IMDb RATING
5.1/10
8.1K
YOUR RATING
A widower moves into a seemingly perfect new home with his daughter and new wife.A widower moves into a seemingly perfect new home with his daughter and new wife.A widower moves into a seemingly perfect new home with his daughter and new wife.
Thomas R. Baker
- Locksmith with BUBAR Kit
- (uncredited)
Alex Daniels
- Cop
- (uncredited)
Christopher Frontiero
- Workman #2
- (uncredited)
Nick Leland
- Cop
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Good movie. I thought this film was going to be a bad low budget horror thriller. But I really enjoyed it. It was abit predictable and that's fine tbh. I would definitely watch it again at some point. The acting was quite good. It's creepy at times. Couple of good jump scares. Some people will like it and some won't but I really liked it. I totally recommend people to give it a watch. The story isn't original but it don't really have to. 5/10
I don't understand these bad ratings.I liked this movie so much I re- watched it with my daughter.I'm looking for it to watch again for Halloween.I've been a horror movie fan my entire life and thought this was great.I'm not talking about gore like the final destination smut.I think horror film fans should see this and I notice everyone now thinks they are a movie critic.Was a good movie and I ended up standing on my couch being scared.Just my two cents
It was somewhat entertaining and easily kept my attention, but I didn't like the inconsistencies in the story.
There was a mystery that was gradually revealed and some scenes were frightening, but some parts of the story were incomplete and made little sense. And the ending was unsatisfying.
It was annoying that people were behaving stupidly and leaving themselves vulnerable in a life threatening situation - why not grab a weapon of some kind?
There was a mystery that was gradually revealed and some scenes were frightening, but some parts of the story were incomplete and made little sense. And the ending was unsatisfying.
It was annoying that people were behaving stupidly and leaving themselves vulnerable in a life threatening situation - why not grab a weapon of some kind?
"Within" actually started out quite nice, and it had the potential to be a somewhat good horror movie. It was the creepy moments with stuff happening around the house that was working out quite well. However, it all came to an abrupt halt when the audience was shown what was really happening in the house.
Wow, are you kidding me? That movie went from being quite good and entertaining to becoming a ridiculous heap of a stupid movie in an instant when it was revealed just exactly what was going on.
The story told in "Within" is about a family that has moved to a new house. However, shortly after the have moved in, strange things start to happen in the house.
"Within" had potential to be a great horror movie, if director Phil Claydon had opted to keep it in a supernatural genre. But no, that was not to be.
The acting in the movie was adequate, although it wasn't particularly memorable. But given what people had to work with, they managed to do well enough.
This was a bucket of ice water to the face, because what started out as a great spooky movie quickly took a turn and went into ridiculous-town. There is nothing worthwhile to be had here, so I can't think of a single reason for recommending this movie to anyone.
After an abysmal forage into what turned out to be a waste of time, my rating of "Within" ends of a meager three out of ten stars.
Wow, are you kidding me? That movie went from being quite good and entertaining to becoming a ridiculous heap of a stupid movie in an instant when it was revealed just exactly what was going on.
The story told in "Within" is about a family that has moved to a new house. However, shortly after the have moved in, strange things start to happen in the house.
"Within" had potential to be a great horror movie, if director Phil Claydon had opted to keep it in a supernatural genre. But no, that was not to be.
The acting in the movie was adequate, although it wasn't particularly memorable. But given what people had to work with, they managed to do well enough.
This was a bucket of ice water to the face, because what started out as a great spooky movie quickly took a turn and went into ridiculous-town. There is nothing worthwhile to be had here, so I can't think of a single reason for recommending this movie to anyone.
After an abysmal forage into what turned out to be a waste of time, my rating of "Within" ends of a meager three out of ten stars.
Did you know
- TriviaMisty Upham's last film.
- GoofsOne major flaw (among many) of this movie was the existence of wide spaces between the walls and floors that allowed our mystery villain to be able to move silently and easily between the attic and the other floors. Construction of homes in the last 50 years does away with these spaces, reserved for pipe chases and duct work.
- Crazy creditsThe end credits descend rather than ascend.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Half in the Bag: Shut in and Arrival (2016)
- SoundtracksI Want It All
Written by Jules Larson and Rich Jacques
Performed by Jules Larson
Courtesy of Flying Trapexe Records
By arrangement with Secret Road Music Services, Inc.
- How long is Within?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $10,424
- Runtime1 hour 28 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content