While transporting serial killer Bonejangles, police officers break down in a town plagued by demonic zombies. To survive the night and save the town, they must release Bonejangles to help f... Read allWhile transporting serial killer Bonejangles, police officers break down in a town plagued by demonic zombies. To survive the night and save the town, they must release Bonejangles to help fight the curse, risking an even greater threat.While transporting serial killer Bonejangles, police officers break down in a town plagued by demonic zombies. To survive the night and save the town, they must release Bonejangles to help fight the curse, risking an even greater threat.
Connor Quinn
- Trailer
- (voice)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
While the 2017 movie "Bonejangles" from director Brett DeJager and writer Keith Melcher is labeled as a horror comedy, there wasn't much of either of those to be found here. The movie wasn't the least bit scary, and it utterly failed to make me laugh or smile.
The movie was off to a fairly poor start, then suddenly they threw zombies into the mix, and I decided to hang around and continue to watch the movie, as I love everything zombiesque. Turns out that adding zombies didn't really improve much on anything here, as the movie just kept on trotting ahead in the same monotonous and generic manner it had previously.
The characters in the movie were not particularly outstanding or memorable in anyway; and the serial killer Mr. Bonejangles, well, let's just say that he was as scary as a stack of fallen leaves and had the appeal of a jellyfish. Horrible, just horrible.
I managed to endure "Bonejangles" to the bitter end. Was I entertained? No, not particularly, but there are worse movies out there. I hoped the movie would pick up eventually, but it never happened.
As I logged on IMDb to write this review, I saw that there is a "Bonejangles 2" movie. I think I will just smoothly give that movie a wide berth.
The movie was off to a fairly poor start, then suddenly they threw zombies into the mix, and I decided to hang around and continue to watch the movie, as I love everything zombiesque. Turns out that adding zombies didn't really improve much on anything here, as the movie just kept on trotting ahead in the same monotonous and generic manner it had previously.
The characters in the movie were not particularly outstanding or memorable in anyway; and the serial killer Mr. Bonejangles, well, let's just say that he was as scary as a stack of fallen leaves and had the appeal of a jellyfish. Horrible, just horrible.
I managed to endure "Bonejangles" to the bitter end. Was I entertained? No, not particularly, but there are worse movies out there. I hoped the movie would pick up eventually, but it never happened.
As I logged on IMDb to write this review, I saw that there is a "Bonejangles 2" movie. I think I will just smoothly give that movie a wide berth.
There are several different types of bad movies. Some are big- budget disasters, such as "Gigli"
and because of this, they are infamous. There are disasters that cost very little and were made by filmmakers who thought they were creating decent films
and "The Room" and "Plan 9 From Outer Space" are perfect examples. But with Bojangles, you've got something different
a bad movie that pretty much sets out to be a bad movie. And, because of this, you might just find it watchable. Most folks won't
but if you are the type person who likes "The Toxic Avenger" or "Killer Klowns from Space", then this movie might just be for you.
When I began watching the film, the only thing that really interested me was seeing Reggie Bannister in a small role. Bannister starred in all five of the Phantasm movies .lower budgeted slasher films which, occasionally, managed to be entertaining. Here he plays a serial killer who is the father of a super-serial killer, Bonejangles, and you see him dispensing sage advice to his aspiring son most of which is completely insane. And, Bojangles himself is insane a supernatural serial killer who cannot be stopped by bullets or most other means and electricity only stuns him. His only weakness, according to his daddy, is his 'wee winkie' .and this pretty much sums up the sort of film it would be with lots of sex jokes, some gratuitous nudity and a lot of dopey jokes. I could talk about the plot but is that really even necessary (the answer, by the way, is no!!)?
In most ways, the film looks like a group of mostly 20-somethings got together and decided to make a movie even though few of them had any experience with cinema. The acting, not surprisingly, is pretty rough and the jokes are the sort that friends who wrote the stuff would laugh at but others would just wonder why .why did they make the picture in the first place? Overall, it's not completely awful the film has a few good moments. But these moments are few and the picture is one that I would recommend skipping unless you enjoy self-consciously bad movies.
When I began watching the film, the only thing that really interested me was seeing Reggie Bannister in a small role. Bannister starred in all five of the Phantasm movies .lower budgeted slasher films which, occasionally, managed to be entertaining. Here he plays a serial killer who is the father of a super-serial killer, Bonejangles, and you see him dispensing sage advice to his aspiring son most of which is completely insane. And, Bojangles himself is insane a supernatural serial killer who cannot be stopped by bullets or most other means and electricity only stuns him. His only weakness, according to his daddy, is his 'wee winkie' .and this pretty much sums up the sort of film it would be with lots of sex jokes, some gratuitous nudity and a lot of dopey jokes. I could talk about the plot but is that really even necessary (the answer, by the way, is no!!)?
In most ways, the film looks like a group of mostly 20-somethings got together and decided to make a movie even though few of them had any experience with cinema. The acting, not surprisingly, is pretty rough and the jokes are the sort that friends who wrote the stuff would laugh at but others would just wonder why .why did they make the picture in the first place? Overall, it's not completely awful the film has a few good moments. But these moments are few and the picture is one that I would recommend skipping unless you enjoy self-consciously bad movies.
Pretty much crap. Couldn't help but raise the occasional smile, whether this was because of the appalling acting or the campness of the characters I'm not sure.
The two stars are for the extremely fit Hannah Richter. Well worth the misery of having to sit through this drivel.
The two stars are for the extremely fit Hannah Richter. Well worth the misery of having to sit through this drivel.
Wow acting was SO bad! The female cop was the worst. Painful to watch. Could definitely been better with different actors or better directing. Cops were hilarious, and not in a good way. It might be a good drinking movie. Every time someone watching rolls their eyes or groans take a shot. LOL Doug was the only one worth watching. His acting was good but his character awful.
Did you know
- TriviaThe town revisited is named Argento, a possible homage to Dario Argento.
- ConnectionsReferences Délivrance (1972)
Details
- Runtime1 hour 18 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content