[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

The Damned Thing

  • 2014
  • 1h 27m
IMDb RATING
2.9/10
277
YOUR RATING
The Damned Thing (2014)
Trailer for Hotel Hell
Play trailer1:32
1 Video
1 Photo
HorrorThriller

Three tales of horror are told from the narration of paranormal investigator Eddie Osborne to his newly hired videographer, as they document an abandoned hotel with supernatural occurrences.Three tales of horror are told from the narration of paranormal investigator Eddie Osborne to his newly hired videographer, as they document an abandoned hotel with supernatural occurrences.Three tales of horror are told from the narration of paranormal investigator Eddie Osborne to his newly hired videographer, as they document an abandoned hotel with supernatural occurrences.

  • Director
    • Derrick Granado
  • Writer
    • Derrick Granado
  • Stars
    • Canon Buckingham
    • Zach Kepple
    • Rodney Osborne
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    2.9/10
    277
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Derrick Granado
    • Writer
      • Derrick Granado
    • Stars
      • Canon Buckingham
      • Zach Kepple
      • Rodney Osborne
    • 12User reviews
    • 1Critic review
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Videos1

    Hotel Hell
    Trailer 1:32
    Hotel Hell

    Photos

    Top cast24

    Edit
    Canon Buckingham
    • Will
    Zach Kepple
    • Lester
    Rodney Osborne
    • Eddie Osborne
    Elizabeth McGrath
    • Leslie
    Miranda Kathleen
    Miranda Kathleen
    • Lana
    • (as Miranda Parham)
    Carson Nicely
    • Michael…
    Jimmy Lee Kelley
    • AC Repair Man
    Stacy Krumholz
    • Ghostly Presence…
    Stephanie Wulfe
    Stephanie Wulfe
    • Real Estate Agent Debbie
    Lance De Los Santos
    • Detective
    Matthew Munoz
    • Lester (Age 10)
    John Cawthon
    John Cawthon
    • Lester's Father
    • (as John 'Hap' Cawthon)
    Gay Hunter
    • Lester's Mother
    Doc Skinner
    Doc Skinner
    • Bully Adult
    • (as a different name)
    James DeArmond
    • Tommy
    Skyy Moore
    • Jared
    Tiffany Griffin
    • Molly
    David Hayes
    • Squid
    • Director
      • Derrick Granado
    • Writer
      • Derrick Granado
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews12

    2.9277
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    5nysalesman

    Comes across like a student project, but still decent

    This movie starts really bad. Everything about the first scene (and subsequent set-up scenes for the anthology stories) is bad. It has the worst acting and the worst production values. It must have been shot on an iPhone, because my home video camera takes better quality video than these scenes. The poorly written dialog, along with the poor production values, makes it nearly unwatchable.

    I was about to give up on this movie after the first ten minutes. Then I remembered the other reviewers saying to stick it out. One even said that the bad acting and story was for a reason and it would all be clear by the end of the movie. So I stuck it out. I'm kind of glad that I did, because the first anthology story was actually pretty good and although the acting was still not that good, it was the best of the entire movie. Suffice it to say that the first story is sort of like the first paranormal activity film, but better and shorter. The second anthology story was decent, with the third being the least decent. Unlike the first scene and set-up scenes, the anthology stories actually had good production values.

    The entire movie, however, never explained why the first scene (and subsequent set-up scenes) had the worst writing, the worst quality, and the worst acting. I'm taking a leap here, but this movie came across to me like a very well made student project. If I were attending film school and watched this as a final grade project, then I would say it was great. Otherwise, as a commercial film, it is entertaining enough to rate 5 stars.
    5Patient444

    Far better than expected.

    I've seen so many horrors, especially those underground ones, that's why I'm here, commenting on those poorly viewed or rated in order to straighten some things up. This one looked like so many before, another cheesy copycat of everything else ever made.. but wait!

    Wait! Watch it till its very end, after about 40 minutes, when the first story ends you start to understand it. It actually has a nice plot to it, some good stories, not the best acting out there but the script is indeed a good one. I declare myself truly pleasantly surprised. I did enjoy this and even tho it is very unknown I will recommend it. If you are a horror junkie armed with a little patience, see this one. Most likely you will not be disappointed!

    Cheers!
    1mephistounderwood

    Another case of writers writing about things they know nothing about!

    The acting is beyond amateurish and bad. It's completely horrible. The dialogue never flows. It's full of pauses and devoid of natural emotion. Everything is forced by bad actors, making it completely cringe worthy. I've seen better acting from teenagers using cell phone cameras to make short videos.

    In addition, it starts off with a faux interview, with a guy throwing out words like positive energy, negative energy, dark matter and vortexes, but they are just words the writer has heard, without understanding anything about what they are. So it all comes off as nothing but meaningless double talk. Us a few "science" words to lend credence to bull. For anyone who actually knows what those thing are, it sounds absolutely ridiculous, to the point of complete idiocy. It's beyond nonsense.

    Then there is the entire premise, all set up, based on pseudo science crossed with pseudo religion, making it a double dose of crap! I can suspend my disbelief fir movie magic, if the stories are good and the basic principals used, even in science fiction, fit within the realm of scientific possibility, written by someone who understands the science being talked about. So hearing a ship explode in space or the rumble of its engines, I can deal with. But this one goes too far down the rabbit hole of utter crap and complete nonsense to tolerate!

    Anyone with intelligence and knowledge, will find this movie so bad as to be an insulting waste of time!
    2ajira99

    Finally, a movie more technically inept than Birdemic!

    I'm a fan of well-executed horror anthologies, especially the classic ones. I was hopeful for this attempt and I was willing to give it a chance (based on the other reviews). While I hate to be a naysayer and embrace negativity, I would truthfully grade this as a "C+" student film, at best. The only time a character showed any emotion instead of just reciting lines was during the third story. That just isn't good...

    Film-making is (very) hard work and every director has a starting point, but compelling characters and/or a decent story can make up for many shortcomings, including poor special effects and slow pacing. While this movie attempts to tie together three "vignettes" in a meaningful way, it would have fared better if the director had just plagiarized a throwaway script from a Syfy-channel reject. Rule number for any film project should be to solicit feedback from outside your immediate peers -- that would probably help cut down on the rampancy of overused movie tropes.

    All in all, this is a rather amateurish effort marred by clichéd dialogue, questionable casting choices, sloppy editing and poor cinematography.
    2dylansecure

    Are you supposed to laugh during a horror movie?

    Honestly this movie can only be described as truly terrible. The abomination of horror films is what lies within.

    I found myself laughing throughout the movie at the attempts to scare the audience.

    I Really do not recommend this movie, and genuinely believe you'd find your time be better spent watching paint dry.

    For a start, the acting wasn't particularly great. Admittedly some actors were better than others in this movie, but they were far and few between, and there was a lot to be desired. The poor cinematic techniques did not support the acting in anyway either. In some scenes, the shakiness of the camera, along with the shaky acting skills, made the movie feel rather amateurish. The lack of cinematic techniques and the inappropriate application of them, in my opinion, damaged any potential this movie had, where they may have been able to salvage it into a half decent movie if applied correctly.

    The story line was rather scattered. There were 3 separate stories that were supposed to connect to a central theme. The stories didn't seem to logically connect together. I appreciate that they were trying to create something that was different from typical and overdone movies in the genre, but the execution was poor.

    Just please don't waste your time on this movie.

    Related interests

    Mia Farrow in Rosemary's Baby (1968)
    Horror
    Cho Yeo-jeong in Parasite (2019)
    Thriller

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Redistributed with Redbox as 'Hotel Hell'

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • December 5, 2014 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United States
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Hotel Hell
    • Filming locations
      • Dallas, Texas, USA(on location)
    • Production companies
      • Blue Light Pictures
      • Cyfuno Ventures
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Box office

    Edit
    • Budget
      • $10,000 (estimated)
    See detailed box office info on IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 27m(87 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.