tadted
Joined Dec 2018
Welcome to the new profile
We're making some updates, and some features will be temporarily unavailable while we enhance your experience. The previous version will not be accessible after 7/14. Stay tuned for the upcoming relaunch.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings57
tadted's rating
Reviews50
tadted's rating
Once you get past Hugh Grant looking like Ronnie Corbett ( you expect him to sit on the edge of his chair and begin a rambling story ) you soon get involved in the story and trying to understand the workings of his characters mind.
Once you set off on the journey you want to to see it through to the end whether it is a good ending or not.
It certainly is thought provoking when it comes to faith or control. Grant's character is sinister, as it needs to be, and played very well by him as it is outside of the "type" we normally see him play.
Worth a watch if you don't mind being scared a little.
Once you set off on the journey you want to to see it through to the end whether it is a good ending or not.
It certainly is thought provoking when it comes to faith or control. Grant's character is sinister, as it needs to be, and played very well by him as it is outside of the "type" we normally see him play.
Worth a watch if you don't mind being scared a little.
Not a fan of the way they use the camera - everything is close-up and shaky. It is obviously improvised to a large extent and this seems to lose the integrity of the original work. The use of expletives seems also to be the order of the day too - not sure if this was because they had to improvise or the original work also contained this. Lots of padding out time with music and needless slow motion shots too. I really wanted to like this but struggled to get to the end of the first episode. There will be plenty of fans who will sing its praises as a work of genius but that's just like your friend telling you how good you are - it just takes too big a detour from a historic tale for me.
This show covers some of the questions we've all been asking but the "drama" injected really got on my nerves. The editing is terrrible and misleading entirely for dramatic effect and the guy doing the interviewing is so "hammy" in the way he drags his words out! This is obviously a case that has gripped the world because normal humans are obviously enraged when they read about the death of an innocent child. We watched and fully expected a conviction all those years ago but Casey "got away with it" according to the opinion of the majority. She then crawled from under her rock and accused her Father of paedophilia against herself and her daughter. As a father I would be furious at such an allegation and would sue the hide out of my child if I was innocent. The question is - "Is George a monster"?