mtbgtown
Joined Apr 2011
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings62
mtbgtown's rating
Reviews25
mtbgtown's rating
Going in with an open mind you can't help thinking these scientists make a good case for catastrophic flood in our geological history. I've always thought that, having been to a prehistoric clam bed a few hundred feet above sea level and prying loose a clam that I kept on my shelf through grade school.
They poke so many mortal holes in evolution, you wonder why it even exists. Come up with something new, science! Every base was covered. How the dinosaurs are found, how they died, how they're piled up, how trees are found in multiple sediment layers. The only reason science doesn't embrace global catastrophic flood around 4500 years ago is because the bible already describes it.
So the only problem with a great flood is that it's a religious tradition. Not only in the bible but in most world cultures. Otherwise, it's a totally plausible event based on the evidence.
They poke so many mortal holes in evolution, you wonder why it even exists. Come up with something new, science! Every base was covered. How the dinosaurs are found, how they died, how they're piled up, how trees are found in multiple sediment layers. The only reason science doesn't embrace global catastrophic flood around 4500 years ago is because the bible already describes it.
So the only problem with a great flood is that it's a religious tradition. Not only in the bible but in most world cultures. Otherwise, it's a totally plausible event based on the evidence.
Besides all the credentialed scientists giving data, proof, evidence, just the fact that for 20 years, progressives whined about machines being vulnerable should be enough to at least look at it.
