[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

B →Vℓ+ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 August 2016
  • Volume 2016, article number 98, (2016)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
B →Vℓ+ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules
Download PDF
  • Aoife Bharucha1,2,
  • David M. Straub3 &
  • Roman Zwicky4 
  • 1813 Accesses

  • 442 Citations

  • 9 Altmetric

  • 1 Mention

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We present B q → ρ, B q → ω, B q → K ∗, B s → K ∗ and B s → ϕ form factors from light-cone sum rules (LCSR) at \( \mathcal{O}\left({\alpha}_s\right) \) for twist-2 and 3 and \( \mathcal{O}\left({\alpha}_s^0\right) \) for twist-4 with updated hadronic input parameters. Three asymptotic light-cone distribution amplitudes of twist-4 (and 5) are determined, necessary for the form factors to obey the equations of motion. It is argued that the latter constrain the uncertainty of tensor-to-vector form factor ratios thereby improving the prediction of zeros of helicity amplitudes of major importance for B → K ∗ℓℓ angular observables. We provide easy-to-use fits to the LCSR results, including the full error correlation matrix, in all modes at low q 2 as well as combined fits to LCSR and lattice results covering the entire kinematic range for B q → K ∗, B s → K ∗ and B s → ϕ. The error correlation matrix avoids the problem of overestimating the uncertainty in phenomenological applications. Using the new form factors and recent computations of non-factorisable contributions we provide Standard Model predictions for B → K ∗γ as well as B → K ∗ℓ+ℓ− and B s → ϕμ + μ − at low dilepton invariant mass. Employing our B → (ρ,ω) form factor results we extract the CKM element |V ub| from the semileptonic decays B → (ρ, ω)ℓν and find good agreement with other exclusive determinations.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Perturbative corrections to B → D form factors in QCD

Article Open access 13 June 2017

Non-factorisable effects in the decays \( {\overline{B}}_s^0\to {D}_s^{+}{\pi}^{-} \) and \( {\overline{B}}^0\to {D}^{+}{K}^{-} \) from LCSR

Article Open access 30 October 2023

Investigating non-local contributions in \( {B}_s\to \phi \overline{\ell}\ell \) including higher-twist effects

Article Open access 03 July 2025

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Angular momentum of light
  • Elementary Particles, Quantum Field Theory
  • Light-Matter Interaction
  • Light Stress
  • Particle Physics
  • Quantum Electrodynamics, Relativistic and Many-body Calculations
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  1. T. Blake, G. Lanfranchi and D.M. Straub, Rare B decays as tests of the standard model, arXiv:1606.00916 [INSPIRE].

  2. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, B d,s → ρ, ω, K ∗ , ϕ decay form-factors from light-cone sum rules revisited, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 014029 [hep-ph/0412079] [INSPIRE].

  3. I. Sentitemsu Imsong, A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel and D. van Dyk, Extrapolation and unitarity bounds for the B → π form factor, JHEP 02 (2015) 126 [arXiv:1409.7816] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Hambrock, G. Hiller, S. Schacht and R. Zwicky, B → K ∗ form factors from flavor data to QCD and back, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 074014 [arXiv:1308.4379] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Charles, A. Le Yaouanc, L. Oliver, O. Pène and J.-C. Raynal, Heavy to light form-factors in the heavy mass to large energy limit of QCD, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 014001 [hep-ph/9812358] [INSPIRE].

  6. M. Beneke and T. Feldmann, Symmetry breaking corrections to heavy to light B meson form-factors at large recoil, Nucl. Phys. B 592 (2001) 3 [hep-ph/0008255] [INSPIRE].

  7. S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias and J. Virto, On the impact of power corrections in the prediction of B → K ∗ μ + μ − observables, JHEP 12 (2014) 125 [arXiv:1407.8526] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, Reassessing the discovery potential of the B → K ∗ ℓ + ℓ − decays in the large-recoil region: SM challenges and BSM opportunities, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 014028 [arXiv:1412.3183] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias and J. Virto, Optimizing the basis of B → K ∗ ℓ + ℓ − observables in the full kinematic range, JHEP 05 (2013) 137 [arXiv:1303.5794] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R.R. Horgan, Z. Liu, S. Meinel and M. Wingate, Lattice QCD calculation of form factors describing the rare decays B → K ∗ ℓ + ℓ − and B s → ϕℓ + ℓ −, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 094501 [arXiv:1310.3722] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. R.R. Horgan, Z. Liu, S. Meinel and M. Wingate, Rare B decays using lattice QCD form factors, PoS(LATTICE2014)372 [arXiv:1501.00367] [INSPIRE].

  12. J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Isospin asymmetries in B → (K ∗ , ρ)γ/l + l − and B → Kl + l − in and beyond the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 094004 [arXiv:1305.4797] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics. Theoretical foundations, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 385 [INSPIRE].

  14. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics. Applications, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 448 [INSPIRE].

  15. I.I. Balitsky, V.M. Braun and A.V. Kolesnichenko, Radiative decay σ + → pγ in quantum chromodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B 312 (1989) 509 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. V.L. Chernyak and I.R. Zhitnitsky, B meson exclusive decays into baryons, Nucl. Phys. B 345 (1990) 137 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics. The ρ-ω mixing, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 519 [INSPIRE].

  18. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, Improved analysis of B → πeν from QCD sum rules on the light cone, JHEP 10 (2001) 019 [hep-ph/0110115] [INSPIRE].

  19. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, New results on B → π, K, η decay form factors from light-cone sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 014015 [hep-ph/0406232] [INSPIRE].

  20. G. Duplancić, A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, B. Melić and N. Offen, Light-cone sum rules for B → π form factors revisited, JHEP 04 (2008) 014 [arXiv:0801.1796] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Ball and V.M. Braun, Exclusive semileptonic and rare B meson decays in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 094016 [hep-ph/9805422] [INSPIRE].

  22. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel and N. Offen, Form-factors from light-cone sum rules with B-meson distribution amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 054013 [hep-ph/0611193] [INSPIRE].

  23. F. De Fazio, T. Feldmann and T. Hurth, SCET sum rules for B → P and B → V transition form factors, JHEP 02 (2008) 031 [arXiv:0711.3999] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Grinstein and D. Pirjol, Exclusive rare B → K ∗ ℓ + ℓ − decays at low recoil: controlling the long-distance effects, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 114005 [hep-ph/0404250] [INSPIRE].

  25. N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, Relationship between form-factors in semileptonic \( \overline{B} \) and D decays and exclusive rare \( \overline{B} \) meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 2388 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Altmannshofer et al., Symmetries and asymmetries of B → K ∗ μ + μ − decays in the standard model and beyond, JHEP 01 (2009) 019 [arXiv:0811.1214] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart, An effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: heavy to light decays, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 114020 [hep-ph/0011336] [INSPIRE].

  28. M. Beneke and D. Yang, Heavy-to-light B meson form-factors at large recoil energy: spectator-scattering corrections, Nucl. Phys. B 736 (2006) 34 [hep-ph/0508250] [INSPIRE].

  29. G. Bell, M. Beneke, T. Huber and X.-Q. Li, Heavy-to-light currents at NNLO in SCET and semi-inclusive \( \overline{B}\to {X}_s{\ell}^{+}{\ell}^{-} \) decay, Nucl. Phys. B 843 (2011) 143 [arXiv:1007.3758] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Ali, V.M. Braun and H. Simma, Exclusive radiative B decays in the light cone QCD sum rule approach, Z. Phys. C 63 (1994) 437 [hep-ph/9401277] [INSPIRE].

  31. M. Diehl, T. Gousset, B. Pire and O. Teryaev, Probing partonic structure in γ ∗ γ → ππ near threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1782 [hep-ph/9805380] [INSPIRE].

  32. M.V. Polyakov, Hard exclusive electroproduction of two pions and their resonances, Nucl. Phys. B 555 (1999) 231 [hep-ph/9809483] [INSPIRE].

  33. N. Kivel, L. Mankiewicz and M.V. Polyakov, NLO corrections and contribution of a tensor gluon operator to the process γ ∗ γ → ππ, Phys. Lett. B 467 (1999) 263 [hep-ph/9908334] [INSPIRE].

  34. M. Diehl, Generalized parton distributions, Phys. Rept. 388 (2003) 41 [hep-ph/0307382] [INSPIRE].

  35. R.A. Briceño, M.T. Hansen and A. Walker-Loud, Multichannel 1 → 2 transition amplitudes in a finite volume, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 034501 [arXiv:1406.5965] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. D. Bečirević and A. Tayduganov, Impact of B → K ∗0 ℓ + ℓ − on the new physics search in B → K ∗ ℓ + ℓ − decay, Nucl. Phys. B 868 (2013) 368 [arXiv:1207.4004] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. U.-G. Meißner and W. Wang, Generalized heavy-to-light form factors in light-cone sum rules, Phys. Lett. B 730 (2014) 336 [arXiv:1312.3087] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the resonant and CP components in \( {\overline{B}}^0\to J/\psi {\pi}^{+}{\pi}^{-} \) decays, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 012003 [arXiv:1404.5673] [INSPIRE].

  39. CLEO collaboration, B.H. Behrens et al., Measurement of B → ρlν decay and |V ub|, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 052001 [hep-ex/9905056] [INSPIRE].

  40. CLEO collaboration, N.E. Adam et al., A study of exclusive charmless semileptonic B decay and |V ub|, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 041802 [hep-ex/0703041] [INSPIRE].

  41. F. Jegerlehner and R. Szafron, ρ 0 -γ mixing in the neutral channel pion form factor F (e) π (s) and its role in comparing e + e − with τ spectral functions, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1632 [arXiv:1101.2872] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. U.-G. Meißner and W. Wang, \( {B}_s\to {K}^{\left(\ast \right)}\ell \overline{\nu} \) , angular analysis, S-wave contributions and |V ub|, JHEP 01 (2014) 107 [arXiv:1311.5420] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. S. Faller, T. Feldmann, A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel and D. van Dyk, Disentangling the decay observables in \( {B}^{-}\to {\pi}^{+}{\pi}^{-}{\ell}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell } \), Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 014015 [arXiv:1310.6660] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. X.-W. Kang, B. Kubis, C. Hanhart and U.-G. Meißner, B l4 decays and the extraction of |V ub|, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 053015 [arXiv:1312.1193] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. G. Colangelo, E. Passemar and P. Stoffer, A dispersive treatment of K ℓ4 decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 172 [arXiv:1501.05627] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. P. Ball and G.W. Jones, Twist-3 distribution amplitudes of K ∗ and ϕ mesons, JHEP 03 (2007) 069 [hep-ph/0702100] [INSPIRE].

  47. M. Dimou, J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Exclusive chromomagnetism in heavy-to-light FCNCs, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 074008 [arXiv:1212.2242] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. R. Arthur et al., Lattice results for low moments of light meson distribution amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 074505 [arXiv:1011.5906] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, SU(3) breaking of leading-twist K and K ∗ distribution amplitudes — a reprise, Phys. Lett. B 633 (2006) 289 [hep-ph/0510338] [INSPIRE].

  50. P. Ball and V.M. Braun, ρ meson light-cone distribution amplitudes of leading twist reexamined, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2182 [hep-ph/9602323] [INSPIRE].

  51. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, |V td /V ts | from B → V γ, JHEP 04 (2006) 046 [hep-ph/0603232] [INSPIRE].

  52. RBC-UKQCD collaboration, C. Allton et al., Physical results from 2+1 flavor domain wall QCD and SU(2) chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 114509 [arXiv:0804.0473] [INSPIRE].

  53. A. Bharucha, Two-loop corrections to the B → π form factor from QCD sum rules on the light-cone and |V ub|, JHEP 05 (2012) 092 [arXiv:1203.1359] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. T.M. Aliev and V.L. Eletsky, On leptonic decay constants of pseudoscalar D and B mesons, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 38 (1983) 936 [Yad. Fiz. 38 (1983) 1537] [INSPIRE].

  55. E. Bagan, P. Ball, V.M. Braun and H.G. Dosch, QCD sum rules in the effective heavy quark theory, Phys. Lett. B 278 (1992) 457 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ −, JHEP 08 (2013) 131 [arXiv:1304.6325] [INSPIRE].

  57. LHCb collaboration, Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 191801 [arXiv:1308.1707] [INSPIRE].

  58. LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of B → K (∗) μ + μ − decays, JHEP 06 (2014) 133 [arXiv:1403.8044] [INSPIRE].

  59. LHCb collaboration, Angular analysis of the B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ − decay using 3 fb −1 of integrated luminosity, JHEP 02 (2016) 104 [arXiv:1512.04442] [INSPIRE].

  60. CMS collaboration, Angular analysis and branching fraction measurement of the decay B 0 → K ∗0 μ + μ −, Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 77 [arXiv:1308.3409] [INSPIRE].

  61. ATLAS collaboration, Angular analysis of B d → K ∗0 μ + μ − with the ATLAS experiment, ATLAS-CONF-2013-038 (2013).

  62. Belle collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., Angular analysis of B 0 → K ∗(892)0 ℓ + ℓ −, in LHC Ski 2016: a first discussion of 13 TeV results, Obergurgl Austria, 10-15 Apr 2016 [arXiv:1604.04042] [INSPIRE].

  63. S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and J. Virto, Understanding the B → K ∗ μ + μ − anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 074002 [arXiv:1307.5683] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, New physics in B → K ∗ μμ?, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2646 [arXiv:1308.1501] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. F. Beaujean, C. Bobeth and D. van Dyk, Comprehensive Bayesian analysis of rare (semi)leptonic and radiative B decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2897 [Erratum ibid. C 74 (2014) 3179] [arXiv:1310.2478] [INSPIRE].

  66. J. Lyon and R. Zwicky, Resonances gone topsy turvy — the charm of QCD or new physics in b → sℓ + ℓ − ?, arXiv:1406.0566 [INSPIRE].

  67. W. Altmannshofer and D.M. Straub, New physics in b → s transitions after LHC run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 382 [arXiv:1411.3161] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. H.H. Asatryan, H.M. Asatrian, C. Greub and M. Walker, Calculation of two loop virtual corrections to b → sl + l − in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 074004 [hep-ph/0109140] [INSPIRE].

  69. M. Beneke, T. Feldmann and D. Seidel, Systematic approach to exclusive B → V ℓ + ℓ − , V γ decays, Nucl. Phys. B 612 (2001) 25 [hep-ph/0106067] [INSPIRE].

  70. M. Beneke, T. Feldmann and D. Seidel, Exclusive radiative and electroweak b → d and b → s penguin decays at NLO, Eur. Phys. J. C 41 (2005) 173 [hep-ph/0412400] [INSPIRE].

  71. LHCb collaboration, Observation of a resonance in B + → K + μ + μ − decays at low recoil, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 112003 [arXiv:1307.7595] [INSPIRE].

  72. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A.A. Pivovarov and Y.M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in B → K (∗) ℓ + ℓ − and B → K ∗ γ, JHEP 09 (2010) 089 [arXiv:1006.4945] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. P. Ball, G.W. Jones and R. Zwicky, B → V γ beyond QCD factorisation, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 054004 [hep-ph/0612081] [INSPIRE].

  74. F. Muheim, Y. Xie and R. Zwicky, Exploiting the width difference in B s → ϕγ, Phys. Lett. B 664 (2008) 174 [arXiv:0802.0876] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. S. Jäger and J. Martin Camalich, On B → V ℓℓ at small dilepton invariant mass, power corrections and new physics, JHEP 05 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1212.2263] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. G. Hiller and R. Zwicky, (A)symmetries of weak decays at and near the kinematic endpoint, JHEP 03 (2014) 042 [arXiv:1312.1923] [INSPIRE].

  77. S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Ramon and J. Virto, Implications from clean observables for the binned analysis of B → K ∗ μ + μ − at large recoil, JHEP 01 (2013) 048 [arXiv:1207.2753] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. J. Gratrex, M. Hopfer and R. Zwicky, Generalised helicity formalism, higher moments and the \( B\to {K_J}_{{}_K}\left(\to K\pi \right){\overline{\ell}}_1{\ell}_2 \) angular distributions, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 054008 [arXiv:1506.03970] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. Particle Data Group collaboration, K.A. Olive et al., Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys. C 38 (2014) 090001 [INSPIRE].

  80. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group (HFAG) collaboration, Y. Amhis et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron and τ -lepton properties as of summer 2014, arXiv:1412.7515 [INSPIRE].

  81. LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the B 0 → K ∗0 e + e − branching fraction at low dilepton mass, JHEP 05 (2013) 159 [arXiv:1304.3035] [INSPIRE].

  82. LHCb collaboration, Angular analysis of the B 0 → K ∗0 e + e − decay in the low-q 2 region, JHEP 04 (2015) 064 [arXiv:1501.03038] [INSPIRE].

  83. S. Descotes-Genon and J. Virto, Time dependence in B → V ℓℓ decays, JHEP 04 (2015) 045 [Erratum ibid. 07 (2015) 049] [arXiv:1502.05509] [INSPIRE].

  84. LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions ℬ(B 0 → K ∗ 0 γ)/ℬ(B 0 s  → ϕγ), Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 112013 [arXiv:1202.6267] [INSPIRE].

  85. LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B 0 s  → ϕμ + μ −, JHEP 07 (2013) 084 [arXiv:1305.2168] [INSPIRE].

  86. CDF collaboration, Precise measurements of exclusive b → sμ + μ − decay amplitudes using the full CDF data set, CDF Public Note 10894 (2012).

  87. BaBar collaboration, P. del Amo Sanchez et al., Study of B → πℓν and B → ρℓν decays and determination of |V ub|, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 032007 [arXiv:1005.3288] [INSPIRE].

  88. Belle collaboration, A. Sibidanov et al., Study of exclusive B → X u ℓν decays and extraction of |V ub| using full reconstruction tagging at the Belle experiment, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 032005 [arXiv:1306.2781] [INSPIRE].

  89. BaBar collaboration, J.P. Lees et al., Branching fraction measurement of B + → ωℓ + ν decays, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 032004 [Erratum ibid. D 87 (2013) 099904] [arXiv:1205.6245] [INSPIRE].

  90. BaBar collaboration, J.P. Lees et al., Branching fraction and form-factor shape measurements of exclusive charmless semileptonic B decays and determination of |V ub|, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 092004 [arXiv:1208.1253] [INSPIRE].

  91. F.U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti and S. Turczyk, New ways to search for right-handed current in \( B\to \rho \ell \overline{\nu} \) decay, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 094003 [arXiv:1408.2516] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. CKMfitter Group collaboration, J. Charles et al., CP violation and the CKM matrix: assessing the impact of the asymmetric B factories, Eur. Phys. J. C 41 (2005) 1 [hep-ph/0406184] [INSPIRE].

  93. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., The unitarity triangle fit in the standard model and hadronic parameters from lattice QCD: a reappraisal after the measurements of Δm s and BR(B → τ ν τ ), JHEP 10 (2006) 081 [hep-ph/0606167] [INSPIRE].

  94. V.L. Chernyak and A.R. Zhitnitsky, Asymptotic behavior of exclusive processes in QCD, Phys. Rept. 112 (1984) 173 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. P. Ball, V.M. Braun, Y. Koike and K. Tanaka, Higher twist distribution amplitudes of vector mesons in QCD: formalism and twist-three distributions, Nucl. Phys. B 529 (1998) 323 [hep-ph/9802299] [INSPIRE].

  96. P. Ball, V.M. Braun and A. Lenz, Twist-4 distribution amplitudes of the K ∗ and ϕ mesons in QCD, JHEP 08 (2007) 090 [arXiv:0707.1201] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. P. Ball and V.M. Braun, Higher twist distribution amplitudes of vector mesons in QCD: twist-4 distributions and meson mass corrections, Nucl. Phys. B 543 (1999) 201 [hep-ph/9810475] [INSPIRE].

  98. K. Maltman and C.E. Wolfe, Isospin breaking vector meson decay constants from continuous families of finite energy sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 096003 [hep-ph/9810441] [INSPIRE].

  99. K. Maltman, private communication.

  100. C.E. Wolfe and K. Maltman, Consequences of the BaBar and KLOE e + e − → π + π − data for the determination of model-dependent ρ-ω mixing effects in Π ρω (m 2 ρ ) and (g − 2) μ , Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 077301 [arXiv:1011.4511] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  101. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Precise measurement of the e + e − → π + π −(γ) cross section with the initial state radiation method at BABAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 231801 [arXiv:0908.3589] [INSPIRE].

  102. E. Braaten and C.-S. Li, Electroweak radiative corrections to the semihadronic decay rate of the τ lepton, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3888 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. Y. Grossman, M. König and M. Neubert, Exclusive radiative decays of W and Z bosons in QCD factorization, JHEP 04 (2015) 101 [arXiv:1501.06569] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  104. M. König and M. Neubert, Exclusive radiative Higgs decays as probes of light-quark Yukawa couplings, JHEP 08 (2015) 012 [arXiv:1505.03870] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. P. Golonka and Z. Was, PHOTOS Monte Carlo: a precision tool for QED corrections in Z and W decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 45 (2006) 97 [hep-ph/0506026] [INSPIRE].

  106. K. De Bruyn et al., Branching ratio measurements of B s decays, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 014027 [arXiv:1204.1735] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physik Department T31, Technische Universität München, James-Franck-Str. 1, 85748, Garching, Germany

    Aoife Bharucha

  2. CNRS, Aix Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CPT, UMR 7332, F-13288, Marseille, France

    Aoife Bharucha

  3. Excellence Cluster Universe, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstr. 2, 85748, Garching, Germany

    David M. Straub

  4. Higgs Centre for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, Scotland, UK

    Roman Zwicky

Authors
  1. Aoife Bharucha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David M. Straub
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roman Zwicky
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Straub.

Additional information

ArXiv ePrint: 1503.05534

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bharucha, A., Straub, D.M. & Zwicky, R. B →Vℓ+ℓ− in the Standard Model from light-cone sum rules. J. High Energ. Phys. 2016, 98 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)098

Download citation

  • Received: 10 June 2016

  • Revised: 11 July 2016

  • Accepted: 31 July 2016

  • Published: 16 August 2016

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)098

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Heavy Quark Physics
  • Quark Masses and SM Parameters
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature