DC Council: Please Reject the Mayor’s Street Safety Cuts

Last month, the Office of the DC Auditor reported that, as DCist headlined it, Vision Zero Doesn’t Have Enough Funding, Staffing To Succeed. ‘“The Bowser Administration failed to follow the ambitious announcement in 2015 with appropriate resources in both funding and manpower,” DC’s auditor Kathy Patterson said in a statement.’

Also last month, the Bowser Administration’s proposed FY 2024 budget requires repealing a two-year-old law that dedicates most traffic camera revenue to Vision Zero projects, cuts three of Circulator’s six routes (and cancels a seventh meant to start service this year), and fails to fund last year’s Metro for DC law to expand bus service and make it free in the District.

A WABA alert this week calls on Council to reverse the Mayor’s transportation cuts. I added a few things, so here’s my version:

2024 is the year the Mayor designated as the year DC gets to zero traffic deaths and serious injuries. We’re nowhere close, and now is not the time to scale back funding for key transportation bills or cut public transit. Yet that’s exactly what the mayor’s proposed budget does—eliminate the Vision Zero revenue set-aside created in the budget two years ago and put money gleaned from automated enforcement cameras back into the general fund, and cut half of the Circulator’s existing routes (and the Ward 7 route scheduled to start this year).

There are a number of reasons why this is a bad idea; I refer you to the testimony of the Pedestrian Advisory Council to last week’s Transportation Committee hearing for several of them, such as reinforcing the popular trope that automated enforcement is a money grab rather than a safety measure. But the bottom line is, we need to make it safe to be on our streets, and make sure that we have safe, accessible ways for people to get around that aren’t in individual private cars. Repealing the Vision Zero funding set-aside, eliminating half of Circulator’s routes, and failing to fund Metro for DC and the ebike rebate program will take us backwards, not advance Vision Zero.

I am asking you to ensure the dedicated funding source in the FY24 budget for the Vision Zero Omnibus bill is not repealed, and to also fully fund the “Electric Bicycle Rebate Program Amendment Act of 2023” and “Metro For D.C. Amendment Act of 2020”.

Combined, these bills will save lives and make our transportation system more equitable. Please reverse the Mayor’s cuts, and fully fund them in the FY24 budget. Thank you!

ETA: I sent this on Monday afternoon, April 3; by evening on Tuesday, I had received a three-word reply from CM Brianne Nadeau:

Working on it

On Improving the Mount Vernon Trail

The National Park Service is, through mid-week, accepting comments on a proposed scope for an Environmental Assessment of potential improvements to the Mount Vernon Trail between Roosevelt Island and Mount Vernon (except in the City of Alexandria) and the George Washington Parkway between Alexandria and Mount Vernon. (Yes, this is an opportunity to comment on the scale of a study that might someday propose changes—or, at any rate, constrain the range of possible changes—that might, at some even-later date, get built….) You can find more details from the Friends of the MVT.

My comments, should you like to adapt them for your own submittal:

Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the potential improvements to the Mount Vernon Trail. (I have never driven on the GW Parkway, and have only once been on the trail south of Alexandria, so I will largely limit my comments to the section of the Trail through Arlington County.)

First, I strongly urge NPS not to limit the expansion of the MVT north of Alexandria, particularly north of National Airport, to a mere 11 feet. As your scoping meeting presentation notes, the current trail already averages 9 feet wide — an additional 2 feet, especially in the heavily crowded area between the 14th St Bridge and National Airport, will barely even be noticeable, and in a few years the Trail will likely be back to the same level of congestion again. Where possible, the trail should be widened to at least 14 feet to allow for the next 50 years of growth in volume. Additionally, the trail should add a crushed-stone shoulder on either side for runners and to prevent trailside grass and other vegetation from taking over the trail.

Crowding is particularly acute near Gravelly Point, where commuters, recreational riders of all speeds, and joggers frequently interact with park users and plane watchers. NPS planning documents have long included creating a trail Bypass that would allow through-riders and -runners to avoid the congested area at the end of the runway. Please include it in the EA Scope. Please also scope creating a paved viewing area so that planespotters can step off the trail safely.

In recent years, there has been a significant increase in cars being parked on the grassy area immediately north across the trail from the Gravelly Point parking area, despite the numerous ‘no parking on the grass’ signs; I have even encountered people parked along and even on the trail where it cuts between the parking lot and Parkway. Please either remove the signs and formalize this additional parking area, and add further protections for trail users from drivers, or add stronger barriers and protections to prevent people parking on the grass and trail. Please also scope finding a permanent spot for the food truck operators who now frequent this area, so that they don’t block visibility for trail users crossing the parking lot driveway, and including electrical connections so that they don’t need to run generators.

Crowding is significant and visible to anyone who uses the Trail, but we don’t actually know how many people are doing so — a recent study by Virginia Tech planning students found that trail counters along the MVT south of National Airport were not functional, and that south of Alexandria trail counters don’t exist at all. Please repair or replace the broken counters, and add additional counters south of the City. Please consider including at least a few large counters with digital displays showing how many people are using the Trail, as seen locally on the Custis Trail at North Lynn St near Key Bridge and on the Maine Ave cycletrack at 7th St SW.

I was deeply disappointed to see that the Bicycle/Pedestrian Safety & Access slide of the scoping meeting presentation declare that crosswalks would not be provided at several crossings of the southern Parkway because they are “not warranted at these intersections”. We don’t not build bridges because not enough people are swimming across the river; we shouldn’t not mark crosswalks—literally the least we could do to make an intersection safe for people on foot or bikes—just because there aren’t enough people currently risking their lives to cross there. (Perhaps if there were functional counters at these locations, we’d know just how many walkers, runners, cyclists, and others in fact do access the Trail at these locations.)

Please consider improving and adding additional connections between bridges to the District and the Trail. For example, the connection from the Roosevelt Bridge involves a long downhill and a narrow, hairpin right turn on a wooden surface that is often extremely slippery when wet. However, there is a second, unused sidewalk on the south side of the Roosevelt that simply peters out after crossing the Parkway—adding a new ramp here at some point in the future could allow southbound riders a safer connection from DC to the trail.

The places where the trail connecting the MVT to Memorial Bridge and the Route 27 Trail crosses the Parkway and associated ramps has gotten significantly safer in the last several years, but could be better yet. Please consider leaving room in the EA Scope for additional improvements, such as further lane reductions, raised crosswalks, stop signs for drivers rather than for trail users, and other means for making vulnerable trail users the priority at these crossings. Similarly, please remove the antiquated and never-obeyed ‘trail users dismount’ signage at the National Airport exit ramp crossing and wherever else they appear and replace with raised crossings and signage and pavement markings for drivers notifying them of the crossing.

The new wider underpass that was recently cut through the Roosevelt Bridge on the DC side is tremendous and resolves a significant bottleneck in the Rock Creek Trail. I strongly urge NPS to scope resolving similar bottlenecks on the Mount Vernon Trail at the Memorial Bridge and on the Crystal City Connector.

I note that my friends at Friends of the MVT suggest that the Parkway needs vegetative screens or other barriers to prevent drivers headlights blinding Trail users, and that the Trail needs lighting and reflective pavement markings to better allow use after sunset. I have two stories that illustrate these needs:

  • When I started attending Virginia Tech’s Masters in Urban and Regional Planning program in Winter 2019 at its former site in Old Town, I attempted to bike to classes in the evenings. However, the Trail is so dark, and northbound cars’ headlights so bright, I nearly ran off the Trail multiple times, and arrived to class with a pounding headache from the glare. I went back to Metro until the time change meant I could ride to evening classes in daylight.
  • Recently, I returned a rental car at National Airport and attempted to ride bikeshare back home to DC. The connection from the airport Bikeshare station to the MVT is well-signed and well-lit, but the Trail proper is so dark I nearly rode straight off the pavement as soon as I reached it. After nearly riding off the trail a couple more times, nearly riding into the Parkway at least once, I gave up, walked the bike to Gravelly Point, and walked the rest of the way to the 14th St Bridge. I needed my phone’s camera light as a flashlight even to be able to navigate the trail on foot, but once I reached the DC side of the bridge I was able to get a new bike at the Jefferson Memorial bikeshare station and ride the rest of the way home.

Please, light and screen the Trail and make it possible to ride at night without being blinded or riding into traffic.

Thank you again for this opportunity to comment on the proposed plan and environmental assessment to improve the Mount Vernon Trail and the southern portion of the George Washington Memorial Parkway.

DC Council committees comparison, 2023 edition

Once again, as the DC Council session comes to a close, Chairman Mendelson has announced the new Council committees and their members for next session. So I updated this post from two years ago, lining up the old and new committees, with people who are no longer on Council (good-bye, Todd & Grosso, Cheh and Silverman…) or simply not on the new version of the committee struck out, like this, while new Council Members (hello, Henderson and Lewis George, Frumin and Parker!) or simply new to the Committee highlighted thusly.

Note that these changes remain proposed until the new Council is sworn in and meets on January 3, at which time they will probably vote to approve the assignments as proposed by the Chairman. It’s always possible things could change…

Council Period 23 (2019–2020)Council Period 24 (2021–2022)Council Period 25 (2023–2024)
Business and Economic Development
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (Ward 5)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Mary M. Cheh (Ward 3)
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
Business and Economic Development
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (Ward 5)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Mary M. Cheh (Ward 3)
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
Business and Economic Development
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (At-Large)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
Education
  • David Grosso (At-Large)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Committee eliminated merged into Committee of the Whole
Facilities and Procurement
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
  • Mary M. Cheh (Ward 3)
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Elissa Silverman (At-Large)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
Government Operations and Facilities
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
  • Christina Henderson (At-Large)
  • Brianne Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Public Works and Operations
  • Brianne Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Government Operations
  • Brandon T. Todd (Ward 4)
  • David Grosso (At-Large)
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Elissa Silverman (At-Large)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Health
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Mary M. Cheh (Ward 3)
  • David Grosso (At-Large)
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Brandon T. Todd (Ward 4)
Health
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Mary M. Cheh (Ward 3)
  • Christina Henderson (At-Large)
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
Health
  • Christina Henderson (At-Large)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Matt Frumin (Ward 3)
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Zachary Parker (Ward 5)
 Hospital and Health Equity
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Christina Henderson (At-Large)
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Zachary Parker (Ward 5)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Housing and Neighborhood Revitalization
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Elissa Silverman (At-Large)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Housing and Executive Administration
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (Ward 5)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
  • Elissa Silverman (At-Large)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
Housing
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
  • Matt Frumin (Ward 3)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (At-Large)
  • Zachary Parker (Ward 5)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
Human Services
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • David Grosso (At-Large)
  • Brandon T. Todd (Ward 4)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Human Services
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4)
  • Elissa Silverman (At-Large)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Facilities and Family Services
  • Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4)
  • Matt Frumin (Ward 3)
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Zachary Parker (Ward 5)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
Judiciary and Public Safety
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Mary M. Cheh (Ward 3)
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
Judiciary and Public Safety
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Mary M. Cheh (Ward 3)
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
Judiciary and Public Safety
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Christina Henderson (At-Large)
Labor and Workforce Development
  • Elissa Silverman (At-Large)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • David Grosso (At-Large)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (Ward 5)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
Labor and Workforce Development
  • Elissa Silverman (At-Large)
  • Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4)
  • Christina Henderson (At-Large)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Executive Administration and Labor
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Matt Frumin (Ward 3)
  • Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (At-Large)
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
Recreation and Youth Affairs
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (Ward 5)
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Brandon T. Todd (Ward 4)
Recreation, Libraries, and Youth Affairs
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (Ward 5)
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
Recreation, Libraries, and Youth Affairs
  • Trayon White, Sr. (Ward 8)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (At-Large)
  • Brianne K. Nadeau (Ward 1)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)
Transportation and the Environment
  • Mary M. Cheh (Ward 3)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (Ward 5)
  • Brandon T. Todd (Ward 4)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
Transportation and the Environment
  • Mary M. Cheh (Ward 3)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Christina Henderson (At-Large)
  • Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (Ward 5)
Transportation and the Environment
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Matt Frumin (Ward 3)
  • Christina Henderson (At-Large)
  • Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4)
  • Zachary Parker (Ward 5)
Finance and Revenue
  • Jack Evans (Ward 2)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Kenyan R. McDuffie (Ward 5)
  • Elissa Silverman (At-Large)

Evans stripped of chairmanship and committee dissolved, July 2019. Responsibilities distributed among Committee of the Whole, Business and Economic Development, and other committees.

Sub-Committee on Redistricting
  • Elissa Silverman (At-Large)
  • Anita Bonds (At-Large)
  • Christina Henderson (At-Large)
Special Committee on COVID-19 Pandemic Recovery
  • Vincent C. Gray (Ward 7)
  • Charles Allen (Ward 6)
  • Janeese Lewis George (Ward 4)
  • Brooke Pinto (Ward 2)
  • Robert C. White, Jr. (At-Large)

The Education Committee remains eliminated (*cough* excuse me, merged into the Committee of the Whole) and a bunch more agencies appear to have shuffled around; for now, the current responsibilities of the outgoing committees can be seen on each old committee’s page linked above, and when that information comes out for next year, hopefully this time I’ll remember to link them on the right side.

On Beach Drive

Last month, the National Park Service proposed ending the 28-month experiment with a (nearly) car-free Upper Beach Drive in DC’s Rock Creek Park and, in order to “improve recreational opportunities, minimize impacts to natural and historic resources, and address the needs of people who drive and those who use non-motorized transportation”, re-allow through traffic between Labor Day and Memorial Day every Fall, Winter, and Spring. Comments were accepted through midnight (Mountain Time, for some reason?) on August 11. Here’s mine.

The first two years I lived in DC, I was on 16th St NW at Longfellow, around the corner from the Morrow Drive entrance to the Park. However, if I ever wanted to get from the Carter Barron area down to Beach Drive, I could walk in the road on Morrow Drive, or walk in the road along Military and Joyce, or I could…..fly, I guess?

You write that “This [pandemic-era] closure has … increased the creation of informal, unofficial trails, which can cause natural resource damage.” First of all, this conclusion suffers from mistaking correlation for causation: The closure didn’t induce the creation of informal unofficial trails, the pandemic itself and the rapidly and vastly increased need for safe, outdoor recreation spaces away from other potentially-infectious people did! There was a critical need, and NPS largely failed to meet it, so people met it any way they could.

Moreover, the solution to informal and unsanctioned trails isn’t to reintroduce cars and scare off the people and others cutting new trails any more than it would be in one of the great Western parks. The solution to people making bad trails is to provide good ones! NPS should work with PARC, WABA, or other Park neighbors to create more official trails so folks east of the Park can get to it safely and without harming the environment.

Similarly, as at other parks NPS “manages” elsewhere in DC, the failure to provide space for people to exercise their dogs, combined with a failure to enforce leash laws and other regulations, has allowed some bad actors to run their dogs freely in the Park. Again, the solution is not to bring back commuter through-traffic, it’s to provide a dog exercise area and get people to use it.

I am a transportation planner, not an ecologist, but I can virtually guarantee that reintroducing through traffic, with cars’ exhaust and rubber particles from eroding tires and brake dust, not to mention drivers’ propensity to hit animals, people, and each other, will cause far greater harm to the Park’s environment than limiting drivers to accessing picnic areas from one end or the other.


The offer to provide car-free access to Beach Drive from Memorial Day to Labor Day is almost an insult. As the last week has shown, high summer is the worst part of the year to be outside in DC. Just as the outside becomes tolerable again, NPS proposes to push joggers, bike riders, walkers, and others to the side so people in their climate-controlled boxes can drive the length of Beach Drive in peace. If anything, the fall and spring are when it’s most pleasant to be outside — and winter, when bike lanes and sidewalks are often treacherous to downright impassible (especially on NPS properties affiliated with Rock Creek Park, from 16th & Morrow to W Street below Malcolm X/Meridian Hill Park, where it is often necessary to get DDOT or Congresswoman Norton’s office involved to have sidewalks cleared…), is when it is most important to have safe, car-free routes to commute and exercise.

Going forward with this plan would not achieve the Park Service’s goals to “improve recreational opportunities, minimize impacts to natural and historic resources, and address the needs of people who drive and those who use non-motorized transportation”, and in fact would diminish all of them.

Connect the New Legion Bridge Trail to the C&O Towpath

As Bill Schultheiss wrote, “How often do motorists have to ‘advocate’ for logical roadway connections?” Nevertheless, here we are: DC-area advocates are campaigning in support of connecting a planned trail on the New American Legion Bridge, where the Washington Beltway crosses the Potomac upriver of DC, to the C&O Towpath Trail — Maryland’s current proposal (part of a much larger, and deeply problematic, expansion proposal for the Beltway) would connect it only to the MacArthur Boulevard shared-use path, up the bluff, requiring a significant detour to access the Towpath. See WABA’s letter to MDOT (PDF), learn more, and send your own note at https://waba.org/blog/2021/11/support-a-better-bike-connection-across-the-potomac/, or learn about the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) and submit a comment directly to MDOT at https://oplanesmd.com/sdeis/

Dear Mr. Jeffrey Folden and Superintendent Tina Cappetta,

I am writing to join the Washington Area Bicyclist Association’s comments supporting a trail connection between the American Legion Bridge and both the C&O Towpath and MacArthur Boulevard as part of any replacement of the Legion Bridge. Both of these connections are critical for a number of reasons:

  • Virginia residents need comfortable and intuitive connections to the C&O Towpath that do not involve driving and parking cars.
  • Connections between MacArthur Boulevard and the Towpath are already limited, and it would be extremely short-sighted to miss this opportunity to build another one.
  • The Towpath, while unpaved, is an important active transportation corridor in this part of the region, and a comfortable and intuitive trail connection between Virginia and Maryland will create many opportunities for sustainable modes of transportation between Northern Virginia and Montgomery County.
  • The Towpath is also an important touring corridor, bringing folks to the region from as far away as Cumberland and Pittsburgh—and beyond. Numerous trail-adjacent towns along the Great Allegheny Passage and C&O know the value in being connected to them, even the ones that are as close to Pittsburgh as the Legion Bridge is to DC. Connecting the Towpath to the New Legion Bridge will also create many opportunities for sustainable modes of recreation and tourism in Northern Virginia and Montgomery County.

Please do not miss this opportunity to connect more people in Maryland and Virginia to this beloved park, and to open up new active transportation options for folks on both sides of the river.

Thanks,

Del. Norton: Support & Expand Sec. 136407 of the Build Back Better Act

Del. Norton,

I am writing to urge you to support Sec. 136407 of the Build Back Better Act, to create a refundable tax credit for e-bike purchases.

Like many DC residents, I am interested in acquiring an e-bike, but I cannot afford one. Folks I know across the country who do have e-bikes, including those who have purchased kits to modify existing bikes, have found that they allowed them to save money and get more exercise, and even to travel and take vacations without needing to use a car. As one says, “I put off getting the e-assist because it was hard to pay for it all at once, but it’s been one of the very best purchases I have ever made. Ever.”

Nearly 40 percent of DC households do not own a vehicle; many residents do not even have a license to drive. Expanding their ability to access electric bikes—especially in combination with the Complete Streets Act of 2021 to help cities and states design and build safer streets, HR 1289, which I wrote you about earlier this year—could expand their ability to access the city in ways many of their car-owning neighbors take for granted.

Even those who will never ride an electric bicycle will benefit from a substantial e-bike credit. A 2019 study from Portland State University’s Transportation Research and Education Center (McQueen, MacArthur, and Cherry, “The E-Bike Potential: Estimating the Effect of E-bikes On Person Miles Travelled and Greenhouse Gas Emissions”) estimates that just a modest 15 percent increase in electric bike usage would result in an 11 percent decrease in CO2 emissions. Since transportation is more than 40 percent of US-generated carbon emissions, that’s a big benefit for a very small investment.

That’s why I also urge you to work to increase the tax credit to 30 percent, push for 2021 implementation, and offer a higher spending limit and credit for adaptive bicycles that allow people with disabilities to benefit from the practical and recreational benefits of e-bikes. As more specialized products, adaptive e-bikes do not scale well, and are much more expensive on average, so it’s even more important to do as much as possible to make them accessible for those who want and need them.

I know you have long been a strong supporter for biking and even scooter-riding on Capitol Hill and around Washington. Let’s get even more people on bikes.

Sincerely,

I. Buffalo

with thanks to Kimberly Kinchen for some language.

Testimony to DC Council on Vision Zero, 2021 edition

After threatening to for over three years, I finally managed to sign up in time to testify in person (….virtually.…). But, even if you didn’t, you can submit testimony in writing (or by voicemail!) within two weeks of the meeting: see the end of the meeting notice and send in your comments by May 27, 2021.

Testimony to the Council of DC, Committee on Transportation & the Environment
Public Roundtable on The Surge in Traffic Crashes, Fatalities, and Injuries in the District and the Urgent Need to Fully Fund the Vision Zero Enhancement Omnibus Amendment Act

May 13, 2021

As my friend Rachel Maisler told this committee in February, if we want those who discovered bikes during the last year to keep riding, the answer is simple: “more safe places to ride…whatever it takes.” DC’s 2015 commitment—Mayor Bowser’s commitment—to Vision Zero calls for lower speeds and safer places to ride, and DC’s repeatedly-stated intent to lower traffic, pollution, and drive-alone modeshare all require taking space from cars and dedicating it to making it safer and more comfortable to use non-automotive modes.

We need more, wider, and more connected sidewalks and bike lanes, all across the District, and we need DDOT to be less timid about proposing and pushing for them. A good rule is “1 of each before 2 of any”—that is, before any road gets a second lane, it should have a bus lane or bike lanes. Conversely, we should be looking at any road that already has multiple lanes in each direction and make one into a bus lane or space for people walking and cycling.

And yet, examples across the city show how DDOT still plans first and primarily for automotive traffic, while bikes and pedestrians are an afterthought. In some cases, bikes and pedestrians are forced to fight for scraps at the edge of massive suburban-style highways, even in the heart of our city, as at Dave Thomas Circle or on 11th Street Southeast at the edge of the Navy Yard, where a seven-lane road will get a protected bike lane by shaving off part of the sidewalk.  We also still see projects like the rehab of Massachusetts Avenue west of Dupont go forward without any rethinking of the space.  As DDOT’s engineer said during the project meeting in February after several questions about the lack of bike lanes, “We’re reconstructing the existing roadway, not planning for the future.”  Indeed.

This goes beyond funding—as the Vision Zero Network says, “Vision Zero is not a slogan, nor a tagline, not even just a program…Vision Zero is a fundamental shift in approach [to] safe mobility.” Vision Zero isn’t some add-on that the Mayor can just throw a couple million dollars at, it must be built into everything the Department does from the beginning.  DDOT needs to get serious about Vision Zero, about Safe Accommodations, and about its own long term plans and to train its staff, starting, apparently, at the top, on what they mean broadly and for the specific projects they are working on. 

In 2016, Linda Bailey, then the Executive Director of NACTO, wrote that “Elected officials should be champions for safe street designs.”  The record and rising number of “lives lost is a wake-up call, yet we know how to stem this epidemic. Better design will save lives and make our streets safer.” Mayor Bowser hired her to be DDOT’s Vision Zero Director, but as the Department’s continuing record shows—on Safe Accommodations, on the Eastern Downtown Protected Lanes, and so many more projects and regulations collecting dust on shelves—the rest of us still need you on this Council to be our champions. We need you to demand more of this Administration. 

On the Ride of Silence

Introductory remarks before the 2021 DC Ride of Silence. As prepared for delivery, May 19, 2021.

For those who are not familiar, the Ride of Silence is an annual, worldwide event, held at 7pm local time on the third Wednesday of May in hundreds of cities, in dozens of countries around the world. In the US, at least, May is Bike Month, and this week is Bike Week—as you may have heard, Friday is Bike-to-Work Day, and even if this year you aren’t going in to an office to work, I encourage you to go out for a spin Friday morning and get that t-shirt.

But tonight is an opportunity to pause during the great joy of Bike Week and Bike Month and honor and remember those who cannot be here to celebrate with us.

We weren’t able to ride together this time last year, so tonight we honor the 4 people killed while riding bikes in DC in the last two years—Jim Pagels, Armando Martinez-Ramos, Michael Williams, and one unnamed neighbor—and the over 800 killed while riding in the United States each and every year. As the national Ride of Silence coordinating site puts it, “Although cyclists have a legal right to be on the road with motorists, [drivers] often [aren’t] aware of these rights, and sometimes not aware of the cyclists themselves.” This ride is a combination of funeral procession and a statement: People on bikes are here, where we have every right to be. We are here and these are our streets, too; we are not going anywhere. See us.

But, as a friend of mine wrote a couple years ago, “Vision Zero isn’t a cycling program. It looks like that here because [the cycling community] is vocal about it, but the tens of thousands of people a year who die in car crashes all deserved better laws, practices, and designs.”

And so tonight we also honor the roughly seventy people killed on DC roads in the last two years, the approximately a thousand people killed on Maryland roads, the 1500 or so people killed on Virginia roads, the over seventy five thousand people killed, and the many, many more gravely injured, on American roads in the last two years. Whether biking in a street, motorcycling on a road, driving on a highway, walking along an avenue, or just sitting on a bench in a roadside park, they all—we all—deserve better.

We begin tonight here, across from the Wilson Building, DC’s city hall and statehouse, and we’ll pass by the US Capitol, because we need better laws from both our local and national leaders. Our ride tonight will end in Navy Yard, outside the headquarters of our District and US Departments of Transportation, because we need better designs from both our local and national engineers.

<Congressman Mike Thompson joined us and was invited to speak.>

We will ride slowly and silently, as in a funeral procession. Please turn on your lights, at their low and steady setting if you can. Much like a funeral procession, if the front of the ride reaches a yellow or red light, we will stop; if the light changes while we are crossing, we will continue, as a mass. However, if we do get separated or stretched out, we will pause and regroup. Please keep alert and aware of the people and pavement around you! While we have tried to avoid known construction areas and bad roads, you may encounter plates, utility cuts, and other hazards. Be aware of who’s around you if you need to dodge a pothole, and use hand signals to point out problems to the riders behind you.


About 40 people joined the four-mile Ride of Silence in honor of the four riders killed in DC since 2019’s Ride. Special thanks to Rep. Thompson and his staff, to Michael Kaercher for bringing us together, to the ride marshals for keeping us safe and together, and especially to Rachel Maisler for all your help and support.

Del. Norton: America (still) Needs Complete Streets

The Complete Streets Act is back (HR 1289, S.425) and once again in DC Delegate Eleanor Norton’s subcommittee, so I guess it’s time to visit @SmartGrowthUSA and send another letter.

Del. Norton,

I am writing to ask you to please support and co-sponsor the Complete Streets Act of 2021, HR 1289, which would help states design and build safer streets to help address the astonishing 45 percent increase in people killed by drivers while walking over the last 10 years. When I wrote you last Congress about the 2019 edition of this bill, that number was 35 percent, so the problem is not only critical, it has gotten significantly worse even just in the last two years.

Federal dollars and policies helped create the streets where a jumbo jet full of people walking are killed every single month, and the federal government must help address this shocking increase in dead pedestrians.

Addressing the public health crisis that is increasing anthropogenic climate change will also require federal leadership. As transportation is the leading source of greenhouse gases, one of the most impactful ways to slow warming will be to reduce tailpipe emissions—put simply, we need people to drive less, especially by themselves. One of the best ways to get them to do that is to make it safer and easier for people to use other means of getting around, especially for short trips that could easily be walked if the roads were safe enough to walk on.

The Complete Streets Act would set aside a portion of each state’s surface-transportation dollars and then 1) require them to create a Complete Streets program to provide technical assistance and capital funding for communities to build safe streets projects, and 2) require states and metro areas to adopt & implement design standards to provide for the safe and adequate accommodation of all users.

Here in DC, in the first third of 2021 we have already lost as many pedestrians and bicyclists to traffic violence as we did in all of 2020—and our roads’ death toll overall has been rising for half a decade. However, we have the solutions to build safer streets now—we just need policy to ensure that we implement these solutions.* The Complete Streets Act will help more Americans have the freedom to move safely and address the worsening epidemic of preventable pedestrian deaths. Safe streets spur the local economy, give more people access to jobs and opportunity, and improve our health.

Del. Norton, as I said two years ago, I know you have been a strong supporter for biking and even scooter-riding on Capitol Hill and around Washington. Even as problematic—as, not to put too fine a point on it, deadly—as biking and walking can be in DC, it’s better than most places in this country. Please contact lead House sponsor Rep. Steve Cohen to sign on to HR 1289, and ask your Senate colleagues to contact lead Senate sponsor Sen. Ed Markey to sign on to S.425, and help the rest of the US get streets at least as walkable and bikeable as the District’s.

* and, yes, enforcement to insure the implementation is, well, implemented…but maybe that’s just a DC problem.

Supporting increased density on U Street NW

It’s nearly time for DC Council to vote to pass the Comprehensive Plan, so it was time to write in again and ask again for the Future Land Use Map to allow greater density on several soon-to-be-redeveloped public sites along the short but critical transit corridor where I live…. If you’d like to submit your own testimony in favor of greater density in the U Street Corridor, send it to COW@DCCouncil.us (as in Committee Of (the) Whole, the Council body working on the Comp Plan bill), preferably with a copy to your council member and, if you like, your ANC commissioner.

Chair Mendelson et al.,

I am writing as a Ward 1 resident—and, particularly, as a resident of the U Street corridor less than a block away from Engine 9/MPD District 3—to say again that I strongly support increasing the FLUM density designations on the public sites in the corridor, including the Engine 9/D3 site, Garnet-Patterson School, and the Housing Finance Agency HQ site.

DC desperately needs more housing, and DC especially desperately needs more affordable housing.  Public sites provide our greatest opportunity not only to build more housing, but to ensure that as much as possible of the housing that gets built is affordable.   As I wrote in my previous testimony on the Comp Plan bill B23-736 in December, I support higher density designations for most of Ward 1, and I strongly support CM Nadeau’s amendment to increase the FLUM designations for the public sites in the U Street Corridor.

Again, as the National Capital Region continues to grow, not only does DC as the core of the region need most of the people moving here to actually locate within the District for economic and tax reasons, we need most of the people moving here to live as close as manageable to work, their groceries and shopping areas, and so forth for climate reasons.  We are in an emergency, the world is burning, and we cannot keep driving hour after hour, day after day to work and school and errands and home again.  As our traffic violence statistics spiral out of control—as of May 1st, we’re on track to lose 48 people on DC streets this year, the most since Adrian Fenty’s first year as Mayor a decade and a half ago—they again reinforce the critical need to reduce DC’s reliance on private automobiles and enable people to live where they do not feel the need to use or even own cars.  Sites like these, which are close to schools, grocery stores and shopping areas, and high-frequency, high-capacity transit lines, are especially critical to make accessible to as many potential future residents as possible.  Please enable this accessibility and allow more density, especially on the public sites in the U Street Corridor.

Thank you,