theme
My theme for 2025 is The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme. I became interested in the scheme when I realised that my great great grandmother was an Earl Grey Girl, who came to Australia as part of the scheme. This scheme was a government sponsored program designed to give young, impoverished Irish girls a chance at a better life in Australia.
Over the years, as part of my research into my 2x great grandmother Ellen Boyle, I have done quite a bit of reading about the scheme. Most of the information in my A to Z Challenge came from that reading, and from articles in newspapers that appeared in newspapers across Australia at the time.
Why I Love This Challenge
Part of the fun and why I come back each year, is that I’m drawn in by other participating bloggers. There are genealogy bloggers who participate and of course, I enjoy visiting their blogs every day. There are also other bloggers who are blogging on a variety of topics such as books, travel, fashion, daily life, fiction writing and any other topic that you can think of. This year, for the first time, I have been able to find time to visit each of the 172 blogs at least once, and many of them, multiple times.
I was visited by many bloggers, who I really do appreciate, and thank for their visit and their thoughtful comments.
I’m not really interested in stats, but I did check them out because I knew that my A to Z Challenge posts in 2025, had created much more interest this year. I found there were were twice as many comments and many more visitors and shares.
My A to Z Challenge Posts for 2025
Colonial Inquest – Mary Coghlan
Is Mise Ellen Boyle – I am Ellen Boyle
Success Story of an Earl Grey Orphan Girl
William and Mary – Orphan Ship
Extreme Opposition to the Scheme
Z: The End of the Challenge and the Scheme
A -Z Challenge Genealogy Blogs
My favourite category to follow during the challenge was, of course, genealogy blogs. Following are a few that I was happy to visit regularly. Now that the challenge is finished I will be doing more catching up with other blogs.
Resources Available to Research the Earl Grey Scheme
- Irish Famine Orphan Girls Database (NSW State Archives) – Over 4,000 orphan girls searchable by name, ship, native place, age, and more.
- [Barefoot and Pregnant? by Trevor McClaughlin] – Essential reading for orphan descendants; check Trove or local libraries for access.
- Public Record Office Victoria (PROV) – Passenger arrivals and immigration records for ships docking in Port Phillip (Melbourne).
- State Records of South Australia – Passenger lists and employment registers for orphan girls who came to South Australia.
- National Archives of Ireland – Explore Irish-side records including poor law union registers and emigration lists.
- Ancestry.com.au & Findmypast.com.au – Immigration, poor law, and workhouse records from both sides of the world.
- Facebook Group: “Earl Grey Irish Famine Orphans in Australia” – A helpful and active community of descendants and researchers. Great for networking and tips.
- Ask About Ireland
General Reading
Barefoot and Pregnant: Irish Famine Orphans in Australia by Trevor McClaughlin
Single and Free by Elizabeth Rushen
Fair Game by Elizabeth Rushen and Perry McIntyre
The Kerry Girls: Emigration and The Earl Grey Scheme by Kay Moloney Caball
The Great Irish Potato Famine by James Donnelly (Sutton Publishing, 2002)
Farewell My Children by Richard Reid
Clamhunger Rowe by M.K. Jones
Kinealy, Christine. This Great Calamity: The Irish Famine 1845-52. Gill & Macmillan, 1994.
©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com
The Blogging from A to Z April Challenge is an annual challenge put out to bloggers, to publish a post from A-Z, every day in April, except for Sundays. April 1 is A, April 2 is B……….and so on throughout the month. Participants can post on a chosen theme or publish random posts with no theme at all. The theme I have chosen for 2022 is The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme. I have done this theme before, but this time, I’m choosing to research people who are more distantly related.
The Earl Grey Scheme scheme faced significant criticism both in Ireland and Australia. Concerns arose over the treatment of these young women, the adequacy of their preparation, and the exploitation they experienced in the colonies. Opposition from local Australians also grew, as some saw the orphan girls as a burden on social services and believed they were taking jobs from local women.
Closing Down the Scheme
The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme, launched in 1848 to address the plight of destitute Irish girls during the Great Famine, came to an abrupt end in Australia just two years later, in 1850.
Initially hailed as a humanitarian effort and a practical solution to Australia’s labour shortages and gender imbalance, the scheme soon encountered growing resistance.
Rising anti-Irish sentiment, concerns over the young women’s backgrounds, and fears of social unrest all contributed to the scheme’s downfall. Understanding why this ambitious program ended so quickly sheds light on the challenges faced by the Irish orphans themselves.
Reasons for Ending the Scheme in Ireland
- Criticism of the Scheme and the Girls in Australia: As the Irish orphan girls arrived in the Australia, many communities quickly began to voice objections. Public meetings about the scheme were held , and Anti-Irish and anti-Catholic sentiment was common. Many people had the opinion that these young girls were a drain on local resources or were very disruptive in the communities. Concerns were growing, as negative reports from Australia were being reported in Ireland.
- Questionable Treatment and Outcomes for the Girls: The young women, were mostly young teenage girls with little work experience. On arrival to Australia, they faced harsh working conditions, exploitation, and sometimes abuse. Many had been promised a better life, but in reality, they were ill-prepared for life in a new, young country, and found themselves very quickly marginalized. As accounts of their mistreatment and vulnerability reached officials in Ireland, they began to reconsider the value of the scheme.
- Changing Policies in Ireland: As the Irish Famine continued, political attitudes toward managing poverty began to change. The British government began to take alternative measures to deal with overpopulated workhouses, such as local relief programs and work schemes. The difficulties that the orphan girls were facing in Australia, caused a gradual shift away from workhouse girls to other emigrant groups.
- Economic and Social Shifts in the Colonies: The Australian Gold Rush began in the early 1850s, creating a demand for different types of labor and an influx of voluntary immigrants looking for opportunity. As a result, the colonial governments prioritized workers who could meet the demands of the growing economy. Additionally, the popularity of assisted passage schemes, which allowed families and skilled laborers to emigrate to Australia, reduced the need for orphaned or impoverished young girls.
- The Scheme’s Financial Strain: The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme was expensive to maintain. The costs associated with transporting, housing, and managing the girls were high, and critics in both Ireland and Australia, argued these funds could be better spent on other relief efforts. The financial problems contributed to the decision to close the scheme.
The Closure Process
The British government halted the selection of girls from workhouses in Ireland in 1850, marking the official end of the scheme. This decision meant that one of the very few escape routes from workhouses for young, impoverished Irish women during the Famine, was no longer an option. Following the end of the scheme, workhouse populations in Ireland once again began to grow, leading to worsening conditions as resources continued to dwindle.
Aftermath and Legacy
The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme is remembered for its humanitarian intentions and its flaws. For the thousands of young women who made the journey, the experience was a mix of opportunity and hardship. There were many women who strugged with life in the country. However, many of these women contributed significantly to Australian society, helping to shape its cultural and social landscape.
Newspaper reports of town meetings and editorials in regard to the Earl Grey Orphan Scheme, didn’t help. Very quickly bias against the girls was building. Community meetings were descending into chaos with the differing opinions held. Most meetings were mainly a tirade against the girls instead of a discussion about how they could be helped. Young girls who had endured the famine and workhouses in Ireland, now had public opinion against them. The orphans were reported as being uneducated, untrained, and burdensome
It’s easy, from our 21st-century perspective, to recognise the unfairness in these assumptions. The orphans, many of whom weren’t technically orphans at all, were pawns in a wider debate about immigration, class, religion, and the needs of a new country.
The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme was a controversial social experiment. For many of the young women, it represented both an opportunity and hardship. Despite the closure of the scheme, these young Irish women contributed significantly to the development of Australian society and culture, leaving a lasting legacy within the Australian community. This legacy has continued through the subsequent generations, with many descendants still living across Australia.
Today, the scheme is commemorated in both Ireland and Australia as part of the shared history of Irish immigration, and it remains an important chapter in the story of the Irish diaspora.
©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com
The Blogging from A to Z April Challenge is an annual challenge put out to bloggers, to publish a post from A-Z, every day in April, except for Sundays. April 1 is A, April 2 is B……….and so on throughout the month. Participants can post on a chosen theme or publish random posts with no theme at all.
Theme
My theme for 2025 is The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme. I became interested in the scheme when I realised that my great great grandmother was an Earl Grey Girl, who came to Australia as part of the scheme. This scheme was a government sponsored program designed to give young, impoverished Irish girls a chance at a better life in Australia.
A Controversial Chapter in Australia’s Past
In 1848, the first of many ships arrived in Australia carrying what would become some of the most hotly debated immigrants of the colonial era – young Irish orphan girls from the workhouses of famine-stricken Ireland. These girls, some barely in their teens, were part of the Earl Grey Orphan Scheme, designed to relieve overcrowded institutions in Ireland, while also helping to balance the gender ratio in Australia’s young colonies, and provide much needed domestic servants in the colony.
However, they were not welcomed by everyone. An article published in The Argus in April 1850 captures the storm of criticism about the scheme. It’s a stark reminder of how politicised immigration can become and how harshly vulnerable people can be judged.
The orphans were described by their critics as “stunted,” “ignorant,” and “unfit for service” – not because they were Irish, the writer claimed, but because they were raised in workhouses without the guiding hand of a mother, or the benefit of a proper upbringing. They were, in the eyes of this colonial newspaper, the worst possible representatives of Irish womanhood.
The article mocks the Irish community’s defence of the girls, painting their support as naïve, misguided patriotism. According to the writer, Melbourne’s Roman Catholic leaders, were ridiculed for insisting that the girls were capable, decent, and simply in need of kindness and opportunity.
I found this article ( source below) uncomfortable reading today, with its heavy sarcasm and thinly veiled bigotry. Yet it offers us, as family historians, vital insight. These weren’t just anonymous passengers on ships like the Lady Kennaway, Eliza Caroline, or Maria—they were real girls, often in their early teens, who had lost everything in the wake of famine and poverty. For many, this migration was their only hope of survival.
Yes, of course some struggled. However, many others persevered, married, raised families, and helped shape the fabric of Australian society. I know this, because my 2x great grandmother was one of these destitute girls, who were given the opportunity of a new life in a new country. Her story is a story of success.
We cannot ignore how harshly these girls were judged, nor should we forget how courageously they faced a new life in an alien land. They were written off by many as “dumpy darlings” and “incorrigibly depraved”, but they were also young innocent Irish girls, survivors of famine, and in their new country, the provided many descendants.
They may have been harshly treated by newspapers all over Australia, but history owes them far more than derision. They are owed recognition, and I hope my AtoZ Challenge posts goes towards providing a little recognition so their story isn’t forgotten in time.
Could one of these brave girls be part of your story?
Take a moment to check your family tree for Irish ancestors who arrived in Australia between 1848 and 1850, especially on ships associated with the Earl Grey Scheme. Their names, stories, and strength deserve to be known and remembered. I’d love to hear if you have an Earl Grey orphan girl in your family.
Source: 1850 ‘IRISH ORPHAN IMMIGRATION.’, The Argus (Melbourne, Vic. : 1848 – 1957), 20 April, p. 2. , viewed 22 Feb 2025, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article4766300
©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com
The Blogging from A to Z April Challenge is an annual challenge put out to bloggers, to publish a post from A-Z, every day in April, except for Sundays. April 1 is A, April 2 is B……….and so on throughout the month. Participants can post on a chosen theme or publish random posts with no theme at all.
About My Theme For 2025
My theme for 2025 is The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme which saw young destitute girls of about 15-16 years old sent to Australia between 1848 and 1850 to start their lives over. I became interested in this scheme when my research showed that my great great grandmother was an Earl Grey Orphan. I am not at all an expert on this topic. The posts in my A to Z Challenge come from information that I have come across over many years of research and reading.
Extreme Opposition To The Scheme
The opposition to the girls arrival in Australia at times was extreme. There were many in the community who thought the girls were ‘‘not of the class required in Australia’. Others described them as prostitutes and vagabonds. Most of the opposition was caused by the unknown and by bigotry.
Regardless of the extreme opposition, most orphans flourished – “they married and raised families in the harsh conditions of the new colony. Great numbers would live to see the dawn of the new 20th century in their new land”
There were less articles published about the success of the scheme, than the extreme opposition to it. The following articles and letter to the editor, are just an example of many that appeared in the newspapers, at the time.
from: The Argus , 4 April 1850, page 2
Another ship-load of female immigrants from Ireland has reached our shores, and yet, though every body is crying out against the monstrous infliction, and the palpable waste of the immigration fund, furnished by the colonists, in bringing out these worthless characters, nobody has, for so far, sufficiently shaken off the ordinary apathy which besets the community, to set about the necessary means for getting up a remonstrance against the farther continuance of a system fraught with such fearful evils to the whole community.
In these circumstances, we learn, with very great gratification, that the Sydney Board of Guardians, appointed to superintend this system of immigration, have deemed it to be their duty to offer a strong remonstrance to the Government, against its further continuance; and we earnestly hope, that the admirable example thus set, will be followed by the Boards of Guardians, here and at Adelaide; the evils attendant upon such an ill-advised and unjust appropriation of the colonial immigration funds, having been equally felt in both colonies.
It is the duty of gentlemen, placed in such a position, to see that they are not made the instruments of wrong-doing to the community; and their fellow colonists have, therefore, the right to expect that, as they must see the evils which belong to the present system, they will remonstrate against its continuance, and, failing success, refuse to have anything farther to do with the matter.
Remonstrance from the Board of Guardians, though highly desirable, is, however, insufficient. The colonists ought to let themselves be heard in the matter, and it will be shameful, indeed, if long time is suffered to elapse, before steps are taken for the redress of a grievance of such serious magnitude.
from: The Argus, 24 April 1850, page 2
Original Correspondence.
IRISH POOR HOUSES AND ORPHAN IMMIGRATION.To the Editor of the Argus,
Sir,—These two subjects are so intimately connected with the welfare of our adopted country, that we cannot reason, on the more than melancholy failure of the latter, without bestowing some consideration on the former.
The whole country cries out against the further admission into our colony, of such degraded beings as the majority of the female orphans have been found. Nor has their cry been raised without reason, for we venture to say, every vessel that brings an increase of this kind to our female population, brings a melancholy increase to the vice and lewdness that is now to be seen rampant in every part of our town.
From this class we have received no good servants for the wealthier classes in the towns, no efficient farm servants for the rural population, no virtuous, and industrious young women, fit wives for the labouring part of the community; and by the introduction of whom a strong barrier would be erected against the floods of iniquity that are now sweeping every trace of morality from the most public thoroughfares of our city.
Surely there must be a cause for this wide spread propensity to wickedness, other than the depraved inclinations of unprincipled individuals. Where then is that cause to be sought after, if not in the establishments in which these persons are subjected to a long course of training, prior to their embarkation for the colonies?
It is from the Irish poor houses we have hitherto received almost the whole of this class of immigrants. In these establishments many of the female orphans have been supported for periods ranging from two to six years, before they were considered eligible for emigration.
It therefore becomes a matter of serious consequence to the inhabitants of this province, to know how so large a portion of the young female population has been prepared for the various tasks that have been imposed upon them by those who placed them in situations, for which all their previous habits have rendered them so eminently unfit.
The seed that has in this province, so signally blighted the expectations of those who planned, and carried out this species of immigration is the idleness, habitual and systematic idleness, of the inmates of the Irish poor houses. Large masses are there congregated, their food is pre-pared and laid before them at certain hours, their employment, if any, is sedentary; their mental culture is of the lowest kind, and their religious instructions all but neglected.
In fine, their whole preparation for the busy scenes of a young community, in a new country where nature is on every side to be subdued, and rendered subservient to the wants of mankind, by the untiring energies of the people, male and female, in their various departments, has been found worse than inadequate.
An unvaried round of constant uselessness at home has produced a rich harvest of vice and degradation in this province. The females of this class can neither wash nor bake, they can neither attend to household wants nor field labour. They refuse in general to go into the country, and when placed in town they refuse either to work, or to learn those parts of their business of which they are ignorant. They lose their places, they have no friends to fall back upon, the brothel is open, and it receives them and there, amid unhallowed orgies, that youth and strength, and beauty, is spent and ruined, which under a more sane management at home, would have shed praise and honour, and blessing around its possessors, abroad.
That this is a true statement of the subject, none need doubt. It may be difficult to amend it, but is it therefore not to be attempted? To the root of the evil the remedy must be applied: and until that remedy has not only been applied, but has worked its effect, it is unjust in those in power, to afflict this fair province with such a curse, as has in this instance, hitherto, been so wantonly cast upon us.
I am, Sir,
your obedient servant.
ADSUM.
©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com
The Blogging from A to Z April Challenge is an annual challenge put out to bloggers, to publish a post from A-Z, every day in April, except for Sundays. April 1 is A, April 2 is B……….and so on throughout the month. Participants can post on a chosen theme or publish random posts with no theme at all.
Theme
My theme for 2025 is The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme which saw young destitute girls of about 15-16 years old sent to Australia between 1848 and 1850 to start their lives over. I became interested in this scheme when my research showed that my 2x great grandmother was an Earl Grey Orphan. I am not at all an expert on this topic. The posts in my A to Z Challenge come from information that I have come across over many years of research and reading.
William and Mary – Orphan Ship
The William and Mary left Plymouth on 25 July 1849, and arrived in Sydney on 21 November 1849, carrying 166 Irish Orphan girls.
In my ongoing research of the Irish orphan girls who came to Australia under the Earl Grey Orphan Scheme, I came across a poem written by one of these girls aboard the William & Mary in 1849. The poem, titled “The Female Emigrant’s Farewell,” is a deeply moving, and it inspired me to imagine the story of a young orphan like her – leaving everything familiar behind in search of a new life on the other side of the world. I have spent a huge amount of time in the research of these girls and the scheme. Just for something different I decided to ask AI to write a story from the poem. You can read the poem below, followed by the story.
from: Bell’s Lie in Sydney and Sporting Reviewer (NSW: 1845-1860) Saturday 16 February 1850, Page 1
The Female Emigrant’s Farewell
TO THE SHIP “WILLIAM & MARY,” OF LONDON.
In which she had sailed from England to New South Wales.
Farewell! – It is a word oft said with careless unconcern
By those who its deep mournfulness have never sought to learn.
But I, ere I have breathed the word, its import fully know;
Oh! may’st thou farewell, gallant bark, whereever thou may’st go.
T’was thou that from my fatherland, and from my childhood’s home,
Didst bear me many a thousand miles o’er ocean’s sparkling foam.
And now I look upon each spar, each sail, each plank of thine,
As on a dear familiar friend I mournfully resign.
When first I entered thee, good ship, my heart was full of woe.
For I had caused a parent’s tears with parting grief to flow,
And friends who loved me well had wept, and some, in tender tone.
Had asked me why I left their side, to face the world alone.
Yet not alone, for HE above who rules the winds and sea.
Who sees each sparrow as it falls, sustained and smiled on me ;
And even in sorrow’s trying hour, when pain and sickness prest,
The still small voice of heavenly love has soothed my aching breast.
And now I go, my future path must be far -far from thee,
And the good hearts then bear’st away I never more may see.
But whatso’er my destined lot, let it be weal or woe,
Oh! may’st thou farewell, gallant bark, whereever thou may’st go.
– A. F. Sydney Cove, December 7, 1849,
The Last Goodbye – A Story Inspired by “The Female Emigrant’s Farewell”
Sydney Cove, December 1849
She stood at the rail of the William & Mary, her fingers clenched tightly around the worn wood, as though it could tether her to the life she had just left behind.
Elizabeth Mahoney, only sixteen, had already known a lifetime of loss. Born in County Louth, Ireland, she was raised in hardship and heartbreak. The famine had taken her family one by one. Her mother, lost to fever. Her father, to the fields. Her baby brothers, too hungry and too fragile to survive the long Irish winter.
The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme promised escape — but at a cost. It meant leaving the last of her family behind: an ageing aunt who could not travel. As Elizabeth stepped aboard the William & Mary, tears streamed down her face. Friends and neighbours wept too, but it was the quiet ache in her chest — the fear of what lay ahead — that weighed heaviest.
The journey was long and harsh. Elizabeth, like many of the girls, battled seasickness, loneliness, and the uncertain dread of what would meet her in the colony of New South Wales. Yet each morning she rose, tied back her hair, and found strength in ritual — in scribbled verses, whispered prayers, and the sound of waves slapping against the hull.
One day, as they neared land, she sat with her thoughts and penned a farewell to the ship itself — that strange and creaking vessel which had carried her, quite literally, into her future.
“Farewell—it is a word oft said with careless unconcern,” – she wrote.
But Elizabeth did not say it carelessly. She wrote it with full knowledge of what had been lost — and with a cautious but determined hope for what might still be found.
When the William & Mary anchored in Sydney Cove in December 1849, Elizabeth stepped ashore. Her future, uncertain. Her heart, still mending. But she carried with her the spirit of all those orphan girls who, despite everything, found the courage to begin again.
1850 ‘The Female Emigrant’s Farewell TO THE SHIP “WILLIAM & MARY,” OF LONDON,’, Bell’s Life in Sydney and Sporting Reviewer (NSW : 1845 – 1860), 16 February, p. 1. , viewed 07 Dec 2024, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article59770212
The story of the poem – The Female Emigrants Farewell, written by ChatGPT
©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com
The Blogging from A to Z April Challenge is an annual challenge put out to bloggers, to publish a post from A-Z, every day in April, except for Sundays. April 1 is A, April 2 is B……….and so on throughout the month. Participants can post on a chosen theme or publish random posts with no theme at all.
Theme
My theme for 2025 is The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme. I became interested in the scheme when I realised that my 2x great grandmother was an Earl Grey Girl, who came to Australia as part of the scheme. This scheme was a government sponsored program designed to give young, impoverished Irish girls a chance at a better life in Australia.
Following are just a few stories of orphan girls who settled in Victoria.
Isabella Brown
Isabella Brown was born in Londonderry, County Derry, Northern Ireland and arrived in Australia with the Earl Grey Orphan Scheme, on the Diadem in 1850, aged 17.1 She had been a House Servant prior to leaving Ireland. On the shipping record, Isabella was listed as being Presbyterian.
Isabella was received into the Immigration Depot on 12th January 1850 and left on 28 January 1850. She had employment with Thomas Stevens of Melbourne, for six months, at £10 per annum. On 01 September 1851, Isabella married Samuel Birch.
Isabella and Samuel had the following children:
- Samuel Birch jnr. born 1852. He died in 1864 at age 12
- Elizabeth Jane born in Ballarat in 1855.
- Thomas Birch born in Ballarat in 1860.
Death of Isabella’s husband
Tragically, Isabella’s husband Samuel Birch, died in 1862, aged only 30 years, following a farming accident in which he lost his left leg below the knee and died from blood loss and exhaustion. Isabella then married John Andrews on the 26th of February 1862.
from: The Star, (Ballarat, Vic: 1855-64), page 2
On Thursday Dr Clendinning held an inquest at the White Hart Hotel, on the body of Samuel Birch, who died at the District Hospital on the Monday previous. The jury found that his death was occa-sioned by exhaustion, and the shock to the nervous system arising from having had his leg accidentally torn off by the drum of a steam thrashing machine whilst working at Mr Robert Keddie’s farm at Cardigan. From the evidence of Mr Keddie, it ap-peared that Birch was engaged on Monday in feeding Bath’s thrashing machine with sheaves of oats. After an interval allowed for refreshment, the machine was again set in motion ; the belts flew off, and Birch was heard screaming in agonised tones from the drum of the machine. On going up to the spot, Birch was found to have his left leg in the drum. The speed of the engine was immediately slackened, and the sufferer taken out, and conveyed without loss of time to the Hospital. Mr Whitcombe, resident surgeon, deposed that Birch was re-ceived at 12.30 p.m., in a state of collapse, with his leg torn off just below the knee. The patient was put to bed, and stimulants applied. Reaction took place about three hours afterwards, when, with the concur-rence of Dr Stewart, the remainder of the stump was removed. In another hour the patient had sunk under his injuries and died. On admission Birch, had informed Mr Whitcombe that he was standing on the iron platform of the thrashing machine when the accident occurred, and tbe platform being covered with straw, and, in consequence slippery, he lost his balance and fell into the drum of the machine.
I have been told that Isabella then married John Andrews on the 26th of February 1862, but have seen no record to verify this.
I wasn’t able to find a death record that could be verified for Isabella.
Sources:
PASSENGER RECORD, BROWN Isabella, Diadem arrived Melbourne 1848, Public Records Office, Victoria (PROV) VPRS 14/P0000, Book No.4B
Information about Isabelle’s marriage and family, personnal communication by a family researcher
“NEWS AND NOTES.” The Star (Ballarat, Vic. : 1855 – 1864) 7 February 1862: 2. Web. 20 Apr 2025 <http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article66331247>.
©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com
The Blogging from A to Z April Challenge is an annual challenge put out to bloggers, to publish a post from A-Z, every day in April, except for Sundays. April 1 is A, April 2 is B……….and so on throughout the month. Participants can post on a chosen theme or publish random posts with no theme at all.
About My Theme For 2025
My theme for 2025 is The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme which saw young destitute girls of about 15-16 years old sent to Australia between 1848 and 1850 to start their lives over. I became interested in this scheme when my research showed that my great great grandmother was an Earl Grey Orphan. I am not at all an expert on this topic. The posts in my A to Z Challenge come from information that I have come across over many years of research and reading.
While many of the girls of The Earl Grey Scheme, had successful lives in Australia, there were others who weren’t so fortunate. In researching this topic, I have read many tragic stories. The following story, in my opinion, is the most tragic that I have come across.
An Undeniably Tragic Story of an Earl Grey Girl
Catherine Toland (or Tolland) arrived at Australia in 1848 on the ship, Lady Kennaway.2 Catherine was from Hamilton Donegal, and travelled to Australia with her sister. This ship also brought my 2x great grandmother, also from Donegal, so I couldn’t help wondering if their paths crossed, and how different the stories of their lives in Australia were to be.
I can imagine that Catherine had high hopes for her new life in Australia, and never could have imagined the tragic turn her life would take in the new country, where she was hoping for a new start.
In 1850, Catherine married Michael Murphy, a shepherd at St. Francis Catholic Church, Melbourne. She went on to give birth to eleven children, with only three who would survive to be adults.
I am the mother of a child who died, and I don’t need to say how heartbreaking that is. I can’t imagine what it must have been like for Catherine to lose eight of her children. Four of those children died in one incident, which I’m sure would have been unbearable. Catherine must have been very resilient to go on from that.
Early on the morning of 9 February 1863, Catherine left the family’s slab hut with her husband and four children still asleep in bed, When Michael left shortly after, the children – John, William, Elizabeth and Michael James – were all still in bed. At approximately 8:00 am, smoke was noticed in the direction of the Murphy’s hut and the landowner, James McDonald, was informed. On arrival, Mr. McDonald found the hut ablaze and partially collapsed, and was unable to locate the children.
He went to where Michael Murphy was minding sheep, and on return to the hut, found that the fire had died down and they were able to retrieve the bodies of the four children – still in their beds.
The children who died in the fire were:
John, aged 9 years
William, aged 6 years
Elizabeth, aged 4 years
Michael, aged 2 years
The above information was found in the Witness Depositions for the Coroner’s Inquest into the deaths of the young children. The inquest is heartbreaking and difficult to read.
The Inquest
The Coroner’s Inquest was held at Gledfield Station, Victoria on 9th February 1863 before James Grant Taylor, Coroner, District of Ararat, Victoria.
Inquest Reported in the Newspaper
Please note: I feel I must give a warning before reading this newspaper report, that I found it very distressing to read. So, you decide if you want to read the details.
from: The Ararat and Mount Pleasant Creek Advertiser and Chronicle for the District of the Wimmera (Vic: 1861-1884), Friday 13 Feb 1863, Page 2
FOUR CHILDREN BURNED TO DEATH
An inquest was held on Monday last, by the Coroner, J.G. Taylor, Esq., on the causes of the distressing accident which happened to the four children of Michael Murphy, a shepherd residing at Gledefield Station, some of the paticulars which were recorded in our last issue.
We understand, that the utter prostration and distress of Michael and Catherine Murphy was harrowing in the extreme, and it was not without some difficulty, the questions necessary to the inquest could be steadily asked by the Coroner. Indeed everyone present seemed greatly affected at the intense grief displayed, by the parents of the unfortunate children.
James McDonald, examined said:
I reside at Gledfield station; this morning about half past eight o’clock, I was told that smoke was seen in the direction of Murphy’s hut. I went there immediately on horseback, and found on arriving that the hut was burning, and had nearly all fallen in. I could see nothing of the children, and thought that they had to to their father on the run.
I went in search of him and found him about a mile from his own place; the hut was not visible from where I found him; I whistled to him and he got up from a tree. I asked if he had seen anything of the children; he said he had not. I then told him that the hut was burned, and that his wife was at the home station, and that I could see nothing of his children about the place; he said perhaps they are burnt with the hut. I replied perhaps they have gone to the home station by a different road to the one I took in coming here. During this conversation, we were running in the direction of the hut. I then left him and went to Austin’s hut, thinking the children might have gone there, but they had not been seen at Austins.
I then went back to Murphy’s, and found Murphy about 600 yards from the hut, coming towards it; I went close up to the place and found that the fire had gone down, and I saw what I fancied to be the remains of the children. I signed to Murphy, who was by this time, close to the hut, and tried to persuade him to go to the home station, that he might not see the remains, but he came up to the hut and said “there are my children”, Murphy and I then got the remains out with sticks and put them into a bag; Murphy carried them a short distance (about 400 yards) then he took the mare and rode in to the home station.
I stayed with the remains till a spring cart arrived, and I put them into the cart, and they were brought to the home station. I found the remains all together on the spot, where it is said the bed stood.
By the Coroner: I could observe the smoke of the hut before leaving the station, but the hut I could not see till within three quarters of a mile of it. I found the heads of two of the deceased together, and one lower down, and another at a short distance away.
Catherine Murphy, the mother of the deceased, said:
I am the wife of Michael Murphy, who is a shepherd in the employment of Mr. Hugh McDonald. I left our hut about half past six in the morning; it is about three miles from the home station.
I had two of the children sleeping with me; three generally slept in one bed and on in another. I awoke my eldest boy, John, and told him to dress the little girl; he said he was very sleepy and I did not like to take him up, so I left them; previous to going away I put one log of wood on the fire, and left the kettle with the tea near the fire for the children. I put one match on the table in the middle of some pins.
When I left the fire was not bright, and the log I put on was damp. I pulled the door to when I left, but did not fasten it. The two beds were close to each other. When my husband hot up he put one of the children in his place. There was no one near the place when I left. My husband never left matches about. He was very careful.
Witness was recalled and said:
My eldest child was called John, he was nine years of age on the 12th of September last; the second was called William, he was six years of age the 28th October. Elizabeth was my third child, she was four years of age on the 29th of November last; the youngest, Michael James was two years old on the 12th of January last.
Ewan Cameron, a bullock driver on the station said:
This morning, I was out bringing in some horses; about eight o’clock I saw smoke in the direction of Murphy’s hut, and came home and told Mr. McDonald immediately; there was not much smoke, the hut was built of slabs.
Dr. Willy deposed as follows:
I examined the remains produced here today, and find they consist of the principal portions of the remains of four children, but almost quite destroyed by the action of fire. I can only judge from appearance that the fire must have been amazingly fierce to have destroyed them whilst in a state of insensibility. from the position of a portion of the bones, which I found, it is my opinion that they were burned in their beds.
The following verdict was returned:
The four children were burnt to death by the conflagration of the hut in which they slept, but how the fire originated there is no evidence to show, and no blame can be attached to any person.
*Please note: Punctuation and paragraphs have been added to the above transcription for ease and speed of reading
Death of Catherine Murphy
At the time of her death in 1899, Catherine was still a widow. She left her estate, which included a town allotment in Kerang to her sole surviving child, Sarah Ellen Gleeson.
Sources:
Public Records Office Victoria Tragedy of Ross Bridge, Irish Famine Orphan. Records Office Victoria,
Public Records Office Victoria, Lady Kennaway Passenger List, 1848
Public Records Office Victoria, Inquest
1863 ‘INQUEST.’, The Ararat and Mount Pleasant Creek Advertiser and Chronicle for the District of the Wimmera (Vic. : 1861 – 1884), 13 February, p. 2. , viewed 15 Mar 2025, http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article280061878
Public Records Office, Victoria. Catherine MURPHY, Will, VPRS 28/P0000 73/94
©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com
The Blogging from A to Z April Challenge is an annual challenge put out to bloggers, to publish a post from A-Z, every day in April, except for Sundays. April 1 is A, April 2 is B……….and so on throughout the month. Participants can post on a chosen theme or publish random posts with no theme at all.
Theme
My theme for 2025 is The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme which saw young destitute girls of about 15-16 years old sent to Australia between 1848 and 1850 to start their lives over. I became interested in this scheme when my research showed that my great great grandmother was an Earl Grey Orphan. I am not at all an expert on this topic. The posts in my A to Z Challenge come from information that I have come across over many years of research and reading.
Behaviour of Orphan Girls During Voyage
I have read many reports of the misbehaviour of orphan girls on the voyage to Australia. These reports, often published in newspapers throughout Australia, caused bad feeling against the girls, in many cases, before they even arrived on our shores.
Thomas Frederick Fitzsimmons Jones was a schoolmaster on board the John Knox, which arrived in Sydney in April 1850. Before leaving Ireland he was a music master, born in Dublin, but living in London. On arrival to Australia, he wrote a seven page letter to the NSW Commissioners of Emigration, describing very bluntly, his experience of being schoolmaster to the orphan girls. The voyage took five months and according to the letter, he faced many challenges, both in the behaviour of the 279 girls on board, and in improving their education during the voyage.
A Teacher’s Onboard Experience
Letter From a Schoolmaster:
A transcription of the first page of the letter follows:
Gentlemen,
It is with regret that I am compelled to admit that the improvements in the education of the orphan emigrants, has been far, very far, short of what, in the commencement, I expected. The cause of this as been, in my belief, entirely reasoned by the want of sufficient power to enforce discipline and obedience among them.
I am persuaded that it has been a serious evil, not only as regards their mental improvement, but also greatly injurious to their future prospects, for doubtless many of them will find it very difficult to submit to the order and quietness of a private family, after five months perfect liberty and uproar.
The want of a sufficient number of suitable books, was also another drawback to their improvement……..
A big frustration for the schoolmaster was the almost half of the girls were unable to read or write English, along with their cramped quarters, rowdy and boisterous girls and the lack of available books.
Classes were meant to begin at 10, but: “it was very seldom I could assemble [the students] before 12, for as fast as they were collected, they went below again, hiding behind their bedding in the dark corners of the ship”.
Jones mentioned that the girls from Cashel and Cork were the most troublesome, with most of them refusing to do their studies. He claimed that girls who could read, refused to do so and that schoolbooks were destroyed or given away to sailors.
He laid blame for the behaviour of the girls, on Richard Greenup, Surgeon Superintendant of the John Knox, saying that he refused to administer the punishments requested.
On being questioned, Richard Greenup “spoke approvingly of the girls, and alluded to Jones’ insistence of threatening grievous punishment”. According to Greenup “had he been calmer these scenes would not have occurred”.
A Different Opinion
A letter from Charles Strutt, Surgeon Superintendant on orphan ship, the Thomas Arbuthnot which arrived in Sydney in 1850, described a contrasting experience. According to him, the girls “were attentive and well behaved, and many worked hard to learn new skills”.

An AI generated image of a schoolmaster and students having a lesson onboard ship to Australia in 19th century
©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com

The Blogging from A to Z April Challenge is an annual challenge put out to bloggers, to publish a post from A-Z, every day in April, except for Sundays. April 1 is A, April 2 is B……….and so on throughout the month. Participants can post on a chosen theme or publish random posts with no theme at all.
Theme
My theme for 2025 is The Earl Grey Orphan Scheme. I became interested in the scheme when I realised that my great great grandmother was an Earl Grey Girl, who came to Australia as part of the scheme. This scheme was a government sponsored program designed to give young, impoverished Irish girls a chance at a better life in Australia.
Sarah O’Malley
I first came across Sarah O’Malley at the site of the Irish Famine Girls Orphan Commemoration in Williamstown, Victoria. Sarah is featured, as an example on one of the permanent information panels that can be seen there.

Sarah, aged 17, arrived at Williamstown via The Pemberton. This ship was the second and the largest orphan ship to arrive in Melbourne.2 Sarah then sailed to Portland via the brig, Raven, where she was assigned to James Allison of Portland for 12 months. Her wage was £10 per year. Ship records show that Sarah was Catholic and could read and write.
In 1850 Sarah married Richard Smith, and they settled at Yarpturk, Victoria. Sarah had seven children.
A very detailed article about the life of Sarah has been written by her descendants and can be found online. It’s definitely worth a read, as it shows the ups and downs of Sarah’s life in Australia, but it also shows that Sarah’s life in Australia, was a success story. This series has shown many examples of Earl Grey orphans who faced abuse, had very sad lives and even early deaths after their arrival in Australia.
My 2x great grandmother’s life as an Earl Grey Orphan was a success, and I have been very keen to highlight more success stories.
The newspaper report below, announces the death of Sarah and gives a very good idea of the life that Sarah lived in her community.
from: The Warrnambool Standard, Saturday 06 June 1914, Page 34
YARPTURK. (From our Correspondent).
June 5.
DEATH OF TWO RESIDENTS.
The hand of Death has been busy in our district, removing two well-known residents in Mrs Sarah Smith and Mr Daniel Sheridan, within a few hours of each other. Mrs Smith had a serious illness a few months ago from which she rallied wonderfully for one of her age.
She reached her eighty-second mile stone on life’s journey a few days before her death, but was taken ill again a few weeks ago and gradually sunk to rest. The remains were interred in the Tower Hill cemetery, followed by many who had known the deceased in the early days of the district. The Rev. Nairns of Koroit read the impressive burial service.
Mrs Smith was a very early colonist and in her youth lived at Henty’s Whaling Station, at Portland, when whaling was briskly carried on. There are few people living who witnessed those sights. It was the custom to reward the person liberally who first saw and reported a whale blowing in the bay, and the old lady’s eyes sparkled with pleasure as she related how on one fine day, when the people were busy at dinner, a whale suddenly spouted in the bay. Mrs Smith then a very young girl had taken a child on to the veranda to soothe the little one. Casting her eye over the bay the spout of a whale appeared. Could it really be true, or was she mistaken.
Once again the young girl holding the child (which the wife of Mr Henty’s partner had entrusted to her care) looked carefully. Yes, it was true. ‘There it blows,’ again and again. She rushed inside with the news. The dinner table was deserted. In a moment every member of the household was on the veranda. No more thoughts of the unfinished dinner. The men raced to the boats for dear life. Swiftly they go out over the surf and very soon the fight begins. It is a lucky chase. The monster, in a comparatively short time, is captured and the young girl whose keen eyesight first noted the sign, was rewarded with a new silk dress and a nice bit of cash besides.
Mrs Smith came to reside at Yarpturk Forest, when there was scarcely anyone else living in it. Not a fence, not a road, scarcely a bush track. There were no galvanized iron tanks in use! Water was carried in buckets from Yangery Creek, a long distance away, for household use.
As neighbours settled around, the women folk would carry their weekly washing to the creek, make a day of it, and carry home the clean clothes. Forty years and more have made great changes, multiplied conveniences and comforts, and yet these early pioneers declared that in spite of difficulties there was a zest and enjoyment of life, a real pleasure in living which is often missing now.
There are three sons of Mrs Smith living, one in Geelong; Mr H. Smith a well-known dairyman of Warragul Gippsland, and Mr C. Smith of Yarpturk. Mrs Vaughan, of Laang is a daughter.
*Please note: Punctuation and paragraphs have been added to the above transcription for ease and speed of reading
©2025 copyright. All rights reserved jonesfamilyhistory.wordpress.com





























