Liberation for the Palestinians and the people of the Middle East Will Not Be Achieved on the Backs of the Oppression of Iranian Workers, Women and Youth
We are witnessing
the biggest rebellion of Iranians against the theocratic regime in Iran for decades.
Whether the regime succeeds in repressing the demonstrations and surviving is an open
question. I suspect, at least in the short term, it will survive because the
Iranian state's repressive apparatus bears many similarities to those of
classical fascism, e.g. in its abolition of trade unions and there is no strong or coherent opposition.
Let us be clear at once for the benefit of the 'anti-imperialists' who have forgotten what socialism means. Socialism is the emancipation of the working class and oppressed not the dictatorship of a theocratic regime.
As the statement of the independent Iranian trade unions make clear, neither Israel nor the United States are in the slightest bit interested in freedom for the Iranian masses. Both states were more than happy to support the vicious repression under the Shah of Iran, whose son Reza Pahlavi they are trying to bring back. The BBC as always is happy to act as their propaganda stooge.
Threats of military action and bombing by the US and Israel, far from weakening the regime, have the opposite effect by forcing people to rally round it. The cynicism of the genocidal Zionist regime and Trump’s neo-cons beggars belief.
The regime of
Supreme Ruler Khameini and President Masoud Pezeshkian has been responsible for the murder of thousands of protesters, with the
security forces using machine guns and live fire. It is impossible at this time
to estimate how many people have been killed but it must run into thousands.
It is
now resorting to mass hangings of protesters in an
effort to coerce and intimidate the opposition.
There is no doubt that Israel and Mossad have played a part in the protests, but I also have no doubt that Israel has hyped its presence and operations for propaganda reasons. I find it strange that those who usually doubt everything Israel says are now willing to believe these pathological liars.
It would be a grave mistake to believe that the demonstrations are
the creature of Israel. People are on the streets because they have their own
grievances with a dictatorial, corrupt and repressive regime.
Israel
and the US want to see an end to the Iranian regime but what they don’t want is
a democratic society to emerge in its place. Their problem is in finding a
replacement which is why Trump’s words have not, so far, matched his actions.
The last thing Trump, Israel and the West want is popular sovereignty.
Iran’s
regime has its own neo-liberal agenda. Indeed its response to the sanctions has
been to further privatise the economy, the exact opposite of what a socialist
oriented regime would do. It is the poor in Iran who have paid the
highest price for sanctions
Iran’s response to decades of
sanctions has involved a turn to market-based policies rather than the
socialisation of the economy. The state has pursued privatisation and
liberalised certain market mechanisms, resulting in ‘crony capitalism’.
To
withstand sanctions, Iran adopted a "resistance economy" strategy. This has integrated
neoliberal-style policies, such as:
·
Privatisation of State Assets:
Successive governments have targeted the sale of state-owned enterprises to
reduce government spending and settle debts.
·
Subsidy Reform: In late
2025, the government further reduced cash subsidies for energy and food,
shifting toward a "ration-style voucher" system to manage fiscal
deficits.
·
Price Deregulation: Major
industrial producers in sectors like petrochemicals and metals are increasingly
allowed to sell at international market prices domestically to maintain
profitability despite sanctions.
Iran’s
privatisation efforts have largely benefited quasi-governmental
entities.
·
Institutional Control: Many 'privatised' firms were transferred to institutions linked to the Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) or supreme leader-controlled foundations (bonyads).
·
Oligarchy and Corruption: These policies have fostered a "crony capitalist" system
based on nepotism, where the powerful maintain control over wealth while the
middle and working classes face extreme inflation—projected to reach 60% in
2026.
The entrenchment of neoliberal
ideology and policies has been an alternative to developing effective economic strategies to shield the working class and small craftsmen
from the devastating effects of sanctions. Rather than adapting policies to
protect vulnerable economic sectors, the establishment has doubled down on two
core positions:
1.
Accelerating neoliberal policies
2.
Pursuing compromise with US
imperialism, primarily to attract foreign investment.
See Neoliberalism Against Revolution: Iran’s Challenges
for Resistance
The hypocrisy
of Israel and the United States over the death of protesters is to be expected.
However it would be a mistake to take their posturing as reflecting their true
views. Israel has perpetrated a genocide of tens of thousands of people in
Gaza. The US and the Trump regime has funded and supplied weapons for that
genocide. They are hardly likely to be concerned about the death of Iranian protesters.
The ‘support’
of Israel and the US for the demonstrations and protests is cynical and
self-serving. Both states are the partners of vicious dictatorial regimes all
over the Middle East. The only disagreement they have with Iran’s clerical
regime is in its independent foreign policy and its opposition to Israeli
hegemony in the region.
The entire Western media refuses to report on the deadly, Mossad-supported wave of riots in Iran, depriving their audiences of context
— Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) January 13, 2026
The anti-government violence has one ultimate objective: to convince the notoriously gullible Trump to bomb Iran on Israel’s behalf https://t.co/iH3yqxaU3C
There is
a section of the anti-imperialist left, represented by people like Max
Blumenthall, who take the view that the enemy of my enemy is my
friend. This is a mistake. The same people supported the Ba’athist
regime of President Assad of Syria and we know how that turned out.
The Zionists are telling you Mossad did it while laughing on TV and breathless British leftists are still banging on about "the people's protests" and "the glorious workers' uprising". pic.twitter.com/dJEdkfbEQd
— David Miller (@Tracking_Power) January 12, 2026
Anti-imperialism
can never be successful when it relies on regimes which are hated by their own
people. In the long term this can only strengthen the Israeli state. It allows
Zionism and US imperialism to pass themselves off as the friends of the Iranian
people.
The origins of the Islamic Republic lie in collaboration with the United States in order to thwart a genuine revolutionary challenge to capitalism and exploitation. This is not surprising since the clerical regime that emerged was based on the Bazaaris, the merchants and shopkeepers of the traditional marketplaces who represent a powerful and heterogeneous commercial class that has functioned as a central pillar of the country's economic and political history.
On 9 November 1978, in a now-famous cable, "Thinking the Unthinkable," the US ambassador to Iran, William Sullivan, warned that the Shah was doomed. He argued that the US should get the Shah and his top generals out of Iran, and then make a deal between junior commanders and Khomeini.
Sullivan's
suggestions caused friction with Jimmy Carter but by early January 1979 Carter had concluded that the Shah had to go.
While the U.S. did not formally support Khomeini, historical evidence confirms that the Carter administration engaged in secret diplomatic negotiations with
him in January 1979 to ensure an orderly transition and prevent a radical
leftist or workers revolution from taking hold.
In 1979
during the Iranian revolution the US effectively backed Khomeini for fear of a workers
revolution. Khomeini initiated a dialogue with the Carter administration to secure his return to Iran and prevent a military coup
that might have kept him from power.
From January 15 to 27, 1979, direct talks occurred in
Neauphle-le-Château, France, between Khomeini’s chief of staff, Ebrahim Yazdi,
and U.S. diplomat Warren Zimmermann. On 27 January Khomeini told
the US just weeks before the overthrow of the Shah's government:
It is
advisable that you recommend to the army not to follow Bakhtiar (...) You will
see we are not in any particular animosity with the Americans. (...) There
should be no fear about oil. It is not true that we wouldn’t sell to the US.
(...)
The primary goal of Carter was to preserve US interests
and prevent civil war and an opening to Soviet influence. U.S. policy makers
believed they could "do business" with the incoming regime,
especially with moderate, Western-educated figures like Yazdi and Ayatollah
Mohammad Beheshti, who were close to Khomeini at the time
Their major fear was of a
potential communist or socialist
takeover, which was a real possibility given the strength of the working-class
movement and the influence of the USSR. Accommodating Khomeini was seen as a
way to prevent Iran from falling to the left.
The primary U.S. motivation for communicating with Khomeini was the fear
of a power vacuum that would benefit the Tudeh (Communist) Party or Marxist guerrillas. There were
three components to US strategy:
·
The "Soft Landing" Strategy: U.S.
officials, including National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, feared a
chaotic collapse of the state would invite a Soviet invasion or a takeover by
local Marxist groups.
·
Khomeini’s Guarantees: From
exile in France, Khomeini sent messages to the White House promising that he
was not anti-American and that an Islamic republic would be a
"stable" bulwark against communism.
·
Neutralizing the Military: To avoid
a bloody civil war that leftists might exploit, the U.S. sent General Robert E.
Huyser to Tehran to convince the Shah's generals not to launch a coup against
the burgeoning revolution. This effectively cleared the path for Khomeini's
return.
Suppression of the Working Class and Leftists
Below is a Collective Statement of Independent Iranian Organizations and Trade Unions opposing both the threats from Israel and US imperialism and the Islamic regime. It is a statement that puts to shame all those 'anti-imperialists' like Miller, Galloway and Blumenthall who forget that imperialism is the projection of western capitalism and its concomitant political domination of weaker countries.
Capitalism is the source of the oppression of workers and peasants, be it the American or the Islamic version. To support the Iranian regime when it is waging class war against its own workers and people is unforgivable.
Once in power, Khomeini moved aggressively to dismantle the secular,
working class and socialist movements that had participated in the revolution:
·
Crushing the Left: By 1983,
the regime had totally crushed the Tudeh and Fedayeen parties, executing
thousands and imprisoning hundreds of thousands of political opponents.
·
Banning Trade Unions: The new
regime banned trade unions and independent workers' councils (shoras), replacing
them with state-controlled "Islamic Labor Councils" to ensure control
over the working class. This is exactly what Hitler did with the formation of the Labour Front on 2 May
1933.
While the Iranian Constitution (Article 26)
theoretically permits "professional associations," the 1990 Labour
Code and subsequent government actions have replaced genuine unions with
state-controlled entities. The Islamic Labour Councils
are tripartite organisations involving the Ministry of Labour, employers, and selected
workers chosen based on loyalty to the state.
The "Workers' House" is a state-sponsored institution that ostensibly represents workers but is widely criticized for prioritising government policy over labour rights.
·
Intelligence Sharing: Reports
indicate that even after the 1979 revolution, the U.S. provided the
Khomeini regime with a "hit list" of Tudeh members in 1983 to help
eliminate Soviet influence in Iran.
·
Leading
global labor bodies like the International
Trade Union Confederation (ITUC)
rank Iran in their worst category for workers' rights.
Fear of a Leftist Takeover
·
Communist Strength: Various
communist organisations, particularly the Tudeh Party, had significant support,
including among the crucial oil workers, and posed an existential threat to
both the Shah's regime and the nascent Islamic revolutionary government.
It was unfortunate in the extreme that after 1979
the Tudeh Party supported Khomeini until he turned on them.
·
Soviet Influence: During the Cold War, the U.S.
was committed to preventing Soviet expansion. A communist Iran, with a shared
border with the USSR, was a major strategic concern.
·
The Power Vacuum: The working-class movement,
organised through factory councils known as shoras, had effectively
taken control of key industries, including the oil sector, which paralysed the
economy and created a power vacuum.
·
Khomeini's Assurances:
Khomeini's secret messages to the Carter administration included assurances
that he had no "particular affinity" for the Soviet Union and that an
American presence was necessary to counterbalance Soviet influence. These
messages made U.S. policymakers believe that they could work with the Islamists
to maintain a non-aligned Iran.
Today, unlike in 1979, the left is weak. That is the central problem
facing the current demonstrations. Without a strong workers’ party it is
difficult to see an alternative government arising.
Anti-imperialists see the present uprising in terms of, above all, the
Palestinian question and Gaza. This is understandable but misplaced.
Iran’s anti-imperialism has been forced on the regime primarily by the
opposition of the US and Israel to the regime. In order to preserve its power
the Iranian regime constructed the Axis of Resistance, which today lies in ruins.
Hezbollah, an indigenous resistance movement, which arose out of
Israel’s invasion of Lebanon in 1982, has been severely weakened with the
assassination of Nasrallah, its leader and the pager attack. Whether it will be
able to respond to a renewed Israeli attack on Lebanon, which the US is trying
to reconfigure by disarming Hezbollah, is open to question.
Hezbollah was the jewel in the crown and was heavily engaged
in supporting Assad in Syria at Iran’s behest. With the overthrow of Assad the
route from Iran to Lebanon for arms supplies has been largely halted.
Hamas in Gaza undoubtedly obtained some help from Iran but it is noticeable that since October 7 Iran has not done anything
to support the Palestinians facing Israel’s genocide. Even when it had a
chance, when Israel sued for a
ceasefire, Iran did not make its agreement conditional on an Israeli withdrawal
from Gaza.
The reality is that the Iranian regime has been in confrontation with
imperialism and Israel despite itself. We should not forget that from 1981-86
Israel was supplying Iran
with weapons in what became known as the Iran Contra Affair.
Whether or not the Iranian regime survives, one thing is for certain.
That it will continue to be a friend of the Palestinians only so long as it
deems it in its interests.
The Islamic Regime is a Barbaric Regime
The Iranian regime, with its rate of executions estimated to have doubled to 1,500
last year, is a barbaric state. It has the second highest number of executions
of any state after China. Its method of execution, hanging from a crane,
strangulation, is also the most barbaric.
The human rights record in Iran includes the persistent use of torture and what
Amnesty International called a ‘Wave
of floggings, amputations and other vicious punishments.’
Iran is certainly not a model state for socialists or anti-imperialists to
idolise.
As regards the current clashes between the Iranian
state and protestors, I have no doubt at all that the regime is using massive,
lethal violence against the demonstrators. Amnesty International talks
about:
a coordinated nationwide escalation in the security forces’ unlawful
use of lethal force against mostly peaceful protesters and bystanders since the
evening of 8 January....
Verified audiovisual evidence depicts severe
and, in some cases, fatal
injuries, including gunshot wounds to the head, including eyes, as well as
individuals lying motionless on streets or being carried
away amid what is believed to be continued sound of gunshots. Other footage
shows patients bleeding profusely or appearing
lifelesson hospital floors. In several
videos, the people filming state that individuals have been killed.
At least two videos show security forces chasing
and directly firing
at fleeing protesters who appear to pose no threat warranting the use of force,
let alone firearms or other prohibited weapons.
In an account shared with Amnesty International, a journalist from
Tehran said:
“Tell the world that unspeakable crimes are being committed in Iran… Tell the world that if they do nothing, they [authorities] will turn the country into a graveyard.”
With so much misinformation swirling about the Islamic Republic of Iran, here are my reflections on the revolutionary career of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei.
— David Miller (@Tracking_Power) January 10, 2026
This was filmed in the garden of Khamenei's home in Mashhad, Iran, which I visited last year.
It's… pic.twitter.com/ZlPvBrU45A
There are shills for the Iranian state like David
Miller who, whatever the state does, however many people it hangs, it can do no
wrong.
the
Islamic Republic of Iran is on the front lines of anti-imperialism and is
actually the main defender of human civilisation that we have left.
There is no reasoning with such nonsense just as
talking to 99% of Zionist apologists for genocide is like conversing with a
brick wall.
Rioters burned the marketplace in the Iranian city of Rasht to a crisp
— Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) January 12, 2026
Netanyahu, Trump and every leader of the collective West has endorsed this
Of course, they are a model of tolerance toward protesters in their own cities pic.twitter.com/fQ26XDSVnS
Israeli Involvement in the Protests
A favourite argument of Miller, Blumenthall and others is Israel’s claims of massive involvement in the Iranian protests. There is no evidence for this. It is an attempt by Israel to recover from some of the damage caused by their genocide in Gaza and to pretend that for once they are on the side of human rights.
Quite frankly I don’t believe half of the nonsense that they and their hasbarists are putting out. It serves Blumenthall and others to go along with this narrative but it is a narrative at the expense of the Iranian people for whom Israel doesn't give a damn.
Deeply disturbing that Israeli TV is claiming that Israel is arming protesters in Iran with "live firearms".
— Owen Jones (@owenjonesjourno) January 14, 2026
Israel does not care about the Iranian people - and doesn't want a genuinely independent democratic Iran.
It wants Iran to fall into violent chaos and civil war. https://t.co/N6OvCpOz5z
I agree (for once) with Owen Jones. It is using the thousands of dead and murdered Iranian people for its
own racist and genocidal purpose. But
nothing will make Zionism or Genocide smell more sweetly. It is useful for Blumenthall and others to
latch on to Israeli claims but why believe Israel now when normally we call them
liars?
As I said at the beginning, our support for the
Iranian state is only against imperialism and Zionism not its own people.
A Region Wide Strategy
The original mistake of the PLO was to always believe that it could
become just another Arab regime, as we see with the Palestinian Authority today.
Their trust in the Arab regimes was entirely misplaced.
It is also clear that a military strategy against Israel is also
doomed. What then? Is Israel invincible? I don’t think so. In addition to its own internal problems with
deep divisions in its settler population which the attack on Gaza, Lebanon and
Iran have hidden, there is the danger of over extending itself as it invades yet more countries.
The main use of Israel to imperialism has always been its
ability to help neuter radical Arab regimes and come to the aid of quisling
ones like Jordan. Israel’s utility to imperialism comes from its role as a
counter-revolutionary state in the heart of the Middle East.
The real question is to develop a strategy aimed at toppling the main
Arab client regimes of the United States, in particular Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
Iran does not provide a model to the people of the Middle East. Nor does it
seek to overthrow any of the surrounding
regimes. It looks for co-existence with them in much the same way as it would
like to co-exist with the United States.
The overthrow of the Arab regimes is the key to the overthrow of Zionism
and imperialist influence in the Middle East.
There is no other way.
Tony Greenstein