[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Advertisement
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Patterns of New Physics in b → sℓ+ℓ− transitions in the light of recent data

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 January 2018
  • Volume 2018, article number 93, (2018)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Patterns of New Physics in b → sℓ+ℓ− transitions in the light of recent data
Download PDF
  • Bernat Capdevila1,
  • Andreas Crivellin2,
  • Sébastien Descotes-Genon3,
  • Joaquim Matias1 &
  • …
  • Javier Virto4 
  • 2024 Accesses

  • 280 Citations

  • 80 Altmetric

  • 11 Mentions

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

In the Standard Model (SM), the rare transitions where a bottom quark decays into a strange quark and a pair of light leptons exhibit a potential sensitivity to physics beyond the SM. In addition, the SM embeds Lepton Flavour Universality (LFU), leading to almost identical probabilities for muon and electron modes. The LHCb collaboration discovered a set of deviations from the SM expectations in decays to muons and also in ratios assessing LFU. Other experiments (Belle, ATLAS, CMS) found consistent measurements, albeit with large error bars. We perform a global fit to all available b → sℓ+ℓ− data (ℓ = e, μ) in a model-independent way allowing for different patterns of New Physics. For the first time, the NP hypothesis is preferred over the SM by 5 σ in a general case when NP can enter SM-like operators and their chirally-flipped partners. LFU violation is favoured with respect to LFU at the 3-4 σ level. We discuss the impact of LFU-violating New Physics on the observable P ′5 from B → K∗μ+μ− and we compare our estimate for long-distance charm contributions with an empirical model recently proposed by a group of LHCb experimentalists. Finally, we discuss NP models able to describe this consistent pattern of deviations.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Theoretical studies in B physics: current and future status

Article 04 December 2023

Difference between two species of emu hides a test for lepton flavour violation

Article Open access 28 March 2017

Implications of New Physics on  $$D_s^+\xrightarrow {} \eta ^{(\prime )} \mu ^+ \nu _\mu $$ Decays

Chapter © 2024

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Experimental Nuclear Physics
  • Nuclear and Particle Physics
  • Nuclear Physics
  • Particle Physics
  • Physics and Astronomy
  • Quantum Physics
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and J. Virto, Understanding the B → K ∗ μ + μ − Anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 074002 [arXiv:1307.5683] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias and J. Virto, Global analysis of b → sℓℓ anomalies, JHEP 06 (2016) 092 [arXiv:1510.04239] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, New physics in b → s transitions after LHC run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 382 [arXiv:1411.3161] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi and S. Neshatpour, On the anomalies in the latest LHCb data, Nucl. Phys. B 909 (2016) 737 [arXiv:1603.00865] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. Bečirević, S. Fajfer and N. Košnik, Lepton flavor nonuniversality in b → sℓ + ℓ − processes, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 014016 [arXiv:1503.09024] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Bečirević, S. Fajfer, N. Košnik and O. Sumensari, Leptoquark model to explain the B-physics anomalies, R K and R D , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 115021 [arXiv:1608.08501] [INSPIRE].

  7. S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Ramon and J. Virto, Implications from clean observables for the binned analysis of B → K ∗ μ + μ − at large recoil, JHEP 01 (2013) 048 [arXiv:1207.2753] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Blake, U. Egede, P. Owen, G. Pomery and K.A. Petridis, An empirical model of the long-distance contributions to \( {\overline{B}}^0\to {\overline{K}}^{\ast 0}{\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-} \) transitions, arXiv:1709.03921 [INSPIRE].

  9. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A.A. Pivovarov and Y.M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in B → K (∗) ℓ + ℓ − and B → K ∗ γ, JHEP 09 (2010) 089 [arXiv:1006.4945] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of B → K (∗) μ + μ − decays, JHEP 06 (2014) 133 [arXiv:1403.8044] [INSPIRE].

  11. LHCb collaboration, Measurements of the S-wave fraction in B 0 → K + π − μ + μ − decays and the B 0 → K ∗(892)0 μ + μ − differential branching fraction, JHEP 11 (2016) 047 [Erratum ibid. 04 (2017) 142] [arXiv:1606.04731] [INSPIRE].

  12. LHCb collaboration, Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay B 0 s  → ϕμ + μ −, JHEP 09 (2015) 179 [arXiv:1506.08777] [INSPIRE].

  13. S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias and J. Virto, Optimizing the basis of B → K ∗ ll observables in the full kinematic range, JHEP 05 (2013) 137 [arXiv:1303.5794] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. LHCb collaboration, Measurement of Form-Factor-Independent Observables in the Decay B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 191801 [arXiv:1308.1707] [INSPIRE].

  15. LHCb collaboration, Angular analysis of the B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ − decay using 3 fb −1 of integrated luminosity, JHEP 02 (2016) 104 [arXiv:1512.04442] [INSPIRE].

  16. LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B 0 s  → ϕμ + μ −, JHEP 07 (2013) 084 [arXiv:1305.2168] [INSPIRE].

  17. Belle collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., Angular analysis of B 0 → K ∗(892)0 ℓ + ℓ −, arXiv:1604.04042 [INSPIRE].

  18. Belle collaboration, S. Wehle et al., Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of B → K ∗ ℓ + ℓ −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 111801 [arXiv:1612.05014] [INSPIRE].

  19. LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality using B + → K + ℓ + ℓ − decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 151601 [arXiv:1406.6482] [INSPIRE].

  20. B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and J. Virto, Assessing lepton-flavour non-universality from B → K ∗ ℓℓ angular analyses, JHEP 10 (2016) 075 [arXiv:1605.03156] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ATLAS collaboration, Angular analysis of B 0 d  → K ∗ μ + μ − decays in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2017-023 (2017).

  22. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the P 1 and P ′5 angular parameters of the decay B0 → K∗0 μ + μ − in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV, CMS-PAS-BPH-15-008.

  23. W. Altmannshofer, C. Niehoff, P. Stangl and D.M. Straub, Status of the B → K ∗ μ + μ − anomaly after Moriond 2017, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 377 [arXiv:1703.09189] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality with B 0 → K ∗0 ℓ + ℓ − decays, JHEP 08 (2017) 055 [arXiv:1705.05802] [INSPIRE].

  25. G. Hiller and M. Schmaltz, R K and future b → sℓℓ physics beyond the standard model opportunities, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 054014 [arXiv:1408.1627] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Hiller and M. Schmaltz, Diagnosing lepton-nonuniversality in b → sℓℓ, JHEP 02 (2015) 055 [arXiv:1411.4773] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. B. Grinstein, R.P. Springer and M.B. Wise, Effective Hamiltonian for Weak Radiative B Meson Decay, Phys. Lett. B 202 (1988) 138 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. G. Buchalla, A.J. Buras and M.E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 1125 [hep-ph/9512380] [INSPIRE].

  29. HFLAV collaboration, Y. Amhis et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ -lepton properties as of summer 2016, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 895 [arXiv:1612.07233] [INSPIRE].

  30. LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ −, JHEP 08 (2013) 131 [arXiv:1304.6325] [INSPIRE].

  31. S. Wehle, private communication.

  32. CMS collaboration, Angular analysis of the decay B 0 → K *0 μ + μ − from pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 424 [arXiv:1507.08126] [INSPIRE].

  33. CMS collaboration, Angular analysis and branching fraction measurement of the decay B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ −, Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 77 [arXiv:1308.3409] [INSPIRE].

  34. S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias and J. Virto, On the impact of power corrections in the prediction of B → K ∗ μ + μ − observables, JHEP 12 (2014) 125 [arXiv:1407.8526] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M. Misiak et al., Updated NNLO QCD predictions for the weak radiative B-meson decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 221801 [arXiv:1503.01789] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. T. Huber, T. Hurth and E. Lunghi, Inclusive \( \overline{B}\to {X}_s{\ell}^{+}{\ell}^{-} \) : complete angular analysis and a thorough study of collinear photons, JHEP 06 (2015) 176 [arXiv:1503.04849] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. C. Bobeth, M. Gorbahn, T. Hermann, M. Misiak, E. Stamou and M. Steinhauser, B s,d → l + l − in the Standard Model with Reduced Theoretical Uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 101801 [arXiv:1311.0903] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. A. Bharucha, D.M. Straub and R. Zwicky, B → V ℓ + ℓ − in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules, JHEP 08 (2016) 098 [arXiv:1503.05534] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. D. Bečirević and O. Sumensari, A leptoquark model to accommodate R exp K  < R SM K and \( {R}_{K^{\ast}}^{\exp }<{R}_{K^{\ast}}^{\mathrm{SM}} \), JHEP 08 (2017) 104 [arXiv:1704.05835] [INSPIRE].

  40. M. Bordone, G. Isidori and A. Pattori, On the Standard Model predictions for R K and \( {R}_{K^{\ast }} \), Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 440 [arXiv:1605.07633] [INSPIRE].

  41. B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer and J. Matias, Hadronic uncertainties in B → K ∗ μ + μ − : a state-of-the-art analysis, JHEP 04 (2017) 016 [arXiv:1701.08672] [INSPIRE].

  42. D. Ghosh, M. Nardecchia and S.A. Renner, Hint of Lepton Flavour Non-Universality in B Meson Decays, JHEP 12 (2014) 131 [arXiv:1408.4097] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. A. Falkowski, M. Nardecchia and R. Ziegler, Lepton Flavor Non-Universality in B-meson Decays from a U(2) Flavor Model, JHEP 11 (2015) 173 [arXiv:1509.01249] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. R. Gauld, F. Goertz and U. Haisch, On minimal Z ′ explanations of the B → K ∗ μ + μ − anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 015005 [arXiv:1308.1959] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  45. A.J. Buras, F. De Fazio and J. Girrbach, 331 models facing new b → sμ + μ − data, JHEP 02 (2014) 112 [arXiv:1311.6729] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S. Jäger, K. Leslie, M. Kirk and A. Lenz, Charming new physics in rare B-decays and mixing?, arXiv:1701.09183 [INSPIRE].

  47. P. Cox, A. Kusenko, O. Sumensari and T.T. Yanagida, SU(5) Unification with TeV-scale Leptoquarks, JHEP 03 (2017) 035 [arXiv:1612.03923] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Quark flavor transitions in L μ − L τ models, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095033 [arXiv:1403.1269] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  49. A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio and J. Heeck, Explaining h → μ ± τ ∓ , B → K ∗ μ + μ − and B → Kμ + μ − /B → Ke + e − in a two-Higgs-doublet model with gauged L μ − L τ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 151801 [arXiv:1501.00993] [INSPIRE].

  50. A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio and J. Heeck, Addressing the LHC flavor anomalies with horizontal gauge symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 075006 [arXiv:1503.03477] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. A. Crivellin, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Greljo and G. Isidori, Lepton Flavor Non-Universality in B decays from Dynamical Yukawas, Phys. Lett. B 766 (2017) 77 [arXiv:1611.02703] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. D. Bhatia, S. Chakraborty and A. Dighe, Neutrino mixing and R K anomaly in U(1) X models: a bottom-up approach, JHEP 03 (2017) 117 [arXiv:1701.05825] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. G. Bélanger, C. Delaunay and S. Westhoff, A Dark Matter Relic From Muon Anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 055021 [arXiv:1507.06660] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. S.M. Boucenna, A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, Non-abelian gauge extensions for B-decay anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 760 (2016) 214 [arXiv:1604.03088] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. S.M. Boucenna, A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, Phenomenology of an SU(2) × SU(2) × U(1) model with lepton-flavour non-universality, JHEP 12 (2016) 059 [arXiv:1608.01349] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia and S.A. Renner, Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in B-meson decays, JHEP 05 (2015) 006 [arXiv:1412.1791] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. S. Fajfer and N. Košnik, Vector leptoquark resolution of R K and \( {R_D}_{{}^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) puzzles, Phys. Lett. B 755 (2016) 270 [arXiv:1511.06024] [INSPIRE].

  58. I. de Medeiros Varzielas and G. Hiller, Clues for flavor from rare lepton and quark decays, JHEP 06 (2015) 072 [arXiv:1503.01084] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. R. Alonso, B. Grinstein and J. Martin Camalich, Lepton universality violation and lepton flavor conservation in B-meson decays, JHEP 10 (2015) 184 [arXiv:1505.05164] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin and T. Ota, Effective Field Theory Approach to B → sℓℓ (′ ) , \( B\to {K}^{\left(\ast \right)}\nu \overline{\nu} \) and B → D (∗) τν with Third Generation Couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 181801 [arXiv:1506.02661] [INSPIRE].

  61. R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, A. Pattori and F. Senia, Anomalies in B-decays and U(2) flavour symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 67 [arXiv:1512.01560] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. S. Sahoo, R. Mohanta and A.K. Giri, Explaining the R K and \( {R_D}_{{}^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) anomalies with vector leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 035027 [arXiv:1609.04367] [INSPIRE].

  63. B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia and S.A. Renner, Linear flavour violation and anomalies in B physics, JHEP 06 (2016) 083 [arXiv:1509.05020] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. P. Arnan, L. Hofer, F. Mescia and A. Crivellin, Loop effects of heavy new scalars and fermions in b → sμ + μ −, JHEP 04 (2017) 043 [arXiv:1608.07832] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. F. Mahmoudi, S. Neshatpour and J. Virto, B → K ∗ μ + μ − optimised observables in the MSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2927 [arXiv:1401.2145] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. C. Niehoff, P. Stangl and D.M. Straub, Violation of lepton flavour universality in composite Higgs models, Phys. Lett. B 747 (2015) 182 [arXiv:1503.03865] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. R. Alonso, B. Grinstein and J. Martin Camalich, Lifetime of B − c Constrains Explanations for Anomalies in B → D (∗) τ ν, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 081802 [arXiv:1611.06676] [INSPIRE].

  68. M. Freytsis, Z. Ligeti and J.T. Ruderman, Flavor models for \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}\tau \overline{\nu} \), Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 054018 [arXiv:1506.08896] [INSPIRE].

  69. A. Celis, M. Jung, X.-Q. Li and A. Pich, Scalar contributions to b → c(u)τ ν transitions, Phys. Lett. B 771 (2017) 168 [arXiv:1612.07757] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. M.A. Ivanov, J.G. Körner and C.-T. Tran, Probing new physics in \( {\overline{B}}^0\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) using the longitudinal, transverse and normal polarization components of the tau lepton, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 036021 [arXiv:1701.02937] [INSPIRE].

  71. D.A. Faroughy, A. Greljo and J.F. Kamenik, Confronting lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with high-p T tau lepton searches at LHC, Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 126 [arXiv:1609.07138] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. F. Feruglio, P. Paradisi and A. Pattori, Revisiting Lepton Flavor Universality in B Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 011801 [arXiv:1606.00524] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, Gauge-invariant implications of the LHCb measurements on lepton-flavor nonuniversality, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 035026 [arXiv:1704.05672] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. A. Crivellin, D. Müller and T. Ota, Simultaneous explanation of R(D (∗)) and b → sμ + μ − : the last scalar leptoquarks standing, JHEP 09 (2017) 040 [arXiv:1703.09226] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. I. Garcia Garcia, LHCb anomalies from a natural perspective, JHEP 03 (2017) 040 [arXiv:1611.03507] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, On B → V ℓℓ at small dilepton invariant mass, power corrections and new physics, JHEP 05 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1212.2263] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, Reassessing the discovery potential of the B → K ∗ ℓ + ℓ − decays in the large-recoil region: SM challenges and BSM opportunities, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 014028 [arXiv:1412.3183] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  79. M. Ciuchini et al., B → K ∗ ℓ + ℓ − decays at large recoil in the Standard Model: a theoretical reappraisal, JHEP 06 (2016) 116 [arXiv:1512.07157] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. M. Ciuchini et al., B → K ∗ ℓ + ℓ − in the Standard Model: Elaborations and Interpretations, PoS(ICHEP2016)584 [arXiv:1611.04338] [INSPIRE].

  81. C. Bobeth, M. Chrzaszcz, D. van Dyk and J. Virto, Long-distance effects in B → K ∗ ℓℓ from Analyticity, arXiv:1707.07305 [INSPIRE].

  82. LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the phase difference between short- and long-distance amplitudes in the B + → K + μ + μ − decay, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 161 [arXiv:1612.06764] [INSPIRE].

  83. A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio, M. Hoferichter and L.C. Tunstall, Violation of lepton flavor and lepton flavor universality in rare kaon decays, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 074038 [arXiv:1601.00970] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut de Fisica d’Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, 08193, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

    Bernat Capdevila & Joaquim Matias

  2. Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland

    Andreas Crivellin

  3. Laboratoire de Physique Théorique (UMR 8627), CNRS, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405, Orsay, France

    Sébastien Descotes-Genon

  4. Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland

    Javier Virto

Authors
  1. Bernat Capdevila
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andreas Crivellin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sébastien Descotes-Genon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joaquim Matias
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Javier Virto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquim Matias.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1704.05340

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Capdevila, B., Crivellin, A., Descotes-Genon, S. et al. Patterns of New Physics in b → sℓ+ℓ− transitions in the light of recent data. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 93 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2018)093

Download citation

  • Received: 06 November 2017

  • Revised: 20 December 2017

  • Accepted: 10 January 2018

  • Published: 19 January 2018

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2018)093

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Effective Field Theories
  • Heavy Quark Physics

Profiles

  1. Andreas Crivellin View author profile
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature