All being well I will be getting quite a few games onto the tabletop for my WW1 Palestine Campaign, between 8 to 12 games seems likely, possibly more. This number of games can turn the writing of Battle Reports or After Action Reports (depending on how you like to call them) from being an enjoyable exercise into a bit of a chore. Part of this dilemma is self inflicted as I have a general rule that I don't like starting another campaign game until I have written up the report from the previous game. This presents a quandary and I was pondering about a taking a different approach with these reports by creating some self imposed constraints on the writing of a battle report.
 |
| A Samurai game currently underway - nothing to do with the post. |
The constraints I plan to apply to the battle report will be the consist of: 4 paragraphs and 4 photographs.
The paragraphs will have the following structure:
- Battle background and order of battle.
- The attacking battle plan.
- 2 paragraphs describing the battle.
This structure is based around the scenarios presented on the "Command and Colors" website where I often go looking for scenario ideas. The game descriptions have a map and a description of the historic events at varying levels of detail. The ones I enjoy reading the most generally have 3 to 4 paragraphs with the following structure:
- Background to the battle
- The plans
- What happened (often over 2 paragraphs)
The four photographs will have:
- 1 photograph of the tabletop or map.
- 3 photographs of key points in the battle.
 |
| Another picture - just to add some images |
As I progress the WW1 Palestine Campaign it will be interesting to see how I go with applying the constraints, and whether it makes the posting of reports easier or simpler. I suspect the photograph constraint may be the most difficult one to adhere too.