Crypto: BLS aggregate_signature_opt takes a subgroup_check optional argument
What
Bls.aggregate_signature_opt now takes an optional ?(subgroup_check = true) argument.
Why
In some contexts where the signature subgroup has already been verified, you may want an aggregation function that skips this verification for better perfomances.
How
Slightly updated all previous environments aggregate_signature_opt implementation accordingly so that their version of aggregate_signature_opt remains unchanged.
Manually testing the MR
Checklist
-
Document the interface of any function added or modified (see the coding guidelines) -
Document any change to the user interface, including configuration parameters (see node configuration) -
Provide automatic testing (see the testing guide). -
For new features and bug fixes, add an item in the appropriate changelog ( docs/protocols/alpha.rstfor the protocol and the environment,CHANGES.rstat the root of the repository for everything else). -
Select suitable reviewers using the Reviewersfield below. -
Select as Assigneethe next person who should take action on that MR
Edited by Adam