IMDb RATING
4.7/10
4.1K
YOUR RATING
Detective Mason's wife is murdered by an ex-convict he jailed. He gets arrested intentionally to seek vengeance inside prison, uncovering a criminal conspiracy those involved will kill to pr... Read allDetective Mason's wife is murdered by an ex-convict he jailed. He gets arrested intentionally to seek vengeance inside prison, uncovering a criminal conspiracy those involved will kill to protect.Detective Mason's wife is murdered by an ex-convict he jailed. He gets arrested intentionally to seek vengeance inside prison, uncovering a criminal conspiracy those involved will kill to protect.
Paul Wight
- Victor Abbott
- (as Paul 'Big Show' Wight)
Benjamin Hollingsworth
- Joel Gainer
- (as Ben Hollingsworth)
- Directors
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Every shot in this film looks like a panel from a comic, and once I got into that vibe I was able to enjoy it; however, I had to get past the first act for that vibe to kick in-I cringed for nearly a full 40 minutes. The first act is jam-packed with clichés, boring plot, & bad acting, (I assume the film was shot in order because the acting gets better in some ways.) If you're looking for "passed-on CW pilot turned motion-comic feature film" energy, this is the film for you.
I know WWE whatever is the studio behind this film, and that's fine (I liked some of their films, Oculus (2013) in particular,) but if I wanted to watch pro-wrestling-style fight scenes I would just watch pro-wrestling.
Paul Wight, who plays the antagonist, Victor Abbott, is under-utilized. Everytime I saw that man I thought, "Yes, give me some of that Vincent D'Onofrio-Kingpin!," and everytime I was let down. The way Wight fights in this film evoked the weak-sauce, muted violence of the in-ring pro-wrestling matches so much that it was hard to not picture him in an André The Giant leotard while he snarls into the camera. It really took me out of the film to watch such a powerhouse merely push his victims to the side-I couldn't take it seriously, the stakes were nonexistent.
I will give the Soska Sisters credit for not forcing us to endure the violence against one of the few women characters in this film, however, the smash cut from such an obviously missed opportunity to homage The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) to the such a gruesome finale to that confrontation was jarring and left me a bit confused. I was also a bit disappointed that she had to be fridged.
I do not like The Punisher, as a character, I never have. Dean Cain, who plays Mason Danvers, was able to keep my interest in the film by never going full-Punisher. (I don't know why but I got more of a Cyclops vibe and I like that for him, l've always been more of an X-Men gal anyway.) Something snapped inside the mind of Frank Castle, and that makes The Punisher who he is; however, Mason Danvers comes off as calculated and intentional, something other characters in the film seem to pick up on. Dean Cain did a really good job.
Michael Eklund, who plays a stereotypical, string-pulling prison warden, is in a totally different and much better film.
Even though the soundtrack was not my cup of tea, I did appreciate the use of music in the film.
Most of the dialogue was cliched nonsense and exposition. I wish I could have seen what motivated these characters, instead I was told. Even then those motivations were often ambiguous concepts rather than specific, character-defining motives.
Despite the resolution of the film being at the end of an all-out, chaotic prison-yard-brawl, it was anticlimactic enough that I out-loud ask, "that's it?!"
I know WWE whatever is the studio behind this film, and that's fine (I liked some of their films, Oculus (2013) in particular,) but if I wanted to watch pro-wrestling-style fight scenes I would just watch pro-wrestling.
Paul Wight, who plays the antagonist, Victor Abbott, is under-utilized. Everytime I saw that man I thought, "Yes, give me some of that Vincent D'Onofrio-Kingpin!," and everytime I was let down. The way Wight fights in this film evoked the weak-sauce, muted violence of the in-ring pro-wrestling matches so much that it was hard to not picture him in an André The Giant leotard while he snarls into the camera. It really took me out of the film to watch such a powerhouse merely push his victims to the side-I couldn't take it seriously, the stakes were nonexistent.
I will give the Soska Sisters credit for not forcing us to endure the violence against one of the few women characters in this film, however, the smash cut from such an obviously missed opportunity to homage The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) to the such a gruesome finale to that confrontation was jarring and left me a bit confused. I was also a bit disappointed that she had to be fridged.
I do not like The Punisher, as a character, I never have. Dean Cain, who plays Mason Danvers, was able to keep my interest in the film by never going full-Punisher. (I don't know why but I got more of a Cyclops vibe and I like that for him, l've always been more of an X-Men gal anyway.) Something snapped inside the mind of Frank Castle, and that makes The Punisher who he is; however, Mason Danvers comes off as calculated and intentional, something other characters in the film seem to pick up on. Dean Cain did a really good job.
Michael Eklund, who plays a stereotypical, string-pulling prison warden, is in a totally different and much better film.
Even though the soundtrack was not my cup of tea, I did appreciate the use of music in the film.
Most of the dialogue was cliched nonsense and exposition. I wish I could have seen what motivated these characters, instead I was told. Even then those motivations were often ambiguous concepts rather than specific, character-defining motives.
Despite the resolution of the film being at the end of an all-out, chaotic prison-yard-brawl, it was anticlimactic enough that I out-loud ask, "that's it?!"
I haven't watched pro/fake wrestling since I was a child, so this movie was blah at best. It was completely unbelievable in almost every aspect.
I must say that Dean Cain actually did a good job acting though. Too bad there was nothing else worthy. This review requires no spoiler alert because you already know everything that is going to happen :]
If you like to make a drinking game out of scrutinizing movies for their errors, make sure you have plenty to drink! But watch out because there are actually some very gory scenes for a B action movie.
I did give it a 5 because it was kind of entertaining - I didn't feel the need to stop watching. To sum it up... If you really like WWE you will really like this. You'll probably like it if your IQ is below 100 as well.
I must say that Dean Cain actually did a good job acting though. Too bad there was nothing else worthy. This review requires no spoiler alert because you already know everything that is going to happen :]
If you like to make a drinking game out of scrutinizing movies for their errors, make sure you have plenty to drink! But watch out because there are actually some very gory scenes for a B action movie.
I did give it a 5 because it was kind of entertaining - I didn't feel the need to stop watching. To sum it up... If you really like WWE you will really like this. You'll probably like it if your IQ is below 100 as well.
"Vendetta" never feels real. It opens with a car "chase" that looks more like a product placement. The police procedures don't seem authentic. The detective's home looks like something he could never afford and the back yard doesn't seem to belong to the rest of the property. A criminal who supposedly is involved in all manner of nefarious activities is set free when one key witness disappears. The prison looks like an abandoned prison with brand new weights in the exercise yard. There is a bright new humidor that sometimes holds cigars and sometimes holds something else. Even the fight scenes, which are usually strong points in WWE films, aren't convincing.
It has a few bright spots, including interesting performances by Michael Eklund as the warden and Matthew MacCaull as a guard. The cinematography is pretty good with decent lighting and steady shots that look like the camera had actually been locked down on a tripod or other support mechanism. There are a couple of nicely executed time-lapse shots. Make-up effects were convincing.
Dean Cain has 139 credits on IMDb, but I've only seen a few of his films. He held his own in dramatic scenes playing opposite Denzel Washington in "Out of Time." But he was in much better shape then and had a convincing role. With a more capable director at the helm, a better screenplay and better action choreography, I might believe that the 2003 Cain could hold his own in a fight against Paul Wight.
We've seen movies about characters who break into prison one way or another to confront an adversary, including "A Law Abiding Citizen," "Face/Off" and "Escape Plan." For such plots to work, the protagonist must have some expectation of eventually escaping or using his incarceration as an alibi. Here, the plot makes the protagonist unsympathetic and fatalistic.
The biggest problem with this film lies in the motivation of the characters. For the story to work, there needs to be a lot of history between the detective and the villain. The villain needs a strong motive to target the detective's family and the attack needs to be particularly loathsome. The plot also needs to make sense. Danvers is a detective. Abbott is locked up with murderers and other violent criminals. Danvers could more easily destroy evidence or persuade a key witness to recant testimony to induce one of the inmates to murder Abbott. Danvers doesn't seem driven by extraordinary circumstances.
None of the motivations, big or small, make much sense. When Danvers learns there is an intruder in his home, he races there and calls his partner instead of sending uniformed officers. Joel pulls a dramatic U-turn and races to the prison to attend to something that could wait until morning. Police need a warrant to arrest somebody, unless they actually witness them commit a crime. Nobody can simply tell a SWAT team to arrest somebody for some crime committed months or years previously.
It's difficult to make revenge plots sympathetic. The protagonist has to have a strong sense of commitment to justice and feel justice has been thwarted, but the movie fails to do this. The protagonist is unsympathetic and uncommunicative. His plan isn't clever. He takes a blunt force approach, but doesn't have unique skills. Along the way, he engages in confrontations with others who had nothing to do with his original motive. We don't see character development. The movie lacks any sort of moral.
Very little seemed convincing. Nothing seemed original, exciting, suspenseful or cathartic.
It has a few bright spots, including interesting performances by Michael Eklund as the warden and Matthew MacCaull as a guard. The cinematography is pretty good with decent lighting and steady shots that look like the camera had actually been locked down on a tripod or other support mechanism. There are a couple of nicely executed time-lapse shots. Make-up effects were convincing.
Dean Cain has 139 credits on IMDb, but I've only seen a few of his films. He held his own in dramatic scenes playing opposite Denzel Washington in "Out of Time." But he was in much better shape then and had a convincing role. With a more capable director at the helm, a better screenplay and better action choreography, I might believe that the 2003 Cain could hold his own in a fight against Paul Wight.
We've seen movies about characters who break into prison one way or another to confront an adversary, including "A Law Abiding Citizen," "Face/Off" and "Escape Plan." For such plots to work, the protagonist must have some expectation of eventually escaping or using his incarceration as an alibi. Here, the plot makes the protagonist unsympathetic and fatalistic.
The biggest problem with this film lies in the motivation of the characters. For the story to work, there needs to be a lot of history between the detective and the villain. The villain needs a strong motive to target the detective's family and the attack needs to be particularly loathsome. The plot also needs to make sense. Danvers is a detective. Abbott is locked up with murderers and other violent criminals. Danvers could more easily destroy evidence or persuade a key witness to recant testimony to induce one of the inmates to murder Abbott. Danvers doesn't seem driven by extraordinary circumstances.
None of the motivations, big or small, make much sense. When Danvers learns there is an intruder in his home, he races there and calls his partner instead of sending uniformed officers. Joel pulls a dramatic U-turn and races to the prison to attend to something that could wait until morning. Police need a warrant to arrest somebody, unless they actually witness them commit a crime. Nobody can simply tell a SWAT team to arrest somebody for some crime committed months or years previously.
It's difficult to make revenge plots sympathetic. The protagonist has to have a strong sense of commitment to justice and feel justice has been thwarted, but the movie fails to do this. The protagonist is unsympathetic and uncommunicative. His plan isn't clever. He takes a blunt force approach, but doesn't have unique skills. Along the way, he engages in confrontations with others who had nothing to do with his original motive. We don't see character development. The movie lacks any sort of moral.
Very little seemed convincing. Nothing seemed original, exciting, suspenseful or cathartic.
The story was formulaic and we have seen it all before. But Dean Cain and Big Show give outstanding performances both. The violence is graphic and at one point Dean was showing that he had the chops to play Batman in another life!
This film does not shy away from the blood and violence. There is very little bad language in it though, if any.
One has to suspend belief a lot though. How Big Show's character can do what he does and how the number of murders goes unnoticed, got stupid. When people are being killed who are not even inmates, the rest of the police should have been investigating. Why a cop was put in general population is another mystery.
My score of 7 is probably higher than the story deserves, but Dean Cain's performance earns it an extra two points and made this a very enjoyable watch.
This film does not shy away from the blood and violence. There is very little bad language in it though, if any.
One has to suspend belief a lot though. How Big Show's character can do what he does and how the number of murders goes unnoticed, got stupid. When people are being killed who are not even inmates, the rest of the police should have been investigating. Why a cop was put in general population is another mystery.
My score of 7 is probably higher than the story deserves, but Dean Cain's performance earns it an extra two points and made this a very enjoyable watch.
"This is my house, the only thing that badge will get you in here is a slit throat." Mason (Cain) is a cop at the top of his game. After finally tracking down and arresting Victor Abbott (Wight) he moves on to the next criminal. When there turns out to not be enough evidence to hold him Victor is released and wants revenge. The next time Mason finds him Victor is standing over his dead wife. Now it is Mason's turn for revenge and after deliberately getting arrested he has Victor right where he wants him. This is a movie that is pretty much exactly what you would expect. The movie is really a B-rate action movie that plays off every cliché in the book. All that said the movie is pretty entertaining and is watchable. There are not really any twists or anything that isn't unexpected but again, when you go to watch a movie like this you pretty much know what your are getting into. Overall, nothing terrible but if you've seen one of these movies you have seen them all. I give this a C+.
Did you know
- TriviaWilhelm scream at 1h19m48s when Mason punches an inmate.
- GoofsAlthough it is stated that the warden has specifically ordered for Danvers not to be killed, the first attack on Danvers in prison is clearly an attempted murder.
- SoundtracksWith You
Written by Irya Gmeyner and Pange Oberg
Performed by Irya's Playground
- How long is Vendetta?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Hận Thù 2: Ngục Tù
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 30 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content