A.I. Art is not Real Art

This article originally appeared at the Amazing Stories Magazine website under my “other” byline.

“With the most primitive means the artist creates something which the most ingenious and efficient technology will never be able to create.”

—Kazimir Malevich

Hey! It’s me! I’m back!

I’m M. D. Jackson. I’m an illustrator. If you’ve read any recent issue of Amazing Stories Magazine you’ve seen my work. If you’ve spent any time here at the website you may have come across an article or two that I wrote, but I haven’t written anything for this website for about five years. I moved on to doing other things. But I’m back now and I have an opinion!

I imagine you are familiar with A.I. art, but on the off chance you’ve been living under a rock for the past year (or have just returned from Mars) let me lay it out for you.

Dall-E image

Since the 1970’s (and even before then) it has been the dream of programmers (and the nightmare of artists) to create a true “generative art”, that is, art created by algorithms alone without the input from human hands or minds. During the past 50 years, several programmers have written computer programs to generate art—what is called algorithmic art. The process requires a programmer to write detailed code with a desired visual outcome in mind.

There is a necessary step before that has been called “pre-curation” where the programmer chooses a collection of images to feed the algorithm. The programmer writes algorithms not to follow a set of rules, but to “learn” a specific aesthetic by analyzing thousands of images. The algorithm then tries to generate new images in adherence to the aesthetics it has learned.

This is the problematic step, but I’ll get to that in a moment.

What matters is the results, which is that instead or captions describing uploaded images, programmers are now able to write captions and have the AI create the artwork described. Type in the caption “Cat drinking tea as painted by Picasso” and the algorithm will cobble together a picture that fits that description.

Dall-E, MidJourney and Stable Diffusion are only the first of what is now an infestation of AI art generation programs.

So, the question I have to ask is: Is it real art?

My answer is no.

Award winning MidJourney image

I know it looks like real art. It looks good enough to fool a lot of people into thinking that it is actual real art created by a human being. It looks good enough to win art contests like the artwork made by an AI that won first place at the Colorado State Fair’s fine arts competition.

It may not be great art, and, honestly, most of it isn’t. But the problem is that it doesn’t need to be good art to disrupt the ecology of the art market. It just needs to be good enough.

Because the “good enough” threshold is a threat to the livelihood of many working artists.

However, if AI art can supply an image that is serviceable enough, then I can quite easily be cut out of the equation.

Now, I know that Steve Davidson did a pretty comprehensive analysis of this issue back in August and his take is certainly worth checking out if you haven’t already.

The thing is, what he is talking about – the hypothetical mid-list illustrator for whom he depicts doom and gloom and certain unemployment – that’s me.

I don’t make a great living as an illustrator. I’m not one of the top tier, in-demand artists. Like many who are working today I fall in the mid-range. I don’t give away my work for free, I charge for it. My clients describe what they want and I provide. It is a service and it is right that I receive recompense for it.

Stable Diffusion image

And since it was Steve (and now Kermit) who employed me… I can’t lie… his take really does sting.

It is entirely possible that artists like me will soon be unable to make any money – pocket change, pittance – much less a living wage, doing what we love. We can still make “art” and call it art in the same way that specialty manufacturers can still press a vinyl album and market it as a “retro” sort of item. But mass market? Forget about it.

But here’s the rub. Remember that thing I mentioned earlier about pre-curation? Finding examples and feeding it into the A. I. So that it can generate similar images? That is exactly the thing that will disappear once working illustrators like me are gone.

Because in order to continue with a living, vital illustration industry, there needs to be new ideas, innovation and exceptions that prove the rule. Without working illustrators, all that will go. Then where does the new “pre-curation” material come from?

The A.I. art generators will be stuck in a loop. Producing only endless variations of what has come before and there will be less and less new material to keep the industry vital.

In other words, generative art will spell it’s own doom along with the doom of the average working artist today.

I know some people will say that generative art is only a tool and that artists will be able to use it to create even more amazing artwork, and, indeed, that will happen with some artists. But the whole thing feels to me like the mythical Ouroborous, the serpent eating its own tail, consuming itself until there is nothing left.

Generative art will not only end the need for artists like myself, it may very well bring about the death of art in its entirety.

Am I being dramatic? Am I being alarmist? Absolutely, I am. I feel that there is an alarm to be sounded in this situation and not just because it effects me in particular.

Maybe I’m off base here. Maybe I am the proverbial little chicken running around screeching about the sky falling.

But then again, I may be right. What do you think?

Leave a comment.

Guillermo del Toro’s Cabinet of Curiosities

This article originally appeared at the Amazing Stories Magazine website under my “other byline.

Guillermo del Toro’s Cabinet of Curiosities is a new anthology series from Netflix. Much like The Twilight Zone, in which Rod Serling introduced every episode, del Toro prefaces each of the eight instalments with his own distinctive style.

At the end of each introduction he gives the name of the episode and the name of the director.

This is important.

Because this is a director’s show.. Unlike the original Twilight Zone, which was predominantly a writer driven show, Cabinet of Curiosities puts the emphasis on style over substance. Del Toro, a director himself, gives his fellow directors free reign to tell each story the way they want.

One might say they are indulged, which is why some episodes feel like they go on too long and tend to get bogged down in cinematography and art direction, so much so that many of the stories move at a leisurely pace, or tend to wander around rather than finding a true narrative structure.

Having said that, I did enjoy watching all of the episodes. but only a few really stand out.

The opening episode, Lot 36, is a rather pedestrian tale of and odious man who comes into possession of a storage unit containing occult artifacts. The episode is written by Regina Corrado and Guillermo del Toro and it is based on a short story by  del Toro. It has some nice touches, but the right wing xenophobia of the main character is so underscored at every moment, it’s hard not to see the end coming from a mile away.

The only saving grace is Tim Blake Nelson playing the xenophobe. He makes the most of the part, as he does with almost every part he plays and watching an actor at the top of his game (as Blake most decidedly is) work is a delight no matter how odious the part he plays may be. The monster (and every episode has some sort of monster in it) is also quite good.

Graveyard Rats, sadly, does not feature any outstanding performances. David Hewlett is not able to rise to the demands of the material as the main character, a desperate grave robber named Masson. The script is based on a story by Henry Kuttner and, despite a somewhat impressive giant rat and an animated legless corpse, is rather pedestrian. It would have not been out of place in an old EC comic book.

The Autopsy, however, is a real standout. Very impressively directed by David Prior and with a gold standard performance by F. Murray Abraham as the pathologist, this story of an alien parasite manages to terrify as well as present a very clever twist ending. Screenwriter David S. Goyer does a bang-up job interpreting the original story by Michael Shea.

The Outside is an exercise in directorial indulgence. Kate Micucci, Martin Starr and Dan Stevens give performances that threaten to go over the top (especially with the very unsettling contact lenses that Micucci’s character wears through most of the episode) but are just restrained enough to be worthy of note. This one went on much too long overall. Even individual scenes could have ended long before they finally did cut to the next.

Episodes five and six are both based on stories by H. P. Lovecraft. Pickman’s Model is a stylish adaptation of one of Lovecraft’s most well known stories, and casting Cripin Glover as Pickman seems to be an inspired choice, despite his very odd Brooklyn accent. Again, style wins out over substance as the story meanders through several set pieces which, although very chilling, don’t seem to amount to much. The creature revealed at the end, however, is very well done.

Dreams in the Witch House, very loosely adapted from the well known Lovecraft tale, is similarly overwrought. Rupert Grint (best known as Ron Weasely from the Harry Potter movies) plays Walter Gilman, a tortured man who has dedicated his life to piercing the veil between the living and the dead to try to find his long dead twin sister. The story meanders here as well, though the witch, Keziah Mason and her familiar, Brown Jenkin, are so well done as effects I could almost forgive the turgid pace at which the story unfolds.

The Viewing, the second to last episode, is terribly self indulgent. Set in 1979, the story features a group of extraordinary minds, talents from various fields, who are gathered together by a wealthy collector (Peter Weller) to view an object. In this segment director Panos Cosmatos takes his sweet time getting to the crux of the story, choosing to dwell on the late ’70’s aesthetic. Here there is literal indulgence as the characters drink, smoke and snort a variety of designer drugs before Weller’s character finally says: “I suppose you’re wondering why I’ve gathered you all here.” After 38 minutes I’d begun to lose interest. What follows is gory and somewhat creepy, but not really worth the time it took to get there.

The final episode, The Murmuring, is a genuinely excellent ghost story. Superbly acted by Essie Davis and Andrew Lincoln, this short feature film (and, indeed, it did feel like a very well done feature) takes its time with an old fashioned haunted house tale. Based on a short story by del Toro. this episode is excellently executed, though after the brobdingnagian and effects heavy episodes that preceded it, I would not be surprised if more than a few viewers doze off during it. Despite the lack of dripping blood and monster puppets, there are some very genuinely creepy moments and more than one jump scare.

The Murmuring is, hands down, the finest of the lot, though, personally, I would have to give The Autopsy the Gold Star for the win.

Do I recommend the series? Certainly if you are a fan of Guillermo del Toro’s films you will find much to interest you here. But the show is best viewed the way that you would examine an actual cabinet of curiosities. These items have many drawers and compartments and each contains items that draw you in, enchant or repulse you in equal measure.

As with an actual cabinet of curiosities, it’s best to take your time with it and not be anxious to race to the finish line.

Inside Man

Stanely Tucci as the Death Row detective Jefferson Grief in Netflix’s Inside Man.

Hey! It’s only 4 episodes, but they are riveting!

Inside Man is a new show from the BBC and it’s on Netflix and you absolutely have to see it!

It stars Stanley Tucci as Jefferson Grieff, a criminologist who is on death row for the brutal murder of his wife. While he waits for his execution he spends his time solving crimes that are brought to him by the prison’s warden.

One of these cases involves a British journalist (Lydia West), a missing woman (Dolly Wells) and an English Vicar (David Tennant).

Each character’s story is intertwined and what starts as a misunderstanding soon spirals out of control as each player’s character is revealed for who they truly are.

The performances are incredible and the scripts by producer Steven Moffat are as tight as they are clever, even when everything threatens to go completely off the rails.

As Tucci’s character observes; “Everybody is a murderer. You just have to meet the right person.”

Chilling, edge of your seat tense with plenty of surprises, Inside Man may frustrate, but it will not disappoint. Check it out. It is totally worth it!

UPDATE

Hey! It’s been a while!

No, seriously, it has! I’m supposed to be trying to maintain a presence on my various social media outlets as well as my own little corner of the internet here and the place is practically abandoned and covered in dust and cobwebs.

Well, here I am, breezing through and about to drop some news, gossip, observations, opinions and maybe a few jokes thrown in for good measure.

This is my “not happy” face.

First off, I have to note that the snow has started to fall in my particular area of Planet Earth and I am most certainly NOT happy about it. Snow, particularly the kind that piles up and interferes with my getting around, is something that I dislike most intensely. You can’t really see it in the above image, but it is there, trust me. The first snow of the season is very unwelcome, as you can probably tell from my unhappy face.

On a more positive note; I am making progress on one of the two novellas I am writing.

GEAR CREW is developing as a horror-tinged science fiction tale of the crew of a salvage ship and their two engineers (my main characters) exploring a derelict vessel in deep space. However, all is not kosher aboard what the salvage ship’s crew considers a floating payday. For one, the ship may not be as derelict as it appears.

I’m shooting for about 40,000 words and I am currently at 27,065, so I think I will likely hit the mark.

The other book I am working on is the sequel to THE SHATTERED MEN. Morrigan Wild and her crew travel to London where they try to capture THE DEADLY MISTER PUNCH. I’m aiming for around 55,000 words… hopefully more. It is a modern day pulp adventure about a group of crimefighters in the tradition of Doc Savage, The Shadow and The Avenger.

That book is currently stalled at about the three-quarter mark, but I know how it is going to end, and I will get there, hopefully sooner rather than later.

That is, of course, provided I actually sit down and place fingers on keyboard and avoid wasting time on Facebook or Twitter.

What are my thoughts about Twitter being taken over by Elon Musk? That’s a whole other post on it’s own. I’ll get to that… eventually.

For now I am going to enjoy the cup of hot tea and some girl guide cookies and try to pretend that the weather is actually clement.

Stay warm, everybody!