more-cpp-extensions #295
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
Compat/Breaking
Kind
Bad merge
Kind
Bug
Kind
Documentation
Kind
Enhancement
Kind
Feature
Kind
New language
Kind
Security
Kind
Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: mergiraf/mergiraf#295
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "mathstuf/mergiraf:more-cpp-extensions"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
cxx
extension as C++ b19f1ebcceHi, thanks again for the PR!
After some quick googling, it looks like there are even more extensions for C++... I'm pretty sure you're more knowledgeable about this than I am, so -- should we add them to the list as well? Or are they rather uncommon in practice?
I'm aware of others (we support them in CMake after all). There are also a raft of header extensions not listed here as well. I've yet to see those I've not added in the wild though.
d0fab23e51
to567711becc
Thanks for fixing the test! Could you please update
4f8f4273bb/doc/src/languages.md
as well?Note to self (CC @wetneb): the
languages_gitattributes
test asserts onlydoc/src/supported_langs.txt
, and only suggests changingdoc/src/languages.md
. I wonder if one could a define CI workflow that ensures that if a PR touchessrc/supported_langs.rs
(99% of time that would beSUPPORTED_LANGUAGES
modification), then it must also touchdoc/src/languages.md
anddoc/src/supported_langs.txt
.Okay, so I'd say we don't add those -- #296 should cover these rare extensions. This should be good to go after the docs are updated
567711becc
tocb9d20bd13
Thanks again!