Animated Atrocities

I don't mind Mr. Enter's content too much. I feel like he gets too much hate, simply because he whines so much in a lot of his reviews. His reviews can be good, but then his reviews can just be him repeating himself over and over again.

Mr. Enter can bring up some interesting points on a subject. His Admirable Animation on Duck Dodgers' Samurai Quack was pretty good. He goes into detail on how to make a respectful parody, while still maintaining some kind of funny aspect. Another great Admirable Animation of his is his Gravity Falls review on 'Land before swine'. In that review he describes how to deal with two characters that have the same goals, but different dynamics at the same time.

Sometimes his animated atrocities are just him rambling & repeating about 'how he doesn't like gross out cartoons' & etc. And he gets a little too p1ssed off from a piece of fiction. To the point where he makes no valid opinions while rambling.

The guy clearly doesn't need the hate that he gets. There are worse cartoon community channels out there. Such as 'Valiksisbum', Phantom Strider after he jumped the shark, Channel Frederator after they jumped the shark, small channels that talk nonstop about TTG, etc. But then again there are better Cartoon Youtubers that get their point across in a superior way within the community. Such as PieGuyRulez, Rebeltaxi, Lewtoons and etc.

I don't care if the majority disagrees, I'm saying this: Mr. Enter is not a good reviewer, and his Animated Atrocities are some of the biggest bunch of bull I've ever seen. What's wrong with him exactly? You mean besides the fact he has an ego as big as the sun and standards higher than Mt. Everest? Well, here's my main problems with him:

He's a cherry-picker. He takes one bad episode of an otherwise decent or mediocre show and makes it look like the whole show is bad. For instance, in his Sanjay and Craig review, he bases his entire opinion of the show on the episode Fart Baby and makes it look like the rest of the show sucks. Never mind the show has good, heartwarming episodes like The Giving G, Trouble Dare, and A Tale of Two Slithers. Teen Titans Go is another example. Yes, it has bad episodes like Waffles and Staring at the Future, but there are still occasional gems to be found from it, such as Colors of Raven, Terra-ized, and Baby Hands. But if one episode sucks to him, it's irredeemable.

He's biased. Sure, he says he holds all cartoons to the same standards. But if that's the case, how come nearly all of his reviews are on recent Nicktoons and he's done only one atrocity of a classic Nicktoon and one atrocity of an earlier season of Fairly OddParents? He also hates anything that Seth MacFarlane (I know he's divisive, but come on) or Nickelodeon make, simply because they're involved.

He's an egotist. Have you ever tried to disagree with him? Don't be surprised if he just calls you a troll (which he thinks is the same as a cyberbully, despite there being obvious differences) and writes you off as some know-nothing dolt. I'm sorry Enter, do you not like Teen Titans Go or Family Guy? Do they not reach your unrealistically high expectations? Oh, and did you know that not everything has to be exactly how you want it and the world does not, in fact, revolve around you? And lord forbid you get his fans on your case... (Basically, they say you suck for "not respecting" his opinion. If he's entitled to his, shouldn't I be entitled to mine?)

He doesn't realize times have changed. Yes, Hey Arnold and Rugrats are good (if highly overrated) shows, but back then, that was the norm. Taste in TV has changed. Sometimes, a show doesn't have to be deep or meaningful. Sometimes it's nice for out-and-out ridiculousness and shock value. Also, he's shocked Breadwinners was at one point the most popular show for kids? Yes, how dare the show's TARGET AUDIENCE enjoy what was made to be viewed by them?

Finally, he's a hypocrite. One of his most notable reviews of My Little Pony, Twilight's Kingdom, has him saying you should not accentuate the negative and shouldn't nitpick. And that's exactly what he does in this vile little show. If an episode he deems "atrocious" does even one, tiny, MINUSCULE thing wrong, it's garbage. Did I mention he says he holds all cartoons to the same standards but hasn't backed it up?

He also tends to forget one of the basic rules of common sense: If you don't like something, YOU AVOID IT! You don't dedicate your life to whining about it! (Yes, I'm aware I'm being a bit hypocritical, reviewing him and all, but at least I KNOW when I'm being a hypocrite).

Yes, he does usually go after stuff that really, truly does suck (such as Tentacolino and Allen Gregory), but most of the stuff he declares is awful is really just subjective. It'd be nice if he was calmer about his opinion, and reminding us it's just what he thinks, but he just beats us over the head with what he thinks and refuses to listen to anyone who tries to debunk his claims.

Basically, if your looking for fair and intellectual analysis of animation, don't go here. Try the Nostalgia Critic instead (and even if you disagree with him or find him biased or unfair, the theatrics and comedy of his reviews at least make it more tolerable).

Quite frankly I'm surprised IMDb lists a YouTube series on here anyways, which is an odd thing to do but I'll accept it. But many of the reviews in this section have been nothing but rude insults thrown at a person. Mr Enter (as his YouTube channel is called) isn't a despicable person, nor is he deserving of half the crap thrown at him here by his haters. Does he get angry? Yes. Is it entirely justified? Mostly, yes. Everyone likes to pick apart his intentions like this person is some object they get to pull apart and decide if it's to their liking, and I find that nothing short of reprehensible and for every piece of actual criticism I've read about him, I've read ten pieces of judgmental and angry junk that is nothing more than the very thing these people seem to have against Mr Enter; rude, arrogant, and insulting. Only instead of a piece of art he found particularly repulsive (and make no mistake, he has reviewed some truly nauseating distasteful trash, and he does make sure to cite his problems with each clearly, using research to back up some of his more political points), these reviewers only seem to want to use these words to attack a person. And for every decent criticism, it's exaggerated by hyperbole like saying his voice is worse than nails on a chalk board (it's not that bad) and he takes cartoons too seriously for a 30 year old man (he sees animation as an art form and thinks it should be treated as such) or other such nonsense.

Next time you attempt to demean and berate a person, I suggest to try to see things from their point of view. Perhaps you might learn to see things differently or at the very least provide something useful, rather than become part of the problem by ranting and insulting someone's viewpoints and manner of expressing it.

First off, the only thing I agree with Mr Enter is the Spongebob episode Squid Baby. I thought it was disturbing and an insult to people with mental disabilities, However I disagree on some of his reviews such as One Course Meal, and Truth or Square. I feel he was cold on spewing hate on them even though I am not a fan of those episodes but I feel he is too harsh and hypocritical. Which isn't bad but he uses his Autism as an excuse.

That being said I do appreciate him reviewing shows, I think he is kind of harsh, The Nostalgia critic is better in my personal opinion, But Mr enter is attacking shows that are actually good but have bad episodes, I think he should leave Youtube and get a real job

I'm gonna preface this by saying why there even is a page for Mr. Enter's "Animated Atrocities" to begin with here on IMDB. We all knew it was gonna be a trainwreck of negative reviews from his haters. He's become the internet's punching bag cause he criticizes kids cartoons, therefore he's seen as a big "man-baby".

But he's actually a really good reviewer. Do I agree with him ALL the time? Good God no, but he definitely makes some really good points. Like his reviewing style or not, you have to actually give him a chance. He's definitely harsh, and can get a bit angry, but he's greatly improved over the last few years. So I strongly recommend his more recent videos over his old ones.

Check out his videos and actually give them a chance instead of letting the bulk of the internet judge for you. The lot of you may still not like him, but you'll also learn a lot from his videos.

Call me an "Enterbot" all you want, but I just had to leave this here. He certainly ain't a bad person, and not as bad a reviewer as most have claimed. He's an internet critic, it's his job to criticize these shows. Give him a chance.