jack-310
Joined Oct 1999
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see ratings breakdowns and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews7
jack-310's rating
I really wanted to like this movie because the critics have been unkind
to it (to say the least)... but it was terrible. Really terrible. Badly
acted, a witless script, cack handed direction... Watching this film was
like watching a car crash- you want to look away but you keep staring
because you want to see how messy it's going to get. Well, the car is
wrecked and there are no survivors. On the plus side, the cinematography
was nice, made me want to go on holiday, if only to cleanse myself from
this unholy
to it (to say the least)... but it was terrible. Really terrible. Badly
acted, a witless script, cack handed direction... Watching this film was
like watching a car crash- you want to look away but you keep staring
because you want to see how messy it's going to get. Well, the car is
wrecked and there are no survivors. On the plus side, the cinematography
was nice, made me want to go on holiday, if only to cleanse myself from
this unholy
A good attempt to do something different. Has a weird, off-beat feel to it, and the community hidden away in the highlands is well drawn. The cast do well in fleshing out their characters, and there is a sense of foreboding and melancholy that slowly creeps up on you. At first I wasn't totally convinced by Charlie (Alistair McKenzie)'s journey as a character, until he's wondering through the woods and finds an old rusty trampoline. With nobody around, he's free to bounce up and down on it like a kid. This sounds a bit dumb, but it was really quite effective - you really got the sense of a guy finally being able to open up and enjoy himself. Good stuff all round, well directed, moody cinematography, deserves to be seen by a wider audience. .
This might have worked okay as a tv drama, but as a film I have to admit
I became pretty bored within half an hour. It's neither realistic enough
to be moving, or funny enough to be a comedy. Maybe it's just me, but I
found my sympathy lying with the Jimmy character- he wants to make a
fresh start with his family. Shirley seems to feel the same way, but at
the end makes the decision to stay with Dec based on her daughter.
I didn't understand the connection made to Westerns either. Although the
music was excellent, it seemed more of an excuse to use the title "Once
Upon A Time..." rather than anything else.
I felt if the film had been trimmed considerably then maybe I would've
have enjoyed it more, as it was it seemed to drag to a conclusion that
could be seen a mile off. There wasn't nearly enough substance to make
the viewer want to continue watching. I don't mind if films don't have
substance as long as there is some kind of wow factor to keep you
watching, but in this case that was sadly lacking. I don't think Ritchie
is a bad director and I still rather see any of his films that his
namesake Guy's, but this was a case of too little, too long.
That said, the actress playing Shirley's daughter was excellent, and her
performance was moving. And Rhys Ifans on his hands and knees in front
of James Cosmo saying "Please don't do anything sexual" did make me
laugh out loud. It's just a shame the rest of the film didn't
I became pretty bored within half an hour. It's neither realistic enough
to be moving, or funny enough to be a comedy. Maybe it's just me, but I
found my sympathy lying with the Jimmy character- he wants to make a
fresh start with his family. Shirley seems to feel the same way, but at
the end makes the decision to stay with Dec based on her daughter.
I didn't understand the connection made to Westerns either. Although the
music was excellent, it seemed more of an excuse to use the title "Once
Upon A Time..." rather than anything else.
I felt if the film had been trimmed considerably then maybe I would've
have enjoyed it more, as it was it seemed to drag to a conclusion that
could be seen a mile off. There wasn't nearly enough substance to make
the viewer want to continue watching. I don't mind if films don't have
substance as long as there is some kind of wow factor to keep you
watching, but in this case that was sadly lacking. I don't think Ritchie
is a bad director and I still rather see any of his films that his
namesake Guy's, but this was a case of too little, too long.
That said, the actress playing Shirley's daughter was excellent, and her
performance was moving. And Rhys Ifans on his hands and knees in front
of James Cosmo saying "Please don't do anything sexual" did make me
laugh out loud. It's just a shame the rest of the film didn't