After his family falls apart Joshua is forced to move to Canada to live with his estranged father. It is there he meets Jay, a local tattoo artist. The two becomes closer despite the negativ... Read allAfter his family falls apart Joshua is forced to move to Canada to live with his estranged father. It is there he meets Jay, a local tattoo artist. The two becomes closer despite the negativity that surrounds them.After his family falls apart Joshua is forced to move to Canada to live with his estranged father. It is there he meets Jay, a local tattoo artist. The two becomes closer despite the negativity that surrounds them.
- Awards
- 4 wins & 1 nomination total
Aaron Potter
- Joshua
- (as Aaron Ellis)
Hunter Page
- Jay
- (as Justin Liles)
- Directors
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
CHRONICLES OF FIRST AND STRONG LOVES... WITHOUT TIME OR DISTANCE
I wandered off to see this feature film because I don't usually watch low-rated films, as it's a clear warning of what you're about to see. But that's not a rule written in stone (as we say here in LATAM), so I decided to give it a chance. And it was, at least, enjoyable.
We have the typical plot of first-time teenage love, that plot over-explored by independent cinema and Hollywood to the point of nausea, but here, at least on paper, it didn't feel like a rehash of other films or cinematic devices, although ironically there are some, but they are necessary to a certain extent.
The acting was good for what the script proposed. Even judging by the script, the acting was above what one would expect in a typical film of these modern times, and even more so in a plot that's already over-explored in general cinema, but it wasn't perfect either. Despite the fact that some actors occasionally didn't connect with their characters (there was, at times, a slight discomfort on the part, mainly, of the lead actor/director), and Wayne Virgo, who wasn't even the raw promise of the time, did something as good as he did in his debut feature and, to this day, his greatest film, Shank (2009), because they gave him a mediocre, almost filler character, forgetting how great he can be without feeling pressured. Still, it was clear that an effort was made to avoid falling into mediocrity.
The script was the film's downside. It has many flaws that seem straight out of a super-amateur film or a university thesis-type project, even though it was noticeable that there was production and certain resources (I mean, it didn't feel like a cheap film, at least from what you see in close-up), and it's a shame because the essence of the plot isn't bad. In fact, I saw some similarities with Steel (2015) or a better-made film in every way, Gameboys: The Film (2021), but due to a mediocre script and direction bordering on amateurish, it felt empty, without substance, and at times, like something that was done more than anything to please mass audiences than to make a more robust, daring, and courageous proposal. The film needed that because the proposal required it.
In short, it's not a bad film, but it's not perfect either. At least by its release date, there weren't yet the 1,000 films made in droves, repeating the same plot indefinitely, with different approaches, but which contributed little or nothing to cinema in general. It's entertaining to watch, at least if you want to relax in your room watching something for those nights when it's hard to sleep.
The title of my review was taken from the song "Mas Allá De La Piel" by Frankie Ruiz and curiously, it coincides with the film's title in Spanish.
I wandered off to see this feature film because I don't usually watch low-rated films, as it's a clear warning of what you're about to see. But that's not a rule written in stone (as we say here in LATAM), so I decided to give it a chance. And it was, at least, enjoyable.
We have the typical plot of first-time teenage love, that plot over-explored by independent cinema and Hollywood to the point of nausea, but here, at least on paper, it didn't feel like a rehash of other films or cinematic devices, although ironically there are some, but they are necessary to a certain extent.
The acting was good for what the script proposed. Even judging by the script, the acting was above what one would expect in a typical film of these modern times, and even more so in a plot that's already over-explored in general cinema, but it wasn't perfect either. Despite the fact that some actors occasionally didn't connect with their characters (there was, at times, a slight discomfort on the part, mainly, of the lead actor/director), and Wayne Virgo, who wasn't even the raw promise of the time, did something as good as he did in his debut feature and, to this day, his greatest film, Shank (2009), because they gave him a mediocre, almost filler character, forgetting how great he can be without feeling pressured. Still, it was clear that an effort was made to avoid falling into mediocrity.
The script was the film's downside. It has many flaws that seem straight out of a super-amateur film or a university thesis-type project, even though it was noticeable that there was production and certain resources (I mean, it didn't feel like a cheap film, at least from what you see in close-up), and it's a shame because the essence of the plot isn't bad. In fact, I saw some similarities with Steel (2015) or a better-made film in every way, Gameboys: The Film (2021), but due to a mediocre script and direction bordering on amateurish, it felt empty, without substance, and at times, like something that was done more than anything to please mass audiences than to make a more robust, daring, and courageous proposal. The film needed that because the proposal required it.
In short, it's not a bad film, but it's not perfect either. At least by its release date, there weren't yet the 1,000 films made in droves, repeating the same plot indefinitely, with different approaches, but which contributed little or nothing to cinema in general. It's entertaining to watch, at least if you want to relax in your room watching something for those nights when it's hard to sleep.
The title of my review was taken from the song "Mas Allá De La Piel" by Frankie Ruiz and curiously, it coincides with the film's title in Spanish.
Just don't watch this. 8th grade level writing, cringe worthy acting and just plain awkward directing. I've never written a review but I just can't hold back on this one and I don't even know that you need 10 lines of texts for a review. None of the nude scenes in this movie makes any sense or are necessary. The actors have zero chemistry with each other. The directing is just awful. I don't know the director's background but whatever the school he went to, don't go there. They cast a porn star to be one of the main roles, but unlike a few others that had been on the "big screen" before, there was not a single moment that you would think "oh damn he can actually do more than fk on camera". This movie is neither inspiring nor entertaining. There is literally no reason to watch this.
OK some of the reviews for this are unjustifiably harsh. Yes, the writing is a lil' cringe in places, the acting can be a bit wooden in parts and the British actors trying to do Canadian accents could've been left out... but over all it was a lovely story. Especially since the writer was just 20ish when this was made! I think for a film made on what was most likely a shoe-string budget, by a very young writing/directing team this was a fantastic effort! I believe with a bit more time and experience, they'll make some wonderful lgbt films in the future (with more HFN endings please.) I was actually considerably impressed with the production value knowing that the budget would've been microscopic.
Also did anyone else get an Ed Sheeran vibe from the main actor/writer?
Also did anyone else get an Ed Sheeran vibe from the main actor/writer?
This was seriously terrible, on so many levels. This movie was nothing more than a vehicle for writer/director/star Ellis to make out with porn star "Hunter Page". In an interview with Page, he exposes Ellis for finding him while "viewing his work" (gee, I wonder what that means). Page didn't seek out this job, it was Ellis who pursued Page and then (conveniently) cast himself as Page's love interest. The film itself is equally awful. I literally made it to 39 minutes into it before having to turn it off. The idea that Ellis' character, who has the personality of a dead snail and the looks of the most boring accountant on earth, would cause Hunter Page to instantly fall for him and then Page be the aggressor, is beyond laughable. Steer clear of this one folks.
I really wanted to like this movie but somehow it fell short of boredom. How many landscapes with piano music backgrounds can you have? It was far fetched that someone from Alabama was on their way to Canada to open a tattoo shop, but how do you meet someone on a park bench and decide to take them with you. The writing was dismal at best and most of the actors sounded like they were reading off cue cards. I gave it 6 stars because I thought it was sweet but not really believable at all
Did you know
- Quotes
Joshua Higgins: I hope it does stop, but it's not me who needs to change.
- How long is Beneath the Skin?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 27 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content