A rebellious college girl, despises her strict single mother-until a news report reveals her long-lost father as a key figure in a human trafficking. She must face shocking brutal past, buri... Read allA rebellious college girl, despises her strict single mother-until a news report reveals her long-lost father as a key figure in a human trafficking. She must face shocking brutal past, buried truth and reevaluate her family and herself.A rebellious college girl, despises her strict single mother-until a news report reveals her long-lost father as a key figure in a human trafficking. She must face shocking brutal past, buried truth and reevaluate her family and herself.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Abhishek Goswami's Avyakt is not a traditional family-crime drama-it is an editorial and directorial rupture designed to fracture narrative rhythm and cinematic expectation. Rather than following genre conventions or offering moral resolution, Goswami executes the film as a precise deconstruction of familial mythos and socio-political veneer. What results is a film that, technically speaking, is as radical as it is emotionally uncompromising.
SCREENPLAY & STRUCTURE: The screenplay is structurally non-linear, organized more by emotional resonance than chronological continuity. Rather than traditional acts, the script operates in accumulative dissonance-each sequence layered over the last like scar tissue.
Character arcs aren't plotted-they are observed through omission, silence, and breakdown. The protagonist's arc is designed as a regression rather than a transformation, rejecting the idea of understanding and instead committing to emotional excavation. The writing refuses exposition; backstory emerges via behavior, not explanation.
DIRECTION: As director, Goswami employs a formalist approach with documentary influence, crafting scenes that exist in a space between naturalism and symbolic framing. Blocking is minimalistic but emotionally loaded-often isolating characters in the frame even during ensemble scenes.
EDITING STRATEGY: Perhaps the film's most innovative aspect lies in its editorial rhythm. Goswami, who edited the film himself, constructs Avyakt with what can be described as a philosophy of strategic interruption.
Cuts occur seconds before emotional or narrative payoff, creating a sense of suspended tension.
Scenes often end on frames that feel psychologically unfinished, forcing the viewer to linger in discomfort.
Temporal shifts are abrupt but not disorienting-they replicate the subjective, often chaotic nature of memory recall rather than a clean & over explanatory flashbacks.
SOUND DESIGN: The sound design functions as a parallel narrative, not merely as atmospheric support. Goswami integrates:
Diegetic sound bleed-news segments, media broadcasts, and ambient city sounds overlap with domestic moments, erasing the boundary between private trauma and public narrative.
Silence is used as counterpoint-scenes collapse into muted spaces, not to offer relief, but to amplify dread.
Voiceovers and layered soundscapes are weaponized to reinforce themes of surveillance, distortion, and media manipulation.
Sound is not a background layer-it is a character, and its presence is frequently more revealing than dialogue.
CINEMATOGRAPHY: The visual language-handled by Goswami himself-is bleakly beautiful, employing a desaturated color palette that reflects moral erosion. Lighting is often stark and top-down, suggesting institutional spaces even in homes. Compositionally, frames are tight, symmetrical, but emotionally off-balance.
Dreamlike sequences occasionally puncture the realism-but even these are denied surrealism, shot with the same cold restraint as the rest of the film. This creates a world where even fantasy is contaminated.
Avyakt is a formally rigorous and aesthetically severe film, constructed with a filmmaker's eye for control and disruption. Goswami's refusal to indulge genre tropes-no overt redemption, no moralizing voiceover, no relief in fantasy-positions him as a filmmaker deeply committed to cinema as confrontation, not consolation.
Technically, it is a case study in editorial resistance, sound narrative, and mise-en-scène as moral positioning.
It does not aim to please.
It aims to expose and also does this successfully.
SCREENPLAY & STRUCTURE: The screenplay is structurally non-linear, organized more by emotional resonance than chronological continuity. Rather than traditional acts, the script operates in accumulative dissonance-each sequence layered over the last like scar tissue.
Character arcs aren't plotted-they are observed through omission, silence, and breakdown. The protagonist's arc is designed as a regression rather than a transformation, rejecting the idea of understanding and instead committing to emotional excavation. The writing refuses exposition; backstory emerges via behavior, not explanation.
DIRECTION: As director, Goswami employs a formalist approach with documentary influence, crafting scenes that exist in a space between naturalism and symbolic framing. Blocking is minimalistic but emotionally loaded-often isolating characters in the frame even during ensemble scenes.
EDITING STRATEGY: Perhaps the film's most innovative aspect lies in its editorial rhythm. Goswami, who edited the film himself, constructs Avyakt with what can be described as a philosophy of strategic interruption.
Cuts occur seconds before emotional or narrative payoff, creating a sense of suspended tension.
Scenes often end on frames that feel psychologically unfinished, forcing the viewer to linger in discomfort.
Temporal shifts are abrupt but not disorienting-they replicate the subjective, often chaotic nature of memory recall rather than a clean & over explanatory flashbacks.
SOUND DESIGN: The sound design functions as a parallel narrative, not merely as atmospheric support. Goswami integrates:
Diegetic sound bleed-news segments, media broadcasts, and ambient city sounds overlap with domestic moments, erasing the boundary between private trauma and public narrative.
Silence is used as counterpoint-scenes collapse into muted spaces, not to offer relief, but to amplify dread.
Voiceovers and layered soundscapes are weaponized to reinforce themes of surveillance, distortion, and media manipulation.
Sound is not a background layer-it is a character, and its presence is frequently more revealing than dialogue.
CINEMATOGRAPHY: The visual language-handled by Goswami himself-is bleakly beautiful, employing a desaturated color palette that reflects moral erosion. Lighting is often stark and top-down, suggesting institutional spaces even in homes. Compositionally, frames are tight, symmetrical, but emotionally off-balance.
Dreamlike sequences occasionally puncture the realism-but even these are denied surrealism, shot with the same cold restraint as the rest of the film. This creates a world where even fantasy is contaminated.
Avyakt is a formally rigorous and aesthetically severe film, constructed with a filmmaker's eye for control and disruption. Goswami's refusal to indulge genre tropes-no overt redemption, no moralizing voiceover, no relief in fantasy-positions him as a filmmaker deeply committed to cinema as confrontation, not consolation.
Technically, it is a case study in editorial resistance, sound narrative, and mise-en-scène as moral positioning.
It does not aim to please.
It aims to expose and also does this successfully.
In a cinematic landscape often content with surface-level thrills, this crime-family drama dives deep into the murky waters of not just organized crime, but the sprawling web of social and media corruption that sustains it. It's more than just a film-it's a commentary on the uncomfortable truths we often choose to ignore. This project shows the deep research for a content driven cinema and a Brilliant storytelling by the writer and director of the project- Abhishek Goswami.
At the center of this story is a harsh relationship in between mother and the daughter as of her mother's separation from her father. It's a chilling reflection of reality, where morality becomes negotiable and truth is just another commodity for sale.
The film's brilliance lies in its refusal to sympathizing the criminal (who plays a victim card often even after committing hideous crimes!). Instead, it lays bare the price of unchecked influence. The patriarch, a stoic and calculating figure, is portrayed not as a glorified antihero, but as a deeply flawed man who has weaponized fear and so called 'liberal' socialist system to continue what he is intrested into. The daughter especially, deceive to be the audience's pseudo moral anchor but fails as stupidly as such characters we see in our real life.
Where this film truly hits hard is in its depiction of the media. Sensational headlines, paid narratives, and strategically buried scandals show how truth is manipulated in real time. Newsrooms aren't shown as pillars of justice, but as battlegrounds for influence. It's a sobering reminder of how corruption doesn't always wear a gun-it sometimes wears a suit and reads the evening bulletin.
The writing is sharp and unapologetic, layered with irony and tension. The cinematography paints a world that is both beautiful and brutal-glittering skylines hiding shadows where secrets thrive. The soundtrack is subtle but haunting, amplifying moments of silence where words fail.
The performances are uniformly excellent.
At the center of this story is a harsh relationship in between mother and the daughter as of her mother's separation from her father. It's a chilling reflection of reality, where morality becomes negotiable and truth is just another commodity for sale.
The film's brilliance lies in its refusal to sympathizing the criminal (who plays a victim card often even after committing hideous crimes!). Instead, it lays bare the price of unchecked influence. The patriarch, a stoic and calculating figure, is portrayed not as a glorified antihero, but as a deeply flawed man who has weaponized fear and so called 'liberal' socialist system to continue what he is intrested into. The daughter especially, deceive to be the audience's pseudo moral anchor but fails as stupidly as such characters we see in our real life.
Where this film truly hits hard is in its depiction of the media. Sensational headlines, paid narratives, and strategically buried scandals show how truth is manipulated in real time. Newsrooms aren't shown as pillars of justice, but as battlegrounds for influence. It's a sobering reminder of how corruption doesn't always wear a gun-it sometimes wears a suit and reads the evening bulletin.
The writing is sharp and unapologetic, layered with irony and tension. The cinematography paints a world that is both beautiful and brutal-glittering skylines hiding shadows where secrets thrive. The soundtrack is subtle but haunting, amplifying moments of silence where words fail.
The performances are uniformly excellent.
Abhishek Goswami's latest directorial venture isn't just a film-it is a scalpel carved deep into the flesh of familial illusion, systemic rot, and moral hypocrisy. With the precision of a painter and the fury of a prophet, Goswami delivers a brutal, unflinching crime-family drama that refuses sentimentality and obliterates the fantasy of redemption often peddled in mainstream cinema.
This isn't entertainment. It's exposure.
The film Avyakt (an unexpressed tale which becomes a whispered curse or a fractured prayer) centers around a rebellious college girl whose disdain for her austere single mother has calcified into deep emotional rebellion. Her world collapses when her estranged father-long idealized as a missing piece of her soul-is revealed to be a mastermind in a human trafficking ring. From that moment, Goswami drags his audience into a psychological descent that feels less like a story and more like a reckoning.
What's most astonishing here isn't just the subject matter-disturbing as it is-but how Goswami directs the emotional architecture of the film. The camera doesn't just capture. It accuses. It doesn't follow characters-it corners them. Each frame pulses with tension, not because of what's happening on screen, but because of what Goswami dares to suggest: that truth, when revealed, isn't liberating-it's corrosive.
From the very first scene, Mr. Goswami asserts his presence not just as a director, but as a force. The use of stark, almost documentary-like visuals-intercut with stylized dream fragments-serves to blur the lines between media spectacle and personal memory. Scenes unfold like trauma flashbacks: jagged, out of order, laced with ambient dread. It's not chaos. It's strategy. This Director is controlling your heartbeat without letting you know where the story's pulse truly lies.
But what truly separates this film from others in its genre is its commentary on media and manufactured morality. Abhishek Goswami, the storyteller, doesn't depict newsrooms as noble-he portrays them as gladiator arenas of curated chaos. Shots of anchors rehearsing empathy, editors erasing inconvenient footage, and viral narratives being manufactured with surgical cynicism-these are not subplots, but central veins in the story's diseased heart. And the director, masterfully, directs these sequences with the same visual grammar as horror. Because what's scarier than a lie told in a suit, under perfect lighting?
Technically, the film is a study in controlled rupture. The cinematography by Abhishek Goswami himself, is bleak, gorgeously colorless, and textural-each shadow feels like it's hiding a headline. The editing choices often cut just before emotional release, denying catharsis. The sound design, too, is weaponized-news reports bleed into personal moments, as if reminding the characters that their private pain is always public currency.
If there's one word for Abhishek Goswami's direction, it's ruthless-but not in a sadistic sense. Ruthless in honesty. In refusal to compromise. In his unwillingness to handhold the viewer toward resolution. This is not a story about justice-it is a story about exposure. And Abhishek Goswami, as a director, does not offer comfort. He offers confrontation.
By the end, you're not left with answers. You're left questioning everything-your beliefs, your biases, your blind spots. That is Abhishek Goswami's gift: he doesn't just make cinema-he holds a mirror so sharp, you bleed by looking.
This isn't entertainment. It's exposure.
The film Avyakt (an unexpressed tale which becomes a whispered curse or a fractured prayer) centers around a rebellious college girl whose disdain for her austere single mother has calcified into deep emotional rebellion. Her world collapses when her estranged father-long idealized as a missing piece of her soul-is revealed to be a mastermind in a human trafficking ring. From that moment, Goswami drags his audience into a psychological descent that feels less like a story and more like a reckoning.
What's most astonishing here isn't just the subject matter-disturbing as it is-but how Goswami directs the emotional architecture of the film. The camera doesn't just capture. It accuses. It doesn't follow characters-it corners them. Each frame pulses with tension, not because of what's happening on screen, but because of what Goswami dares to suggest: that truth, when revealed, isn't liberating-it's corrosive.
From the very first scene, Mr. Goswami asserts his presence not just as a director, but as a force. The use of stark, almost documentary-like visuals-intercut with stylized dream fragments-serves to blur the lines between media spectacle and personal memory. Scenes unfold like trauma flashbacks: jagged, out of order, laced with ambient dread. It's not chaos. It's strategy. This Director is controlling your heartbeat without letting you know where the story's pulse truly lies.
But what truly separates this film from others in its genre is its commentary on media and manufactured morality. Abhishek Goswami, the storyteller, doesn't depict newsrooms as noble-he portrays them as gladiator arenas of curated chaos. Shots of anchors rehearsing empathy, editors erasing inconvenient footage, and viral narratives being manufactured with surgical cynicism-these are not subplots, but central veins in the story's diseased heart. And the director, masterfully, directs these sequences with the same visual grammar as horror. Because what's scarier than a lie told in a suit, under perfect lighting?
Technically, the film is a study in controlled rupture. The cinematography by Abhishek Goswami himself, is bleak, gorgeously colorless, and textural-each shadow feels like it's hiding a headline. The editing choices often cut just before emotional release, denying catharsis. The sound design, too, is weaponized-news reports bleed into personal moments, as if reminding the characters that their private pain is always public currency.
If there's one word for Abhishek Goswami's direction, it's ruthless-but not in a sadistic sense. Ruthless in honesty. In refusal to compromise. In his unwillingness to handhold the viewer toward resolution. This is not a story about justice-it is a story about exposure. And Abhishek Goswami, as a director, does not offer comfort. He offers confrontation.
By the end, you're not left with answers. You're left questioning everything-your beliefs, your biases, your blind spots. That is Abhishek Goswami's gift: he doesn't just make cinema-he holds a mirror so sharp, you bleed by looking.
"AVYAKT" is a gripping blend of domestic tension and criminal undercurrents, a film that bravely explores how personal histories and societal decay intertwine. At its core, it is a story of a daughter's reckoning with truth, a mother's silent endurance, and a family secret that detonates with the force of national scandal. With a layered narrative and compelling cinematography by the DOP Abhishek Goswami, this film elevates the family-crime-drama genre beyond mere entertainment into the realm of emotional catharsis.
One of the most striking aspects of "AVYAKT" is its cinematography, which captures both the scale of the crime and the intimacy of familial tension. From the cold, sterile newsrooms broadcasting the police operation of capturing Keerti's father, the camera never loses sight of the emotional pulse beneath the visuals.
Early scenes are shot with brighter, more vibrant colors-signifying Keerti's illusion of freedom and independence. However, as her world begins to unravel, so does the visual palette. The colors become colder, the lighting more diffused, with shadows creeping into every corner of the frame. The choice of tight close-ups in confrontational scenes creates a sense of suffocation, mirroring the psychological collapse happening within the characters.
A particular standout is the sequence where Keerti watches the news report about her father. The camera lingers not on the screen, but on her face-shifting focus from the spectacle to the shock, underscoring the emotional stakes. In contrast, the flashbacks of the mother's past are shot with a grainier texture, giving them an almost documentary feel-brutally real, heartbreakingly unadorned.
Really a masterpiece by the young but brilliant Director Abhishek...
One of the most striking aspects of "AVYAKT" is its cinematography, which captures both the scale of the crime and the intimacy of familial tension. From the cold, sterile newsrooms broadcasting the police operation of capturing Keerti's father, the camera never loses sight of the emotional pulse beneath the visuals.
Early scenes are shot with brighter, more vibrant colors-signifying Keerti's illusion of freedom and independence. However, as her world begins to unravel, so does the visual palette. The colors become colder, the lighting more diffused, with shadows creeping into every corner of the frame. The choice of tight close-ups in confrontational scenes creates a sense of suffocation, mirroring the psychological collapse happening within the characters.
A particular standout is the sequence where Keerti watches the news report about her father. The camera lingers not on the screen, but on her face-shifting focus from the spectacle to the shock, underscoring the emotional stakes. In contrast, the flashbacks of the mother's past are shot with a grainier texture, giving them an almost documentary feel-brutally real, heartbreakingly unadorned.
Really a masterpiece by the young but brilliant Director Abhishek...
There are crime-family dramas-and then there are cinematic experiences that linger long after the credits roll. This film belongs to the latter category, a slow-burning, emotionally charged masterpiece that blends gritty realism with poetic storytelling. Helmed by a visionary director ABHISHEK GOSWAMI, the film doesn't just tell a story-it carves one into your psyche.
Known for their deft handling of morally grey characters and haunting visual language, Abhishek brings his signature style to this project with precision and grace. Their ability to balance raw intensity with quiet introspection is what elevates this film from a traditional gangster narrative into something far more profound.
The story revolves around a college going girl who is brainwashed by the usual media narratives and the radical student unions. The conflict in between her and her mother is due to the past decision of her mother to get separated from her father as he was a pathetic criminal. The emotional weight of this tension is palpable, thanks to a script that's both unflinching and beautifully restrained. But when the past continues in the present she has to understand the real truth of this system with the help of a righteous friend of her mother.
The performances are equally magnetic. The lead delivers a layered portrayal of a man unraveling under the weight of heritage and conscience. The supporting cast brings richness and authenticity to every scene, each character carefully crafted with depth and nuance. And yet, it's clear the director's hand is always present-guiding, shaping, and elevating.
But what truly sets this film apart is its refusal to simplify. It does not glorify criminal life, nor does it paint its characters as mere villains or victims. It's a meditation on power, guilt, love, and the unbearable weight of family expectations. Director ABHISHEK GOSWAMI doesn't offer easy answers-only questions that linger, long after the screen goes dark.
Known for their deft handling of morally grey characters and haunting visual language, Abhishek brings his signature style to this project with precision and grace. Their ability to balance raw intensity with quiet introspection is what elevates this film from a traditional gangster narrative into something far more profound.
The story revolves around a college going girl who is brainwashed by the usual media narratives and the radical student unions. The conflict in between her and her mother is due to the past decision of her mother to get separated from her father as he was a pathetic criminal. The emotional weight of this tension is palpable, thanks to a script that's both unflinching and beautifully restrained. But when the past continues in the present she has to understand the real truth of this system with the help of a righteous friend of her mother.
The performances are equally magnetic. The lead delivers a layered portrayal of a man unraveling under the weight of heritage and conscience. The supporting cast brings richness and authenticity to every scene, each character carefully crafted with depth and nuance. And yet, it's clear the director's hand is always present-guiding, shaping, and elevating.
But what truly sets this film apart is its refusal to simplify. It does not glorify criminal life, nor does it paint its characters as mere villains or victims. It's a meditation on power, guilt, love, and the unbearable weight of family expectations. Director ABHISHEK GOSWAMI doesn't offer easy answers-only questions that linger, long after the screen goes dark.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Filming locations
- India(105, Skyteck merion residency, Crossing Republic, Ghaziabad,India)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- ₹600,000 (estimated)
- Runtime29 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 16 : 9
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
