[go: up one dir, main page]

Archive for EU

Nature tidbits [14 May 2026]

Posted in Books, pictures, Statistics, Travel, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 21, 2026 by xi'an

Nature dedicated two pages to the dire situation of Iranian scientists and universities under the cumulated impact of US and Israeli bombings, of increased repression from the theocracy and of internet blackouts. Thirty universities were bombed since the beginning of the attacks (among other civilian buildings). Many scientists are detained at the Evin prison, in Tehran, which is also regularly targeted. This situation is highly concerning about the future of Iranian academia, which stood as an exception in the Middle East against all odds.

The same issue covers the opening of a radiation observation centre in Fukushima, where an area of 300 km² remains off limit. While the remainder of the Fukushima region is declared as safe as the whole of Japan, very few people have returned. One of the goals of the institute (F-REI) is to induce more confidence in the scientific validity of the above declaration, but it remains to be seen how effective it will prove. (I intended to hike nearby this summer but plans have changed!)

Still in the 14 May volume, a longer “feature” article on the dangers of AI-based bioweapons. Which seem real but also difficult to counteract. Especially if rogue states are involved and can create AI-controlled robotic labs for the production. The common recommendation that scientists should create adequate guardrails sounds naïve, at best, since generic LLMs are not designed with such guardrails. (It seems to me each article on the topic reaches the Asilomar trigger at some point!) Followed by a less doom-laden article on the use of AI “vibe coding” by scientists, if not of lesser interest. Which relates to the explosive call to LLMs to design or improve codes. (Also impacting our students and courses in a massive way.) The gains are mostly appreciable for those in the know, since newcomers without coding experience are unlikely to spot subtle errors. (Of course, we a.s. faced pre-AI codes with a subtle error that took ages to detect. Or may even still be there!) The issue also contains an “outlook” leaflet [supported by external sources, who assumedly do not influence the contents!] on antimicrobial (incl. antibiotic) resistance. Among the causes are the default use of antibiotics in farming, which again reflect on the difficulty of controlling such practice (banned in the EU, except in some imports!) and the urge to reduce faster meat consumption. And a book review of Canadian anthropologist Samson’s The Sleepless Ape, which offers an interesting theory of evolution thru sleep deprivation! (“The philosophers John Locke and David Hume thought that sleep hindered rationalism and the pursuit of knowledge.”)

privacy research day in Paris [24 June 2026]

Posted in pictures, Statistics, Travel, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 11, 2026 by xi'an

Nature on ERC funding

Posted in Books, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 8, 2026 by xi'an

In four recent opinion articles, Nature questions the response of the European Research Council (ERC) to a steep increase in grant applications supported by AI tools, namely Responses to the AI grant flood must prioritize fairness as part of excellencePrestigious European science funder scraps stricter rules after researcher backlashCould agentic AI topple grant-funding systems?, and European funder must increase capacity to meet the ambition of scientists,

What is happening is that LLMs are making the construction and design of grant applications much easier, even improving their scientific worth in many cases. Hence seeing the number of submitted proposals rise. For instance, an 142% for EU Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions fellowships. This is getting worse with agentic AI. The funding bodies are unable to implement the various bans they set against relying on these agents. The low-tech solution of increasing the role of interviews and team assessments, while worthwhile, is not working above a certain threshold, being time-intensive (and open to many biases). A comment of 27 April 2026 suggests burning all bridges and resorting to locally designed agentic AIs to assess these proposals… As if the well-studied drawbacks of AIs and LLMs relying on black-box, biased, bibliometric, unsecured, machines would magically vanish with this new construct! The mention of post hoc human verification is also wishful thinking, considering the impact of earlier bibliometric tools such as the h-factor. (Even more recent proposals are similarly bananas.)

An editorial of 05 May 2026 claims the higher moral ground by calling for fairness and inclusivity. But with a bounded budget and an equally bounded pool of human reviewers, the protocol of evaluating an ever-growing pile of applications cannot remain the same. The ERC step of limiting how many grants researchers can apply for and how long unsuccessful candidates have to wait before they can re-apply has been rescinded under protest from some researchers. But a call of 01 May 2026 for more structural investment does not stand the test of reality. Working in an ERC panel is time-consuming, equivalent to one month of investment, and finding more willing experts is unlikely to succeed, not mentioning the rise in the ERC budget the EU Commission is not going to vote, the more (or the less!) with the rise of populist fractions in the European Parliament

heading south [cover]

Posted in Books, pictures, Travel, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on June 4, 2026 by xi'an

Nature on mirror conferences

Posted in Books, Statistics, University life with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on January 28, 2026 by xi'an

In a news article entitled “Scientists skip key US meetings — and seize on smaller alternatives”, Nature discusses the impact of the restrictive policies put in place by the Trump administration on US conferences and their attendance. Including the multiplication of mirror and satellite meetings. One of the examples in the article is Neurips 2025,

“…the artificial-intelligence conference NeurIPS hosted not only its main meeting in San Diego, California, but also its first-ever alternative location, in Mexico City, with the goal of alleviating travel challenges (…) in response to “skyrocketing attendance and difficulties in obtaining travel visas some attendees have experienced in the past few years when only one location was available” [while] a group of AI researchers in Europe organized an independent spin-off conference, dubbed EurIPS, in Copenhagen (…) owing to concerns including climate change [and people expressing] a desire for a less hostile environment”

With a limited number of 500 participants attending in Mexico. And a massive number in Copenhagen, over 2,000! With a final quote from Emtiyaz Khan (a plenary speaker at ISBA 2026):

[I] chose to travel to EurIPS rather than NeurIPS because of the difficulties many others faced in getting into the United States. The smaller nature of EurIPS made it much easier to meet and interact with other scientists. I absolutely loved it and I would love to see it happen again.”

This state of affairs is not going to vanish with Trump adding more countries to the banned country list, 75 at this stage!, and this is a call to arms for ISBA and IMS conference organisers towards planning for multi-hub configurations, since such international organisations cannot exclude a third of the countries in the World from attending their conferences. Which makes our current ISBA survey all the more relevant! I am currently building a mirror meeting for BayesComp 2027 in Aussois, French Alps. For those who cannot or do not wish to travel to Texas for the main conference.